Team Space Jam Critical Design Review Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Jamie Usherwood, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Taylor King, and Paul Guerrie October 5,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UP, UP, AND AWAY! CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Ty Bailey, Soo Park, Cameron Coupe, Trevor Arrasmith, Carolyn Mason, Sam Frakes, Brandon Harris, Peter VanderKley.
Advertisements

Team K^3 + C Final Team Presentation Khin Oo, Kim Gleffe, Carlie Bolin, Katelyn Harder AEM /16/11.
Team Space Jam Launch Readiness Review Paul Guerrie, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Taylor King, & Jamie Usherwood November 2,
Matt Breihan, Jay Davis, Jack Gregory, Ashton Schrage, Sara Schuette, and Lydia Whitney October 14, 2008.
Space Debris Conceptual Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathan Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth
Solar Cell Efficiency Flight Readiness Review Teddy Bounds Angela Dunn Joel Sasser.
Clean Air Project: Team Big Green SpaceGasm Launch Readiness Review Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin.
Team Space Jam Conceptual Design Review Ben Azlein, Bridget Chase, Paul Guerrie, Taylor King, Shane Meikle, Megan Scheele, Jamie Usherwood 09/16/10 Fall.
Team Space Jam Launch Readiness Review Paul Guerrie, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Taylor King, & Jamie Usherwood November 2,
Team Lightning Rod Launch Readiness Review Fall 2010 Rev C 11/2/2010 Trevor Luke Chris Bennett Matt Holmes Sushia Rahimizadeh Alex Shelanski Matthew Dickinson.
TEAM kkkkk Conceptual Design Review Saad Alqahtani, Charles MacCraiger, Alexa Warly, Connor Jacobson, Kyle Skjerven, Matt Busby 09/19/11 Fall 2011 Rev.
The Wright Stuff Conceptual Design Review Colton Hall, Brendan Lee, David Thomas, Zak Collins, Eli Nelson, Devin Bazata September 20th 2011 Fall 2011 Rev.
Brynn Larson Trey Karsten Terek Campbell Marcus Flores Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki 2015/6/10 Team Ochocinco.
Team BIOHAZARD Presents: Project CRUENTO. CRUENTO: Latin – to make bloody; stain with blood.
Flight Club Critical Design Review Evan Akselrad, Chris Anaya, Natalie Bixler, Melanie Dubin, Logan Finch, Ted Maritz, and Scott Williams October 14, 2008.
BalloonSat “Optimism Prime” Team “Thumbs Up” Conceptual Design Review Nick Lenk, Greg Nelson, Eddie Cyrus, Jake Varey, Chase Pritchett, Brian Inglis 9/23/08.
Space Monkeys Final Presentation Michael Bartek, Jacob Blakely, Katelynn Finn, Katie Fletcher, Lance Markovchick, Michael Skeen, Thomas Snow Fall.
Khufu’s Starship Jennifer Nill Chelsea Donaldson Graham Risch Henry Shennan Jonathan Lumpkin Jennifer Nill Chelsea Donaldson Graham Risch Henry Shennan.
Paul “Trey” Karsten Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki Brynn Larson Terek Campbell Marcus Flores 11/25/09 Final Revision.
Team Zephyr Critical Design Review Joseph Sheehey, Huy Le, Andrew Zizzi, Alex Morrow, Sam Evans, Logan Wright October 14, 2008.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn October 17, 2006.
Team Name Critical Design Review Team Members Date Fall 2011 Rev A
Carnivorous Ninja Warriors Critical Design Review Cameron Comeau, Katie Brissenden, Kat Bryant, Arley Hendrick, Aram Podolski, Hannah Williams 06OCT2009.
Teamo Supremo Critical Design Review Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner Kimberley Fornall Barton Tofany Nick Martinez Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner.
1 Student Hands On Training I (2009) Construction, Integration, and Test Construction, Integration, and Test.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Foam Core Class #05 Foam Core Class #05.
Space Debris Critical Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathon Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth October 14, 2008 Fall 2008 Rev.
Panoramic Rays Conceptual Design Review Brian Gonzales, Kaia Jerde, Harrison McLean, Anirudh Sarsam, Brett Traub, Matt Capron September 20, 2007.
Project YES! Critical Design Review Team Search: Matt Paley, Emily Fuentes, Nick Stohl, Ian Andrzejczak, Jackie Myrose, Erik Horn 10/6/09.
Skillz That Killz Team 3 Conceptual Design Review Travis Dowdy, Jocelyn Mulkey, Hunter Hoopes, Taylor Smith, Kaitlyn Zimmitti, Jess Davidoff September.
Colton Hall, Brendan Lee, David Thomas, Zak Collins, Eli Nelson, Devin Bazata October 6, 2011 The Wright Stuff Conceptual Design Review.
GloboGym Fighting Cobras Conceptual Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards September 21, 2006 Project.
Critical Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani October 17, 2006.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Oddballs Critical Design Review Team 8: Grant Fritz, Jessica Brown, Stephanie Jalovec, Jennifer McGraw, Brian Roth, Evan Townsend 10/18/07.
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
Launch Readiness Review 11 Nov Brady Phillips, Elliot Guber, Brandon Campbell, Dushyant Dhundra, Joel Mendez, Cameron Trussell.
Conceptual Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani September 21, 2006.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
Design Review Corinne Desroches Saad Alqahtani Charles MacCraiger Alexa Warly Connor Jacobson Kyle Skjerven Matt Busby.
Space Debris Launch Readiness Review Seanna Renworth, Emily Logan, Corey Godwin, Sean Murphy, Cole Bostrom, Jonathan Kirchmaier November 11 th, 2008.
Conceptual Design Overview
Thomas Jeffries, Anthony Anglin, Dylan Cooper, Dustin Fishelman, Colin Harkins, Joao Mansur, Starteya Pais, Andrew Trujillo 10/2/2012.
SPIRIT of the Koala Project VOLT Critical Design Review Anthony Anglin, Colin Harkins, Dylan Cooper, Thomas Jefferies, Starteya Pais, Joao Mansur, Andrew.
Team Lightning Rod Critical Design Review Fall 2010 Rev A Trevor Luke Chris Bennett Matt Holmes Sushia Rahimizadeh Alex Shelanski Matthew Dickinson.
Hang Seven Critical Design Review Sierra Williams, Lucas Migliorini, Abby Caballero, Chase Goodman, Paul Smith, Becca Lidvall, Ethan Hollenbach, Nikhil.
Zachary Cuseo, Andrew Fruge’, Tyler Knappe, Christopher Nie, Sydni Smith, and Shweta Maurya 5 November, 2009.
Space Monkeys Launch Readiness Review Project Curious George November 11, 2008 Project Curious George November 11, 2008.
Evan Akselrad, Chris Anaya, Natalie Bixler, Melanie Dubin, Logan Finch, Ted Maritz, and Scott Williams September 23, 2008 Fall 2008 Rev A
Matt Breihan, Jay Davis, Jack Gregory, Ashton Schrage, Sara Schuette, and Lydia Whitney September 23, 2008.
Zachary Cuseo, Sydni Smith, Andrew Fruge’, Tyler Knappe, Christopher Nie, and Shweta Maurya 8 October 2009.
Team SSCSC Critical Design Review Nick Brennan, Kier Fortier, Tom Johnson, Shannon Martin, Dylan Stewart, and Adam Wright October 05, 2010 Fall 2010 Rev.
Napoleon Connor Strait | Chris Gray | Chad Alvarez Akeem Huggins | Ashley Zimmerer Tucker Emmett | Ginny Christiansen |Caleb Lipscomb Conceptual Design.
Space Monkeys Conceptual Design Review Project Curious George Michael Bartek, Jacob Blakely, Katelynn Finn, Katie Fletcher, Lance Markovchick, Michael.
Team Hubble Jr. Critical Design Review Ryan Del Gizzi, Evan Levy, Kyle Norman, Chris Everhart, Holly Zaepfel, Rachel Small October 17, 2006.
PROJECT SCREAM PROPOSAL Josh Yeaton Kevin Dinkel Chris Kopacz Conrad Schmidt Chris Warren Dillon Thorse
Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin Wong 05 October 2010.
S.H.I.E.L.D. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Addison, Travis, Jared, Evan, Aaron, Matt 10/14/08.
Junk in a Box Critical Design Review
Mission Statement... The Space Wolverines will;
Brandi Casey Lee Wilson
Skillz That Killz Team 3 Final Presentation
Team Go Go Gadgets Launch Readiness Review
Team Thumbs Up Final Presentation
Space Debris Critical Design Review
Launch Readiness Review
Team Solkraft Conceptual Design Review
Team Munchies Conceptual Design Review
Proposal Team 8: Grant Fritz, Jessica Brown, Stephanie Jalovec, Jennifer McGraw, Brian Roth, Evan Townsend.
Panoramic Rays Critical Design Review
Presentation transcript:

Team Space Jam Critical Design Review Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Jamie Usherwood, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Taylor King, and Paul Guerrie October 5, 2010 Fall 2010 Rev A/B

Mission Statement The main mission of Project Monstar shall be to build a satellite that ascends to an altitude of 30km following the RFP. Project Monstar will test the use of a servo as a means of rotating a camera in the y plane, while the balloonsat naturally rotates in the x plane. The secondary mission of Project Monstar shall be to take pictures 360 degrees, to prove the use of the mechanical system. Project Monstar shall also record attitude of the camera with the use of a digital compass. It will also measure internal humidity, internal and external temperature of the balloonsat. Hypothesis We hypothesize that our mechanical system will operate by fully rotating 360 degrees in the y plane, as the balloonsat ascends to a height of 30 kilometers. We believe that the ability to make a panoramic picture will prove the successful use of our design.

Mission Overview The balloonsat Monstar will travel to an altitude of approximately 30 kilometers while taking pictures while rotating 360 degrees in the x and the y planes. (The camera will be rotating vertically, as the balloonsat rotates horizontally) The balloonsat will also record temperature, pressure, humidity and the direction the camera is facing. Our mission will focus on the controlled mechanical rotation of our camera to provide a foundation that can be built upon for other scientific experiments. For example, the controlled rotation of the balloonsat could be used to record temperature in every direction. An analysis of this data could be used to find heat and temperature trends relative to position. Taking pictures while rotating 360 degrees in the x and y plane will serve many purposes. First and foremost a picture of the entire Earth from 30 kilometers will be obtained from the many pictures that the balloonsat takes. This picture will serve as a visual representation of data being collected in every direction relative to the balloonsat. The balloonsat Monstar will discover the plausibility of controlling the attitude of a balloon satellite dedicated to a scientific experiment which is heavily dependant on the position of the satellite. From analysis of our pictures we will be able to see what design improvements could be made to more efficiently control the attitude of our balloonsat.

Why? To design a platform for other scientific experiments which need directional sensitive data. Researches in the future will be able to record scientific data in all planes, so the results would be more realistic. Also to test a method of the attitude determination of the balloonsat.

Requirements Flow Down Level#Detail Derived From Basic Requirements O1 The Balloonsat shall ascend to/descend from an altitude of 30 kilometers over a period of 2.5 hours on November 6. MS O2The Balloonsat shall not exceed a mass of 850 grams.MS O3The expenses of the Balloonsat shall not exceed $300.MS O4 The balloonsat shall measure the interior and exterior temperature in Celsius throughout the flight. MS O5 The attitude of the balloonsat shall be measured relative to the camera in degrees off of magnetic north. MS O6 The inside of the balloonsat shall be kept above a temperature - 10° Celsius MS O7The balloonsat shall fly a camera to take picture throughout the flight.MS O8The balloonsat shall rotate the camera in the y-axis plane, to combine with the natural x-plane rotation of the flight. MS

Level One Requirements Level 1 System Requirements S1 The balloonsat shall have a tube through the center to attach the 2.4mm Dacron flight string of the helium balloon. O1 S2 The balloonsat shall survive the severe temperatures throughout the flight, and the landing at the end of the flight. O6 S3The structure shall protect all subsystems contained in the balloonsat.O1 S4 A Digital Compass shall be used to record the orientation of the camera on the balloonsat relative to magnetic north. O5 S5 A HOBO data logger shall be used to record internal and external temperature of the balloonsat O4 S6A mass budget and a monetary budget shall be created.O2,O3 S7A servo shall be programmed to rotate the camera 180◦ back and forth.O5 S8 A system of heaters and insulation shall be used to maintain an internal temperature above -10° Celsius. O8 S9The servo and the system of heaters shall be wired to a switch for easy use before launch.O7 S10A Canon Powershot SD780 IS camera shall be flown.O7 S11The balloonsat shall contain its own power for the entire flight.O1 S12 All tests, design changes, and construction shall be completed prior to November 6 launch date O1 S13The camera will be mounted outside the balloonsat for possible rotation.O8

Subsystem Requirements Level 2 Subsystem Requirements SS1The balloonsat structure shall consist of foam core.S3 SS2 All components shall be secured in the box so not to be damaged during flight/landing. S3 SS3 The camera will be protected by a casing attached to the tripod attachment of the camera. S13 SS4 The balloonsat shall bear the U.S.A. flag with contact information on the outside in case of separation from the flight string. S3 SS5 A system of ball bearings and the servo will be used to facilitate the smooth rotation of the camera. S7 SS6A heating circuit shall be used with three 9V batteries.S8 SS7The balloonsat will be insulated with the provided insulation foam and Styrofoam.S8 SS8A Digital Compass shall be calibrated to measure the orientation of the balloonsatS4 SS9A Basic Stamp II module shall control the digital compass and the servo, and store their data. S4,S7

Design –HOW YOU ARE DOING YOUR MISSION –Parts What has been ordered and what has not How long will it take to get parts. –Drawings –Functional Block Diagram –Mass and Money Budgets (have but don’t discuss unless asked) –Schedule (have but don’t discuss unless asked) –Recommend you discuss proposal requirements and how you plan to meet them. –The question of “How you are going to complete your mission?” should be answered

Design The balloon sat structure will be a cube with a small rectangular prism cut out of it. A smaller cube with the camera inside of it will be embedded in this space so it is free to rotate with the help of two servos. The structure of both containers will be primarily foam core. They will be created with one sheet of foam core that is cut into connected squares and then folded up, thus maintaining the structural integrity of the foam core. The corners will be reinforced with hot glue and aluminum tape to preserve the structure strength and help with maintaining insulation. The two cubes will be attached to the arms of the servos. The smaller cube will be a cube with one open side to allow the camera to take pictures. The smaller cube will be 5.8 cm x 8.4 cm x 10.8 cm. The only thing in this cube will be the camera and insulation. The smaller cube will then be connected to the main body of the satellite by two servos on either side which will rotate the camera 180 degrees back and fourth. This will prevent our camera from taking pictures of our satellite as it rotates. We don’t want our camera taking pictures of our satellite because we are collecting data in a panoramic area around our satellite, we don’t need any of the satellite itself. The camera inside the smaller cube will be mounted by taking advantage of the threaded hole on the bottom of the camera meant for tripods. A screw inserted in that hole will connect to a tight fitting covering made of foam core surrounded by Styrofoam. The covering will be protection for landing, vibrations and shocks. It will also insulate the camera. To heat our balloon sat we will use one heater. The camera box will not have a heater in it, instead it will just be insulated tightly with Styrofoam and air tight. The heater will be in the center the satellite and will be surrounded by electrical components. The heater will essentially be placed right next to the majority of our electrical components to ensure the functionality of said components during the entirety of the mission.

Design Concept

.114 m 23 cm.23 m.03 m.14 m.09 m.11 m.23 m.17 m.23 m.14 m. 03 m.09 m.03 m.11 m Stamp/Digital Compass HOBO Heater Batteries

Functional Block Diagram 2 AA BatteriesSwitch 1Camera2 GB Memory 3 9V BatteriesSwitch 2Heater Solar Panels (12) Backup Batteries (15V) Switch 3 Basic Stamp Servos Digital Compass HOBO External Temp Internal Temp Humidity

Schedule 09/16 Proposal Due/ Conceptual Design Presentation Due 09/21 Order Hardware/ ATP Appointment 09/21 Team Meeting (TM) 09/23 TM 09/28 TM 09/30 TM 10/05 Critical Design Review 10/05 Design Document Rev. A/B Due 10/05 Start Prototype Structure 10/07 Critical Design Presentation Due 10/07 TM 10/09 Prototype Structure Complete 10/09 Whip test, drop test and staircase test 10/12 TM 10/12 Final Design Complete 10/14 TM 10/19 TM 10/19 Subsystem construction complete 10/21 TM 10/25 Balloonsat construction complete 10/26 Pre-launch Inspection 10/26 TM 10/28 In Class Mission Simulation 10/28 TM 11/02 Design Document Rev C and LRR Slides Due 11/02 TM 11/04 TM 11/05 Final Balloonsat Weigh In and Turn In. 11/06 Launch 11/09 TM 11/16 TM 11/30 Final Presentations Due 12/04 Design Document Rev D Due 12/04 Design Expo 12/07 Balloonsat Hardware Turn In

Mass Budget HOBO – 30g Canon A570IS – 200g Heater Systems (2) – 100g (each) Solar Panels (6) – 4.54g (each) Servo Motor (2) – 13g (each) Digital Compass – 5g Foam Core – 40g Switches (3) – 5g (each) Total – 543 g

Money Budget

Testing Tests: -Whip Test -Drop Test -Freeze Test -Staircase Test -Subsystem Functional Test

Testing (cont.) Whip Test –A cord will be threaded through the balloon sat and then a team member will vigorously swing the satellite around on it –This will test the integrity of the PVC pipe and opening in the balloon sat that are crucial to the satellite remaining on the balloon cord –The rocks inside our prototype satellite will simulate our mass of our components and this test will allow us to test how our components need to be fastened Drop Test –Consist of dropping the balloonsat off of a balcony or second story to the ground below to test structure endurance both generally and for landing. –This test will also allow for us to see how our components may be affected during landing, so we can make proper adjustments to strengthen these specific areas. Freeze Test –Will be administered to the subsystems to check that all systems can work with the cold temperatures to be expected. –Condensation tests will be done in accordance with the freeze tests to ensure that no condensation will prevent electronics from working, and to make sure that the camera has a clear opening to take pictures from. –The freeze test will also test the functionality of our servo motors. The motors are only able to operate efficiently above -10° C. –By running our servo motors in the freeze test, our team can determine specific insulation changes that may need to be made in order to maintain the servo motor’s functionality throughout our flight.

Testing(cont.) Staircase Test –The balloon sat will be rolled down a staircase. –By doing this test with the correct mass inside our prototype, we will be able to determine if structural reinforcements may be needed for our subsystems in order to ensure a successful retrieval of data. Subsystem Functional Test –The compass and motor tests will be run in order to test if the compass will receive accurate readings and the motor will work properly in rigorous conditions. –This test will require spinning the satellite about a rope. – The camera test will take place in order to check that the time intervals that the camera is taking pictures and compare it to the spinning velocity of the motors to make sure we can accurately only take pictures of the environment around us instead of taking pictures of the satellite itself, which is not needed.

Team Organization Chart

Expected Results Panoramic pictures – full view from satellite to accurately show flight Used in future experiments – record direction sensitive data in 360 degrees

Biggest Worries Holding the servo in place, so it can be supported in the middle of the box. Having the servo survive the harsh temperature of near space. Condensation on the camera lens. Having the extended parts of foam core structure (that hold the camera) survive impact.