1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Grades Model and Historical Background
Advertisements

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Senate Bill 1908 Beginning in the school year, 50% of the school’s grade will be based on the existing FCAT- related factors and the remaining.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
School Grades, Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Reporting, and Alternative School Improvement Ratings Florida Charter School Conference 2010 Presenter: Edward.
Test Chairpersons Meeting September A ccountability R esearch and M easurement  On February 28, 2012, the State Board of Education considered.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.
Rule Development Workshop: School Grades Rule 6A , Florida Administrative Code August 13, 2013 Florida Department of Education Division of Accountability,
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31,
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
A Survival Guide 13/23/2010.  Today’s Presentation  Presenters & Support Personnel  Handouts  Questions  Follow-Up School Visits 3/23/
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
1 Putting It All Together Training August 18, 2009 School Name (and motto or theme) ODMS PD SIP.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update Florida Charter School Conference November 20, 2014.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
1 School Grades Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida Department of Education Accountability Research and Measurement Florida’s School Grading System Rule.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Student Services Meeting September 2012 Gisela Feild 1.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C. Dr. Karen Schafer October, 2010 Secondary Curriculum Contact Meeting Adapted.
1.  Non-FCAT Components  Review FCAT Components 2.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
Overview “School Grading Rule” 6A Proposed CS/SB 1522 ESEA Waiver CAO March 2012.
1 School Grades and AYP for New Accountability Coordinators.
CTE and the A-F Report Card Tommi Leach and Kelly Arrington, ODCTE.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Accountability Update School Grade Changes Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Accountability and Testing March 14, 2012.
Florida’s School Grading System Updates Florida Organization of Instructional Leaders (FOIL) Fall Conference 2013 Lake Mary, Florida November 14, 2013.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
Understanding our 2012 High School Grade 1Spruce Creek High.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
1 Proposed Changes to School Grades for and Beyond.
Testing and Accountability Update July, 2010 Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Testing and Accountability.
Accountability and School Grades FY 16 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting March 17, 2016 Everglades Preparatory Academy.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
Revising High School Grading Requirements Revision of Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Accountability and School Grades FY 17 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting August 24, 2016 Pew Center.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Accountability Update
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component February 2016 Principals Meeting February 2016 Gisela Feild Assessment, Research.
FY 11 School Grade Calculation
FY12 Accountability Updates
Overview of School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress,
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
AYP and Report Card.
Revising High School Grading Requirements
Accountability Presentation
Secondary Data Presentation
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress

2 School Grades Schools are graded based on the percentage of students who reach specific criteria in 8 measures. Level 3 and above in reading (grades 3-10) Level 3 and above in math (grades 3-10) Essay Score 4.0 and above in writing (grades 4, 8, and 10) Level 3 and above in science (grades 5, 8, and 11) Achieving High Standards Learning Gains Learning gains in reading (grades 3-10) Learning gains in math (grades 3-10) Learning gains of lowest 25% in reading (grades 3-10) Learning gains of lowest 25% in math (grades 3-10)

3 How Are Learning Gains Defined? 1. Improving from one FCAT Achievement Level to the next (example: Level 3 to Level 4) 2. Maintaining FCAT Achievement Level 3, 4, or 5 3. Students remaining FCAT Levels 1 or 2 and achieving more than one year’s growth on the FCAT developmental scale

4 Developmental Scale Score Learning Gains Cut Points Grade LevelReadingMath 3 to to to to to to to Students must register a gain of one point more than the numbers listed above.

5 Learning Gains Students who drop a level (Level 4 to 3 or Level 5 to 4) are not counted as a learning gain Students who drop a level (Level 4 to 3 or Level 5 to 4) are not counted as a learning gain Retained students who are Level 1 or Level 2 must improve at least one level in order to be counted as a learning gain Retained students who are Level 1 or Level 2 must improve at least one level in order to be counted as a learning gain

6 Learning Gains (FAA) Learning gains for students who take the Florida Alternate Assessment (FAA) are included in School Grade beginning in Learning gains for students who take the Florida Alternate Assessment (FAA) are included in School Grade beginning in The FAA has nine separate performance levels, ranging from 1 to 9, with 4 or higher equaling proficient. The FAA has nine separate performance levels, ranging from 1 to 9, with 4 or higher equaling proficient. A learning gain is defined as an improvement in performance level or the maintenance of a proficient level. A learning gain is defined as an improvement in performance level or the maintenance of a proficient level.

7 Science and Writing Schools with less than 10 students will still receive the district average. Schools with less than 10 students will still receive the district average. –In the past schools with less than 30 students received the district average. FCAT writing essays will be scored by one reader. FCAT writing essays will be scored by one reader. Schools will be accountable for the percentage of students scoring a 4 and above. AYP will remain 3.0 and above Schools will be accountable for the percentage of students scoring a 4 and above. AYP will remain 3.0 and above

8 FCAT Grade Scale GradePoints A B C D F0-394

9 Adequate Progress At least 50% of students in the bottom 25% must demonstrate learning gains in reading and math “A” Schools Must register adequate progress in the current school year Must register adequate progress in the current school year “B” and “C” Schools Must register adequate progress in the current or prior school year Must register adequate progress in the current or prior school year Failure to make Adequate Progress for two consecutive years results in reduction of letter grade, regardless of number of points earned.

10 Adequate Progress Exception A, B, and C schools that do not meet the 50% learning gains requirement will not be penalized one letter grade if: 40% or more of lowest quartile students make gains in Reading and Mathematics and this percentage is at least a 1 percentage point increase from the prior year Less than 40% of lowest quartile students make gains in Reading and Mathematics and this percentage is at least a 5 percentage point increase from the prior year

11 New High School Grading Beginning in schools serving a 9-12 population will be graded based: Beginning in schools serving a 9-12 population will be graded based: –50% on the 8 FCAT components and –50% on the school’s: graduation rate, graduation rate, performance and participation in accelerated courses, performance and participation in accelerated courses, graduation rate of at-risk students, graduation rate of at-risk students, postsecondary readiness, postsecondary readiness, and growth and decline in the data components from year to year. and growth and decline in the data components from year to year. Performance on state end-of-course assessments when they become available. Performance on state end-of-course assessments when they become available.

12 Graduation Rate Students Not Included in the Calculation Graduates (4 year) Non-Graduates Students who transfer to: Other schools (public, private, or DJJ facilities) Other schools (public, private, or DJJ facilities) Home-education Home-education Adult education Adult education Deceased students Deceased students Standard Diploma Standard Diploma Special Diploma Special Diploma Dropouts Dropouts Certificate of Completion Certificate of Completion GED recipients GED recipients Continuing enrollees who are not on-time graduates Continuing enrollees who are not on-time graduates

13 Participation in Accelerated Coursework For a school to receive credit for participation in an accelerated course that ends in an exam (e.g., AP, IB, AICE), the student must take the exam. For a school to receive credit for participation in an accelerated course that ends in an exam (e.g., AP, IB, AICE), the student must take the exam. For dual enrollment, a student must earn a grade in the course for a school to receive credit for participation. For dual enrollment, a student must earn a grade in the course for a school to receive credit for participation. For industry certification, a student must have taken an industry certification exam on the SBE approved “Industry Certification Funding List” for the year. For industry certification, a student must have taken an industry certification exam on the SBE approved “Industry Certification Funding List” for the year. NumeratorDenominator 11 th -12 th graders who took an accelerated exam or dual enrollment course AND 9 th -10 th graders who passed an accelerated exam or dual enrollment course (weighted) All 11 th -12 th graders

14 Performance in Accelerated Coursework Students will receive weight based on the number of postsecondary courses for which the student earns credit: Students will receive weight based on the number of postsecondary courses for which the student earns credit: –Dual Enrollment- a C or better equals credit in one course. –Industry Certification- 1 or multiple successful outcomes based on statewide articulation agreements ( –AP, IB, and AICE- determined by the Credit-by-Exam Equivalencies List. ( NumeratorDenominator Number of successful outcomes in accelerated coursework by a student (9 th through 12 th grade) All 11 th -12 th graders who took an accelerated exam or dual enrollment course AND 9 th -10 th graders who passed an accelerated exam or dual enrollment course

15 Weighting for Participation and Performance Schools will earn weighted credit for participation and performance based on this weighting system to accommodate multiple enrollments or successful completions: WeightOutcome Exam/Course Exams/Courses Exams/Courses No cap is proposed for participation or performance. That is, schools will earn an increasing amount of credit for those students who take/pass increasing numbers of accelerated courses/exams. One tenth of a point will be added for each course/ successful outcome for a student.

16 Postsecondary Readiness NumeratorDenominator Number of students scoring “ready” on SAT, ACT, and/or CPT any time during their high school careers On-time high school graduates who scored a Level 3 or higher on the 10 th Grade FCAT Separate Measures for Reading and Math. Separate Measures for Reading and Math. If a student takes multiple tests (ACT, SAT, or CPT), the student’s highest score by subtest is used. If a student takes multiple tests (ACT, SAT, or CPT), the student’s highest score by subtest is used. The scores used to define “ready” are: The scores used to define “ready” are:ReadingMathematicsACT1819 SAT CPT8372

17 Graduation Rate for At-Risk Students Use same method of calculation used for overall graduation rate calculation. Use same method of calculation used for overall graduation rate calculation. Subset of overall cohort – include only those students that earned a Level 2 or lower on both FCAT Reading and Math in 8 th Grade. Subset of overall cohort – include only those students that earned a Level 2 or lower on both FCAT Reading and Math in 8 th Grade. If a school does not have at least 10 students in that subgroup, the school’s overall graduation rate will be substituted for this measure. If a school does not have at least 10 students in that subgroup, the school’s overall graduation rate will be substituted for this measure.

18 Growth or Decline in components Schools earn an escalating number of points based on the magnitude of their improvement. Schools earn an escalating number of points based on the magnitude of their improvement. Additional points would be awarded based on the number of points the school improved (growth from prior year); up to 20 additional points. Additional points would be awarded based on the number of points the school improved (growth from prior year); up to 20 additional points. Schools will lose 5 points if a component declines by 10 percentage points or more. Schools will lose 5 points if a component declines by 10 percentage points or more. EXAMPLES EXAMPLES GROWTH: A school’s acceleration performance improves from 25% to 32%; the school earns an additional 7 points resulting in a total of 39 points (32 + 7). GROWTH: A school’s acceleration performance improves from 25% to 32%; the school earns an additional 7 points resulting in a total of 39 points (32 + 7). DECLINE: A school’s acceleration performance declines from 30% to 20%; the school would lose an additional 5 points resulting in a total of 15 points (20 – 5). DECLINE: A school’s acceleration performance declines from 30% to 20%; the school would lose an additional 5 points resulting in a total of 15 points (20 – 5).

19 Additional Requirement Law stipulates that in order for a school that earns enough points for an “A” to be awarded an “A”, the school’s at-risk graduation rate must meet a certain threshold to ensure “adequate progress.” Law stipulates that in order for a school that earns enough points for an “A” to be awarded an “A”, the school’s at-risk graduation rate must meet a certain threshold to ensure “adequate progress.” Threshold: Threshold: –75%; or 1 percentage point improvement over the prior year if percentage is within 10 points of the target 1 percentage point improvement over the prior year if percentage is within 10 points of the target 5 percentage point improvement over the prior year if percentage is beyond 10 points of the target 5 percentage point improvement over the prior year if percentage is beyond 10 points of the target This requirement is akin to the current learning gains requirement for the Low 25%. This requirement is akin to the current learning gains requirement for the Low 25%. –If a school fails to make adequate progress for the low quartile and the at-risk graduation rate the school’s grade will only be reduced once.

20 High School Grading Matrix GRADUATIONACCELERATIONREADINESS Overall Rate 200Participation 175 (in ) Performance on Reading 100 At-Risk Rate 100Performance 125 (in ) Performance on Math 100 Total Graduation Points 300 Total Acceleration Points 300 Total Readiness Points 200 Total Points Possible 800 Things to Note All components are percentages. Those components weighted twice as much as others reflect a calculated percentage that is doubled (e.g., School X has a 75 points for graduation rate – School X earns 150 points (75*2) for that component). Over a 3 year period, the weighting of acceleration will be adjusted so that eventually both participation and performance will be weighted equally (150 points each). If a school earns points in excess of the total for a particular component – through the growth adjustment or the escalating weights in the acceleration components – the school will receive the maximum points for that component.

21 Bonus Points (High Schools) High Schools are eligible for 10 bonus points added to their total school grade points, if at least half the 11th and 12th grade students in the school retaking the FCAT meet the graduation requirement (score of 300). Student who meet the graduation requirement with an ACT or SAT concordant score are not included. High Schools are eligible for 10 bonus points added to their total school grade points, if at least half the 11th and 12th grade students in the school retaking the FCAT meet the graduation requirement (score of 300). Student who meet the graduation requirement with an ACT or SAT concordant score are not included.

22 HIGH SCHOOL GRADING SCALE Current 800- point scale New 1600-point scale A B C D F Less Than 395 Less Than 790

23 Participation Rates “A” Schools Must test at least 95% of students Must test at least 95% of students “B”, “C”, and “D” Schools Must test at least 90% of students Must test at least 90% of students Failure to test at least 90% of students results in an “I” pending investigation and may result in a lowering of the letter grade. Failure to test at least 90% of students results in an “I” pending investigation and may result in a lowering of the letter grade.

24 Who Counts for School Grades? Students enrolled during the October and February FTE surveys Students enrolled during the October and February FTE surveys Included for all components: Included for all components: –Standard Curriculum Students –ESE: Gifted, Hospital/Homebound, Speech Impaired –LEP: Enrolled in a ESOL program for more than 2 years prior to testing Other ESE and LEP (less than two years) categories included in percent tested and learning gains. Other ESE and LEP (less than two years) categories included in percent tested and learning gains.

25 No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Includes all students who took the FCAT and were enrolled during the October and February FTE surveys Includes all students who took the FCAT and were enrolled during the October and February FTE surveys Participation is computed based on students enrolled during the February FTE survey who are still enrolled during testing Participation is computed based on students enrolled during the February FTE survey who are still enrolled during testing Performance by Subgroup Performance by Subgroup –Total –White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian –Economically Disadvantaged –Limited English Proficiency –Students With Disabilities

26 Subgroups Must test at least 95% of each subgroup with 30 or more students. Must test at least 95% of each subgroup with 30 or more students. Subgroups count for proficiency if: Subgroups count for proficiency if: –30 students and more than 15% of the school’s tested population (valid scores) OR –100 students (valid scores) Students can be in more than one subgroup Students can be in more than one subgroup All students included in Total All students included in Total

27 ELL Subgroup FDOE has recently received approval for ELL students enrolled for less than one year to be exempted from the proficiency calculation for AYP. FDOE has recently received approval for ELL students enrolled for less than one year to be exempted from the proficiency calculation for AYP. These students will still be included in participation for AYP. These students will still be included in participation for AYP. –To count towards participation in Mathematics a student must take the FCAT –To count towards participation in Reading a student must take the FCAT and/or CELLA The first year ELL students will be included in Writing and Graduation rate. The first year ELL students will be included in Writing and Graduation rate.

28 Annual Raising of the Bar

29 Three Ways to Make AYP 2%

30 1. Meeting Standard Criteria Each Subgroup: Each Subgroup: –95% of students tested in Reading and Math –79% at level 3 or above in Reading –80% at level 3 or above in Math Total Group: Total Group: –1% increase OR 90% in Writing scores at 3.0+ –2% increase OR 85% in graduation rate School Grade “A”, “B”, or “C” School Grade “A”, “B”, or “C”

31 2. Safe Harbor Total and all subgroup participation rates and School Grade requirements must be met. Total and all subgroup participation rates and School Grade requirements must be met. Subgroup Participation rates, Writing, and Graduation requirements met. Subgroup Participation rates, Writing, and Graduation requirements met. Decrease of at least 10% in the percent of non-proficient students. Decrease of at least 10% in the percent of non-proficient students. –A school had 55% of a subgroup level 1 or 2 in That school needs 49% or less in levels 1 and 2 during that school would make Safe Harbor for that subgroup and subject.

32 3. Growth Model School-wide Participation rates and School Grade requirements met. School-wide Participation rates and School Grade requirements met. Subgroup Participation rates, Writing, and Graduation requirements met. Subgroup Participation rates, Writing, and Graduation requirements met. Percent of students on track to be proficient in 3 years or less Percent of students on track to be proficient in 3 years or less Students without at least two years of data are not included in the Growth Model Students without at least two years of data are not included in the Growth Model

33 3.Growth Model- On Track to Proficiency A trajectory is developed for each student. A trajectory is developed for each student. Developmental Scale Scores Developmental Scale Scores Student must reduce the gap between their prior year score and proficiency by at least 33% per year. Student must reduce the gap between their prior year score and proficiency by at least 33% per year.

34 3.Growth Model- On Track to Proficiency Intermediate on track trajectory scores represent one third of the difference between the baseline and proficient score.

35 3.Growth Model- On Track to Proficiency Grade Of Enrollment Test Used As The Basis For Trajectory Test Used As Target For Proficiency Years In Trajectory Percent Of Difference Closed Per Year % % % %

36 Correlation Between School Grades and AYP School Grades and AYP are based on separate computational methods. School Grades and AYP are based on separate computational methods. D or F schools cannot make AYP D or F schools cannot make AYP Differentiated Accountability Differentiated Accountability –A, B, & C schools with 80% or more of AYP criteria and 2 to 4 years w/o AYP are Prevent 1 80% or more of AYP criteria and 2 to 4 years w/o AYP are Prevent 1 less than 80% of AYP criteria and 2 to 4 years w/o AYP are Prevent 2 less than 80% of AYP criteria and 2 to 4 years w/o AYP are Prevent 2 80% or more of AYP criteria and 5 or more years w/o AYP are Correct 1 80% or more of AYP criteria and 5 or more years w/o AYP are Correct 1 less than 80% of AYP criteria and 5 or more years w/o AYP are Correct 2 less than 80% of AYP criteria and 5 or more years w/o AYP are Correct 2 –All D or F schools are either Prevent 2 or Correct 2.

37 For Additional Information Florida Department of Education Student Assessment & School Performance Research Services School Improvement