RCPNA Residential Infill Project (RIP) 2017 Questionnaire Responses opened from Thursday November 2nd until Wednesday November 15, 2017
135 Total Responses Date Created: Sunday, October 29, 2017 Complete Responses: 135
Q1: Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the City proposed Residential Infill Project(RIP) 'a' Overlay? Answered: 135 Skipped: 0
Q1: Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the City proposed Residential Infill Project(RIP) 'a' Overlay? Answered: 135 Skipped: 0
Q2: Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the rezone of Historically Skinny Lots from R5 (5,000 sq. ft) to R2.5 (2,500 sq. ft)? Answered: 134 Skipped: 1
Q2: Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the rezone of Historically Skinny Lots from R5 (5,000 sq. ft) to R2.5 (2,500 sq. ft)? Answered: 134 Skipped: 1
Q3: Do you support RCPNA in recommending no limitations to allowed off-street parking for skinny lots up to 36-feet wide? Answered: 131 Skipped: 4
Q3: Do you support RCPNA in recommending no limitations to allowed off-street parking for skinny lots up to 36-feet wide? Answered: 131 Skipped: 4
Q4: Do you support RCPNA recommendation of applying the 'a' Overlay only to Single Dwelling zoned properties located within 300-feet of current Frequent Transit bus lines, Max Stations, and Town and Regional Centers? Answered: 131 Skipped: 4
Q4: Do you support RCPNA recommendation of applying the 'a' Overlay only to Single Dwelling zoned properties located within 300-feet of current Frequent Transit bus lines, Max Stations, and Town and Regional Centers? Answered: 131 Skipped: 4
Q5: Do you support RCPNA asking for an "Extension" of the Nov Q5: Do you support RCPNA asking for an "Extension" of the Nov. 20th Discussion Draft comment deadline? Answered: 134 Skipped: 1
Q5: Do you support RCPNA asking for an "Extension" of the Nov Q5: Do you support RCPNA asking for an "Extension" of the Nov. 20th Discussion Draft comment deadline? Answered: 134 Skipped: 1
Q6: If an "Extension" to this deadline is requested which of the following indicates the extent of time needed? Answered: 134 Skipped: 1
Q6: If an "Extension" to this deadline is requested which of the following indicates the extent of time needed? Answered: 134 Skipped: 1
No Question Posed
RCPNA Board Meeting Tues. November 7th Unanimously approved the recommendation: “Request a 6-month Extension to the Nov. 30th, 2017, comment deadline for the City of Portland RIP Discussion Draft”
City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS) BPS recently extended the deadline for public comments to the RIP Discussion Draft to 5:00 pm on Thursday November 30, 2017, See: https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/67728 RCPNA LU & TC has the authority by Charter to render a decision on behalf of RCPNA when the item in question is time sensitive and does not allow the Board the opportunity to review the proposal. This is the case with the RIP Discussion Draft. LU & TC Possible Actions Include: Forwarding the RCPNA Board recommended 6-mo extension, only; Recommending approval of the Oct. 19th Tentative Recommendations (possibly amended) together with the 6-month extension request; Bullet #2 with questionnaire summary. No Action
Thank You for Your Participation Tamara DeRidder, AICP Principal, TDR & Associates