Survey Data Summary Data Compiled Fall 2007

Graduating Seniors Survey Data UCF Items of Interest – Positive Survey ItemCEDUCF Overall undergraduate experience97.5%94.6% Academic experience97.1%95.3% Challenged to do your best81.9%72.2% Quality of other undergraduates93.8%89.5% Responsiveness to student academic problems87.4%83.1% Recommend UCF to a friend or relative90.2%87.0% In major, courses needed were available81.5%67.0% In major, classes were too large [INVERSE SCALE]10.0%18.1% Academic advising in major84.1%82.1% Academic advising – transfer84.0%81.6% In general, advisors were helpful83.3%77.7%

Graduating Seniors Survey Data UCF Items of Interest – Positive (cont.) Survey Items on Personal GrowthCEDUCF Writing effectively92.3%90.0% Speaking effectively94.4%91.1% Listening more closely to others93.1%91.0% Organizing time effectively88.0%85.8% Ethical practices92.7%88.5% Professional practices95.3%90.9% Preparation to pursue life-long learning94.4%89.2%

Graduating Seniors Survey Data UCF Items of Interest – Opportunities Survey ItemsCEDUCF In my major, I was provided opportunities to develop appropriate computer skills 65.1%68.7% Personal growth: improve math skills77.2%78.2% Personal growth: Thinking logically/resolving analytical problems 92.2%92.7% Personal growth: Respecting different philosophies and cultures 90.8%90.2% Drop and Add procedure80.3%62.3% Financial assistance58.6%62.3% Quality of UCF catalog76.9%84.3%

Graduating Seniors & Graduating Graduate Student Surveys, Program Specific Addenda Response Scale 5 = Strongly Agree 5 = Strongly Agree 4 = Agree 4 = Agree 3 = Neutral 3 = Neutral 2 = Disagree 2 = Disagree 1 = Strongly Disagree 1 = Strongly Disagree Typical question asked for candidate’s agreement with adequacy of preparation regarding variable X. Positive response percentage = % combined “5” and “4”

Graduating Seniors Survey Data Program Specific Addenda Items of Interest Positive Ratings for FEAPs Assessment88.4%83.5% 2. Communication92.5%85.2% 3. Continuous Improvement90.8%82.6% 4. Critical Thinking92.4%82.6% 5. Diversity89.5%88.1% 6. Ethics90.7%82.7% 7. Human Development & Learning89.4%81.5% 8. Knowledge of Subject Matter91.3%82.2% 9. Learning Environments90.9%83.4% 10. Planning90.1%85.1% 11. Role of the Teacher89.4%84.5% 12. Technology82.6%75.2%

Graduating Seniors & Graduating Graduate Student Surveys Data Program Specific Addenda Items of Interest Opportunities for Improvement GSS: Field experiences other than internships73.3%75.1% GSS: ESOL preparation75.3%68.1% GSS: Portfolio28.2%32.2% GGSS: Portfolio54.5%26.7%

Graduating Seniors Survey Data Qualitative Items of Interest In what way did the CED best meet your expectations? In what way did the CED best meet your expectations? Professors/faculty (22.7%) Professors/faculty (22.7%) Professional preparation (22.7%) Professional preparation (22.7%) Personal satisfaction (12.9%) Personal satisfaction (12.9%) Quality of courses (10.4%) Quality of courses (10.4%) What one change would you suggest to improve CED? What one change would you suggest to improve CED? Improve LiveText/e-portfolio design (19.4%) Improve LiveText/e-portfolio design (19.4%) Curricular changes (more flexibility; classroom management) (18.8%) Curricular changes (more flexibility; classroom management) (18.8%) How did your experiences in CED assist you in becoming a reflective educator? How did your experiences in CED assist you in becoming a reflective educator? Promoted the importance of reflection (21.9%) Promoted the importance of reflection (21.9%) Prepared me for the profession (14.2%) Prepared me for the profession (14.2%) Provided personal satisfaction from reflective practice (11.6%) Provided personal satisfaction from reflective practice (11.6%) Increased the value of internships (11.0%) Increased the value of internships (11.0%)

Alumni Survey Data % of Respondents that Strongly Agree or Agree They Were Well Prepared in Each of the Following Areas Positive Ratings for FEAPs (n=42) (n=23) 1. Assessment90.5%87.0% 2. Communication95.2%95.7% 3. Continuous Improvement95.2%100.0% 4. Critical Thinking83.3%100.0% 5. Diversity97.6%95.7% 6. Ethics97.6%91.3% 7. Human Development & Learning92.9%100.0% 8. Knowledge of Subject Matter95.2%91.7% 9. Learning Environments97.6%95.7% 10. Planning88.1%100.0% 11. Role of the Teacher95.2%91.3% 12. Technology92.9%91.3% ESOL Preparation81.0%77.3%

Employer Survey Data % of Graduates Rated Above Average or Excellent Positive Ratings for FEAPs (n=173) (n=122) 1. Assessment76.0%77.5% 2. Communication77.8%81.7% 3. Continuous Improvement80.8%80.3% 4. Critical Thinking73.8%73.2% 5. Diversity85.2%81.4% 6. Ethics87.7%85.5% 7. Human Development & Learning77.8%71.8% 8. Knowledge of Subject Matter79.5%78.9% 9. Learning Environments80.6%75.4% 10. Planning77.6%79.7% 11. Role of the Teacher84.2%78.9% 12. Technology78.0%81.7%

Employer Survey CED Aggregated % of Graduates Rated “Above Average” or “Excellent” Communication skills: 81.9% Communication skills: 81.9% ID/remediate reading/computational problems: 79.8% ID/remediate reading/computational problems: 79.8% Use/integrate technology: 76.0% Use/integrate technology: 76.0% Sunshine state standards: 81.3% Sunshine state standards: 81.3% Classroom management: 79.3% Classroom management: 79.3% Overall performance rating: 78.9% Overall performance rating: 78.9% Comparatively well prepared: 90.6% Comparatively well prepared: 90.6% Would hire other UCF grads: 99.4% Would hire other UCF grads: 99.4%