MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information.  The primary evaluator will assign the final rating  The primary evaluator will take the lead on any Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Providing Effective Feedback and Evaluation of Competency Development UW School of Social Work Field Educator Training Program.
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Dr. Jon Milleman, Assistant Superintendent Sabra Gage, WTEA President MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information Review of Updates
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Teacher Evaluation Model
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information. Primary Evaluators All teachers will be assigned one Administrator to be the Primary Evaluator. The primary evaluator.
Appraisal Process and Forms Probationary – first 3 years of employment Permanent – tenured On or before Oct. 1 – meet, In person, with appraiser to review.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Differentiated Supervision
Formal Observation 2 per year (due by February 7 th & May 6th) all teacher formals (write up only) in a zip file to Melissa Kaplan, Ron Bauer, and.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Dr. Jon Milleman, Assistant Superintedent Jennifer Thomas, WTEA President MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Changes
Roles and Responsibilities for University Supervisors
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluations Swartz Creek Community Schools.
May 29, 2013 Chanute USD 413 And Kansas State Department of Education.
TAPCo. Full Staff Mtg March 17 th Agenda ● ADVANCE ● Regents.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
TAA2 Assessor Workshop Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
OASYS Teacher Evaluation User Training – Part 2. Presentation Outline Pre-Conference Form review Overview of Formal Observation and Summative –Accepting/Declining.
Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.
TEM 4.0 For School Librarians Laurie Butler, Library Services Advisor 2014.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.
NCVPS TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS We believe this process will help us to determine the specific support and professional development you need to steer.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
Nevada Department of Education Office of Educational Opportunity Nevada Comprehensive Curriculum Audit Tool for Schools NCCAT-S August
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Dissemination Training
Teacher Evaluation Process
PoHi TLE information.
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Process
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
2018 SMU Staff Performance Review Training
Local Option Plan for Analysis of Student Work (ASW)
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
TDES Think Tank September 25, 2018 Jill Cabe, Director of Performance Management Megan Scully, TDES Coordinator Time: 1 Minute.
Evaluation Information
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information

 The primary evaluator will assign the final rating  The primary evaluator will take the lead on any Performance Assistance Plan  The primary evaluator will conduct the Summative Levels Conference Primary Evaluators

 Name of Evaluator will be connected to informal observations through the technology tool  Teachers will receive a secure login and access to the OwnIt! website  When conducting Summative Levels Conference comments and formal/informal observation comments, Primary Evaluator should accurately attribute appropriate comments to the evaluator (either primary or secondary)

 A teacher may be afforded Association Representation if they so choose during the evaluation process

 Anytime during the evaluation process, a teacher has the right to submit a written reflection to be attached to any written evaluation document

 Preferably the length of an entire class period ◦ At least 30 minutes in length  Exceptions as discussed with teacher

 At least 10 minutes ◦ Preferably at least 15 minutes  minutes (general rule)

 Opportunity for teachers to inform the evaluation  Lesson Plans  Pacing Guides  Samples of Student Work  PD Reflections/Logs/Evidence of Curriculum Work  PLC Documentation  Can be requested by evaluator  Can be submitted by teacher at any time

 Minimum 2 Formal Observations  Minimum 2 Informal Observations  1 Per Semester minimum  First Formal Observation = announced within a one week window  Opportunity to complete Pre-Observation form prior to Formal Observation – May be requested by evaluator or submitted voluntarily by teacher  Recommend at least a Pre-Observation form before 1 st Formal Observation  Evaluator to hold a meeting prior to Formal Observation – can be group meeting

 Minimum 1 Formal Observation (First Semester) - announced  Minimum 2 Informal Observations  Opportunity to complete Pre-Observation form prior to Formal Observation - May be requested by evaluator or submitted voluntarily by teacher

 Minimum 1 Formal Observation – No restriction of timing - announced  Minimum 2 Informal Observations  Opportunity to complete Pre-Observation form prior to Formal Observation - May be requested by evaluator or submitted voluntarily by teacher

 Meeting (group) prior to Formal Observation  Inform all teachers of their primary evaluator  Informal Observation feedback within a reasonable amount of time following Informal Observations – preferably within 48 hours, 1 wk max

 Required after each Formal Observation  If, during a Performance Expectation Reflective Conference, a teacher receives an Improvement Necessary performance level in any domain, the teacher and evaluator will discuss and list teacher goals for improvement for any performance expectations.

If, during a Performance Expectations Reflective Conference, a teacher receives an Ineffective performance level in any domain, the evaluator and teacher will 1.Review the specific performance expectation(s) not being met 2.Identify and add indicators in the teacher and student observation/evidence sections of the domain rubric that need to be addressed in order to improve the level of performance

 Prior to May 15  Determination of Rating (12-13) at Summary Levels Conference  IDOE will give guidance to years after to determine when Student Achievement Measures apply to final rating  Place on Plan of Assistance with guidance from appropriate Director and Director of HR

 Update on Selection of Measures  Work Ahead – Determining Highly Effective – Ineffective on each Primary and Secondary Measure  Documentation of Student Achievement Measures - TBD