Manager Performance Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Appraisals
Advertisements

Unclassified Performance Management Process For Unclassified Administrative and Professional (Non-Teaching) Employees Summer 2011.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Developing the Learning Contract
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Performance Management Process
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
UMW Administrative and Professional Faculty Performance Evaluation Process.
EvalS Application User Guide version September 17, 2011.
Introduction Performance appraisals, reviews and evaluations are all terms used to describe a process for documenting and communicating employees’ performance.
Performance Management Review FAQs
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Human Resources Center The Department of Labor’s Performance.
System Office Performance Management
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Staff Compensation Program Update
FY 2010 UMMS Leadership Performance Management Process and Form
FY 2010 Leadership Performance Management Process and Form Who should take this course? All Leaders Content Expert: Jane Pettit
System Office Performance Management
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
SMART Goal Setting. Introduction Goal Setting Exercise Identify 4-5 Key Goals/Responsibilities for 2012:
Performance Management 2010  Performance Management Cycle  Organizational Success  Shared Responsibilities  Setting Goals and Expectations.
Performance Management Open Information Session for Individual Contributors.
Setting SMART Goals.
Engaging in Effective Performance Discussions June 6, 2013.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
Performance Management  Performance Management Cycle  Organizational Success  Shared Responsibilities  Setting Goals and Expectations.
The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.
Performance Planning & Evaluation Classified & Operational Form.
Creating Pathways for Education, Career and Life Success Webinar: Developing a Pathways Plan January 18, 2013 Facilitated by Jeff Fantine, Consultant.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Office of Human and Resources 2014/2015 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS & GUIDELINES.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
COLORADO COLLEGE PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE  WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT GOALS?  VALUE OF GOALS  DESIGNING SMART GOALS  EXAMPLES.
© PeopleAdvantage 2013 All Rights Reserved We will Show You How to Easily Conduct Effective Performance Appraisals LCSA Conference 2013.
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
Mid-Year Performance Review Process University System of New Hampshire System Office | 5 Chenell Drive, Suite 301, Concord, NH
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Navigating the Performance Review Process
The Performance and Staff Development Program
UCPEA Supervisor Performance Evaluation Training
Performance Management
System Office Performance Management
Performance Review Tool Updates College of Engineering
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS Daniel Dominguez-Moncada Director of Administration January 12, 2017.
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Kristan Williams Soave HR Dept
My UI Career Implementation
Performance Management System
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Performance Review for County Educators
Employee Performance Management System
Performance Review for County Educators
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
Kristan Williams Soave HR Dept
Dean of Engagement Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Manager Performance Evaluation Presented by: Irma Ramos Administrative Dean, Human Resources Linda Umbdenstock Administrative Dean, Planning December 7, 2005

Statement of Philosophy The Annual Performance Evaluation Procedure is designed to improve District services by: Setting individual objectives and strategies. Assessing the progress of the objectives and strategies. Conducting a comprehensive evaluation of performance.

Manager’s Performance Evaluation Purpose Recognize excellence. Provide rational for evaluation decisions. Identify performance areas needing improvement. Identify areas of general management development training.

Manager’s Performance Evaluation Introduction Who: All employees holding a manager/supervisor or administrative appointment will be evaluated by their immediate supervisor utilizing the new Evaluation Performance instrument. When: Evaluations will be completed on a calendar year basis. Annual evaluations must be submitted to Human Resources no later than: January 15

Manager’s Performance Evaluation Procedures Five Easy Steps! Manager (evaluee) notification Initial meeting Supervisor (evaluator) preparation Final meeting Evaluation documents sent to HR

Step One Manager Notification Supervisor schedules initial meeting. Manager receives employee performance evaluation packet containing: Performance evaluation procedures Performance evaluation forms Education Master Plan goals Board of Trustee goals Superintendent-President goals Supervisor goals

Step Two Initial Performance Evaluation Meeting Initial meeting agenda: Supervisor explains the process. Supervisor provides an over-view of the District-wide goals (i.e. goals the employee received in the initial packet). Supervisor charges manager with the task of developing objectives that align with District goals for upcoming year. Supervisor and manager collaboratively discuss options for developing the manager’s Objectives Action Plan. Within two weeks of initial meeting: Manager develops and returns the first draft of goals to the Supervisor.

Step Three Supervisor Final Meeting Preparations Supervisor receives, reviews and (if needed) revises 1st draft of manager Objectives Action Plan. Manager previously submitted within 2 weeks of initial meeting Supervisor completes the performance evaluation for previous year which includes: Three-part evaluation forms Evaluation of manager’s previous year Objectives Action Plan Manager’s proposed Objectives Action Plan for upcoming year Supervisor schedules manager’s final performance evaluation meeting.

Step Four Final Performance Evaluation Meeting Supervisor and manager finalize manager’s objectives for next year. Supervisor reviews/discusses manager’s performance evaluation for previous year. Manager has opportunity to respond and/or comment in writing (within five days). Supervisor and manager sign off on documents.

Step Five Final Performance Evaluation to HR Signed final performance evaluation documents are submitted to Human Resources no later than… JANUARY 15

Manager’s Performance Evaluation THREE FORMS Form A – Overall Performance & Criteria Form B – Individual Performance Objectives Action Plan Form C – Performance Summary PLUS Form B prior year – Individual Performance Objectives Action Plan (Commencing with 2007 Performance Evaluation)

Performance Areas and Criteria Sample Form A Probationary ___ Administrator ___ Permanent: ___ Manager/Supervisor ___ Name:________________________________ Date Due: January 15, 2006 Classification:__________________________ Review Period: _________to _________ Performance Evaluation Keys: O=Outstanding M=Meets Expectations NI=Needs Improvement U=Unsatisfactory NA/O=Not Applicable/Observed Performance Areas and Criteria Team Work O M NI U NA/O a. Works to achieve cross-unit objectives in support of institutional efforts. b. Contributes supportive attitudes and behaviors towards the organization and its goals c. Works to establish and maintain cooperative and productive relationships. d. Consistently supports, motivates and encourages staff in work relationships. Comments: Other Performance Areas and Criteria >Leadership >Learning Outcomes >Planning and Review >Management >Decision Making

FORM B Sample Objectives Action Plan Employee Name: Date: Strategies   Employee Name: NOTE: Major Performance Objectives must be: Date: a. Related to District and department b. Attainable and reasonable c. Realistic and measurable d. Items which are in addition to the day-to-day operational tasks Strategies Timeline Comments Objective (Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary) FORM B Sample

Form C Sample LBCCD Manager Performance Evaluation Performance Summary Considering both the performance goals outlined on the Goal/Objective Action Plan, and the competencies described in the Performance Evaluation Form, comment on the individual’s overall contribution. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Form C Sample Overall Performance Rating Effective – May include a professional Development Plan Needs Improvement – Must include a Professional Development Plan Unsatisfactory – Recommendation Attached (May include a professional Development Plan) Employee Comments (Optional) Signatures Acknowledgement __________________________________________ _______________ Employee Date Supervisor Date

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Q: How do we incorporate the Form B (Individual Performance Objective Action Plan) into this year’s evaluation process? A. The 2006 Objective Action Plan will be developed for the 2006 Performance Evaluations. The next evaluation (due Jan 2007) will include both an evaluation of the previous year’s objectives and the development of the upcoming year’s objectives. Q Can the supervisor schedule and invite all managers to the initial meeting (explanation of process), or must the supervisor meet individually with each manager? A The Supervisor can structure the initial informational meeting in a manner that best fits the needs of that supervisor’s area, keeping in mind that the first draft of the individual manager’s objectives are a collaboration between the manager and supervisor. Q January 15 is a busy time for many supervisors and managers and may create a scheduling hardship. Is there any flexibility with the January 15 due date? A Performance Evaluations are due to Human Resources no later than January 15 of each year. To avoid January 15 time pressures, supervisors have the flexibility of completing evaluations a month or two prior to the due date.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Q. Do all my objectives have to reference the objectives of the college, Board of Trustee, etc.? A. No, some will be specific improvements to your area. Q. How many objectives are reasonable? A. There should be a few major ones with strategies that include sub tasks. There should not be a list of tasks. Q. What if I can’t accomplish my objectives due to another area (i.e. technology)? A. Objectives should be feasible and worked out with others involved – do not presume you are on another area’s priority list. Q. How does this relate to the goals in my Program Review? A. To the extent you have good, concrete goals, it should expedite your statement of objectives for the next year or so. Q. What happens if something else comes up mid-year that is a more important goal? A. If this should occur, you will need to discuss it with your supervisor. Objectives can be modified mid-year

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Continued Q. How does a supervisor respond to the Performance Areas’ criteria (Form A) that are not applicable to the manager being evaluated? A. The rating of NA/O (not applicable/observed) is available for this purpose. Q. Are there guidelines available to help the supervisor and manager develop objectives? A . Yes, page two of the Procedural Information handouts provide guidelines and definitions to assist you in this process. Q. Will the forms be available on the Intranet? A. Yes, the forms will be available on the Human Resources website. Q. What Performance Evaluation Forms should be used to evaluate the Confidential Employees? Will the due date change from a fiscal to a calendar year as well? A. Confidential Employee Performance Evaluation Forms will not change. Supervisors will use the same forms from previously years. However, the due date will change to January 15. Q. Who should I contact for answers to additional questions or concerns? A. Irma Ramos, Administrative Dean, Human Resources.

For Further Information… Irma Ramos Administrative Dean, Human Resources Phone: X 4512 Email: iramos@lbcc.edu Thank you!