1 Purpose: The purpose of this Appendix to the State of the Community Report is to present county residents’ and community leaders’ perceptions about:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The survey Conducted state-wide with same questions Data collected locally for Region 11: Delaware, Dubuque & Jackson counties. 32 respondents identified.
Advertisements

Perceptions of Bioterror Threat Among Rural, Northeast Missouri Residents.
Community Health Assessment San Joaquin County.
Program Planning: Community Nutrition Assessment
Prepared by the North Dakota State Data Center February North Dakota Statewide Housing Needs Assessment Dr. Richard Rathge Professor and Director.
HOMELESS POPULATION Karly Porter Paula Williams Alisha Eversole Modified by Dr. Carol Albrecht Numbers and charts have been modified, and information has.
1 CDBG Income Survey Requirements For Grant Administrators.
Capacities, Challenges, and Opportunities. Introduction Challenges to reducing health disparities in the United States Poor diffusion of knowledge on.
Canada’s Health by Region By: Jack Wei and Colin McClenaghan.
Survey on Rural Community Wealth and Health Care Provision John Pender USDA Economic Research Service (ERS) NCRCRD Webinar November 16, 2011.
© 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 1-1 Basic Business Statistics (9 th Edition) Chapter 1 Introduction and Data Collection.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Facilitated by: FACILITATOR Community Needs Assessment Template Community Health Needs Assessment R National Center for Rural Health Works Community Needs.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: CNA Toolkit August 21, 2012.
2014 CDBG Applicants' Workshop Documenting the National Objective.
Community Needs Assessments Thomas P. Holland, Ph.D., Professor UGA Institute for Nonprofit Organizations.
Trying Out New Survey Techniques – Lessons Learned 2013 Northwest Hazardous Materials Management Conference Liz Tennant, Strategic Advisor, Office of the.
Customer Survey Van Bennekom Book. Introduction Surveying has become a commonplace tool on the business landscape due to the drive of the quality management.
Urban American Indian and Alaska Native Health Indicator Graphs September 2010 Urban Indian Health Institute Seattle Indian Health Board.
Community Socioeconomic Profile Wayne County, West Virginia March 27, 2007.
What Have We Learned? Spillover Benefits for Society Urban and metro areas have high potential for innovation and social benefits across policy areas Inequality.
Presentation outline Purpose of study / methodology Overview of counties and people Challenges: perception and reality Satisfaction with quality of life.
Protestant Pastors’ Use of Statistics. 2 Methodology  The telephone survey of Protestant pastors was conducted November 5-12, 2009  The calling list.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
Constructing the Formal Report.
RKM / BIA 2011 Business Outlook Survey (1 of 8) Research Design:  Systematic in-depth phone interviews with:  302 businesses with at least one location.
Sampling UAPP 702 Research Methods for Urban & Public Policy
Using and Interpreting Data Community Health Assessment Unit Office of Epidemiology.
The 8 th Annual COMMUNITY FORUM on the Conditions of Children in Orange County WELCOME.
From Digital Divide to Digital Opportunity – Policy Issues Kelly Levy, Associate Administrator National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
1 Successes: Community & Nonprofit Leaders’ Views of Successes & Innovative Approaches SURVEY ANALYSISSURVEY ANALYSIS Community leaders were asked: “From.
Liesl Eathington Iowa Community Indicators Program Iowa State University October 2014.
Davenport-Perth Neighborhood Centre Community Profile Data from Statistics Canada, 2006 Census Profile Series, Community Social Data Strategy (CSDS), 2008.
DocumentDelivery methodsTime required Additional resources Planning and Development This handout can be used to begin a conversation about planning in.
Service Learning at the Center for the Study of Local Issues Review CSLI History/Mission The Semi-Annual Survey: An Opportunity for Student Learning and.
Working Toward One Community for All Arizonans Arizona Governor’s Council on Developmental Disabilities.
Community Assessment Process WHY?? To identify and document the opportunities, challenges, strengths, and needs of a specific geographic community and.
EVALUATION RESEARCH. Evaluation Research  How do we begin?  What are the different types of evaluation research?  How do these different types fit.
Regional Transportation and Complete Mobility Okotoks Presentation June 23, 2014.
San Joaquin County’s Health Profile: Useful Data to Improve Our Future Sponsored by the San Joaquin County Community Health Assessment Collaborative
ONE ECONOMY/BROADBAND OPPORTUNITY COALITION EVALUATION PLAN JUNE 27, 2011 Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
The Uninsured in Alameda County 2010 December 2010.
Website to Access Presentation WACY Landscape Report A preliminary look at the distribution of resources for children and youth in Washtenaw County.
 How do we begin?  What are the different types of evaluation research?  How do these different types fit together?  What purpose do they serve?
What Makes Them Give? 2012 Stelter Donor Insight Report Latest Stelter Study finds influences and activities that yield planned gifts.
CLUSTER SAMPLING a survey of selected groups within a population the entire population is divided into groups (clusters), and a random sample of these.
Methods for Documenting National Objective Compliance Michael Casper, Compliance Manager  December 3, 2014.
Indicators of Progress: Objective and Subjective Indicators Constructing Indicators of Progress/Well-being with Citizens/Communities Council of Europe-
Data Driven Professional Learning Communities Hertford County Schools.
1 Public Library Use in Oregon Results from the 2006 Oregon Population Survey Oregon State Library March 2007.
Understanding your Community Needs and Resource Assessments Primary Prevention Institute 2015.
LEEDS & GRENVILLE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT.
Chapter Ten Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Basic Sampling Issues.
© 2009 South-Western, Cengage LearningMARKETING 1 CHAPTER 22 Public Relations Project Purpose Successful business leaders understand the importance of.
Data Collection and Experimental Design. Data Collection Methods 1. Observational study 2. Experiment 3. Simulation 4. Survey.
1 of 29Visit UMT online at Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 1, STAT125Basic Business Statistics STATISTICS FOR MANAGERS University of Management.
Marketing Research Chapter 29. The Marketing Research Process The five steps that a business follows when conducting marketing research are: Defining.
Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan Update.
2009 COMMUNITY SURVEY Presentation of Final Results January 21, 2010.
Partnering to End Homelessness in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania on Twitter.
EXPLORING MARRIAGES AND FAMILY, 2 ND EDITION Karen Seccombe © 2015, 2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Why Study Families and.
General Districting Considerations Legal Requirements Geography Neighborhoods Physical Layout School Districts and Other Areas Political Participation.
What was Redevelopment?
Yakama Nation Housing Authority
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
CHAPTER 22 Public Relations Project
Upper Valley Needs Assessment Research Surveying Community Leaders
Basic Sampling Issues.
Community Health Needs Assessment: Inform The Process
Community Health Needs Assessment
Presentation transcript:

1 Purpose: The purpose of this Appendix to the State of the Community Report is to present county residents’ and community leaders’ perceptions about: 1.What are the major issues facing this county? 2.How adequate are the current services and/or resources available to address these issues? 3.What are the existing assets we have to build upon? This Appendix is is part of a larger report which includes an executive summary; a profile of Washtenaw County; county indicators presenting data related to the quality of life; and a review of existing reports. Three surveys were designed and implemented to collect data. They included: 1.A telephone survey of 402 county residents, conducted by Wayne State University’s Center for Urban Studies. A statistically representative random sample of the community was surveyed. 2.A written survey conducted by FERA to obtain input from residents who were likely to be systematically excluded from the telephone survey (e.g., individuals who are homeless, low income and youth who are likely to have cell phones, no land line, or no phone at all). The surveys were distributed through community nonprofits serving these residents and used the same questions as did the telephone survey. A total of 65 residents responded to this survey. 3.An online survey of community leaders conducted by FERA. Nonprofit, Business, Educational, and Political leaders were included. A total of 185 leaders responded to this survey. A summary of the data gathered can be accessed on the Washtenaw United Way website, at Introduction:Purpose, Methods, & Appendix Organization NEEDSASSESSMENTNEEDSASSESSMENT Methods:

2 Appendix A presents a summary of respondent demographics and then is divided into five categories: Community and Economic Development, Health, Education, Environment, and Community Connection. Each category has sub-areas and presents a table for each of the sub-areas. For example, Housing and Poverty is a sub-area under Community and Economic Development. The table includes issues of: (a) affordable housing, (b) homelessness, (c) poverty, and (d) hunger. The table presents the percent of survey respondents who identified affordable housing as a “major” or “minor” issue or as “not an issue.” It also details the percent of respondents who thought that the resources available to address that issue were “adequate,” “somewhat adequate,” or “not adequate.” Data from the three surveys are presented separately, allowing for differences in perceptions to be seen. Community and nonprofit leaders’ views of our county’s top three issues are also presented, as are their views about barriers to improving the quality of life county-wide and successful or innovative things that are happening in Washtenaw County. A discussion of what the survey results tell us and whether they fit with data found in the indicators can be found in the body of the main report. Note: community residents who responded to the telephone survey will be referred to as residents (telephone), while the group that responded in writing will be referred to as residents (written). Introduction: Purpose, Methods, & Appendix Organization (continued) Section Organization: Section Organization: SURVEYRESULTSSURVEYRESULTS