Understanding Data for Beginners School Community Council Training October 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

Bureau of Indian Education
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
English Language Learners Washoe County School District Janeen A. Kelly Washoe County Schools Director English Language Learners.
Standards help teachers ensure their students have the skills and knowledge they need by providing clear goals for student learning. Common standards.
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
School Performance Framework (SPF). Purpose of SPF The School Performance Framework (SPF) is a comprehensive system to help schools focus on strengths.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability
Data Disaggregation: For Data Driven Decision Making By Ron Grimes: Special Assistant to the Assistant Superintendent Office of Career and Technical Accountability.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Van Hise Elementary School Improvement Plan (SIP) UPDATE October 29, 2013.
K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CST DATA ANALYSIS STAR RESULTS Presented by Audrey Lee Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology 10 September.
California State University, Long Beach Long Beach City College Cerritos College Collaboration Between the University and Community College to recruit.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
How are we doing? Where are we going? How are we doing? Where are we going?
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Ware County High School State of the School Address Dr. Tim Dixon Dr. Tim Dixon.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Pathways to Graduation for English Language Learners Council of the Great City Schools Annual Conference October 27, 2011 Teresa Walter – Director, Office.
Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2015.
Sonoraville Elementary Parent Meeting February 3, 2015.
Welcome to the District! Sue Chandler, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools.
Vae View Elementary School Improvement Plan
Mini-Project #2 Quality Criteria Review of an Assessment Rhonda Martin.
Office of District and School Accountability and Program Management Larry Smith and Taylor L. Young, Ph.D. 1.
School Improvement Plan Central Elementary Vanessa S. McAllister, Principal Margaret Lewis, Assistant Principal RaeAnn Whiteside, Literacy Coach.
Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 
PED School Grade Reports (with thanks to Valley High School) ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager.
Using Assessments to Plan for Learning MEAP and MME Data Collection.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
TACOMA PUBLIC SCHOOLS- RESEACH AND EVALUATION Webinar for Tacoma Principals May 7, 2014 (Thank you to the State Board of Education for some of the slides.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
Tift County High School ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING SY16 Tap Knowledge – Capture Wisdom - Harness Talents -Sculpt Minds.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Annual Report to the Public CENTERPOINT OCTOBER 10, 2016 SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
UNBRIDLED LEARNING: College/Career Ready for All
Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools
Administrative Council September 10, 2012
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
Annual WBWF Student Achievement Report 2017
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Marshall Public SchoolS MCA Results
Phi Delta Kappa October 4, 2012.
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Texas State Accountability
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
An Introduction to the Future Ready PA Index
College/Career Ready for All
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
T = Texas A = Academic P = Performance R = Report
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
March 2019 GA Milestones 3rd, 4th, and 5th.
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Data for Beginners School Community Council Training October 2013

Why we use data

 Tells a story  Identifies questions  Identifies answers  Gives context for understanding  Minimizes common excuses  Provides accountability  Informs practice  Drives change

Two key types of data Demographic DataAchievement Data

School Demographic Data  School size  Number of students  Number of teachers/staff  Class size  Grade Bands  K-6, 7-9,  K-5, 6-8, 9-12  K-6, 7-12  Other  School location  Attendance/mobility  Teacher qualifications

Student Demographic Data  Race and Ethnicity  English Fluency  ESL = English as a second language  ELL = English language learner  LEP = Limited English proficient  Economics  Economically disadvantaged = qualifies for free or reduced lunch under federal guidelines  Ability  Gifted/talented  Special education  504

Race and Ethnicity

USOE Published Demographics

Student Achievement Data Mastery (Location)Growth (Direction)

Mastery Data (State)  State Testing  Criterion Referenced Tests (CRT)  Grades 3-12  Language Arts, Math, and Science  Direct Writing Assessment (DWA)  Grades 5 & 8  Writing  DIBELS  Grades 1-3  Reading  UALPA  Grades K-12  English Language Proficiency

Mastery Data (Davis District)  District Testing  Criterion Referenced Tests (CRT)  Grades 1-2  Language Arts and Math  Kindergarten Assessment  Language Arts and Math  DIBELS  Grades K-6  Reading  Other Assessments  District common assessments  School common assessments

Growth Measures  Student Growth Percentile (State)

Growth Measures  Bin Percentile Rank (Davis District) 2011 Test Scores (or score history) 2012 Test Scores Bin 1Bin 2Bin 3Bin 4Bin 5Bin 6Bin 7Bin 8Bin 9 Lowest Bin 5 Highest 60%40% BPR = 60

College and Career Readiness Data  Graduation Rate  New federal formula  AP Credit  Concurrent Enrollment  International Baccalaureate  ACT Scores

School Environment Data  State Measures  SHARP surveys  Accreditation  District Measures  Indicators of School Quality (ISQ)  Parent/student surveys of teachers (classroom environment)  Parent/student surveys of principals (school environment)

USOE Published Achievement Data

Things to Remember  Data only tells part of the whole story.  We should look for trends not snapshots.  Data generates more questions than answers.  Data must be well understood in order to generate conclusions.

Thank You! Logan T. Toone, PhD Director of Assessment, Research, & Evaluation