Dunlap Community Unit School District #323 1 2012-13 Harris Poll Stakeholder Satisfaction Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda For Today! School Improvement Harris Poll Data PDSA PLC
Advertisements

Welcome School Improvement Advisory Committee Members We are happy youre here!
©2005, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Cedar Rapids Community School District Results - Key Overall District Findings.
©2005, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Cedar Rapids Community School District Results - Key Overall District Findings.
©2005, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Cedar Rapids Community School District Results - Key Overall District Findings.
Support Services Department- Leadership Teams Involving Everyone in the Plan on a Page!
©2005, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Cedar Rapids Community School District Results - Key Overall District Findings.
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #4 April 12th, 2011.
Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
© 2010 Robert Half Management Resources. An Equal Opportunity Employer. Using Staff Evaluations to Motivate Your Team.
From Research To Practice: Implementing PBS at the Fairfield Freshman School Mr. Wissman (Principal) Mr. Lindberg (Assistant Principal) Dr. Ray Soh, NCSP.
POLLARD Survey Respondents Response Rates 402 PARENTS48.7% * 774 STUDENTS93.8% 65 STAFF47% ** * Parent Survey Respondents: 28% ONLINE and 72% PAPER **
Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.
Becoming a High Impact Board Susan Salter Director of Board Development Alabama Association of School Boards.
Parent School Climate Survey Results and Analysis November 2010.
1 CUSTOMER SERVICE. 2 Benefits of Great Customer Service Critical to any successful business Productive Happy Employees Reputation & Decor Increased Patronage.
EBI Statistics 101.
Ways to Utilize the 2012 FCPS Working Conditions Survey April 11, 12, 13 Laurie Fracolli, Sid Haro, and Andrew Sioberg.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.
School Uniforms: An Investigation Status Report Harford County Public Schools December 17, 2007.
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #1 September 9th, 2010.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
© 2013 K12 Insight Central Office Climate Survey Results Las Cruces Public Schools March , 2013.
Annual Student Survey IHS makes learning exciting and encourages me to continue my education.
Building a Brighter Future for Our Kids and Families Multnomah County Department of School and Community Partnerships.
Teacher Engagement Survey 2014
Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
1 Ss. Colman-John Neumann Basketball Survey 2006/2007.
Reducing Turnover and Increasing Retention Tips and Tactics for Supervisors.
Teacher Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
1 Claverley COE School Parent/Carer Questionnaire Results Summer Term - June 2014.
0 1 1.Key Performance Indicator Results ( ) KPI Survey Statistics Student Distribution by Year in Program KPI Overall Results Student Satisfaction.
ROSSHALL ACADEMY “Our School Our Future” Our Future”
October 20 th, Beliefs and Expectations for Site Council Seek and listen to the insights of all stakeholder perspectives and groups. Deal with issues.
SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS  As you know, we survey parents, teachers, teacher assistants and students at grades 4, 7 and 11.  Three strategic directions.
Dunlap Community Unit School District # Harris Poll Stakeholder Satisfaction Results.
Teacher Survey Highlights R&E/LWW May2014.
2015 SAA Board Survey. Raw Board Survey ResultsStrongly Agree AgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree Don't Know Total Points Responses minus DKs Average Score.
1 Scoring Provincial Large-Scale Assessments María Elena Oliveri, University of British Columbia Britta Gundersen-Bryden, British Columbia Ministry of.
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #2 November 3rd, 2011.
District Climate Survey—Parents & Community Results and Analysis June /10/20101.
ITQ Institute Strengthening Instructional Leadership in Mathematics June 5, 2014 Focus 4; Communicating with Constituents; June 2014.
Ekaterina P. Forrester, Ph.D.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
Secondary School Parent Surveys May 2015 Madison Secondary
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
BLOOMFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS B Learning and Growing Together Climate and Satisfaction Survey Results Dr. James Thompson, Superintendent Dr. Ellen J. Stoltz,
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
© 2016 Results and Analysis: Elementary Schools Only 2016 School Quality Survey Spring ISD January 19 – 31, 2016.
Robertson County Parent Survey
District Leadership Team
Online Survey of Los Gatos Saratoga Union High School District Students, Parents, Teachers & Staff Summary Report May 2015.
School Climate Data Workshop
Survey Results Overview
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
2019 School Climate Survey Results and Analysis Nampa School District
Presentation transcript:

Dunlap Community Unit School District # Harris Poll Stakeholder Satisfaction Results

2

3 Underlying Theory  If you do not measure it, you will not change it  Not all problems are equal. Some have more IMPACT than others  Satisfaction/Motivation are key attitudes which are leading indicators of performance  Attitudes are formed from experience  Identify experiences that relate most to satisfaction *

4 Two Dimensions of Satisfaction  Frequency of problem–you don’t always want to work on the most common problems  Relevance of the problem–is it affecting satisfaction? –Prioritization by highlighting (statistically) the problems which frequently occur and cause dissatisfaction when they do occur –Result is a prioritized list of improvement tasks

5 Harris School Poll Objectives  Measure satisfaction: overall and by specific area  Identify the frequency of specific problems  Statistically define the penalty and impact of problems for each stakeholder group  Establish priorities among opportunities for improvement  Foster data-driven decision making  Provide benchmark, comparative, and tracking data

6 Harris Interactive School Poll Topic Areas Teachers/Staff  School Atmosphere  Equipment/Facilities  Computer Technology  School Leadership/ Administration  Communications/ Involvement  Parental Support  Career  Students  Other Staff  Other Issues Parents  Equipment/Facilities  School Bus  Computer Technology  School Leadership/ Administration  Communications/ Involvement  Child’s Teachers  Curriculum/Training  Budget  Other Issues Students  School Atmosphere  Equipment/Facilities  School Bus  Computer Technology  Main Teacher/ Teachers (five subjects)  School Leadership  Counselor  Other Staff  Other Issues

7 Sample Survey Questions Harris Interactive Inc. Please give an overall rating for your SCHOOL ATMOSPHERE by filling in one oval on the A to F scale provided?

8 Sample

9

10 Sample

11 Sample

12 Stakeholder Response Rates  Surveys were conducted in April 2013  Students in grades 3-12 completed online surveys  Parents completed paper/pencil surveys  All teachers and staff asked to complete an online survey  Response Rates: –Elementary Students94% –Secondary Students67% –Teachers/Staff95% –Parents40%

©2005, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Dunlap Community Unit School District #323 Results - Key Overall District Findings

14 Rules of Thumb on Ratings  Above 9.0: Exemplary  : Strong compared to the nationwide database.  : Average, in need of continuous improvement  : In need of a defined focus and improvement plan.  Under 6.0: Sign of a serious issue within the district. *

15 Overall Satisfaction Ratings- All Groups

©2005, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Student Satisfaction Survey Results 16

17 Overall Student Satisfaction

18 Elementary Students vs. 2013

Elementary Students- Interesting Data 19 QuestionDunlap 2011 Dunlap 2013 Harris Are students well behaved while in school?24%21%31% Are most other students nice to you?11%14%18% Do you feel safe while in school?3%4%5% Does your teacher like you?7%8%7% Does your teacher help you want to learn?9%8%7% Are the rules at your school fair?10%12%17% Have you been yelled at by an adult at school?29%27% Percent With Problem

Elementary Students Executive Summary Opportunities for Improvement  Overall satisfaction decreased from 8.4 in 2011 to 8.3 in  37% reported that their teacher didn’t give interesting homework.  15% of the students said their teacher did not make class fun.  38% said their teacher did not help them outside of class time.  8% of the students stated that their teacher did not like them.  14% of the students said that most other students were not nice to them. 20

Secondary Students vs

Secondary Students- Interesting Data 22 QuestionDunlap 2011 Dunlap 2013 Harris Is there enough time between classes?43%45%53% Are students well behaved in school?28%30%39% Is your school too crowded?48% 34% Are most other students nice to you?11%13%14% Do other kids try and get you to use drugs in school? 6%11% Do you feel safe while in school?5%7%9% Does your school principal handle discipline fairly?25% 23% Does your school principal treat students with respect? 10%16%11% Have you been yelled at by an adult at school?45%41% Percent With Problem

Middle School Students Executive Summary Opportunities for Improvement  Overall satisfaction for middle school students decreased from 8.1 in 2011 to 7.9 in  77% of the students said that they did not like the food served in the lunchroom.  57% of the students said they do not study with other students before or after school.  21% of the students indicated rules at their school were not fair. 23

High School Students Executive Summary Opportunities for Improvement  Overall satisfaction for students remained the same at 7.0 from 2011 to 2013  74% said that they did not like the food served in the lunchroom.  36% said that their hallway locker was not in a good location.  12% said there was not extra help available when they needed it.  38% indicated that the rules at school were not fair. 24

©2005, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Teacher Satisfaction Survey Results 25

26 Overall Teacher Satisfaction

27 Teacher/Staff Satisfaction 2011 vs. 2013

Teacher/Staff Satisfaction 2011 vs (Continued) 28

Teachers- Interesting Data 29 QuestionDunlap 2011 Dunlap 2013 Harris Do you have enough time for planning and grading?40%50%39% Is your workload too high?48%61%46% Do you have adequate time for classroom instruction?15%25%18% Is gossip among teachers a serious problem?19%20%24% Is student behavior a problem?22%21%48% Do you feel safe at school?0%2%4% Is there parental support for the school?3%6%28% Does the school board show appreciation for your work?24%33%17% Does the superintendent ask for suggestions/opinions?11%21%18% Are you involved in the training you receive?33%41%28% Is your salary fair for the work you do?31%49% Do you enjoy your work?1%3%6% Percent With Problem

Teachers/Staff Executive Summary Opportunities for Improvement  The overall satisfaction rating decreased slightly from 8.0 in 2011 to 7.8 in  33% said their principal did not reward outstanding performance.  30% felt that the superintendent did not show appreciation for their work.  11% said their principal did not handle student discipline fairly.  14% of the employees identified communication with their principal as an area for improvement. 30

©2005, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Parent Satisfaction Survey Results 31

32 Overall Parent Satisfaction

33 Parent Satisfaction 2011 vs. 2013

Parents- Interesting Data 34 QuestionDunlap 2011 Dunlap 2013 Harris Is your child’s school too crowded?49%43%28% Does the school system include parents views when making decisions? 36%40%25% Are you allowed to be involved in your child’s education? 18%19%12% Do teachers communicate with you when your child has a problem? 25%22%19% Is the homework assigned appropriate?16%17%11% Are there enough courses for advanced students?31%29%18% Do your schools give you a good value for your tax dollar? 16%17% Percent With Problem

Parent Satisfaction Themes by Level 35 Elementary Parents M.S. Parents H.S. Parents

Elementary Parents Executive Summary Opportunities for Improvement  Overall increased slightly from 8.3 in 2011 to 8.4 in  34% said that the District did not do a good job of communicating about the budget.  25% indicated that they were not getting enough feedback on their child's performance.  14% indicated that the school did not do an adequate job of communicating when their child had a problem. 36

Middle School Parents Executive Summary Opportunities for Improvement  Overall satisfaction decreased slightly from 8.1 in 2011 to 8.0 in  25% felt that the variety of academic courses available needed improvement.  32% indicated that teachers did not communicate to them when their child had a problem.  20% rated the Board of Education less than satisfactory at improving the overall quality of instruction.  7% felt they were not treated with respect by administrators. 37

High School Parents Executive Summary Opportunities for Improvement  Overall decreased slightly from 7.6 in 2011 to 7.4 in  30% rated the Board of Education less than satisfactory at improving the overall quality of instruction.  34% said that the Superintendent/Central Administration needed to improve in responding to the needs and concerns of parents.  9% felt they were not treated with respect by administrators.  12% felt that school did not provide a safe environment for their child. 38

Dunlap Specific Questions 39

40 Comparative Data

41 Comparative Districts District# SchoolsEnrollmentMinorityF/R LunchPer PupilIncome A %29.0%$12,943$76,902 B %8.4%$15,011$77,166 C %36.0%$12,450$56,109 Dunlap %8.0%$8,602$80,146

Comparative Data

Balanced Scorecard! % 96.4% 94.3% % 94.2% 91.6%

Balanced Scorecard! % 100%

Balanced Scorecard! % % % %

Balanced Scorecard! 46

47 Moving Forward with the Data  Survey questions identify the symptoms of the problems  Statistical analysis (Impact Analysis) calculates the relative IMPACT of the symptoms  Focus groups and other techniques translate the symptom into a defined problem  Task teams define solutions  Measurement tracks and documents success –Do not wait for the next survey –Develop metrics for success in your own building –Communicate improvements to your stakeholders

48 Survey Results  The survey results point out “specific areas” where improvement would lead to increased satisfaction.  There are other areas identified as concerns (high % of respondents reporting problems) that do not impact satisfaction.  It is critical that a building focus on the concerns that will make a difference.  The following steps can be taken to process the data and select high priority areas for improvement… Harris Interactive Inc.

49 As you review your school’s data… Identify issues of concern Group like ideas together – issues that could be solved in tandem Surprises? Confirmation? Look for areas where your school’s “percent of problem” is most different than the overall district “percent of problem” Look for common issues across your stakeholders… solving a problem may impact more than one group Refer to your data tables to look at differences among subgroups Looking at Your Data

50 Planning Next Steps  Document areas of improvement –Are the areas more commonly received from a particular audience (staff, parents, elementary students, or secondary students)? –Are there trends in the types of categories that are consistently lower (i.e. leadership, facilities, etc.)?  Document areas of strength and consider whether or not aspects related to those strengths are changing  Pay closer attention to the "Overall Satisfaction" indicators to gauge how important these individual issues are to stakeholder’s general sense of satisfaction  Document areas where the satisfaction ratings are going against expected norms (i.e. gender differences, ethnicity differences, grade trends)  Relate subgroup ratings to survey counts to ensure accurate interpretations  Examine subgroup trends for possible changes for next year (ex. Turnover of staff and effect on demographics)

51 Planning Next Steps  Tackle each section one at a time –For each section, examine the list of issues and determine which one(s) can be addressed for the coming year –Prioritize the list based on whichever factor your site deems as most important for that issue (percentage of stakeholder affected, magnitude of dissatisfaction, or portion of potential improvement)  Identify trends within individual sections, or more broadly (ex. Is there a discipline issue at the school? A facility issue? A communication issue?)  Prioritize sections in order of importance – is Equipment & Facilities anywhere near as important a section as Curriculum/Training?  Determine how next steps fit into other school improvement plan initiatives  In the back of the binder will be the results by question separated by Students, Teachers/Staff, & Parents  The hard data references the sample size for each individual question, as well as the count responding to entire survey  Use the hard data to add context to issues that were raised to this point

52

53

Dunlap Community Unit School District # Harris Poll Stakeholder Satisfaction Results