Educating for professional life Dr Mark J.P. Kerrigan, Dr Mark Clements, Dr Andrew Bond, Ms Federica Oradini, Ms Yanitsa Nedelcheva & Prof Gunter Saunders.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing PBL to a first-year curriculum: results and experiences Frank Forsythe [ project leader ] Malcolm Campbell Paul Keen.
Advertisements

Personal Development Plans (PDPs) Subject-specific PDPs in Economics.
Enhancing Induction: Principles for Improving the Student Experience Engaging the learner: Why did I get 37%? Professor Brenda Smith Goldsmiths, University.
1. 2 Personalising education Approx students at the University of Nottingham…. Approx students at the University of Nottingham…. …..must.
Demanding Questions and Difficult Answers Alan Maddocks Carol Newbold Loughborough University.
Self-directed Learners Dr Sara Preston.
Towards a Student led PDP Dr Nigel Richardson Natural, Geographical and Applied Sciences Natural, Geographical & Applied Sciences.
Pre-entry qualifications – staff perceptions versus reality Sarah Maguire Derry Corey.
A Masters in Education in eLearning The University of Hull.
Making Assessment Count (MAC) Consortium An informal group further developing and adapting best practice in the use of technology to enhance feedback.
Creating a dialogue over feedback between staff and students in the classroom and online Heather A. Thornton
Engaging Learners at Multiple Levels: Innovations to support the development of professional practice in e-learning Adrian Kirkwood, Robin Goodfellow &
The ENHANCE Project Intended to meet objectives of: -UWICs Technology Enhanced Learning Plan - Welsh Assembly Governments For our Futures document, which.
“The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be ignited.”
Making Assessment Count (e-Reflect) Mark Clements and Gunter Saunders University of Westminster Mark Kerrigan University of Greenwich.
Research Informed Teaching – a summary Dr Susan Hill and Assoc Prof Tony Fetherston.
‘Colin, I need to speak to you some time about my own CPD - I’ve been so busy that I just haven’t had time to think about myself… ’. ‘The most important.
1 Teaching and Learning Conference 2011 Evidencing Employability Skills: Introduction Dr Jessica Jung, Careers Service
Synergy in action: getting more than we anticipated Part 1 Diverse projects – common themes Part 2 Collaboration : What are the benefits and fears? Dominic.
An evaluation of the experience.  SHU Corporate plan aims for an excellent student experience. In practice this means:  An enhanced course focus.
Quality Enhancement and Communications The development and delivery of a research active curriculum will be promoted as a core and high quality activity.
Towards the Development of a Subject Specific Mathematics Teaching Component Michael Grove, Duncan Lawson and Bill Cox.
Engaging diverse student groups in higher education:- reflections on the impact of team teaching Wendy Yellowley and Marilyn Farmer Business School University.
E-assessment An introduction to assessment for learning.
“Learning to be lawyerly”
Faculty of Health & Social Care School of Nursing Shape your own future.
Personal Development Planning Margaret Harrison Associate Dean of Academic Frameworks.
Perceptions of the Role of Feedback in Supporting 1 st Yr Learning Jon Scott, Ruth Bevan, Jo Badge & Alan Cann School of Biological Sciences.
E-portfolios for PDP An overview of student and staff perceptions across subject areas Federica Oradini and Gunter Saunders Online Learning Development.
Online tutoring. Tutor Instructor Facilitator Moderator Subject specialist – Undertaking a role to support and enable students to learn online effectively.
Professional Skills Development
Lifelong Learning Personal Development Planning (PDP)
E_learning.
 E-learning forum Thursday 12 th May Introductions Daniel Clark University Learning Technologist Louise.
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
AN INTRODUCTION TO PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR POSTGRADUATES.
Personal/Professional Development Planning (PDP) Year one Mary McCartney September 2010.
Harnessing Technology: Meeting the needs of London’s Learners November 2006 Lewisham College Dame Ruth Silver.
Learning Development and Innovation Overview and Updates Steve Wyn Williams March 2013.
ULTSEC Innovation Fund Ruth Valentine School of Dental Sciences Simon Cotterill Learning and Teaching Support Unit, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
PG Cert HE Post Graduate Certificate in Higher Education Teaching.
Chemical Engineering curriculum renewal for the twenty first century: a work in progress Peter Holt, Jose Romagnoli and Ali Abbas.
Transforming lives through learning Profiling Education Scotland.
Making Assessment Count (MAC) Consortium An informal group further developing and adapting best practice in the use of technology to enhance feedback.
Key features of the University of Manchester Professor Cathy Cassell Deputy Director (Academic) Sarah Featherstone Head of Undergraduate Services Original.
Building An Academic Career
From an e-portfolio to a PLS: Integrating an e-portfolio into PgC in Learning & Teaching in HE. Sarah Chesney Centre for the Development Of Learning &
Been There Done That: Peer group interventions for student retention Sue Will : Brighton Business School 2 nd May 2013 University of Aberdeen Symposium:
Learning From Assessment: Evaluating the Benefits of DALI (Diagnostic Assessment Learning Interface) Hershbinder Mann & Guinevere Glasfurd-Brown, University.
Leeds University Library Implementing an information literacy audit in the School of Healthcare, Leeds University Alison Lahlafi, Faculty Team Librarian.
Learning Teaching and Assessment at University of Worcester Dr John Peters NTF Academic Development and Practice.
Improving Academic Feedback - Turning the ship around with the power of 1000 students David Hope
Redevelopment of an e-learning module to provide supported open learning Alan Boddy.
Examination Feedback Maximum Impact, Minimum Cost? Paul L. Latreille Seminar January 24 th 2011.
Alessio Peluso 1 Critical evaluation of the module ‘Introduction to Engineering Thermo Fluid Dynamics’ First Steps in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.
D4 Curriculum Design Workshop Liz Bennett and Sue Folley Discover - Dream - Design - Deliver.
Feedback in University Teaching Prof. Arif Khurshed Division of Accounting and Finance.
Learning materials Assessments Learning guidance Student records Personal finance Campus information Social information Student services Timetables.
Taking Learning Development outside of the university Catherine McConnell, University of Brighton.
IT&L Training Introduction for New Observers. Domestics Curriculum manager for improving teaching & learning Tea and.
D EVELOPING A COHERENT AND PROGRESSIVE APPROACH TO CAREERS EDUCATION IN HE: A CASE STUDY Katharine Price Edwards and Shawna McCoy.
Pedagogical aspects in assuring quality in virtual education environments University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Enhancing Students’ Collaborative Learning Through Podcasts Libby Rothwell Kingston University Dr. Ming Nie University of Leicester.
Personal Development from a Student Perspective: Introducing and using the NUS Personal Development Benchmarking Tool Kate Little Senior Project Officer.
Personal Learning Planning Learning Logs and Pupil Achievement Folders
Developing the reflective learner -
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
Sarah Lawther, Nottingham Trent University
A Structured Conversation: Enabling and Measuring Responsive Pedagogy Dr Christine Couper & Dr Cathy Molesworth Planning and Statistics, January 2018.
A Moodle-based Peer Assessment Tool
Presentation transcript:

educating for professional life Dr Mark J.P. Kerrigan, Dr Mark Clements, Dr Andrew Bond, Ms Federica Oradini, Ms Yanitsa Nedelcheva & Prof Gunter Saunders e-Reflect, a System for Making Assessment Count through Reflection

educating for professional life UK University Context I National Committee of Inquiry in Higher Education (Dearing and Garrick reports) Has led to a focus on transferable skills Often in practice linked to individual modules Seen by many academics as an imposition How can the curriculum make room? Are there bigger underlying but linked problems?

educating for professional life UK University Context II UK students feel they are assessed too much that they do not receive enough feedback UK lecturers feel students do not use feedback Mass HE means that students can be isolated And the same can also happen to staff Staff/student differences and separation significant

‘Once I have read the feedback I understand why I got the grade I did’. educating for professional life ‘I would learn more if I received more feedback’.

‘I use the feedback to go back over what I have done in the assignments’. educating for professional life ‘I tend to only read marks’.

educating for professional life Can the feedback/assessment issue be addressed and in turn help to deliver PDP? In the rest of this presentation: I hope to be able to show you how students can be encouraged to make better use of the feedback that they receive on their subject specific work and in so doing draw on a wider community of scholars to inform their development in their subject as well as mature in relation to the key transferable skills they will need to be effective workers and lifelong learners.

educating for professional life In this presentation: I hope to be able to show you how students can be encouraged to make better use of the feedback that they receive on their subject specific work and in so doing draw on a wider community of scholars to inform their development in their subject as well as mature in relation to the key transferable skills they will need to be effective workers and lifelong learners.

educating for professional life Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Students enrol on a degree Degree with a Fantastic sounding name

educating for professional life Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW

educating for professional life Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW

educating for professional life Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW Team Student CW

educating for professional life What holds a degree together? The motivation and willingness of a student to succeed Staff that support the students throughout their learning The feedback that students receive on their work Personal tutors

educating for professional life The e-Reflect Project

educating for professional life Aims & Objectives The development of a student-centred, Web 2.0 process for reflection on feedback (eReflect) Integration of eReflect with tutoring process thus opening a learning dialogue Foster a ‘joined-up’ virtual and physical learning environment, which will focus attention on individual student needs thus supporting them to become better lifelong learners

educating for professional life The eReflect process eReflect uses the SOS model of feedback whereby students receive Subject, Operational and Strategic feedback for each piece of coursework. Students complete a piece of course work (1) that is then graded and feedback written on the script (2). Following reading their feedback students complete and an online reflective questionnaire (3) that culminates in an ed report (4). Students then use this report to complete their reflective blog (5) that is then read and commented on by their personal tutor (6).

educating for professional life The eReflect process eReflect uses the SOS model of feedback whereby students receive Subject, Operational and Strategic feedback for each piece of coursework. Students complete a piece of course work (1) that is then graded and feedback written on the script (2). Following reading their feedback students complete and an online reflective questionnaire (3) that culminates in an ed report (4). Students then use this report to complete their reflective blog (5) that is then read and commented on by their personal tutor (6).

educating for professional life The eReflect process eReflect uses the SOS model of feedback whereby students receive Subject, Operational and Strategic feedback for each piece of coursework. Students complete a piece of course work (1) that is then graded and feedback written on the script (2). Following reading their feedback students complete and an online reflective questionnaire (3) that culminates in an ed report (4). Students then use this report to complete their reflective blog (5) that is then read and commented on by their personal tutor (6).

educating for professional life The eReflect process eReflect uses the SOS model of feedback whereby students receive Subject, Operational and Strategic feedback for each piece of coursework. Students complete a piece of course work (1) that is then graded and feedback written on the script (2). Following reading of the feedback students complete an online reflective questionnaire (3) that culminates in an ed report (4). Students then use this report to complete their reflective blog (5) that is then read and commented on by their personal tutor (6).

educating for professional life The eReflect process eReflect uses the SOS model of feedback whereby students receive Subject, Operational and Strategic feedback for each piece of coursework. Students complete a piece of course work (1) that is then graded and feedback written on the script (2). Following reading of the feedback students complete an online reflective questionnaire (3) that culminates in an ed report (4). Students then use this report to complete their reflective blog (5) that is then read and commented on by their personal tutor (6).

educating for professional life The eReflect process eReflect uses the SOS model of feedback whereby students receive Subject, Operational and Strategic feedback for each piece of coursework. Students complete a piece of course work (1) that is then graded and feedback written on the script (2). Following reading of the feedback students complete an online reflective questionnaire (3) that culminates in an ed report (4). Students then use this report to complete their reflective blog (5) that is then read and commented on by their personal tutor (6).

educating for professional life The eReflect process eReflect uses the SOS model of feedback whereby students receive Subject, Operational and Strategic feedback for each piece of coursework. Students complete a piece of course work (1) that is then graded and feedback written on the script (2). Following reading of the feedback students complete an online reflective questionnaire (3) that culminates in an ed report (4). Students then use this report to complete their reflective blog (5) that is then commented on by their personal tutor (6).

educating for professional life The Reflective Questionnaire Workload and time management Efficiency/effectiveness of work approach Motivation Direct learning strategy Awareness of available assessment guidance Understanding of feedback received Placing feedback in context Questions designed to focus student on:

educating for professional life The Learning Journal (Blog) Reflection on Subject and Operational feedback Identify key strengths Share grades and performance with tutor Identify areas for improvement Develop a strategy for learning Increase integration Develop as a life-long reflective learner Designed to focus student and act as a basis for dialogue

The eReflect Pilot 77students and 9 staff in Biosciences Average of 9 different assessments over the semester Use a combination of diagnostic questionnaire and reflective blogs Not compulsory Pilot just come to an end ~40 have so far participated educating for professional life

Response to the eReflect Pilot Active participants very positive about –The process –The benefits of engaging Overall participation rate lower than hoped for –It was a ‘voluntary’ scheme –It started mid way through an academic year educating for professional life

Response to the e-Reflect Pilot educating for professional life

Next Steps All students on the Life Sciences degree Participation integrated into curriculum Tutors given time allocation for e-Reflect e-Reflect now linked to students records SQL database provides ‘robust’ application e-Reflect becoming a corporate application educating for professional life

Summary E-Reflect Helps students use feedback in a structured way Can give tutors information to help guide the student Can personalise the learning experience Builds a corpus of reflective evidence of progress Adds breadth to PDP via close links to the subject educating for professional life

JISC (funding body) University of Westminster TWOLER – JISC funded project educating for professional life Acknowledgements