Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Advertisements

School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
AYP Status Determination in Smart Accountability Six Steps to Status.
Adequate Yearly Progress 2012 Comfort ISD. Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA.
Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement Summary of 2007 Statistics Prepared by NORMES, University of Arkansas Presented to the Joint Adequacy.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
Accountability 101. State Accountability Federal Accountability # Students Met Standard # Students Tested If the Standard is not met: Apply Required.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Understanding the Texas Accountability System. – 1979 Texas Assessment of Basic Skills (TABS) – 1985 Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills (TEAMS)
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Goal 1: To successfully educate all students Objective 3 Identify subgroups and content areas which contributed Identify subgroups and content areas which.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
An electronic document that stores various types of data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Accountability TETN April 19, 2011 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT – FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY BECCA MARSH, DIVISION OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT AND SUPPORT TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©2013.
Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check percent proficient.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Annual Report Georgetown ISD 2016 Accountability Rating:
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Hudson ISD
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) [insert district name]
ABCs/AYP Background Briefing
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
The Implementation of House Bill 22
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
AEIS [Our School District]
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
Understanding AYP Campus Data
Texas State Accountability
[insert district logo above]
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data
2014 State Accountability Ratings
AYP and Report Card.
Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
Presentation transcript:

Adequate Yearly Progress 2011-12 [Our School District]

Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA Math Other Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Reading/ELA Math Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Math Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Math Other Attendance Rate For elementary and middle school campuses Districts not offering 12th grade Graduation Rate For high school campuses Districts offering 12th grade

Standards for Performance % of students must pass in 2014 100 93 87 92 80 83 Reading 73 75 Math 67 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 % Proficient

Student Groups Evaluated Performance Accountability Subset Participation All Students Enrolled Other Indicator Attendance & Graduation* All Students Group African American* Hispanic* White* Economically Disadvantaged* Special Education* Limited English Proficient* * Provided that these groups meet the Minimum Size Requirement. < 50 = Not Evaluated | > 200 = Always Evaluated | 50-200 = Evaluated if equal to at least 10% of the All Student group

AYP Status Labels Met AYP Missed AYP – (Reason) Reasons include: Math (Proficiency and/or Participation) Reading (Proficiency and/or Participation) Attendance Rate Graduation Rate

Accessing the AYP Report 1 http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/ [Insert District Website Link] Campus Libraries or Offices 2 3

2012 AYP Report Overview Page One Performance: Reading/ELA – 87% Proficient Reading Performance, 2011-2012 Used to demonstrate proficiency. Reading Performance, 2010-2011 Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor).

2012 AYP Report Overview Page Two Performance: Mathematics – 83% Proficient Math Performance, 2011-2012 Used to demonstrate proficiency. Math Performance, 2010-2011 Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor).

2012 AYP Report Overview Page Three Participation: Reading/ELA & Mathematics – 95% Participation Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2011-2012 Used to demonstrate participation. Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2010-2011 Used to calculate 2 year average, if needed.

2012 AYP Report Overview Page Four Graduation Rate (75%) or Attendance Rate (90%) Graduation or Attendance Rate, 2011-2012 Used to calculate whether or not the campus or district met the target rate. Graduation or Attendance Rate, 2010-2011 Used to demonstrate improvement. 5 Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate, 2011-2012 Class of 2010

2012 AYP Report Overview Page Five AYP Explanation Table Summarizes the results of the AYP report

2012 AYP Status [Our School District] Campus Name 2012 Status Stage Sample Campus A Met AYP (Reading) Missed AYP (Math Stage 1, Year 1 Math Sample Campus B Met AYP None

2012 AYP Performance Reading/English Language Arts - (Grades 3-8 and 10) To insert your data into this chart, follow these steps: Using your mouse, right click on the chart so that the whole chart is selected. Choose the “Edit Data…” option from the menu that pops up. An Excel spreadsheet will open. Enter your 2009 Reading/ELA Percent Met Standard for each group into the “Met Standard” column. For the TPM column, you will need to enter the difference of your “% Met Standard or TPM” minus your % Met Standard for each group. The chart will adjust automatically.

2012 AYP Performance Mathematics- (Grades 3-8 and 10) To insert your data into this chart, follow these steps: Using your mouse, right click on the chart so that the whole chart is selected. Choose the “Edit Data…” option from the menu that pops up. An Excel spreadsheet will open. Enter your 2009 Math Met Standard for each group into the “Met Standard” column. For the TPM column, you will need to enter the difference of your “% Met Standard or TPM” minus your % Met Standard for each group. The chart will adjust automatically.

2012 AYP Participation Reading/English Language Arts - (Grades 3-8 and 10) To insert your data into this chart, follow these steps: Using your mouse, right click on the chart so that the whole chart is selected. Choose the “Edit Data…” option from the menu that pops up. An Excel spreadsheet will open. Enter your 2009 Reading/ELA Participation Rate for each group into the “Participation Rate” column. The chart will adjust automatically.

2012 AYP Participation Mathematics- (Grades 3-8 and 10) To insert your data into this chart, follow these steps: Using your mouse, right click on the chart so that the whole chart is selected. Choose the “Edit Data…” option from the menu that pops up. An Excel spreadsheet will open. Enter your 2009 Math Participation Rate for each group into the “Participation Rate” column. The chart will adjust automatically.

2012 AYP Graduation Rate For High Schools and Districts with a 12th Grade To insert your data into this chart, follow these steps: Using your mouse, right click on the chart so that the whole chart is selected. Choose the “Edit Data…” option from the menu that pops up. An Excel spreadsheet will open. Enter your 2009 Graduation Rate for each group into the “Graduation Rate” column. The chart will adjust automatically.

2012 AYP Attendance Rate For Elementary & Middle Schools and Districts Not Offering 12th Grade To insert your data into this chart, follow these steps: Using your mouse, right click on the chart so that the whole chart is selected. Choose the “Edit Data…” option from the menu that pops up. An Excel spreadsheet will open. Enter your 2009 Attendance Rate for each group into the “Attendance Rate” column. The chart will adjust automatically.