HB5 School District Self- Evaluation in Community and Student Engagement and Compliance The lesser known piece...

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Results-based Financing Workshop Evaluation Results Kigali Rwanda June, 2008.
Advertisements

1 Citrus County 21 st CCLC Progress Report Larry Parman External Evaluator.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Forsyth County Schools
1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Parkland School Division
Crisis Shelter Program GOALS To stabilize youth and families in crisis To develop stable living conditions for youth To engage families in the resolution.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Subtraction: Adding UP
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #4 April 12th, 2011.
North Santiam School District State Report Cards
Teacher Evaluation: Lessons Learned Teaneck Public Schools Dr. Marisa M. King Dr. Deirdre Spollen-LaRaia.
Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
Ralls ISD HB 5 Student and Community Engagement Process.
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
HOUSE BILL 5 UPDATE. Curriculum Graduation Plans Endorsement Pathways College Readiness requirements Accountability Community and Student Engagement Student.
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
HB 5 Community & Student Engagement Francisco Rodriguez Education Specialist 806/
Community and Student Engagement
+ HB 5 — School District Evaluation of Performance in Community & Student Engagement.
TMISD District and Campus Improvement Plans and Budget Overview
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
House Bill 5 Community and Student Engagement Mathis ISD Presented at Regular Board Meeting, July 22, 2014.
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
Community and Student Engagemen t Evaluatio n. Community & Parent Involvement  EXEMPLARY Fine Arts  EXEMPLARY Wellness & Physical Education  EXEMPLARY.
Community-based accountability June 22, 2015
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
Insert campus logo * House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
NISD Community-Based Accountability System vs. HB5 School District Self- Evaluation in Community and Student Engagement and Compliance.
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
. * House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section Myrta Garza Principal Laura L. Treviño Facilitator Clara Magallanes Assistant Principal.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
2nd Language Acquisition Program Luz Garcia-Martin, Director, Bilingual/ESL, Deadline: May 16, 2016 HB 5 Community and Student Engagement Campus.
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
2nd Language Acquisition Program: Campuses with No Bilingual Program Luz Garcia-Martin, Director, Bilingual/ESL, Deadline: May 16, 2016 HB 5 Community.
Grand Prairie ISD Community and Student Engagement Performance Ratings June 2014.
Insert campus logo * House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
Community and Student Engagement: HB 5 Thursday, February 6, 2014 Dialog and Brainstorming.
Maypearl Independent School District - Local Accountability.
MARCH 2, 2016 ACCOUNTABILITY WEBINAR Kim Gilson, Doni CashRegion 10 ESC 1.
* House Bill 5, Section 46; Texas Education Code Section
Vision To inspire and equip students to be life-long learners and positive contributors to the world.
Community and Student Engagement June PEIMS Submission.
HB 5 HB 5 made sweeping changes:
Stillman Middle School
Community and Student Engagement
District Improvement Plan Summary Report June 26, 2017
under House Bill 5 Community and Student Engagement*
HB 5 HB 5 made sweeping changes:
G/T: Inclusion, not Exclusion
House Bill 5 Community Engagement Survey
Presentation transcript:

HB5 School District Self- Evaluation in Community and Student Engagement and Compliance The lesser known piece...

HB 5 New requirement: Districts must report on PIEMS a self-evaluation of the district and each individual school in the district. Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Acceptable, Unacceptable. Areas: Fine Arts, Wellness & Physical Education, Community & Parent Involvement, 21 st Century Workforce Development, Second Language Acquisition, Digital Learning Environment, Dropout Prevention Strategies, Ed Programs for GT One overall rating in each area due to TEA by August 8.

Why? None of this is directly stated in HB5. Demonstrates to a larger audience that the community is an important stakeholder in the schools. Demonstrates our values in regard to educating the whole child. There is more to education than state mandated tests. A wonderful opportunity to brag about what we are already doing.

What this assessment to looks like Simple, objective, and easy to document. Rubric for the engagement side Checklist (yes/no) for the compliance side Divided between elementary, middle, and high school levels to develop a rating for the district –Will be reported for the district based on individual school scores Look at what we are already doing well, as well as areas we need to strengthen. Indicators that demonstrate excellence in each content/program.

Performance Measure Data Source QuestionUnacceptableAcceptableRecognizedExemplary Campus provides multiple opportunities for parent and community volunteer service **recorded by total hours logged per student District/ Campus How many parent and community volunteer opportunities are provided? Less than 100 volunteer hours are recorded 100-1,000 volunteer hours are recorded 1,000-5,000 volunteer hours are recorded 5,000+ volunteer hours are recorded *Programs, events, organizations are scheduled to engage parents in the education of their students. District/ Campus Are parent engagement programs scheduled throughout the year? Rarely - < 3 Occasionally (4-6) Common Practice (7-9) Consistently Throughout the Year > 10 Students participate in community service projects CampusHow many hours were logged in student sponsored community service projects? Less than 5,000 hours of student led/sponsored community service activities ,999 hours of student led/sponsored community service activities. 10,000-14,999 hours of student led/sponsored community service activities. Over 15,000 hours of student led/sponsored community service activities. Community and Parent Involvement Elementary, Middle, and High School Engagement Rubric:

Performance Measure Data Source QuestionUnacceptableAcceptableRecognizedExemplary Campus seeks involvement from community stakeholders (examples: businesses, civic, faith- based partners) How many community stakeholders are officially recognized? 0-3 partners4-6 partners7-10 partners10+ partners Campus uses a variety of communication tools to inform parents of school news (example: website, newsletters, social media, auto-dial, marquee, school messenger, etc.) Does the campus use a variety of communication tools to inform parents of school news? 0 communication methods 1-2 communication methods 3-4 communication methods 5+ communication methods Parents feel adequately informed about district issues (i.e. Student growth, school finance, etc.) Do parents feel adequately informed about district issues? >69% agree70-79% agree80-89% agree90% or more agree

Community and Parent Involvement District Engagement Rubric: Performance Measure Data Source QuestionUnacceptableAcceptableRecognizedExemplary Campus provides multiple opportunities for parent and community volunteer service **recorded by total hours logged per student District/ Campus How many parent and community volunteer opportunities are provided? Fewer than 65% of campuses report 5,000+ volunteer hours recorded 65-74% of campuses report 5,000+ volunteer hours recorded 75-84% of campuses report 5,000+ volunteer hours recorded More than 85% of campuses report 5,000+ volunteer hours recorded Programs are scheduled to engage parents in the education of their students. District/ Campus Are parent engagement programs scheduled throughout the year? Fewer than 64% campuses report consistently scheduling more than 10 programs to engage parents in the education of their children 65-74% campuses report consistently scheduling more than 10 programs to engage parents in the education of their children 75-84% of campuses report consistently scheduling more than 10 programs to engage parents in the education of their children More than 85% of campuses report consistently scheduling more than 10 programs to engage parents in the education of their children Students participate in community service projects CampusWhat percentages of students participate in community service projects? Over 35% of students participate in community projects at fewer than 15 campuses Over 35% of students participate in community projects at campuses Over 35% of students participate in community projects at campuses Over 35% of students participate in community projects at campuses

Community and Parent Involvement District Engagement Rubric: Performance Measure Data Source QuestionUnacceptableAcceptableRecognizedExemplary Campus uses a variety of communication tools to inform parents of school news (example: website, newsletters, social media, etc.) How many parent and community volunteer opportunities are provided? Fewer than 70% of campuses use 5 or more communication methods 70-79% of campuses use 5 or more communication methods 80-89% of campuses use 5 or more communication methods More than 90% of campuses use 5 or more communication methods Parents feel adequately informed about district issues (i.e. Student growth, school finance, etc.) What percentage of students participate in community service >69% agree70-79% agree80-89% agree90% or more agree

Northwest ISD Community and Parent Involvement Compliance Did your campus notify parents of required health screenings such as hearing, vision, spinal curvature, etc.? Are parents provided information in their native language, when feasible and appropriate? Do parents/community have access to the parent involvement plan within the CIP/DIP? Does your campus offer at least two parent conferences per year? Does your campus have NCLB report card posted on the website? Does your campus offer students remediation opportunities after statewide assessments?

Questions?