Sample Reviewer Questions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Academic Program Review Site Visits
Advertisements

Updates on the Statewide Policies on Military Credit and CLEP Exams CLEP Regional Workshop – Collaborative Effort by the Ohio Transfer Council and the.
Biennial Review 1. Timeframe: August 1, 2011 – July 30, 2013.
Sustaining the ADVANCE Program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Peter D. Spear Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs NSF ADVANCE National.
The Pennsylvania State University Service Learning- Engaged Scholarship Task Force Sponsored by Interim Provost Vice President, Student Affairs Vice President,
Open Forum International Education Task Force October 30, 2012.
Developing an Institutional Assessment Plan: Product and Process Bruce P. Szelest Winter Workshop - January 20-21, 2005 Saratoga Springs, NY Association.
1 Performance Leadership Taking the University of Missouri to New Heights of Achievement.
A Dialogue With the Community: Wireless Expansion, Network Connectivity, and the Rate Model Telecommunications Advisory Board.
Life after New 7.12: Documenting Faculty Choice Arlene Carney, Vice Provost for Faculty and Academic Affairs.
Professor Dolina Dowling
Maria Thompson Provost & Vice President for Academic Affairs Academic Affairs Restructuring Proposal 23 April 2012.
Advisory Committee on Application* Development** CCFIT * Administrative, not research ** Build/Buy/Borrow: Provisioning.
University of Louisville Faculty Discussion on Research Ho! Ho! Ho! Happy Holidays! 1 December 10,2009.
INSTITUTE FOR DISTANCE AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING Virginia Tech A Holistic Approach to eLearning The Institute for Distance and Distributed Learning.
Planning and Budget Committee March 13, Agenda Current Financial Position Original charge of this committee Sub-committee findings regarding Enrollment.
University of Massachusetts Boston FY11 Budget Process February 25, 2010.
PROVOST’S REPORT March 19, Overview New Vice Provost and Dean Hiring Process Task Force recommendation near completion Special Faculty Meeting to.
FY10 Spending Plan Process Finance and Administration Advisory Group September 30, 2009.
Preparing for SACS: Focusing our Quality Enhancement Plan.
Progress Toward University Goals for Equity, Inclusion, and Diversity Report to the Faculty Senate February 13, 2014.
Purdue University Calumet Faculty Convocation Fall 05 Purdue University Calumet Faculty Convocation Fall 05 Academic Affairs Current Status and Goals for.
Transformation through Enrollment Management Lynette J. Olson & William A. Ivy Pittsburg State University.
Institution program proposal is developed using campus processes (Review by department/division, university curriculum committee, faculty senate, dean,
Gail Hackett University Council Retreat August 30, 2005 Increasing Baccalaureate Degree Production in Arizona: ASU-Community College Partnerships.
Enrollment Management Council (EMC) Overview July 8, 2008.
A Culture of Inquiry: Creating a Sponsored Programs Office at a PUI.
SCC Tenure Process November 13, Goal: Ensure Faculty Excellence  Faculty excellence supports Shoreline’s vision of being a world-class institution.
2010 Faculty Leadership Institute Local Senates & Curriculum Committees Richard Mahon, Area D Beth Smith, Treasurer.
Academic Affairs (ACAF) Office Conducts Initial Review of Proposal Proposal owner (typically, a college) submits proposal Approval Process for Academic.
Enterprise IT Decision Making Governance Amy Gee, Portfolio Manager, EITDM Office of the CIO.
UTC STUDENT-COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SGA - GOVERNMENT AND EXTERNAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE,
Vice Provost Planning and Programs. Saul J. Weiner, MD Faculty in College of Medicine Active researcher in patient care Practicing clinician College.
.62 STRATEGIC PLANNING Framework, Process, & Calendar June 2008 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ADVENTIST HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER.
Academic Affairs Update David Lavallee Executive Vice Chancellor & Provost SUNY System Administration UFS Winter Plenary, Oneonta January 25, 2013.
Kimberlee Pottberg.  Part 1: Why we use WEAVEonline  Part 2: How to enter components.
Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes at Pitt Patricia E. Beeson Vice Provost for Graduate and Undergraduate Studies University of Pittsburgh.
Academic Advising Program
Faculty Senate Special Meeting June 12, 2014
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
UW SYSTEM AND INSTITUTION LEADERSHIP Administrative Hiring Practices Presented by Shenita Brokenburr, Ph.D. UW System Human Resources August 30, 2017.
President Provost / Dean of Arts & Sciences (CSGS and CLA)
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
Promotion in Extension Presented by: Ken Martin, Ph. D
A Sampling of IT Compliance in Higher Education – 2010
Shared Governance and the Academic Senate
Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.
STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOPS
Workflow: Hiring Proposal (Faculty PT/LT/Adjunct)
§ 1-6. Powers The General Faculty has power:
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
Movement: An Actor’s Challenge from a Dance Perspective – A Work in Progress D’Erika Flowers, Department of Dance and Theatre, College of Arts and Sciences,
Workflow: Hiring Proposal (Faculty)
State of the University
Governance John Zomchick Interim Provost
FA Winter Plenary Meeting
OUHSC Graduate College Program Review Overview and Timeline
Administrative Review
Changes in Salary Rates for Academic Administrators
Administrative Structure and Duties Task Force
Shared Governance Territorial Act (1889): The faculty, the president, and the regents are jointly responsible for governing the university. NWCCU, Standard.
Diversity & Inclusion at UCONN
Administrative Review Committee
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Fort Valley State University
Administrative Review Committee
Start with PROGRAM REVIEW
Industry-academic collaboration is a strategic necessity in today’s fragmented and turbulent economy. Advisory boards offer an effective way to achieve.
Responsibility for assessment at Brooklyn college – a distributed leadership model OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness September 9, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Sample Reviewer Questions Administrators

Provost Meeting What is your background? Describe your university’s organization and governance with respect to academic affairs. What are the major issues at SIUC over the last three years? What is your view of the role of the college (of program under review) and the program (under review) in meeting the mission of SIUC? What are the major challenges to the university, and along these same lines, the program (under review)? How is strategic hiring of faculty determined? Describe the student support services that are offered by the university. How does the campus audit pre-reqs and degree completion? Describe the Provost’s role in assuring assessment and continuous improvement in all academic programs

Vice Chancellor for Research Meeting What is your background? Describe the organization of the VCR office. What are the major challenges and opportunities for growth of the college? What are the major challenges and opportunity for growth of the program(s) under review? Describe major initiatives of the VCR office (note whether these include the program under review). Can you recommend new directions or initiatives at the state or national level that the program faculty should consider?

Dean Meeting What is your background? Describe your college organization and governance. What are the major challenges and opportunities for growth of the college? What are the major challenges and opportunity for growth of the program(s) under review? Describe the student support services that are offered by the college. Are there major scholarships offered to students? Do students in the college participate in the Honors Program? Does the college have an advisory board? How does it support academic programs? How is the college involved in assessment and continuous improvement of programs? Can you cite changes that have been done at the college level as a result of assessment? Have these changes been successful?