1 The Delaware Education Insight Dashboard. 2 Essential Questions of The Dashboard 1) What is The Dashboard? 2) Who had input in the design of The Dashboard?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Technology Use Plan Methacton School District Patty McGinnis ED TECH 501.
February 8, When 2 or more teachers deliver substantive instruction to a diverse group of students in a single classroom. May be general ed. + special.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
Presented by: Shirley Woika, Director of Clinical Training
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Contents Context Progress Update Performance Update LEA Plan Update
February, 2010 LEA Support Advisory Council. Agenda 2:30-3:00Discuss plan revision process (feedback and support) 3:00-3:30Discuss February workshops.
March, 2010 LEA Support Workshop. 11 Agenda 8:30-9:10Welcome and update 9:10-10:00Breakout: As determined by team 10:00-10:10Break 10:10-11:00Breakout:
June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom Day
1 1  1 =.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
What is Title 1?.
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
Revised: November 11, August ~ September 2013 ~ October SunMonTueWedThuFriSat 12 NO SCHOOL LABOR DAY 3 FIRST DAY GRADES FIRST DAY GRADES
Edupoint Educational Systems
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
DPS Journey to the Digital Doors 10/5/11. DPS Journey to the Digital Doors Who are we? 79,060 students 70% FRL 53% graduation rate Endless possibilities.
July 11, 2013July 18, 2013July 25, 2013August 1, 2013 August 8, 2013August 16, 2013August 29, 2013September 5, 2013 September.
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
Board of Education Meeting February 6, Did you know during 2013 Summer School, only 20% of our student population attended? Vision Building.
KtO—In a Glance Local Literacy Plan Year 2- Keystones to Opportunity.
Data handling Thursday. Objectives for today Extending our knowledge of statistics – range, mode, median and the mean. mode rangeToday we are focusing.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
RTI 101 Mia Hyde Tennessee Department of Education Coordinator of Reading Content & Resources.
High School School Performance Framework (SPF)
Welcome! Please sign in and take a seat at one of the front tables 1.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
National Partnership on Youth Attainment and Transitions Reform of schooling through collaborative efforts with the States and Territories, to improve.
District Advisory Council (DAC) 1 October 22, 2012 Westlawn Elementary School.
UNIT 2: SOLVING EQUATIONS AND INEQUALITIES SOLVE EACH OF THE FOLLOWING EQUATIONS FOR y. # x + 5 y = x 5 y = 2 x y = 2 x y.
A Quick Look at MDE’s Program Evaluation Tool. At the top of an index card, identify a hobby, sport, or activity in which you enjoy participating. Then.
NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: New Jersey Association of School Administrators April 30,
Western Hemisphere Membership Development Strategy.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
History / SDP Snapshot  SY ,933 K-12 Students / 9,552 teachers / 242 public schools / 471 Principals & Assistant Principals  SY
A Good teacher Explains... A Superior teacher Demonstrates... A GREAT teacher Inspires… One Team One Mission!
Understanding Title I Programs: An Overview for Parents.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Moving Forward!. Let’s C.H.A.T. (Children, High Expectations, Academic Achievement, Teacher Growth) Missouri School Boards’ Association Annual Conference.
Slide 1 Comparison of Young Children’s Development by Child and Family Characteristics Tulsa County Results February 2014.
Annual Title I Program Overview at Williston Sherry Veasey, Principal September, 2011 Parent/Teacher Meeting.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. LOCAL.
REL Appalachia and the Virginia Middle School Research Alliance Justin Baer, Director, REL Appalachia Virginia School-University Partnership Steering Committee.
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #4 April 12th, 2011.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Back to the Future The Return of AYP for School Accountability.
Brighter Choice Charter School for Boys Elementary.
Pupil Premium Review  Format of the day  Additional information  Questions asked  Report findings  Future cctions.
Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education June 17, 2013 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator Leslie Titler, Title One Teacher.
An Introduction to AVID:
Greenwood Elementary School Somerset County Public Schools.
End User Training Session
2014 FALL USER GROUPS November 3, 2014 FEH BOCES November 4, 2014 Capital Region BOCES.
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
1 DDOE Education Insight Dashboard Implementation Project 25 th Annual STATS-DC 2012 Data Conference July 13, 2012.
TITLE ONE PLAN Forts Pond Elementary School A Title One School Title One Plan.
TSDS Pilot – Lubbock ISD Dashboard Training Module September 26, 2011.
Texas Educator Evaluation & Support System Systems US Department of Education NCLB Waiver-Fall 2013 Condition of Waiver to develop new Texas evaluation.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night
California Distinguished Schools Input Session 2019
Presentation transcript:

1 The Delaware Education Insight Dashboard

2 Essential Questions of The Dashboard 1) What is The Dashboard? 2) Who had input in the design of The Dashboard? 3) What is the purpose of The Dashboard? 4) What are the benefits of The Dashboard? 5) How can The Dashboard be used? 6) What are the Critical Success Factors of The Dashboard?

3 The Insight Dashboard Project Timeline Release 1.0 Interim Teacher Dashboard Development Stakeholder engagement 4/1/11 Release 2.0 Teacher (expansion), Principal, Administrator, DOE Dashboards 4/1 Release 3.0 and beyond Expansion, refinement, and support for additional Stakeholders 6/30 9/412/1 1) What is The Dashboard?

4 System Architecture and Data Flow (24hr) 1) What is The Dashboard?

5 Stakeholder Workshop Review Three stakeholder engagement workshops were conducted in June June 20, 2011 Glasgow HS 84 participants June 22, 2011 Polytech HS 55 participants June 23, 2011 Sussex Tech HS 36 participants 175 people attended the stakeholder workshops 122 Classroom Teachers 4 Principals 49 Other Administration 11 Breakout Sessions with 4 stakeholder groups Elementary Teachers Middle School Teachers High School Teachers Principals, Counselors, and other Administrative personnel (sometimes as part of teacher breakout sessions) 2) Who had input in the design of The Dashboard?

6 Stakeholder Survey Feedback Feedback from the Workshop participants was overwhelmingly positive. 2) Who had input in the design of The Dashboard?

7 How was The Insight Dashboard Created? 45 Individuals All Districts 4 Charter Schools 70 Student Metrics 200 Aggregate or Rollup Metrics Regional Education Laboratory Research 11 Focus Groups 175 Participants 122 Teachers 4 Principals 49 Admin 2) Who had input in the design of The Dashboard?

8 The Purpose of The Dashboard K-12 data is increasingly important Federal mandates (RT3) Management – Data-driven decision making DOE Targets (RT3) 90% of students will graduate by % will meet standard on state math and reading exams by How do we close the gap? 3) What is the purpose of The Dashboard?

9 The Purpose of The Dashboard cont 3) What is the purpose of The Dashboard?

10 Dashboard Benefits One-stop shop for performance information o Student, Class, School, District State o Wide angle view No-click access to DCAS for Teachers Requires no additional data input Easy to Use o Intuitive and accessible from any location Available free of charge to all Delaware districts and charters 4) What are the benefits of The Dashboard?

11 Dashboard Usage Incoming class review Risk Identification - Intervention planning (RTI) Lesson planning PLC Activities with real-time data Parent-Teacher Conference Administrator-Teacher Conference Contact information 5) How can The Dashboard be used?

12 Critical Success Factors 6) What are the Critical Success Factors of The Dashboard?