CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community-Based Reentry Programs Using Electronic Technology
Advertisements

Ex-Offenders and Housing
Oklahoma Department of Corrections DUI Offender Profile
Presented by: Elana M. Parker, M.Ed., M.L.A.P. Reentry Coordinator/Public Health Liaison Alabama Prisoner Reentry Initiative and Family Reintegration.
Juvenile Sentencing Options in Texas
Thinking Critically Questions Chapter Ten and Eleven.
Chapter 12 Preparing for Prisoner Reentry: Discretionary Parole and Mandatory Release.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
RECIDIVISM STUDY PROPOSAL MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AND REHABILITATION DETENTION SERVICES DETENTION SERVICES PRE-RELEASE AND REENTRY SERVICES.
Objective Point Base Classification Carol Mici Acting Deputy Commissioner Massachusetts Department of Correction.
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Offender Re-Entry: One Jail’s Perspective Montgomery County Department of Correction and Rehabilitation Wendy Miller-Cochran, LCSW-C Re-Entry Unit Social.
Charles E. Egeler Reception and Guidance Center (RGC)
Chapter 3 Jails ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Corrections: An Introduction, 2/e Seiter.
13 Prison and Jails.
Community Corrections.  Community Corrections are the subfield of corrections in which offenders are supervised and provided services outside jail or.
Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill CHAPTERCHAPTER EIGHTEIGHT.
Substance Abuse Treatment and Corrections
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
When Prisoners Come Home: Public Safety and Reintegration Challenges Joan Petersilia, Ph.D. Department of Criminology, Law & Society University of California,
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
State of Connecticut Department of Correction Juvenile Justice Planning and Implementation Committee Data Presentation Commissioner Theresa C. Lantz.
Table 1 Introduction  Overview  While predictors of recidivism and technical violations are often examined in probation and parole outcome research,
Chapter 40 Rehabilitation. Objectives Identify the major factors that affect criminal behavior Explain the role of correctional treatment programs in.
1 THE MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL Office of the Correctional Investigator Royal Canadian Mounted Police Solicitor General Department National Parole.
Population, Alternatives to Incarceration and Budget Information Population, Alternatives to Incarceration and Budget Information.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Special Prison Populations
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
Offender Supervision Control and Public Safety Issues.
An Age of hope: a National Effort for Corrections, Rehabilitation and Social Re-integration of Offenders THE OFFENDER REHABILITATION PATH (ORP) THE OFFENDER.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Define community corrections and discuss its role in the criminal justice system  LO2 Describe.
Missouri Re-Entry Program Analysis of offender release factors from 2005 to 2011 and selected demographics Boone County Prepared for Boone.
2 in 5 prison and jail inmates lack a high school diploma or its equivalent. Employment rates and earnings histories of people in prisons and jails are.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
Chapter 6 Postimprisonment Community Supervision.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
ASCA Performance Based Measures System Training Performance Standards, Measures, and Key Indicators ASCA 1.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Flowood Satellite Facility Kevin Jackson, Deputy Warden Restitution Program.
CANADA’S PRISON SYSTEM. Entering Prison Prison/Incarceration is a very polarizing issue. It is also a very political issue Conservative rhetoric- more.
Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.
Prison Rape Elimination Act The Prison and the Community.
Chapter 10 Looking Toward the Future Overcrowded Prisons, Drugs, Laws, and Race 7 million Americans under correctional supervision; 2 million in prison.
OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATION AR’s 503, 521 & 523. Learning Objectives What is objective classification? What is objective classification? What is the purpose.
Criminal Justice Policy & Planning Division STATE OF CONNECTICUT OFFICE OF POLICY & MANAGEMENT (OPM) 1 ANNUAL REPORTS.
 LO1 Describe the history of incarceration in Canada  LO2 Identify the goal of the correctional system in Canada  LO3 Describe correctional facilities.
Thinking About A Risk-Based Registry. Sex offender risk assessments are most often employed in applied forensic settings for purposes of decision-making.
Unit 8 Prof. Hulvat CJ240. Housekeeping…. We are winding down…. We are winding down…. Late work…. Late work…. Coming up in our final unit 9 Coming up.
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
CLASSIFICATION & RECEIVING OF OFFENDERS CLASSIFICATION DEFINED.
Prison/Incarceration is a very polarizing issue. It is also a very political issue Conservative rhetoric- more jails, more sentences, throw people in.
Charles E. Egeler Reception and Guidance Center (RGC)
Copyright 2011 Curriculum Technology, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
The Use of Prisons in America
Class Name, Instructor Name
CJ 130 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CJ 130 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
CJ 130 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Offender Management Plan
24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction

Introduction  Offender Management Plan  Classification or Assessment  TPAI  Offender Accountability Plan

DOC MISSION The Department of Correction shall protect the public, protect staff, and provide safe, secure and humane supervision of offenders with opportunities that support successful community reintegration.

OFFENDER MANAGEMENT PLAN Corrections to the Community Corrections to the Community I. INTRODUCTION II. THE INSTITUTIONAL PHASE A. Admissions B. Offender Accountability Plan C. Correctional Facilities 1. Classification 2. Treatment, Programs and Services 3. Community Release Outlook 4. Discharge Planning 5. Transitional Services III. COMMUNITY BASED PROGRAMMING IV. Future Initiatives V. Website Referrals VI. Question and Answer

INSTITUTIONAL PHASE ADMISSIONS A. ADMISSIONS Initial health, mental health screening within 24 hours Initial Risk and Treatment Needs Assessment Housing assignment based on management and treatment needs Orientation

CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES INSTITUTIONAL PHASE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES 1. Classification & Assessment 2. Treatment Programs and Services 3. Community Release Outlook 4. Discharge Planning 5. Transitional Services

Assessment- MacDougall- Walker  Adult male offenders w/ Parole sentence, over 2 years.  Female and offenders under 18 yrs to York and Manson Youth Inst.  10 Day process at Walker Building.  Seen by DOC and Board of Parole & Pardon staff.

Assessment Process  Risk assessment- classification scores TPAI  Medical & Mental Health evaulation  Offender Accountability Plan (OAP)  Addiction and Educational testing  Seen by Board of Parole & Pardon

CLASSIFICATION RISK SCORES  Escape Escape  Severity of Offense Severity of Offense  Violence History Violence History  Length of Confinement Length of Confinement  Detainers Detainers  Security Risk Group Security Risk Group  Disciplinary History Disciplinary History NEED SCORES  Medical  Mental Health  Education  Alcohol/Drug  Vocational  Sex Offender Treatment  Community Resource Need

Treatment and Program Assessment Instrument  Initially based on the Pennsylvania DOC approach.  Adapted to the availability and quality of data. sentencing to DOC Age at first DOC movement Number of Adult Incarcerations (DOC) Gender Violation of CJ Supervision (DOC) Convictions for Violence (Specified List)

TPAI QUESTIONS  Age at first admission?  Current age?  Number of convictions resulting in incarceration?  Current/History of violence resulting in incarceration?  Violated a period of Probation/Parole/ DOC supervision resulting in incarceration?  Gender?

Scoring the TPAI  Age points point points < 25 3 points  Gender Male = 1; Female = 0.  Prior Adult Convictions 0-1 = 1; 2+ = 1.  Any violent conviction = 1.  first Adult Conviction < 16 = 1.  Violated CJ Supervision = 1.

The Need for a Triage System  Systems such as Departments of Correction cannot provide all the assessments & programs it would ideally provide due to resource limitations.  A rational triage system needs to exist to allocate limited resources.  A good place to start is by sorting inmates by level of risk of recidivating.

Rate of New Prison Sentence by TPAI Score Recidivism, new prison sentence 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Months since 2004 release TPAI 1, new sentence TPAI 2, new sentence TPAI 3, new sentence

New Prison Sentence within 3 Years by TPAI Score TPAI GROUP n to Prison% 1 (0-3) % 2 (4-5) % 3 (6-8) % %

Violence & the TPAI TPAI ScorenViolent Crimes% 02800% % % % % % % % % Totals %

OFFENDER ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN  The OAP is a tool to identify and address specific needs to assist the offender in a successful reintegration to the community.  DOC and BOPP staff contract with offender  Includes behavioral and treatment expectations  Initiated at onset of sentence, monitored and modified throughout incarceration.

When and Where OAP  Sentences greater than 2 years, OAP initiated during assessment process at MWCI, York, MYI.  Offenders with sentences from 6 months to 2 years initiated at their permanent facility.

OAP- How many Programs  Greater than 10 years = Behavior modifications, job and minimal programming  Less than 10 years = up to 3 programs  A general referral for all offenders that do not have a GED, or high school diploma, and/or those with an addiction need should be made.

Questions and Answers