Presented to: SBAS Technical Interoperability Working Group Date: 21 June 2005 Federal Aviation Administration Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HIPAA Security Presentation to The American Hospital Association Dianne Faup Office of HIPAA Standards November 5, 2003.
Advertisements

Agenda Item 6 GNSS Operations Ross Bowie, NAV CANADA Rapporteur, Operational WG Navigation Systems Panel Thank you… Good morning… I am ... and member.
A Joint Code of Practice Objectives and Summary Presentation
PRINCIPLES OF A CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Effective Contract Management Planning
Presented by: Fouad Al-Malazi ID No.: Managing Construction Contracts By Robert D. Gilbreath Chapter 1 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS: Roles and Relationships.
Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) for Aviation United Nations International Committee on GNSS December, 2005 Ken Alexander United States.
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Introduction to Military Certification Office
By: Nurhan Tan, NAS Planning & Integration Date: Sept. 16, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration ACA Association of California Airports Conference S. Lake.
Presentation for the Management Study of the Code Enforcement Process City of Little Rock, Arkansas August 3, 2006.
Contractor Safety Management
DoD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP) Phase III – Validation Thomas Howard Chris Pierce.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
Presented to: MPAR Symposium II By: James Williams – Director, Systems Engineering and Safety Date: 17 November 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Multifunction.
Secure System Administration & Certification DITSCAP Manual (Chapter 6) Phase 4 Post Accreditation Stephen I. Khan Ted Chapman University of Tulsa Department.
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
Managing Risk to Reduce Construction Claims (And Improve Project Success) Presented by Laurie Dennis, PE, CVS-Life, FSAVE.
Project Execution.
Privacy By Design Sample Use Case Privacy Controls Insurance Application- Vehicle Data.
UN/CEFACT Pioneering Paperless Trade: The way covered and the way ahead Experience of Innovative Compliance in Supply Chain Security UN/CEFACT Executive.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY Continuity of Operations Planning (COOP)
Information Security Compliance System Owner Training Richard Gadsden Information Security Office Office of the CIO – Information Services Sharon Knowles.
AVS Repair, Alteration and Fabrication Team (RAFT) Results
By: Carol Martineau, Acting Assistant Manager, Aircraft Maintenance Division, AFS-301 Date: June 7, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration ASA Conference.
Test Organization and Management
Standard WBS Version 1.0 WBS2-3.pptPage 1 Standard Work Breakdown Structure Legend = Decomposes to lower level WBS elements 4.0 Implementation 4.0 Implementation.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
1 Chapter Three IT Risks and Controls. 2 The Risk Management Process Identify IT Risks Assess IT Risks Identify IT Controls Document IT Controls Monitor.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
Protecting GPS Transportation Infrastructure – Action Plan Status Report 43rd CGSIC Meeting Washington, DC March 10, 2004  CDR Peter Keane U.S. Department.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
UNCLASSIFIED DITSCAP Primer. UNCLASSIFIED 1/18/01DITSCAP Primer.PPT 2 DITSCAP* Authority ASD/C3I Memo, 19 Aug 92 –Develop Standardized C&A Process DODI.
Satellite Navigation Program Federal Aviation Administration.
10/16/2015Bahill1 Organizational Innovation and Deployment Causal Analysis and Resolution 5 Optimizing 4 Quantitatively Managed 3 Defined 2 Managed Continuous.
CHECKPOINTS OF THE PROCESS Three sequences of project checkpoints are used to synchronize stakeholder expectations throughout the lifecycle: 1)Major milestones,
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: By: Date: Oversight Throughout the Supply Chain: Is It Adequate? DOT OIG Audit: Assessment of FAA's Risk-Based.
Eliza de Guzman HTM 520 Health Information Exchange.
Presented to: IWG 26 By: Jason Burns (FAA) Date: February 5-7, 2014 Federal Aviation Administration DFMC Work Plan Update.
Presented to: Verification and Validation Summit By: James Daum NextGen and Operations Planning Safety Manager AJP-1900 Date: November 05, 2009 Federal.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Quality and Standards Team (QST) In-Service Management Gold Standard ATO Acquisition Practices.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
DRAFT WAAS Integrity Resolution Process Pat Reddan 22 June 2005 ZETA ASSOCIATES.
Software QA Safety Systems at SLAC Enzo Carrone Controls Department – Safety Systems SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
BSBPMG501A Manage Application of Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification.
Project management Topic 8 Quality Review. Overview of processes Prepare for Quality Review Questions list Meeting Agenda Review Meeting Sign-off Product.
Satellite Navigation Program
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF ORDER Larry Stirling
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Friends and Partners in Aviation Weather Michele Merkle, Federal Aviation Administration Director.
1 1 Effective Administration of Commercial Contracts Breakout Session # Session D06 Name: Holly Walker, CPCM Corporate Learning Solutions and Contract.
by: Er. Manu Bansal Deptt of IT Software Quality Assurance.
PIP-II Environment, Safety, Health & Quality Assurance Strategy John Anderson Jr. DOE Independent Project Review of PIP-II 16 June 2015.
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
Temporary Works Co-ordination
Description of Revision
CMMI – Staged Representation
HSE Case: Risk Based Approach.
MOD.A’s Quality Standard
#IASACFO.
UNLV Data Governance Executive Sponsors Meeting
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
1 Stadium Company Network. The Stadium Company Project Is a sports facility management company that manages a stadium. Stadium Company needs to upgrade.
Cybersecurity ATD technical
PSS verification and validation
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: SBAS Technical Interoperability Working Group Date: 21 June 2005 Federal Aviation Administration Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Dan Hanlon WAAS Program Manager

Federal Aviation Administration 2 Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) 21 June 2005 A New Paradigm WAAS was the first navigation aid to be certified nationally As such, many of FAA’s standard certification criteria had to be tailored to fit the program

Federal Aviation Administration 3 Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) 21 June 2005 Steps to Certification FAA Administrator Directs Establishment of an Independent Review Board (IRB) –Role: Perform an Independent Assessment of the Need for a Satellite Based Augmentation System and to Independently Review the Technical Solution Proposed by the WIPP –Reported Findings to the Administrator WAAS Program Office Establishes a WAAS Integrity Performance Panel (WIPP) –Role is to Establish Technical Approach and Solution for Meeting Integrity

Federal Aviation Administration 4 Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) 21 June 2005 Steps to Certification WIPP Comprised of WAAS Experts……(FAA, Academia, Industry) WIPP Meetings with Contractor Held Monthly to Review and Evaluate Contractor’s Progress FAA Briefed Status of WIPP Activities to IRB who then Reported Back to Administrator

Federal Aviation Administration 5 Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) 21 June 2005 Role of the WAAS Integrity Performance Panel (WIPP) Provided The Needed Expertise To Help Define The Actual Threats Or Threat Models That WAAS Would Have To Be Designed To Protect Against WIPP Was Charged With Defining The Extent Of The Threats Including Their Description And Likelihood WIPP Judged The Completeness Of A Monitor’s Design WIPP Insured That The Threat Models Generated Fully Spanned All Feared Events

Federal Aviation Administration 6 Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) 21 June 2005 FAA Certification

Federal Aviation Administration 7 Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) 21 June 2005 Certification by Program Phase System Development –System Owned by Contractor Contractor Must Prove System Meets Safety Certification Criteria Prior to FAA Acceptance Contractor Acceptance Inspection (CAI) –Program Office Formally Accepts Ownership of System Operational and Security Certification Period Begins Joint Acceptance Inspection (JAI) –Field Satisfied That System is Functioning and All Support Material Is in Place Commissioning –Requires JRC In Service Decision –System Becomes Part of National Airspace System

Federal Aviation Administration 8 Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) 21 June 2005 Types of Certification Safety Certification –Performed By the Product Team Prior to Acceptance From the Contractor –Design Assurance Process Used to Provide Sufficient Proof That The Integrity Requirements Are Achieved Operational Certification –Performed by Airways Facilities Validation that WAAS is Working Properly Within the NAS Infrastructure Equipment is Functioning Within Limits Operators and Maintainers Are Trained Procedures Are in Place and Being Followed Security Certification –Compliance With Security Requirements, Procedures & Training

Federal Aviation Administration 9 Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) 21 June 2005 WAAS Integrity Issue WAAS Integrity Design Did Not Provide Proof of Compliance For Integrity Requirement –Traditional Testing Methods Showed That the Design “Did Not Fail” Complete Definition of the Potential Threat Models Was Not Performed –Standards In Place At That Time Did Not Require This Level of Assurance Integrity Monitoring Algorithms Were Not Designed To Support This Type Of Analysis In Response –WAAS Program Office Formed WAAS Integrity Performance Panel (WIPP) –FAA Administrator Requested Independent Review Board (IRB) WIPP Activities Were Integrated With System Engineering and Development Activities

Federal Aviation Administration 10 Certification of the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) 21 June 2005 Summary Complex Architecture Requires Detailed Process and Documentation for Capturing and Assuring WAAS Safety FAA efforts to involve many stakeholders was crucial in resolving the integrity risk Future Changes to WAAS must undergo the same safety assessment activities to ensure continued system safety