Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Danville Area Transportation Study. Fundamentals of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Adam Aull Danville Area Transportation Study MPO ASCE Presentation.
Advertisements

Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
Homeland Security at the FCC July 10, FCCs Homeland Security Focus Interagency Partnerships Industry Partnerships Infrastructure Protection Communications.
Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
RESPONSE TO THE THEMATIC EVALUATION: INCREASING WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP AND PARTICIPATION IN PEACE AND SECURITY AND IN HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE Saraswathi Menon,
Transportation Planning for Federal Land Management Agencies (FLMAs) SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006 SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006.
Ensure the Disaster Housing Strategy is institutionalized throughout the jurisdiction Identify a process to update and maintain the Disaster Housing Strategy.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
National Infrastructure Protection Plan
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA’s Talking Freight Seminar presented by Michael Williamson Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
Nathan Masek, AICP 18 th ITS World Congress, October
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
Federal Transit Administration Office of Safety and Security FTA BUS SAFETY & SECURITY PROGRAM 18 th NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RURAL PUBLIC AND INTERCITY.
Chapter 5 1 Chapter 5. The Transportation- Planning Process 1.Explain how travel demand modeling fits into the transportation-planning process 2.Explain.
Community Planning & Capacity Building Recovery Support Function Presented By: Michelle Diamond Community Planning & Capacity Building Coordinator FEMA.
Session 121 National Incident Management Systems Session 12 Slide Deck.
The Planning Perspective Presented by Joel Eisenfeld – KFH Group.
Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Primer FHWA/FTA Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 3 Module 3: CSS and Livability In Area Wide Planning.
1 New Emergency Transportation Operations Resources Nancy Houston Booz Allen Hamilton.
1 SAFETEA: Transportation System Management, Operations and ITS Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator, Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration.
National Disaster Recovery Framework. National Disaster Recovery Framework Reasons for establishing the Framework Past large-scale recovery efforts revealed.
STRENGTHENING the AFRICA ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION NETWORK An AMCEN initiative A framework to support development planning processes and increase access.
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,
Outcomes of the 16 th Regional Disaster Managers Meeting held from 9 th – 11 th August 2010 Presentation to the Pacific Humanitarian Team Monday 6 th December.
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.
Dixie Regional ITS Architecture Project Summary July 31, 2006.
Spencer Stevens FHWA Office of Planning Michigan Transportation Planning Association 2011 Annual Conference July 14, 2011.
Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Primer FHWA/FTA Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Think Regionally - Act Locally The Development and Evolution of the I-95 Corridor Coalition: Think Regionally - Act Locally John Baniak Executive Director,
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
Chapter 5 1 Chapter 5. The Transportation- Planning Process 1.Explain how travel demand modeling fits into the transportation-planning process 2.Explain.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
MATOC Trial Phase Dec 2008 to Jun 2009 Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Richard W. Steeg, PE Chair MATOC Steering Committee VDOT Regional.
Transit Bus Safety and Security Program Federal Transit Administration.
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs State Incentive Grant Project Overview Michael Cunningham Deputy Director, Program Services.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
What APEC Task Force for Emergency Preparedness (TFEP) has progressed in the implementation of HFA Presented by Vincent Liu Program Director APEC Secretariat.
Freight-21: A National Strategic Freight Mobility Program & Trust Fund Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Incorporating Connected/Automated Vehicles into the Transportation Planning Process November, 2015 Max Azizi US DOT.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
NTOC National Summit November 7, 2011 Washington, DC Aliyah Horton Douglas E. Noble, P.E., PTOE Aliyah Horton Douglas E. Noble, P.E., PTOE Operations:
COG Activity Center Update Climate, Energy, & Environment Policy Committee May 23 rd, 2012.
Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant Programs: Partnership Planning & 5304 (formerly 5305) Transit Planning Presented by Priscilla Martinez-Velez California.
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
FHWA Update SHRP2 Implementation and Other Agency TSMO R&D Efforts Tracy Scriba, FHWA 12/8/15 1.
Kansas City Regional ITS Architecture Ron Achelpohl, PE Assistant Director of Transportation Mid-America Regional Council September 29, 2005.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Community Health Centers of Arkansas Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Workshop August 11, 2017 Mark Fuller.
Project Overview – Phase 1
What is the Regional Transportation Plan?
Overview of Climate Resilience in Transportation Planning October, 2017 Savannah, GA Jill Stark, FHWA, Office of Planning.
2017 Health care Preparedness and Response Draft Capabilities
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
What is an MPO Anyway? (and why should I care?)
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner

THE FEDERAL MANDATE “Planning Factors” Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users Increase accessibility and mobility of people and freight Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight Promote efficient system management and operation Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system The Metropolitan Transportation Plan should include ….. “(as appropriate) emergency relief and disaster preparedness plans and strategies and policies that support homeland security (as appropriate) and safeguard the personal security of all motorized and non-motorized users.”

METRO COG’S ROLE IN SECURITY Stakeholder Input Planning and coordinating (e.g. evacuation routes/alternate route planning) Public education and info dissemination Forum for regional dialogue/assessments/ and other activities Engage existing structures and committees Form a critical partners group Emergency Services Management Clearinghouse of critical transportation routes and traffic flow, infrastructure Funding for training and/or exercises Points of distribution planning and recovery strategies/policies Define Metro COG’s capabilities (systems/planning audit) None

MPO Peer Groups The Trends Integrate Security into UPWP Conducting Workshops/Trainings/Outreach Create new databases and information sets Traffic Operations Center Deployment Formed an ITS Coalition Engaging Public Transit Plan/Program Development Outcomes unique to region and existing dynamics

What is the MPO Doing? Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Update Annually Projects Programmed for 4 years with an ‘Annual Element’ Metro Planning & Tech Assistance (UPWP) Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Updated Every 5 years Long Range Planning for next 30 Years

REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS AND ADVISORS Metro COG Policy Board Transportation Technical Committee ITS Deployment Committee Incident Management Committee (Dormant) Misc. Interest Committees

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR METRO COG Strengthen Human and Institutional Capacity Coordinate with EXISTING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT / SECURITY GROUPS Work proactively with KEY ENTITIES to address TRANSPORTATION SECURITY PLANNING in the region Coordinate HAZARD TRAINING EXCERCISES with neighboring jurisdictions / agencies Coordinate Asset Management and Planning –Develop a Regionally Significant Transportation Infrastructure (RSTI) –Work with KEY ENTITIES to ANALYZE the transportation network for redundancies in moving large number of people –Offer ASSISTANCE for interagency coordination of evacuation route, identification of shelter points etc.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR METRO COG Deploy and develop ITS STRATEGIES – Traffic Management Systems – Advanced Traveler Information Systems (DMS) – Incident Management – Integrate Incident Mgmt & Emergency Response Stakeholders into ITS Deployment

WHY ITS ? ITS Deployment Plan Completed Prioritized List of Regional Deployment Priorities Regional Consensus Metro Communities DOT’s FHWA, etc. Regionalized Traffic Operations Traffic Operations Center CCTV Deployment Transportation Surveillance/Detection Tools Signal Coordination Dynamic Messaging Capabilities Coordination with RRRDC, Metro Transit, etc

ITS = Transportation Security Emergency Management & Incident Response Metro COG ITS Stakeholders

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR METRO COG Establish Sustainability in Regional Security Partnerships –Evaluate existing PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN –Identify “INTERESTED PARTIES” specifically Incident Management and Emergency Management Stakeholders –Encourage CONSULTATION with Incident Management and Emergency Management Stakeholders when updating “Growth Plans” and “Ordinances” Institutionalize project security profile and assessment –Add SECURITY PLANNING AUDIT to UPWP –CLARIFY types of INFORMATION available for inclusion in planning program –Assess security aspects of TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS in MTP

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2008 –Metro COG engages INCIDENT MANAGEMENT and EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT stakeholders in the review and adoption of the “Metro Intelligent Transportation Deployment Plan” –Metro COG establishes a CRITICAL PARTNERS GROUP to participate in a Focus Group for Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) update –“Critical Partners Group” will assist Metro COG in defining the RSTI –“Critical Partners Group” will assist in integrating TRANSPORTATION SECURITY into the MTP –“Critical Partners Group” will assist in defining SECURITY related elements within Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) –“ Critical Partners Group” will redefine the ITS DEPLOYMENT COMMITTEE –“ Critical Partners Group” will begin discussion on integration of “Incident Management” and “Emergency Management” into ITS DEPLOYMENT

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2009 –Metro COG initiates work on MAJOR PROGRAM ELEMENT – “Alternate Route/Evacuation Planning” effort –“Alternate Route/Evacuation Planning Effort” will integrate EXISTING TOOLS AND TECHNOLOGIES such as “Regional Travel Demand” and “Freeway Microscopic Simulation Models” –“Alternate Route/Evacuation Planning Effort” will integrate existing ITS INFRASTRUCTURE and possible new infrastructure needed –Metro COG will work with redefined “ITS Deployment Committee” on deployment of Metro ITS DEPLOYMENT PLAN. –Metro COG will facilitate dialogue and actions aimed at INCREASED COLLABRATION between “ITS and Incident Management Stakeholders”

MPO INTEGRATION OF SECURITY Metro COG Planning Program Inclusion of Annual Security Planning & Maintenance Program Metro Profile “Security Element” Long Range Plan “Security Element”

Security: It’s a Process Stupid Ongoing & Continuous Ensure the MPO is active & engaged with stakeholders, use MPO skill for interdisciplinary coordination Be persistent, find common linkages and interests among inter- related agencies and departments UPWP Integration (& other monitoring devices/tools) Comprehensive Ensure relationship are made regarding all facets of MPO Planning program Transit ITS Roadway/Facility Planning Land Use Planning

Comments & Questions