Consolidated District Reviews and Monitoring Preparing for Desk Monitoring of Titles I-A, I-D, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Advertisements

NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Preparing for an NCLB Monitoring Visit NCLB Regional Meetings Roundtable Discussion April 2007.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
PACTS Online Tools Adriana Golumbeanu, Loretta Brown and Randall Richardson Office of Federal Programs.
Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, VI and X.
Bureau of Indian Education Pilot Monitoring System Integrated Accountability and Support 2014 Indistar Summit Albuquerque, New Mexico March 24, 2014 BUREAU.
Fall 2011 Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 6, 2011.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
ESEA Consolidated Application Before Logging In  Conduct a District Needs Assessment Analyze LEA data Consult with private schools (if applicable) Communicate.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Federal Programs Consolidated Review Monitoring Kelly Iorfida Education Administrative Associate Division of Federal Programs Department of Education.
LEA Federal Program Monitoring/Review Presented by: Kelly Iorfida and Norma Hull Division of Federal Programs Department of Education.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Title I-D, Subpart 2 Neglected, Delinquent, and At- Risk Youth Program ESEA Odyssey Summer 2013 Russ Sweet Education Specialist Oregon Department of Education.
FY12 Title I Common Program Review Findings Title I Technical Assistance Session May 11, 2012.
SASA WEBGRAM State Title I Directors July 27, 2011 Topic: 2011 Grantee Satisfaction Survey Patricia A. McKee Acting Director Student Achievement and School.
1 Fall 2010 Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education October 5, 2010.
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION FUND 2011 Updates February 1, 2011.
NCLB Monitoring Overview and Details /15 Version.
Elementary & Secondary Education Act Marcia Beckman ESEA Program Director
Facilitated by Tanya Morin, Gary Sumnicht, and Alison Wineberg
NCLB Monitoring Overview Part 1 - Questions. Objectives  To provide clearer understanding of the monitoring process  To provide further guidance regarding.
Title IA Annual Parent Meeting  Date: September 14, 2015  Gainesville ISD  School: Edison Elementary  Time: 6:00 p.m.  I. Discussion of.
Data Quality & the Consolidated District Performance Report (CDPR) Jesse Parsons & Russ Sweet, Education Specialists Oregon Department of Education August.
Title I-A Coordinators Conversation May 15, 2014.
Title IA Planning, Fiscal, and Parental Involvement Workshops Maine Department of Education Kathryn Manning Jackie Godbout Rachelle Tome May 2006.
TITLE I-A COORDINATORS CONVERSATION November 5, 2014.
Federal and State Programs Title I Chat May 14, 2012.
Fiscal Considerations Spring 2006 NCLB Regional Workshops.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
A District Coordinator’s Guide WHAT TO EXPECT DURING CONSOLIDATED MONITORING David Millanti Audit and Compliance Branch Manager Kentucky Department of.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Office.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Arizona Department of Education Office of English Language Acquisition Services.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 1 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Federal Program Monitoring Overview and Organization.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
BAGGETT ELEMENTARY Annual Title I Parent Involvement Meeting Baggett Elementary September 16, 2015.
Special Education Compliance Monitoring. 3 Phases of Compliance Monitoring Review Pre-Site phase Pre-Site phase On-Site phase On-Site phase Post-Site.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 3 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
Oregon Department of Education March 10, 2005 Video Conference Title ID Subpart 2 Formal Agreements with Facilities to Provide Academic Programs.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Title I-A Back to Basics.
Consolidated Program Reviews Jan McCoy, PhD School Improvement Specialist.
Oregon Department of Education Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Field Services Presenter:Bob Siewert, Associate Superintendent Presentation to the.
Grants Management Update – March Collaborative. Agenda Final Allocation Amendments Grant Close Out Activities State – EEF, LA4, 8(g),
Community Liaison Training NCLB Parental Involvement Requirements “Creating an Audit Trail” October 19, 2007 Eduardo Elizondo, Director Federal Programs.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
TITLE IIA, IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY FEDERAL PROGRAM MONITORING AND SUPPORT DIVISION FALL PANC Conference October 4, 2015.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
District Validation Review (DVR) Nonpublic School Preparation Information Division of Special Education.
Title I Program Review Preparation
Resource Allocation Strategy & Planning August 2017
MEGA Advanc-Ed ASSIST ACIP Local Indicator Transform 2020 Compliance
FY19 Federal Grant Monitoring: Titles I, II, IV
Presentation transcript:

Consolidated District Reviews and Monitoring Preparing for Desk Monitoring of Titles I-A, I-D, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2013

Welcome!  ODE’s objective in monitoring  Learn about program recordkeeping  Collaborate with other program coordinators  Discuss the format, content, and review of program materials

ODE Strategic Plan  Goal: Conduct all federal compliance and on- site monitoring visits in a positive and respectful way that leads to improved outcomes for students.

What to Anticipate  Technical assistance before, during, and after monitoring  Level of satisfaction and feedback from districts  Other changes to streamline document submissions, provide better technical support, and reduce burden on districts  Some changes will be during and some implemented the following year

Capturing Good Strategies  Goal is to record and share strategies for meeting requirements  Effective, efficient, smart thinking and action  Districts assist in the sharing in the future  Working on details of a plan

Why does ODE monitor districts?  Responsibility for accountable use of funds as supplemental to state funds  Confirm intentional use of funds to expand services  Provide technical assistance on program management and services to students

Will my district be monitored?  3-5 years after last monitoring  Selected based on geography and time since last monitoring  Districts to be monitored announced each spring

When will districts be monitored?  Fall 2013  6 districts visited  26 districts desk monitored  Spring 2014  5-7 districts visited from among fall desk monitored  24 districts desk monitored  Fall 2014  5-7 districts visited from among spring desk monitored  20 districts desk monitored

Which programs are included?  Title I-A – Funds to schools with high levels of poverty  Title I-D – Programs for neglected and delinquent students  Title II-A – Teacher quality  Title VI-B (REAP) – Small, rural schools  Title X – Homeless student education

Which are completed separately?  Title I-C – Migrant Education  Title III – Education of ELLs  Title IV-B – 21st Century Community Learning  Title V-B – Charter Schools  Federal programs in special education  Federal programs in assessment

How does monitoring work?  Review of program documentation (desk monitoring)  Follow-up report or plans for visit  Most districts receive report from monitoring  5-7 scheduled for follow-up visit with discussion but no report

How are the reviews conducted?  Districts submit notebooks describing program implementation  Reviewers assemble for 4 days of notebook reading  8-10 ODE staff  knowledgeable contractors  Budget compared to expenditures  Submitted materials reviewed for completeness  Technical assistance opportunities identified and documented

What should district staff prepare?  Notebook for each program  Dividers downloaded from ODE website  Search for “ESEA Monitoring” 

Which years are reviewed?  Last year and current year for programs funded in your district  For 2013 both fall and spring, SY and SY  Budget narrative as currently available (ODE provides this)  Expenditures to date

What evidence should I have?  Materials called for in notebook tabs  Announcements and sign-in sheets for meetings, letters and other communication with private schools, staff assignment and utilization, etc.  Budget and expenditures

What happens after the review?  ODE staff choose 5-7 districts for onsite visit/review  Those not visited will receive report of findings from desk monitoring  Those visited will receive report of findings after visit

How do onsite visits work?  Coordinate with ODE lead for visit  Submit new notebooks 2 weeks before visit  Meet with ODE/contractor staff to discuss content of notebooks and discuss programs  Host 1 to 5 day visit depending on district size

What reports do districts get?  Desk monitored districts receive oral report during exit interviews on last day of monitoring  Onsite monitored districts receive oral report on last day of visit  Print report sent within 30 days of monitoring  District response requested within 60 days of receipt of report

Who do I contact?  Russ Sweet, ESEA District Support and Monitoring Lead  