11 Report on Professional Development for 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 Update Developed for the Providence School Board March 28, 2011 Presented by: Marco Andrade.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Advertisements

Provisions for Training and Professional Development 1 Florida Digital Instructional Materials Work Group November 13, 2012.
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
EPAS: Elevating the Postsecondary Aspirations of Students! Using ACTs EPAS Data Effectively Glenn Beer Louisiana Tech University
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
LCAP Update, Feedback, & Input Vision Quality Indicator 5: Professional Learning For All December 9, 2014.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
April 29, 2014 Gail A. Epps, Ed. D. Program Manager.
Results from the AVID Program in Chicago Jenny Nagaoka, Jonah Deutsch, Melissa Roderick, and Andy Brake January 29, 2008.
KEDC Project for Special Educator Effectiveness (Project SEE) KEDC Special Education.
1 Magnet Program A “school within a school” Magnet Program to include commitment to the planning and implementation that would enhance the learning of.
Aim of paper To investigate teachers’ perceptions on the role that teachers’ associations play in their professional development, with reference to the.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Melanie N. Yangrelbug.  Objective Tree  Narrative Summary  Outputs and Activities  6 Months Activities  Indicators  When I go back…
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Dr Elena Luchinskaya, Lancaster University/ Leeds Metropolitan University, UK.
The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Leveraging DI Through Curriculum Implementation Ron Ballentine Cindy Cosentino Halton District School Board
Nevada Counselor / Psychologist Survey Data Prepared for the Legislative Committee on Education July, By Marina McHatton CTE Counseling and Assessments,
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Cluster Classroom Grouping Model
Bruce White Ruth Geer University of South Australia.
Longitudinal Study to Measure Effects of MSP Professional Development on Improving Math and Science Instruction.
Professional Development Activity Log: A New Approach to Design, Measurement, Data Collection, and Analysis AERA Annual Meeting San Diego April 13, 2004.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
The CSUP/PDS Partner District/ AVID Alliance. A structured, college preparatory system working directly with schools and districts A direct support structure.
Survey Data Executive Summary Fall 2008.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
ANNOUNCEMENT The NC Department of Public Instruction is pleased to announce that Summer Institutes 2014 will take place in all eight regions across the.
San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.
You Are Not Alone: Why Every WL Classroom needs an EduCorps Intern. Presenters: Monica Abuliak & Beth Matcham-Shepherd.
Moodling in Ontario: A Professional Learning Approach Anita Drossis Nathalie Rudner ABEL Professional Learning Lead ABEL School Lead Science and Math Teacher.
Middle School Design Team (MSDT) Phase II: Revised Draft Recommendations Rigor, Relevance, and Responsiveness (R 3 ) April 14, 2009.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Service Learning Dr. Albrecht. Presenting Results 0 The following power point slides contain examples of how information from evaluation research can.
Online Professional Development: One State’s Algebra 1 Initiative Ernise S. Singleton, PhD Educational Technology Consultant.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
DUE CTC Professional Development National Visiting Committee Convergence Technology Center Feb , 2009.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
On The Right Road Moving Forward From a Lowest Achieving School to a High Progress Rewards School Fitzgerald High School Ben Hill County.
Austin Community College TEACHER CERTIFICATION PROGRAM It’s all about the Kids!
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Implementing NVACS The State Role. State Law NRS NRS NRS
Goals Increased Student Achievement Balanced Assessment System Summative Formative Assessment for Learning.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
» Students who meet the passing standard on STAAR must still meet all promotion requirements outlined in the district policy. We will review.
Perkins End of Year Evaluation Southwestern Community College May 18, 2016.
Issues in Teaching EDU Session 1 The Conceptual Understanding of What You are Teaching.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
TEACHER ORIENTATION BEGINNING TEACHERS AND TEACHERS NEW TO SCS.
TEACHER ORIENTATION BEGINNING TEACHERS AND TEACHERS NEW TO SCS
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Providing Customized Training on Quality Online Design and Delivery
Leveraging DI Through Curriculum Implementation
Professional Development Update Summer Teacher Institutes and
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Recruitment & Retention Committee Update Job & Task Analysis Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

11 Report on Professional Development for and Update Developed for the Providence School Board March 28, 2011 Presented by: Marco Andrade Office of Research, Planning and Accountability Sharon L. Contreras, Chief Academic Officer

B ACKGROUND Office of Professional Learning responsible for coordinating the PD offerings in PPSD PD sessions offered after school, Saturdays, and at seasonal institutes throughout the year (summer, optional days) My Learning Plan (MLP), a web-based system to manage PD offerings and teacher accounts to facilitate registration for, and tracking of, PD sessions 22 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

B ACKGROUND Focus of Report 1.Review of PD provided in consisting of: –participant end-of-session evaluations –percentage of math and science teachers who completed their required number of professional development hours. 2.Review of 2010 Summer Institute and brief update on Optional PD days 33 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

R EVIEW OF PD Math & Science PD Hours Crosstabulation completed in Mar2010 – some PD offerings still available 29.5% general education teachers at the elementary level completed (or had the potential to complete) all required math and science hours 50-62% of elementary level teachers (outside 3 rd and 4 th due to Science kits spanning 2 years) were not able to complete all required hours elementary level teachers had completed an average 83% of required hours 44 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

R EVIEW OF PD Math & Science PD Hours 52.8% middle school teachers were not going to be able to meet all required hours in math and 54.8% in science even if they were to participate in all remaining scheduled PD sessions Middle school math teachers had completed an average of 66.9% of required workshops High percentage (44.4%) of incorrect workshops taken among math teachers –teachers may have taken incorrect workshops –changed in what was required, either in terms of the required courses or changes in level or subject matter they were going to teach 55 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

R EVIEW OF PD Math & Science PD Hours Three in four (74.6%) high school math teachers were not going to complete all their required hours High school math teachers on average had taken 72.2% of their required courses 34.9% had taken an incorrect workshop Two in three high school science teachers (67.3%) did not or were not going to complete all their required hours. 66 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

R EVIEW OF PD End of Session Evals End of PD session evaluation form – 13 questions 12,859 returned, completed session evaluation forms 86% of respondents were teachers (2,903 did not respond to question 1) 65% of respondents said the info provided in PD was new to them 90%+ “agreed” or “strongly agreed” to questions Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

R EVIEW OF PD End of Session Evals 3.I learned at least one new piece of information in this session that could impact my thinking and teaching. 4.The information provided in this session is relevant to my professional practice. 5.The information presented at this workshop reflected best practice 6.The presentation was clear and easy to understand. 88 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

R EVIEW OF PD End of Session Evals 7.Information was presented in an interesting, engaging manner. 8.I am likely to implement information from this session in my professional practice. 9.Students in my building or class would likely benefit if the information from this session were implemented. 10.I would recommend this session to my colleagues. 99 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

R EVIEW OF PD End of Session Evals 25% liked the speaker best 22% liked the general info presented the best 59% said the part of the session that needed the most improvement was nothing followed by other and hands-on practice at 8% 38.5% needed practice to best apply learned knowledge and skills followed by 17% nothing and 10% additional training 10 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

PD U PDATE 2010 Summer PD Offerings & Attendance 11 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

PD U PDATE 2010 Summer PD Offerings & Attendance Currently 1,176 session offerings for the academic year 36% of PD offerings available in summer over 5 week period Most sessions over 7 fall/winter months Session offerings are added throughout the year as needed; info is subject to change 12 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

PD U PDATE 2010 Summer PD Session Eval 7,668 participants completed end-of- session surveys evaluating PD sessions offered during the summer of 2010 (July 19-August 26, 2010). Majority of respondents (n=5,742; 94.9%) identified themselves as teachers Over two thirds indicated that most of the info covered was new (n=5,234; 69.0%) However, about 1 in 3 “disagreed” or “strongly disagreed” that the session provided them with new information 90%+ “agreed” or “strongly agreed” to questions Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

PD U PDATE 2010 Summer PD Session Eval 31% liked the general info presented the best 28% liked the speaker best 49% said the part of the session that needed the most improvement was nothing followed by hands-on practice at 11% 44% needed practice to best apply learned knowledge and skills followed by 14% nothing and 13% additional training 14 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

PD U PDATE Optional PD Days DATES# offerings# participants Aug (16/offering) Oct 29811,586 (20/offering) Oct 30 (Sat.)22349 (16/offering) Jan 18611,233 (20/offering) Mar 5 (Sat.)11224 (signed-up) Mar 7 (cancelled)721,472 (signed-up) Total:2975, Office of Research, Planning and Accountability Includes teacher PD sessions, administrator trainings, and teacher assistant trainings

C ONCLUSIONS Ultimate question regarding PD is whether teachers have completed their required hours (as a precursor to correlating how this may contribute in combination with other variables into improved classroom instruction and student outcomes) PD sessions are labeled “required” but in fact are not mandatory and thus at the discretion of the teacher However in regards to professional practice, in order to appropriately instruct students using the curriculum, employ best practices and use assessment information for decision making, teachers should be using available opportunities to maintain expertise as a matter of ethical and professional responsibility. 16 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability

C ONCLUSIONS Majority of general ed math and science teachers across levels, even with the potential to accumulate more hours, would not complete their required PD hours. The numbers of participating teachers and hours completed, session offerings and enrollment increased for the 2010 Summer Institute Participant perceptions of the PD sessions show a consistency in responses. Many would like more hands- on practice to apply what is learned. 17 Office of Research, Planning and Accountability