2010 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2012 EXAMINER TRAINING Examples of NERD Comment Formatting
Advertisements

Calera Intermediate School Parent – Culture Survey.
Employee Engagement Survey Results – District Wide March 2013.
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
The Power of Employee Engagement
SCCP Excellence. TOP-10 Quality Blueprint for Excellence SCCP Excellence Key performance indicators Pillar Goals MUSC Excellence LDI.
Leadership MOT Version 1. The Leadership MOT survey is a tool which will help leaders to benchmark their leadership capabilities within Nuffield Health.
Charting a New Course EDUCATION & STUDENT LIFE OPEN FORUM AUGUST 18, 2009 First Quarter Fiscal Year EDUCATION & STUDENT LIFE Open Forum October.
University of Louisville Employee Satisfaction Survey Presented by Dey Systems, Inc.
TRANSFORMATION IN ACTION Paula Myrick Short, PhD Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Gender umanitoba.ca.
PRESENTATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Priorities for an Engaged Community of Employees TRU People Make Things Happen.
SET UP SLIDE. Survey of Organizational Effectiveness Meeting July 13, 2001 Presentation by Dr. Karen Haynes, President University of Houston-Victoria.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Saginaw Valley State University Allison Deighton McKall Mayner Amanda Fisher Megan Litwiller Emily DeShone.
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Department of Institutional Research.
University Senate August 26, 2014 KEY FINDINGS FROM THE COACHE FACULTY JOB SATISFACTION SURVEY.
SPE Engagement Survey Results Summary Digital Media Group Masek November 2012 Confidential 1.
A&S Staff Survey Fall 2014 Results. 1. Competence.
Teacher Engagement Survey 2014
Department of Administration Employee Relations Committee 2012 Survey.
The Houston Business Journal’s Best Place to Work list.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
MEASUREMENT TEAM MUSC Excellence. Measurement Team Co-chairs – Lynn Shull (CON) and Becki Trickey (CHP) Members –  Wally Bonaparte (President’s Office)
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.
Engagement at The Health Trust Presented by Quantum Workplace 2014 Executive Report - The Health Trust.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
Employee Survey 2009 Analysis of results and trends Comparison with the 2007 & 2005 survey July 2009.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust Corporate Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
2009 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute September 25, 2009.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust CSS Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
MUSC Excellence University Excellence 101 Getting Connected.
What are Pillar Goals? What are the goals and metrics for the university? How do our unit level goals fit in? What happens next? 11/19/2015 University.
A. P. Moller - Maersk Employee Engagement Survey 2011 MDSI Corporate IT-Admin; RVA018 - Roberto - Valenciano Report.
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
Force Results – August 2012 Sussex Police Employee Survey 2012.
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: Are you stuck on an escalator?
Teacher Satisfaction Whitney Zimmerman Christine Henry.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,
Community College Faculty & Staff Tell it Like it Is! The El Paso Community College Employee Survey.
Chapter 9 Review How can you measure employee engagement levels over time?
Survey Results and Pillar Goal Progress Leadership Development Institute June 3, 2011.
Evaluating Our Assessment Program Spring 2004 What is assessment? Assessment is the ongoing process of understanding and improving student learning.
Retaining Top Talent AACRAO 2009 Conference Tandy Elisala.
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Work Areas 2015 Response Count 2014 Response Count.
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Survey Summary of Fall 2014 Results Presentation to College Council Executive Cabinet August 5, 2015.
Pillar Goal Progress Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Information Technology.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Advancement.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
IMPROVING EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION: A WAY TO “ALWAYS” IMPROVE PATIENT SATISFACTION AND HCAHPS SCORES Laura L. Egan Widener University Nursing Leadership for.
Mid Michigan Community College Prepared by President Christine Hammond March 31, 2016 PACE Survey Results Summary.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
2012 Employee Engagement Survey September What is Employee Engagement? Employee engagement is about: Motivated employees Employees who are passionate.
Developmental Intervention Model Use for student or institution Can be planned or responsive Planned (Disable Student Services) Responsive (Teacher notices.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Office of Planning, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness
The High Cost of Low Morale
Survey of Organizational Excellence
Employee Engagement Survey
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
Butler University Great Colleges To Work For
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

2010 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010

Survey Sent to Faculty and Staff of University ▫Not COM and F&A n= completions (entire or partial) ≈ 70% 28 multiple choice questions 2 open-ended questions

Question Categories Environment, Morale and Job Satisfaction MUSC Excellence Relationship with supervisor Human Resources Focus Compensation

Service Determine Key Sustainable Financial Metrics for each academic unit by that links unit goals to clearly identified unit Assess the viability of an RCM model for the University PeopleQualityFinanceGrowth University Achieve Pass Rate on licensure, credentialing, or board exams of 96% Achieve 95% graduation rate within each program Achieve E- Value score of 4.2 or higher for ‘students satisfied with faculty eff. as teacher’ Faculty & Staff ‘believe their environment is conducive to performing high quality research and scholarship at 84% or higher Achieve top 50% ranking for total funding of research as compared to ‘peer institutions’ Graduating students believe they made the RIGHT choice in selecting MUSC at 90% or higher or would choose this experience again Develop Baseline - Current students believe they are receiving a high quality education at __% or higher Each unit will define what service satisfaction is and how it will be measured by March Develop Baseline - Achieve __% patient satisfaction or higher in faculty clinical practice settings As we begin our pursuits in Excellence – we will be striving to reach or exceed the top quartile in most key areas (some yet unmeasured as indicated below). Once benchmark data are available, we will establish step goals to move us upwards at all times. Develop an institutional infrastructure and platform for the delivery of international education programs 75% of students agree their understanding of the contributions of other professionals to health care delivery or research increased through their experience at MUSC. Faculty made right choice in selecting MUSC at 90% or higher 90% of Staff pleased to be working at MUSC 90% faculty, staff, & students evaluate MUSC’s culture as valuing diversity 5% overall improvement in employee recognition score

* p<.05 = Goal  I made the right choice in selecting MUSC.  I am pleased to be working at MUSC. Environment, Morale and Job Satisfaction 100% Office of the President Office of the VP for Academic Affairs & Provost Division of Education and Student Life Office of Associate Provost for Research University Libraries and Learning Resources 100% Office of Development College of Graduate Studies College of Pharmacy

* p<.05 = Goal  I believe the MUSC’s culture values diversity.  I believe that my environment is conducive to performing high quality research and scholarship.  I feel part of a team that is working toward a common goal.  Good performance is recognized in my work area.  If I know of a good person looking for a job in our industry, I would refer him or her here.  I feel my physical work environment is conducive to a productive workload.  Overall, I am satisfied with my job. Environment, Morale and Job Satisfaction 100% Office of Associate Provost for Research Office of Development College of Graduate Studies 93.8% Office of Associate Provost for Research 92% College of Nursing 89.2% College of Nursing 100% Office of Development 91.3% Office of the President 96.8% Office of Development

* p<.05  I understand why MUSC Excellence is important to our University.  I believe that MUSC Excellence is making a positive difference. MUSC Excellence 4.28 College of Health Professions 3.91 College of Nursing

* p<.05  My immediate supervisor communicates our department/College’s goals and objectives effectively.  General communication from my immediate supervisor is timely and relevant.  My immediate supervisor treats me with respect.  My immediate supervisor recognizes the efforts of individuals.  My immediate supervisor sets a good, positive and professional example in our workplace. Relationship with supervisor 4.41 College of Nursing 4.43 College of Nursing 4.52 College of Nursing 4.41 College of Nursing 4.49 College of Nursing

* p<.05  The people I work with cooperate and work as a team.  My immediate supervisor encourages me to develop my job skills.  I feel that performance evaluations are fair.  I have a safe workplace.  My immediate supervisor cares about me.  I have adequate tools and resources to do my job.  My department/College provides adequate ongoing training I need to perform my job. Human Resources Focus 4.42 Office of the VP for Academic Affairs & Provost 4.34 College of Nursing 4.32 College of Nursing 4.61 Office of the VP for Academic Affairs & Provost 4.40 College of Nursing 4.14 College of Health Professions 3.86 College of Health Professions