Chris Meyer, York Mills C.I.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Life Beyond Levels. Independence looks like…Inquisitiveness Looks like…Reflection looks like…Collaboration looks like… I make excellent use of all opportunities.
Advertisements

AVID Elective Overview
Welcome to Day 3 Please be seated in groups of 4.  Like grade bands  Mixed schools  New faces Introduce yourself to your table members.
Literacy and STEM: Incorporating Nonfiction into Science Jake Melnyk Governor’s Teacher Network Greene Early College High Snow Hill, NC.
Presentation Name December 05 Embedding blended learning into mainstream Higher Education “Developments” Debbie Reynolds Clare Denholm.
Workshop on Peer Instruction: Setting Yourself up for Success Beth Simon Computer Science and Engineering University of California, San Diego Formerly,
Improving Students’ understanding of Feedback
Chapter 3 Teaching Through Problem Solving
Good Instruction as a Basis for Differentiated Teaching
Best Practices IIEngineering Engineering Education1 use active learning.
Developing Instructional Strategies
PROFESSIONALDEVELOPMET PROGRAMME PROGRAMME 14 April 2011.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
C LASS #3: P LANNING TO T EACH S CIENCE P ART 1 Chapter 5: Teaching Science Chapter 9: Differentiated Instruction Chapter 10: Learning in Secondary Schools.
Welcome Welcome to “Getting Results” A National Science Foundation project developed by WGBH with the League for Innovation and 13 community colleges from.
Student Writing Conferences District Flex Workshop
Facilitators: Teresa Roe English Language Arts Division Manager, TDS Latahshia Coleman English Language Arts Instructional Facilitator, TDS Session Outcomes.
Integrating the Life Sciences from Molecule to Organism The American Physiological Society Transform a Cookbook Lab Moving Toward More Student-Centered.
1. Addresses the Common Core Standards 2. Differentiation 3. Supports RtI 4. Technology/On-line Resources 5. Results Top Benefits of.
Student-Centered Coaching Instructional Design and Assessment Presented by Diane Sweeney Author of: Student-Centered Coaching (Corwin, 2010), Student-
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
UniSA - a strategies workshop. Today’s program: (if of course, we have time for it all!!) Developing good tutor skills Tutorial dynamics Continuing.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Operation STEM Cleveland State University February 22, 2014.
Helping Students Develop Statistical Reasoning: Implementing a Statistical Reasoning Learning Environment (SRLE) Dani Ben-Zvi
HIS 420 – Spring 2012 Student Survey #1 January 19, 2012.
CLT is based on the idea that the goal of language learning is communication. And it considers that many fundamental communication activities are spoken.
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Go to my group zap and share your thoughts on interaction in the classroom. How often do you use student to student interaction in class?
The Principles of Learning and Teaching P-12 Training Program
SCIENCE COMPANION: OVERVIEW AND INTRO TO WEATHER ___DATE___ ___YOUR NAME___.
Inquiry-based Learning Linking Teaching with Learning.
S-TEAM PROJECT: Dialogic Inquiry University of Leeds January 2010 Jaume Ametller and Phil Scott School of Education University of Leeds.
AHS Zoo School Focus and Development Interdisciplinary Training Image Credit:
Tips for writing Aim: This study guide gives you some general ideas on improving your own writing skills.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards October, 2012.
Reflection helps you articulate and think about your processes for communication. Reflection gives you an opportunity to consider your use of rhetorical.
Student Norms The following norms were decided by YOU! If your goal is to have a successful year, here’s how to make your goal a REALITY!
Experiments with PER (Physics Education Research) Chris Meyer York Mills C. I.
Depth of Knowledge. Let’s review... 1.Students perform simple procedures like copying, calculating, and remembering. They either know an answer or they.
Rigor PLC. What are the components of core instruction? From Student Achievement Partners and Achieve the Core.
 Together, my Co-Teaching partner and I have 32 first grade students. All of the students listed below are either 6 or 7 years old.  One child has.
SCIENCE COMPANION: AN OVERVIEW OCTOBER 13, 2009 Debbie Leslie, University of Chicago Center for Elementary Mathematics and Science Education (CEMSE)
FLIPPED LEARNING. HOMEWORK EXPECTATIONS ➤ Students are expected to watch video examples (found on the SFE 6 th Grade Math Page) while following along.
Study & Learning Skills Learning new ways to learn.
Conducting Professional Development Programme LEADING TO LEARN, LEARNING TO LEAD.
FOUNDATIONS OF LEADERSHIP REFLECTION QUESTIONS Anna Moncada.
Chapter 8: Inquiry & Teaching Science Chapter 11: Discussion, Demo, & Lecture Design Strategies: Universal, Backwards, & Inquiry Based Class #4: Teach.
SCIENCE COMPANION: TRAIN THE TRAINERS OCTOBER 13, 2009 Debbie Leslie, University of Chicago Center for Elementary Mathematics and Science Education (CEMSE)
Applying Principles of Learning Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University Assessment.
Erin Smith EDU: 673 UDL VS. DIFFERENTIATION. What are the most important elements of effective lesson design? Research gather knowledge from many sources.
Observation System Kidderminster College January 2012.
Coaching for Math GAINS Professional Learning Day 1 AM Irene McEvoy David Zimmer September 16, 2009.
4:00 – 4:05pm Welcome and Introductions 4:05 – 4:20pm Ice Breaker 4:20-4:30 pm Norms 4:30 – 5:00pm Journaling 5:00 – 5:30 pm Enquiry activity stations.
The Big Interview Amy Fouts EDU 650 Teaching, Learning, and Leading in the 21 st Century Instructor Richard Newman.
CHAPTER 1 Teaching Mathematics in the 21 st Century.
Scientific Teaching Chris Meyer York Mills C. I., Toronto This presentation is available at:
Learning Management System
Computational Reasoning in High School Science and Math
Building Academic Language
The Concept of INTERDISCIPLINARY TEACHING
EDU 695 STUDY Lessons in Excellence-- edu695study.com.
A Fully Integrated Print and Digital Program
The whole is greater than the sum of the parts. –Aristotle
Michigan Science Standards (MSS)
Teaching Science for Understanding
PARTICIPATORY TEACHING STRATEGIES By: Alfredo S. Donio Jr.
Presentation transcript:

Chris Meyer, York Mills C.I.

Richard Feynmann, from the introduction to his set of lectures for the first year physics survey course (180 students) at Caltech. The Feynmann Lectures in Physics (pg. 5) “The question, of course, is how well this experiment [his introductory course] has succeeded. My own point of view – which, however, does not seem to be shared by most of the people who worked with the students – is pessimistic. I don’t think I did very well by the students. When I look at the way the majority of the students handled the problems on the examinations, I think that the system is a failure. Of course, my friends point out to me that there were one or two dozen students who – very surprisingly – understood almost everything in all of the lectures, and who were quite active in working with the material and worrying about the main points in an excited and interested way. These people have now, I believe, a first-rate background in physics – and they are, after all, the ones I was trying to get at. But then, “The power of instruction is seldom of much efficacy except in those happy dispositions where it is almost superfluous.” (Gibbons)”

Why change? In a traditional lecture, how many students do we engage? What proportion of class time do students spend wrestling with physics ideas? How much writing or talking do they do about physics in their own words? How much feedback do students get to guide their understanding of physics concepts? What have they learned to help them solve more than a plug’n’chug type problem?

Universities noticed poor results from traditional teaching practices Student understanding explored and quantitatively measured, and practices refined Variety of techniques developed (Redish, Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite) Physics Education Research

Quantified Success From: Redish, Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite

The Social Learning Principle For most individuals, learning is most effectively carried out via social interactions

MIT – Introductory Physics Implementations

U of T Practicals Implementations

Show me the goods! Sounds great - how to pull this off?

Teacher lecture  Student group learning Cookbook activities / labs  Guided-inquiry activities Content: broad and shallow  Deep and focused Plug’n’chug problems  Context-rich problem solving Furious note-taking  Careful textbook reading Describing  Explaining Change! The good news: I have done most of this for you.

Less is More Less content is covered, but in more depth Each idea explored from many angles Research shows having fewer, but solid, pillars of understanding in no way harms their education Question yourself - What is the purpose of racing through what they don’t understand?

Target the Whole Class Traditional Teaching = Sputnik Model Find the best of the best fast and educate them as quickly as possible Reformed Teaching = Life Sciences Model An increasing number of disciplines need core physics knowledge and skills to prosper in 21 st century

From the Toronto Star

“The trouble with biologists in the academic world is they are trained to work on their own,” says Edwards. “Ray, by contrast, was trained as an engineer to work in teams, to problem solve.”

Group Work Structure the course around groups Provide explicit training in the good function and management of groups Provide opportunities for critical reflection of group work skills Devote energy to daily coaching of groups Get whiteboards

Group Structure Size: 3 people, rarely 4 or 2 Gender: MMM, FFF, FFM, rarely MMF Group Roles: Manager, Recorder, Speaker Composition: a strong, medium and weak student Rotation: Groups change every major unit (3-4 weeks) Seating: Always face-to-face Table human

Change Your Role Moderator and socratic “inquisitor” of group activities Facilitate class discussions Provide summaries, clarifications and tips

Transform the Lessons Lectures are largely gone or are at most 10 minute intros Guided-inquiry activities - introduce and explore new ideas Problem solving challenges - reinforce and apply concepts

The Physics Challenge

Redesign Homework Homework consists of: Textbook note-taking: extend or formalize understanding from the day’s activities Problems: a few well-chosen problems that further the understanding of concepts – limit the plug’n’chug A thing not worth doing is not worth doing well.

Reassess the Evaluation Evaluation must reflect the goals of the new course. Evaluate: basic skills quality of physics writing and explanations understanding of concepts genuine problem solving

The Measure of Success Much greater student engagement across all mark ranges 60 minutes of hard work per class Emphasis on writing Direct, face-to-face probing of student understanding

How to Start? For the full set of Gr. 12 activities and teacher resources, go to:

Resources The Physics Suite Cooperative Group Problem Solving nBook.html Workshop Physics Tutorials in Physics Sense-Making U of T Practicals Tutorials in Introductory Physics

How to Start? For the full set of class activities and teacher resources, go to: Try out individual activities Try one whole unit Go all the way! Arrange a visit Need help?