1 Aeronautics Committee Report to the NASA Advisory Council Gen. Lester Lyles (Chairman) Dr. John Sullivan Dr. Gene Covert Dr. Ilan Kroo Dr. Ray Colladay.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented to: COSCAP SA By: Aaron E. Wilkins III / Ajay Kumar Date: April 2011 FAAs Presence in South Asia An Overview of Technical Assistance Provided.
Advertisements

1 Regulation. 2 Organisational separation 3 Functional Separation.
1 AIAA Delta Forum AIAA Public Policy A CRISIS IN AERONAUTICS The NASA Landscape Aerospace Sciences Meeting January 8, 2001 Carol A. Cash, Chair Aeronautics.
Normal Operations Data: Air Traffic Facility Evaluations and NOSS
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
A PERFORMANCE BASED GLOBAL AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEM: PART II
NextGen and Its Impact on Performance Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System ICAO Montreal, Quebec, Canada March 26-30, 2007 Victoria.
Presented by the US Department of Education. More information at
Federal Aviation Administration International Flight Inspection Symposium June 24, 2008 James H. Washington Vice President, Acquisition and Business Services.
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
Date: October 16, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Research and Technology Park of New Jersey (ARTP) Presented to: American Society for Quality.
27 June Report on two themes: Airport Management Weather & Environment by: Jan Terlouw (NLR) ATM 2003 Seminar, Budapest June 27, 2003.
25 August 2014Page 1 Civil Military Cooperation in Enhancing operations Asia and Pacific Regional Sub-Office 2014 BEIJING, CHINA; 30 JUN-11 JUL 2014.
Ken Jacobs Airport Planning & Environmental Division March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration 33.
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Functional Areas & Positions
Large Aircraft Survivability Initiative (LASI) Programmatic Overview Briefing for the: 4 th Triennial Aircraft Fire & Cabin Safety International Research.
Traffic Management and FUA integration
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ground Test Project Aeronautics Test Program Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate
Federal Aviation Administration Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Briefing to COMSTAC Kelvin Coleman May 16, 2008.
6th Framework Programme Thematic Priority Aeronautics and Space.
Presented to: MPAR Symposium II By: James Williams – Director, Systems Engineering and Safety Date: 17 November 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Multifunction.
Programs without software- intensive system research elements Where most of the software- intensive system safety research resides Aeronautics Research.
1 Federal Aviation Administration Mid Term Architecture Briefing and NextGen Implementation 1 Federal Aviation Administration Mid Term Architecture Briefing.
Aeronautics Committee Report to the NASA Advisory Council Gen. Lester Lyles (Chairman) Dr. John Sullivan Dr. Gene Covert Dr. Ilan Kroo Dr. Ray Colladay.
Update on the NASA/NOAA/DOE Collaboration on the Utilization of ROA/UAV/UAS for Global Climate Change and Weather Research Will Bolton Sandia National.
Federal Aviation Administration CLEEN (Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions and Noise) Program Technologies Development AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Jim.
Presented to: Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee By: Stan Pszczolkowski, Manager, System Analysis Division Date: March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s approach for quiet and efficient subsonic air transportation Prepared for Lynne Pickard,
Presented to: Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee By: Stan Pszczolkowski, Manager, System Analysis Team Date: October 11, 2006 Federal Aviation.
Focus Points Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Overview ALP Guidance
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Concept of Operations for Commercial.
FAA NAS Enterprise Architecture – Informing Future Challenges in V&V for NextGen 2009 V&V Summit November, 2009.
Next Generation Air Transportation System Institute 1500 K Street, NW – Suite 500 Washington, DC NGATS Institute 2007 Annual Meeting June 21, 2007.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona ANDREA L. KINCAID DLA Energy Integrated Energy TrackIntegration of the Energy Industry.
11 Aeronautical Information Exchange Model (AIXM) / Weather Information Exchange Model (WXXM) Conference Addressing the NextGen Challenge Charles A. Leader.
FAA System-Wide Information Management Program Overview for SWIM-SUIT Public Lauch Donald Ward Program Manager FAA SWIM Program April 2007.
Corporate Management of Facilities Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD) Blair Gloss May 3, 2005.
Aeronautics Technology Where NASA is going….. Aeronautics Technology Environmentally Friendly Aircraft Smog-free No impact on global climate Noise within.
Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Canadian Implementation Presentation to Air Transport Association of Canada 9 November 2010.
Discussion Topics NASA AND FAA ROLES - TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT AIRLINES SUPPORT - ENVIRONMENT COMPATIBILITY BUDGET PROBLEMS-NEED TO RESOLVE;
AFRL Nuclear S&T Investment Strategy Dr. David Hardy SES Associate Director for Space Technology Air Force Research Laboratory 27 August 2010.
EUROCONTROL European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
Federal Aviation Administration NextGen Environmental Management System (EMS)
Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center Presented by: Deborah Germak To:FLC National Meeting Date:April 29, 2010.
NextGen Next Generation Air Transportation System
NASA Applied Sciences Program Update John A. Haynes Program Manager, Weather National Aeronautics and Space Administration Applied Sciences Program Earth.
Integrated Work Plan (IWP) Update Dr. Edgar Waggoner JPDO Interagency Architecture and Engineering Division (IAED) October 16, 2009.
ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 NMP 2-1 EW M ILLENNIUM P ROGRA NNMM Program Overview Dr. Christopher Stevens Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of.
Commercial Space Transportation Research and Development Program COMSTAC RLV Working Group Chuck Larsen October 10, 2007 Federal Aviation Administration.
NASA ARAC Meeting Update on Next Generation Air Transportation System May 3, 2005 Robert Pearce Deputy Director, Joint Planning & Development Office.
Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.
Next Generation Air Transportation System Presentation to the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) May 26, 2005 Robert A. Pearce.
UAS in the NAS Technology Working Group Out-Brief Suborbital Science Technical Roadmap.
A Technology Partnership for the New Millennium Anne Harlan, Director William J. Hughes Technical Center 68th NASAO Annual Convention September 20, 1999.
1 DFRC SUAS Program Operations and Risk Management Approach for Small UAS Presented to the Certification Working Group 6/26/2008 Brad Flick/DFRC Chief.
1 Stan Pszczolkowski FAA Technical Center (609) October 19, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration.
Space Operations and the National Airspace System 9 October 2012 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 Overview of Space Operations and the National Airspace.
How the NextGen Florida Test Bed could enable integration of Domestic and International Space Traffic airspace.
NASA Aeronautics FY 2017 Budget Request Investing in our Future Briefing to REDAC Airports Subcommittee Meeting John Cavolowsky, Director, Airspace Operations.
Presented to:Nextor NAS-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, NextGen Systems Analysis Date: January Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
NASA Model-Based Systems Engineering Pathfinder 2016 Summary and Path Forward Karen J. Weiland, Ph.D. Jon Holladay, NASA Systems Engineering Technical.
NASA Hypersonic Research
Presentation to the National Council of Space Grant Directors
The Air Traffic Organization: Building Today to Ensure Our Future
Joint Planning and Development Office “Where new ideas are welcome”
A Concept for Launch and Reentry Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)
Presentation transcript:

1 Aeronautics Committee Report to the NASA Advisory Council Gen. Lester Lyles (Chairman) Dr. John Sullivan Dr. Gene Covert Dr. Ilan Kroo Dr. Ray Colladay (ex-officio) October 16, 2008

2 Areas of Interest Explored at Current Meeting Col. Jeffrey S. Turcotte, Chief of the Air and Weapons Division, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base –Status of Agreements Between AFRL and NASA Aeronautics Research –Sense and avoid systems for UAVs and airspace technology for NextGen Dr. Kenneth W. Barker, Chief Engineer, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base –Technology Transition process improvements resulting from the USAF Smart Operations for the 21st Century initiative. Dr. Jaiwon Shin, Associate Administrator, Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate –Presentation on NASAs Aeronautics Research and ARMDs Response to the NACs Recommendation for System-Level Work Dr. Robie Samanta-Roy, Assistant Director for Space and Aeronautics, Office of Science and Technology Policy –Presentation on the Technical Appendix to the National Plan for Aeronautics R&D and Related Infrastructure

3 Status of Agreements AFRL and NASA Aeronautics Research Col Jeff Turcotte AFRL/XPA 14 Oct 2008

4 AFRL Mission Leading the discovery, development, and integration of affordable warfighting technologies for our air, space and cyberspace force.

5 S&T Customers/Stakeholders I-CRRA Capability Shortfalls MAJCOMs DSB/SAB DDR&E SAF/US SAF/AQ Congress System Program Offices CSAF & SecAF AFMC/CC Balanced S&T Investment AFSPC/CC Wargaming Strategic Command Joint Forces Command Special Ops Command Transportation Command DARPA ARMY NAVY PARNTERSHIPS DOE NASA Capability-based Planning and Programming

6 Some On-Going Agreements Program Automatic Collision Avoidance Technologies Integrated High Lift and Control Systems High-Speed Wind Tunnel Test of Blended Wing Body Future High Altitude, Long Endurance Vehicles Reduce Fuel Usage Scramjet Engine Tests Software Usage and Validation Directed Energy Effects upon Aircraft Aircraft Acoustic Signatures Human Factors in Aeronautics JView Visualization for NextGen Propulsion and Power Systems Power for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

7 Summary AFRL is working with NASA in many areas, as it should Additional agreements are welcome wherever they make sense – Unique/underutilized facilities – Unique expertise – Synergistic benefits where missions overlap – Sharing results is a no-brainer in most cases

8 Observation NASA and the USAF have significant collaborative activities Much of the collaborations takes place at the working level, where there exists a network of researchers working in related fields Committee Observation

9 Technical Appendix to the National Plan for Aeronautics R&D and Related Infrastructure NAC Aeronautics Committee Meeting 15 October 2008 Robie I. Samanta Roy Assistant Director for Space and Aeronautics Office of Science and Technology Policy

10 Observation –The National Aeronautics R&D Policy and the follow-on Implementation Plan lay out the roles and responsibilities of participating federal agencies, including NASA, in a collaborative effort to advance U.S. technological leadership in aeronautics. –In the Committees view, the NASA Aeronautics program, while currently conducting high quality research, is insufficient in scope to achieve the U.S. leadership objectives implicit in the Presidents Aeronautical R&D Policy. Recommendation – ARMD should plan and develop candidate systems-level research projects of highest priority that should be evaluated and considered by NASA for augmentation in the FY2010 (and out years) budget request. –These projects should be consistent with the objectives and themes of the National Aeronautical R&D Policy and Implementation Plan, leverage NASAs unique expertise and competencies, and reflect the priorities of the NRCs Decadal Survey for aeronautics. NAC Aeronautics Committee Observation & Recommendation from April 2008 Meeting

11 NASAs Aeronautics Research and ARMDs Response to the NACs Recommendation for System-Level Work Overview to the Aeronautics Committee of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC) Dr. Jaiwon Shin ARMD Associate Administrator October 15, 2008

12 ARMD Response Integrated system-level research to address national problem: Integrate advanced operational concepts and new aircraft and engine technologies to safely increase capacity and reduce fuel burn, noise and emissions. –Demonstrate integration of new aircraft and engine technologies through system level experimentation to simultaneously reduce fuel burn, noise, and emissions –Demonstrate the capability to conduct in-situ field testing of concepts which integrate surface, super-density, separation assurance and/or traffic flow management elements –Understand and mitigate safety concerns to fully and safely exploit new capabilities

13 New System-level Research Focus 1 = Hybrid wing configuration 2 = 1+ advanced engine and airframe technologies 3 = 2 + embedded engines with BLI inlets 4 = 3 + laminar flow Achieving Significantly Reduced Fuel Burn By Integration of Multiple Technologies Based on existing NASA data, investment in terminal procedures has the most benefit to fuel reduction Continuous climbs and descents (at top-27 airports) Direct routing/improved re-routing/collaborative TFM No-stop taxi operations (arrivals only at 35 OEP airports) VEHICLE THEMEOPERATIONS THEME Reduce noise Reduce emissions

14 Coordination With Other Efforts FAA: CLEEN NASA is also significantly involved in the technical aspects of this effort CLEEN focuses on more mature technologies (i.e. N+1) while the new focused activities are intended to explore more advanced (N+2) technologies The new activities are more closely related to the existing base research portfolio. JPDO/FAA Demonstrations The new activity should compliment any planned JPDO demonstrations, including applications on FAAs South Florida testbed. The new activity is focused on establishing a more extensive capability to test new operational concepts rather than maturing a few operational concepts that are ready for implementation Industry ASP System Study NRA – Integration of Advanced Vehicles Into NextGen FAP N+3 System Study NRA – Advanced Concept Studies for Subsonic and Supersonic Commercial Transports Entering Service in the Period NASA/FAA Research Transition Teams The new activity will directly support two of the RTTs – Integrated Arrival/Departure/ Surface RTT and Efficient Flow Into Congested Airspace RTT The improved analysis capability should benefit the future transition of other technologies that are not yet ready for the RTTs.

15 ARMD has been very responsive to the Council recommendation The proposed system-level research will have a major impact on aviation and the environment This system-level research builds on the progress that has been made in the past two years in the foundational program Summary and Committee Observations