Copyright © 2003 Americas’ SAP Users’ Group Microsoft’s SAP Upgrade based on the Quarterly Release Strategy Scott Baxter Lead Program Manager, EAS Becky.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MIGRATION MIGR-09. How to Run Your Next Implementation... Don't Let It Run You! Patricia Johnson Senior Systems Consultant Strategic Systems Group, Inc.
Advertisements

Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
TECH Project Company X Documentation Plan Champion/Define Phase
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Test Automation Success: Choosing the Right People & Process
1 State of Connecticut Core-CT Project HRMS Training Registration July, 2003.
ITIL: Service Transition
MyFloridaMarketPlace Roundtable July 9, 2003 MyFloridaMarketPlace.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Project Kick-off 14-Jan-09.
Enterprise Impact on Funds Management with BCS
Panorama Consulting Group LLC ERP Assessment, Selection, and Planning SAMPLE APPROACH.
3108: Enterprise Upgrade Lessons Learned
A framework for describing IT Project Management Processes and Tool Set Features Enterprise Project Management Framework.
Release Management in SAP David Osborne, Planning & Release Management, Canada Customs and Revenue Agency May 20, 2003 Session 2909.
Creating & Maintaining an Effective SAP CCC (On A Budget!)
University of Southern California Enterprise Wide Information Systems Instructor: Richard W. Vawter.
Implementation Audit and Control Background Internal Audit Role Go-Live Criteria Audit Approach - Systems Audit Approach - People Summary Agenda.
Hyperion EPM Overview & Case Study.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Selecting and Implementing an LMS for your Company Session Code #2411.
Ashoka Indonesia Implementation Kick-off August 2014
Introduction to SAP R/3.
High-Level Assessment Month Year
SCC EHR Workshop for Contractors: Implementation Considerations May 25, 2011.
State of Kansas Statewide Financial Management System Pre-Implementation Project Steering Committee Meeting February 8, 2008.
000000_1 Confidential and proprietary information of Ingram Micro Inc. — Do not distribute or duplicate without Ingram Micro's express written permission.
StickyMinds.com and Better Software magazine presents… How to Build a Testing Center of Excellence Sponsored by Cognizant This event aired on July 8, 2008.
National Finance Center’s 2008 Customer Forum EmpowHR 9.0 Billy Dantagnan Teracore.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
UMT and Microsoft Presenting Tips and Tricks Basics What’s new in Microsoft Project 2010 Brian Feder, MBA, PMP Senior Vice President UMT Consulting Group.
Rutgers Integrated Administrative System RIAS Phase III – HRMS, Budgeting, and Enterprise Reporting Treasurer’s Luncheon December 2, 2008.
02/10/2011Ombati Thomas ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP)- SAP PRESENTATION November 2012.
Financials – Phase II Kick-Off Meeting September 11, 2008 Brenda Bolander, State Comptroller Michael Grisser, Project Manager.
Web Development Process Description
Project Management Process Overview
The Microsoft Office 2007 Enterprise Project Management Solution:
 OSA MeetingMay 17,  Project Vision  Scope, Governance, Benefits  Timetables & Next Steps  Realizing the Vision - Procurement  Questions 2.
PMP® Exam Preparation Course
Roles and Responsibilities
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
University of Wisconsin System HRS Project Update to ITC November 19, 2010.
Serena Project Case Study Sapphire, Atlanta April 23, 2007.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
DEV234 Project Management For.NET Developers Marc Gusmano Director of Emerging Technologies The Information Management Group.
Project Life Cycle.
September Interface Kickoff Sunflower Project Statewide Management and Reporting Tool Update September 02, 2009.
 2001 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Accounting Information Systems, 8/E, Bodnar/Hopwood Systems Implementation, Operation, and Control Chapter.
] Orange County Convention Center Orlando, Florida | May 15-18, 2011 Procure to Pay – Using SAP and SharePoint Jon Ross – Shure Inc. Jay Westberg – Dickinson.
Project Portfolio Management Business Priorities Presentation.
Strategies for Knowledge Management Success SCP Best Practices Showcase March 18, 2004.
Eric Wagner Mike Taylor Phil Joseph Copyright © 2009 Catavolt, Inc. All rights reserved.
ITPD ISSUE MANAGEMENT PROCESS SEPTEMBER 5, 2008
11 i Upgrade: Is an Assessment Useful for Your Company? By: Bernard Doyle, Applications Software Technology Corp. Marie Klein, Information Resources Inc.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
Levers enabling industrialised deployment and a effective multi-vendor eco-system We wish to assess the current position of these levers and the opportunity.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Asset accounting-29.pptx This course will give an overview of the following Workbreakdown Structure Network Project Builder Project Planning.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 2 Diploma of Project Management.
6/6/ SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLE OVERVIEW Professor Ron Kenett Tel Aviv University School of Engineering.
Project Life Presented by Chuck Ray, PMP ITS Project Manager.
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, Project Review Overview Facilitative approach that actively engages a number of key project staff and senior IS&T.
ITIL: Service Transition
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
Roles and Responsibilities
Description of Revision
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Executive Project Kickoff
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
IT Next – Transformation Program
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2003 Americas’ SAP Users’ Group Microsoft’s SAP Upgrade based on the Quarterly Release Strategy Scott Baxter Lead Program Manager, EAS Becky Moe Senior Program Manager, CAIT Tim Gale Product Manager, Corporate Accounting May 19 th, 2003

Key Learning Points  Leveraging Microsoft's Quarterly Release framework to minimize impact of SAP Upgrade on organizations  Importance of strong communication and resource planning  No “One Size Fits All” approach to training and documentation

Company Profile Employees: US39,640 International14,726 Total54,366 Vendors WW19,757 Agency Temps WW4,500 Total24,257 Contingent Staff:

SAP at Microsoft  General Facts  400 company codes (180 with headcount)  15,000 active cost centers (5,500 with headcount)  140,000 active internal orders  User Numbers  2,000 named; 50,000+ total users  600+ concurrent users  Modules Implemented  SD, MM, FI, CO, AM, HR, BW, APO, RE, PS  System Information  950+ GB in single, central database  6.25 GB growth per week  99.9+% availability (excluding quarterly releases)  Microsoft’s First and Best Customer

Upgrade – Objectives  “Just Another Quarterly Release”  Upgrade SAP to Enterprise by August 2003  Minimize production downtime  Keep performance similar or better  Reduce number of repairs  Identify and retire obsolete custom objects

Quarterly Release/Upgrade Resources  Continuity maintained from release to release  Quarterly release resources utilized for Upgrade  Enterprise Application Services (EAS)  SAP Program Management  SAP Product Management  Business Unit IT Partners

Quarterly Release/Upgrade Resources Enterprise Application Services (EAS)  Perform all custom SAP programming (ABAP) and related unit testing  Support conceptual stage of design phase  Perform functional and performance testing  Maintain stable and cost-effective SAP environment  Manage production issue resolution  Review and analyze Hotpacks

Quarterly Release/Upgrade Resources SAP Program Management  Manage SAP change request process  Support envisioning process from an IT and SAP perspective  Drive design process for SAP changes  Complete SAP configuration activities  Support functional and regression testing processes  Serve in a consulting role for escalated production issues  Review and analyze Hotpacks

Quarterly Release/Upgrade Resources SAP Product Management  Manage SAP change request process  Manage CR prioritization for each Release  Liaison to Business Representatives  Assist business in development of requirements  Manage User Acceptance Testing (UAT) and Business Process Regression Testing (BPRT)  Training and rollout  Communication

Quarterly Release/Upgrade Resources Business Unit IT Partners  Responsible for integrated tools and applications  Examples:  Web Extensions  Data Warehouses  Partner with SAP teams on envisioning process from an IT perspective  Support Upstream/Downstream Testing Activities

Preliminary Analysis Business Analysis IT Costing & Prioritization Development Test Preliminary candidate cutoff Code complete UATBPRT Candidate cutoff Requirements deadline Quarterly Release Phases/Milestones Business Need Identified & Business Case Developed  Stakeholder Requirements Documentation  Stakeholder  Product Mgmt IT Work Effort Estimated  Program Mgmt Technical Spec Complete  Program Mgmt User Acceptance Testing  Product Mgmt  Stakeholder Product Studio Item (for tracking) & Candidate List Created  Product Mgmt Candidate Prioritization  All Stakeholders  Product Mgmt Effort Adjusted Final Candidate List  All Configuration & Development  Program Mgmt  IT Development Business Process Testing  Product Mgmt  Stakeholder Preliminary Work Effort Estimated  Product Mgmt  Program Mgmt Quarterly Business Review “Draw the Line”  Executive Sponsors IT Resources Assigned IT Unit Testing  Program Mgmt  IT Development GoLive

Quarterly Release Schedule FY2003 Milestone Q1Q2Q3Q4 Preliminary Candidate Cutoff BizCase Due BizCase Due 5/03/02 Fri 8/02/02 Fri 11/01/02* Fri N/A* Requirements Deadline Detail requirements due Detail requirements due 5/24/02 Fri 8/30/02 Fri 11/29/02 Fri N/A Candidate cutoff Effort adjusted request listing Effort adjusted request listing 6/07/02 Fri 9/06/02 Fri 12/06/02 Fri N/A Specification Cutoff Spec reviews complete Spec reviews complete 6/21/02 Fri 9/20/02 Fri 12/20/02 Fri N/A Code Complete Development and Unit test Development and Unit test 7/05/02 Fri 10/04/02 Fri 01/03/03 Fri N/A UAT Complete Stakeholder buyoff Stakeholder buyoff 7/19/02 Fri 10/18/02 Fri 01/17/03 Fri N/A BPRT Complete Business Process Test Business Process Test 8/02/02 Fri 11/01/02 Fri 01/31/03 Fri N/A Release to Production Production handoff 8/09/02 Fri 11/08/02 Fri 02/07/03 Fri N/A *=Q3-Contingent on complexity of the SAP upgrade: Pre approved items only; Q4-Closed-SAP upgrade

Upgrade Timeline

Scoping & Planning  Roles & Responsibilities replicated from Quarterly Release process, simplifies process of organizing upgrade project team  Plan for 6 month black-out for change requests  Give sufficient lead time to allow critical business and IT changes to occur before the blackout  Executive sponsorship for project plan and resource requirements  SAP technical enhancements considered where processes and support can be simplified

Scoping & Planning System Landscape designed to minimize need for dual maintenance DEVMS2PRODMSS ADJMSV TEST MSU TEST T02 TEST MST DEVMS1TESTMSTPRODMSS ADJMSY TESTMSX

Analysis and Design  Necessary configuration and programming changes identified  SAP RBE tool used to build inventory SAP transactions & programs being used  Inventoried items reviewed and tested by Program Management  “Broken” items categorized in Timeboxes  Obsolete programs eliminated  Significant changes between SAP releases identified and communicated  Delta documentation  Navigational instructions

Development and Test Timeboxes  Four Timeboxes to organize effort and impact  Core Transactions, Repairs & User Exits  Inbound and Outbound Interfaces  Reports/Security  Contingency  Clearly Defined Deadlines  Program Specifications  Configuration  Testing

Testing: UAT & BPRT  User Acceptance Testing:  ALL SAP transactions, reports and programs used  All bugs should be identified and fixed prior to BPRT  Broad security access assigned to prevent impact on user acceptance testing  Security Roles tested centrally by small teams  Business Process Regression Testing:  Occurs over 10 weeks beginning 5/19  Follows guidelines used for normal quarterly release process  Comprehensive End to End testing including tools and upstream/downstream systems  Broad Security Role testing

Testing: Inventories & Scripts  Existing Quarterly Release test inventories leveraged for Upgrade Project  Updated to reflect new and retired transactions  Opportunity to enhance for existing transactions  Business Units own and maintain independent repositories of test cases and scenarios  Various tools used (Access DB, Excel, SharePoint)  Users are critical in defining scope and documenting test cases  Global Testing Networks developed to support ongoing regression testing  Detailed test scripts required and used in many operational groups  Other groups identify test cases only and rely on subject matter expertise for testing

Testing: International Scope  Regional Product Managers/Coordinators - Critical  Manage International testing effort  Regular meetings with Corporate team  Evangelists and communication liaisons for their regions  International Finance/Procurement resource constraints required focus on “Unique” requirements  Examples:  Country specific Statutory Reports  Country specific tax calculations (e.g. VAT)  Accounts Payable processing in each subsidiary  SAP allocations executed by subsidiaries  Subsidiary specific output requirements such as Dunning or Purchase orders  International Fixed Asset Depreciation

Testing: Issue Management  Effective Issue/Bug Management Tools are Essential  IT Teams Share Bug Tracking Tool (Product Studio)  Enhanced visibility and reporting  Efficient status tracking  Maintain IT & Biz Contacts, Steps to Reproduce, Dev Status, Testing Status…  Relevant documents such as specifications are attached or linked  Business groups maintain independent issue tracking tools  Examples:  Excel  SharePoint  Product Studio

Product Studio for Bug Tracking

Communication and Coordination  Establish communication framework early  Evangelize SAP Upgrade Benefits regularly  Schedule project kick-off meetings  Set expectations  Confirm support  Maintain Team Web Sites (SharePoint)  Communication  Store Project documentation  Contact information  Issue and Risk Management  Links to other sites and information  Hold Frequent Status Meetings  Team specific and cross organizational  Schedule Brown Bag Sessions  Send Weekly Status Reports and Meeting Summaries

Documentation & Training  Business Units determine own documentation and training strategy  Common themes across organizations  Web Based Self-Help Training & Documentation  Delta documentation & training to support testing  Train the trainer approach widely used  Workshops  Limited End User Live Training  Factors resulting in different strategies  Centralized versus decentralized users  Size of user groups  Cross organizational considerations  Extent that Web Tools are used  Resources  Distributed Project Management  Turnover considerations  Use of Vendors to initiate transactions

Documentation & Training  World Wide Operations  Widely distributed user community  Domestic and International  Cross Organizational  International scope requires Regional Coordinators  Broad Range of Training & Documentation Products  Step by Step Procedures  Quick Reference Cards  Mandatory workshops with workbooks  Online quizzes testing proficiency  Web Based Training and Documentation  Live Training Two Weeks prior to Go-Live  Train the Trainer approach

Documentation & Training  Finance  Widely distributed user community  Domestic and International  Cross Organizational  International Scope Requires Regional Product Managers  Communication, coordination, education  High use of Web Tools minimize training requirements  Reporting  Posting Journal Entries  Master Data Maintenance  Web Based Training and Documentation  Live Workshops  Formal Training Focus Several Weeks Prior to Go-Live

Documentation & Training  HR/Payroll  Small, centralized user group  Limited training required  Preliminary delta training provided to support testing  Existing Online Documentation Manual Updated  Procurement  Centralized domestic Accounts Payable  Limited training needed for domestic team  High use of Web Tools minimize training requirements  International and Domestic  Some international subsidiaries require training and documentation  Where web tools not implemented  Regional Product Managers key to success

Lessons Learned  “Technical” does not necessarily = “Simple”  EARLY analysis of Security  Impact from new and retired transactions  EARLY analysis of new, changed and retired transactions  User education and documentation requirements  Impact on security profiles  Old versus New decisions for similar transactions  Impact on RFCs  Plan for EARLY development  RFC impacts  Internally released function modules  Unicode enabled programs  Good documentation for custom programs is important  Provide sufficient user education early to support testing  Make sure ALL groups budget project support capacity

Wrap up Project Status:  All analysis, development and unit testing complete in test environment 5/19  Business Process Regression Testing beginning 5/19  Formalized training for most groups starting in July  On schedule for release to production 8/8 Summary:  Upgrades are unique so start assessment early  Cannot over communicate  Get Executive Sponsorship from all teams participating  Effective Cross Organizational Partnering is Critical  Limit scope if possible  Flexibility is a must!

Copyright © 2003 Americas’ SAP Users’ Group Thank you for attending! Please remember to complete and return your evaluation form following this session. Session Code: [2305]