Table 2. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at Non-Executive level

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Table 23. Summary on Hypothesis

before and after rehabilitation

Intermediate-level learner

Table 2. Correlation matrix for variables in this study

Perception of discriminatory organizational relationships

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

osteoporosis among the studied working women (n= 365)

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Management Philosophy

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Corporates/ Institutions/ Others

Corporates/ Institutions/ Others

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. The radial spheroidal functions

Year range Rainfall (mm) ∆s in rainfall Temp (°C) ∆s in temp RH (mm)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Author(s) and Published Year

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Unstandardized Coefficient Standardized Coefficient

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS

Source of variation Degrees of freedom Sum of squares Mean square

Dislike product & pay to avoid it

Cumulative Percentage

and Applications, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: /jcsa-4-2-2

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Number Of Investors Accounts

Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level

chemistry that are involved in peer group

Table 4. University Minnesota Model

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Corporates/Institutions/Others

Figure 2. MDS-T configuration for the thirteen (13) criteria (and their Place) in DPESS in Athens (NKUA) Chris P. Lamprou et al. Evaluating the effectiveness.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 4. Value creation (Y2)

Table 3. The Result of Post-test Data Normality Test

Table 4. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Managers level

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Educational Attainment

Average Execution Time in seconds

Sum of Square df Mean Square F Sig Health Between Groups

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

Table 2. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at Non-Executive level compgap_non executive_PC compgap_non EXECUTIVE_MC compgap_non EXECUTIVE_RC compgap_non EXECUTIVE_IC Compgap non executive_PC Pearson Correlation 1 -.245* -.713** -.391** Sig. (2-tailed) .034 .000 .001 N 75 Compgap non EXECUTIVE_MC -.156 -.257* .182 .026 .545** *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Neeraj Kumari et al. Role of HR in Designing & Implementing the Competency Models. Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 4, 83-89. doi:10.12691/jbms-2-4-1 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.