Environment Flagship POWB 2018 P. Ericksen, A. Notenbaert, L. Merbold, L. Robinson PMC meeting Nairobi September 6 2017

Key objectives, outputs, outcomes and targets Environmental concerns considered by decision makers Solutions to increase productivity in face of ongoing environmental change National partners promote environmental management options Households adopt gender responsive options Countries implement policies that enable environmental management Flagship evidence influences key global livestock agendas. Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

Flagship structure Cluster 1: Assess environmental sustainability and adaptability of production technologies An Notenbaert, CIAT, ILRI 2: Optimize natural resource use and enhance provision of ecosystem services Lutz Merbold, ILRI, ICARDA, CIAT 3: Develop and support improved governance for environmental solutions Lance Robinson, ILRI, ICARDA CRP partnerships: CCAFS (FP 1, 3); PIM (FP 5); ?WLE Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

POWB 2017 progress: Milestones Framework for assessing environmental footprint tested in two countries – on target First assessment of GHG emissions Kenya, TZ, Vietnam – on target in Kenya, TZ. Synthesis policy issues on reducing GHG emissions from livestock – on target Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

POWB 2017 progress: Key outputs Research paper on gendered and other social differences Assessments environmental impacts technology interventions. Research reports on rangeland restoration; GHG emissions; roles of women and youth. Assessment current initiatives to improve land/ resource tenure National policy advice GHG mitigation, resilience to drought plus issue papers Evaluation PES: limited Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

Major research lines for six years Gender and age-differentiated assessments of risks and opportunities arising from global environmental change Quantification of environmental footprints of technology interventions. Improved environmental management options tested and costs/ benefits quantified. Tools and interventions to empower women and young people as agents of change. Recommendations for land and resource tenure that enhance land management. Policy advice on key environmental issues. Viable PES schemes. Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

Figure 2.4a Livestock and the Environment Flagship theory of change Cluster 1: Assessing environmental sustainability and adaptability of production technologies Novel approaches for ex-ante environmental assessment are widely adopted by extension systems, development partners and government agencies to identify win-win options Figure 2.4a Livestock and the Environment Flagship theory of change E1,4 Environmental concerns are considered in decision-making by national & international development partners, government agencies and extension systems, including technology developers seeking to improve cattle, small ruminant and pig production Land, water and forest degradation (including deforestation) minimized and reversed Gender and age differentiated assessment of risks and opportunities arising from GEC A1 1 E1,5,6 A3,7 Technology developers take environmental issues into account in their research priority setting Framework for assessing multiple environmental footprints for specific packages of technologies and interventions. A17,18 E1,5,6 E1 1 Increased resilience of agro-ecosystems and communities, especially those including smallholders Quantification of environmental impacts guides the development and selection of productivity-enhancing options by research and development partners Quantification of environmental footprints of packages of technology interventions. Targeted solutions are used by research and development partners to sustainably increase productivity of cattle, small ruminants and pigs in the face of on-going environmental changes. A1,2 A3,6,7,8,9, 10,11,12 Cluster 2: Optimize natural resource use and enhance the provision of ecosystem services A2 E4 More productive and equitable management of natural resources 4 A1,2 Quantification of environmental benefits leads to selection and further development of management options by partners A3,4,5,7 Government agencies and development partners at local and national levels are promoting environmental management options Improved environmental management options identified and tested with environmental benefits quantified. E1,3 Reduced net greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, forests and other forms of land use Role of women and young people in fostering environmental management promoted and strengthened across communities and with development partners. Tools and interventions to empower women and youth as agents of change for environmental management developed. E4 3 Gender responsive environmental management options that are well adapted to Global Environmental Change (GEC) are adopted by households (women & youth) A1,8 A10 Cluster 3: Develop and support improved institutions and other governance mechanisms for environmental solutions E1,4 Technologies that reduce women’s labour and energy expenditure developed and disseminated National government agencies, make Improvements in land tenure arrangements for reduced land degradation E4 4 Improvements in land tenure to improve land use management for reducing land degradation. A14 A15 National government agencies design and implement key policies to improve the management of the environment and livestock systems Key enabling policies for water, GHG and biodiversity developed (synthesized policy options = Output) E2 A7,8 Improved capacity of women and youth to participate in decision-making A3,4,5 Communities and development actors pilot payments for ecosystem services Develop and support implementation of viable PES schemes A13 Inform the global livestock and environment agenda A16 E1,4,5 1,4 Evidence generated by the flagship influences key global livestock agendas (IPCC, Global agenda for Sustainable Livestock) Agricultural systems diversified and intensified in ways that protect soils and water Research outputs Research & (near) development outcomes Sub-IDOs (Sphere of control) (Sphere of influence) (Sphere of influence →→interest)

Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Outcome Milestone 2017 2019/20 Environmental concerns considered by decision makers Framework for environmental footprints disseminated Approaches ex-ante impact assessment widely adopted Targeted solutions used 10 countries N/A Technology developers consider environmental issues in priority setting National partners promote environmental management options. GHG emissions quantified three livestock systems. Quantification of benefits leads to development of management options. Households adopt gender responsive options. National governments implement policies. Synthesis of policies to reduce GHG emissions. Land tenure arrangements improved. Communities pilot PES Global agendas influenced Key publications disseminated. Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

POWB 2017 progress: Milestones Framework for assessing environmental footprint tested in two countries on target. Window 1 / 2. First assessment of GHG emissions Kenya, TZ, Vietnam on target in Kenya, TZ. Also Colombia, Nicaragua. Window 1 / 2; CCAFS; IFAD; GIZ Synthesis policy issues on reducing GHG emissions from livestock on target; CCAFS Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

POWB 2017 progress: Key outputs Research paper on gendered and other social differences (W 1 / 2) Assessments environmental impacts technology interventions (W 1 / 2). Research reports on rangeland restoration (bilaterals); GHG emissions (W 1 / 2; CCAFS); roles of women and youth (Window 1 / 2). Assessment current initiatives to improve land/ resource tenure (W 1/ 2 and bilaterals) National policy advice GHG mitigation, resilience to drought plus issue papers (W 1 / 2 and IBLI bilaterals) Evaluation PES: limited Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

POWB 2018 main activities No water or biodiversity; limited PES Outcomes: Identify and test sustainable rangeland management practices in four countries Develop policy instruments for county level spatial planning and rangeland management Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

POWB 2018 main activities Outputs: Recommend forage intensification options adapted to CC and enhancing ES Publish GHG emissions factors for livestock systems Kenya ISI publication on participatory rangeland management Policy discussions on RM in three countries Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

POWB 2018 main activities Cluster 1: Ex-ante impact assessments ($1,000K; 60 -40) Evaluation environmental sustainability ($550K; 30 - 70) Cluster 2: Rangeland restoration practices ($800K 20-80 split) GHG emissions ($3,000 K (20 – 80) plus CCAFS) Drought resilience ($1,000 K bilaterals) Cluster 3: Land tenure/ governance in rangelands ($600K – 40-60 split) Policy advice drought resilience (800K bilaterals) Modest PES ($50K) Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

POWB 2018 cross - cutting Cluster 1: Gender $100K Cap Dev $50K Gender w/ PIM: 100K Cap Dev ?? Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

POWB 2018 countries Cluster 1: Uganda, Vietnam, Tanzania Cluster 2: Ethiopia, Tunisia, Kenya, Tanzania Cluster 3: Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Tunisia Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages

POWB 2018 budget Cluster 1: W 1 / 2 713, 493. Bilaterals. 1,013, 997 Page title minimum of 30 points and maximum of two lines Main point 6 point smaller than slide title Bullet points 4 point less than main point Font type is Calibri It is advised in one slide maximum 6 bullets We recommend you use images on slides You can change partner logos on front page You have to duplicate this slide for more inside pages