Technical Session for Preparing MELP Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hivos | Toolkit “Sustainable Coffee Farming as a Family Business” Objective To motivate and help practitioners in integrating a gender and youth.
Advertisements

1 Twinning Review Mission Johan Van Ransbeke. 2 Why Twinning ?  Pre-accession assistance  Implement a section of the Acquis  Member State (MS) – Beneficiary.
INITIATING THE PLANNING PROCESS. CONTENT Outputs from this stage Stage general description Obtaining government commitment Raising awareness Establishing.
Case study in the ToolBox Dana Thalmeinerova, GWP.
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
United Nations Statistics Division
CHAPTER 5 Infrastructure Components PART I. 2 ESGD5125 SEM II 2009/2010 Dr. Samy Abu Naser 2 Learning Objectives: To discuss: The need for SQA procedures.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
THE OECD APPROACH TO ASSESSING ORGANISATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Frank van Tongeren Head of Division, Policies in Trade and Agriculture (OECD) ICAE pre-conference.
Basic Impact Evaluation Course Poverty Analysis Initiative (C102) Poverty Analysis Initiative (C102) World Bank Institute Attacking Poverty Program.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Essential SNA Project being developed from 2011 to 2013.
University of Leeds Ethnicity and Cultural Diversity Network The Globe Centre, Accrington 22 nd September 2005.
Session 17 Structure of the CPIP Book Project for Capacity Development for the Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC.
TA7566-REG: Strengthening and Use of Country Safeguards Systems CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL DECREE Hanoi, August.
Session 9 CPDP M&E Process and Indicators for the C/P Development Framework Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital.
INITIATING THE PLANNING PROCESS. CONTENT Outputs from this stage Stage general description Obtaining government commitment Raising awareness Establishing.
1 Records Exchange Advice, Communication, and Technical Support (REACTS) State Strategic Plan Overview December 14, 2011.
Assessing The Development Needs of the Statistical System NSDS Workshop, Trinidad and Tobago, July 27-29, 2009 Presented by Barbados.
Grundtvig Learning Partnership Project TeachingFlex.
Introduction 1. Purpose of the Chapter 2. Institutional arrangements Country Practices 3. Legal framework Country Practices 4. Preliminary conclusions.
Up to the HILT! The Handbook for Information Literacy Teaching explained LILAC – University of Leeds 28 th March 2006 Peter Clinch & Nigel Morgan.
Session 3 CPDP Formulation Process Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)
Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.
ACP S&T Programme - Stakeholder conference October Implemented by the ACP Secretariat Funded by the European Union EDULINK - ACP Science and.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Insert Graphic Presentation Title Name Title Location.
PLANNING CYCLE An Overview. CONTENT Expected achievements Expected achievements Why IWRM Planning? Why IWRM Planning? Why a strategic approach? Why a.
National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Action Planning Workshop January 2007.
The Curriculum Development Process Dr. M
Right to Food Curriculum Overall Intent: Contribute to strengthening the in-country capacity to implement the right to food by different state duty bearers.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Biosafety Clearing House Training Workshop for Regional Advisors May 2006 Bangkok, Thailand.
M & E System for MI’s Training Program & Guidelines for MI’s Completion Report Presented by Monitoring and Evaluation Officer Mekong Institute January.
Developing National Capability for Integrated Border Management (IBM) in Lebanon Project Funded by the European Union Implemented by the International.
Using a Wiki to Scaffold Primary- School Students’ Collaborative Writing JOURNAL CRITIQUE Analyzed By: Norzie Khamis [MP101430] Fatimah Hishamuddin Fatimah.
Tips for Academic Quality Assurance Hugh Starkey Tempus DO IT 2 nd Consortium Meeting Landau 13 March 2013.
Web-Portal Format. Click The format and data for this will be provided by TTZ This will be regularly updated by IHT, plus it will contain the newsletters.
true potential An Introduction to the First Line Manager Programme’s CMI Qualifications.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Review of CEPSIP2 and PSIP tools March 2016 PROJECT FOR CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT IN PUBLIC SECTOR INVESTMENT PROGRAMMING PHASE II (CEPSIP2)
A ACTRAV/ITC-ILO COURSE Decent Work, Green Jobs and Sustainable Development Turin Centre, 24 August to 04 September 2015 Course Orientation.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center 1 Introduction.
Objectives and Flow of this Workshop. Objective 1: Review PSIP Process ⇒ Day 1 Sessions 3. Review of FY Development Budget Execution 4. Review.
UNEP/Global Mechanism support for UNCCD reporting
The most represented stakeholders within the NAPA process were governments, followed by research institutions, UN Agencies and local communities. Private.
Monitoring and Evaluation
RAF9038 Final Coordination Meeting
MUHC Innovation Model.
Hazard Mitigation Planning VII
GROUP 2 - STRATEGY GOAL/IMPACT AND OUTCOME; OUTPUT OBJECTIVE 4
Presented by Seluvaia Finaulahi
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Role of external contractors - Assistance, monitoring and evaluation
Purpose of the Workshop
Development of energy balance statistics
ITCILO/ACTRAV Course (A )
European Institute of Public Administration (NL)
Evaluation of teacher training
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
Course Orientation Promotion of the Protocol on Forced Labour
Field monitoring Project (number and title)
Presentation title Conclusions of 13th meeting of lead reviewers of GHG inventories –follow-up 14th meeting of GHG Inventory Lead Reviewers Bonn, Germany,
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
5b. Presentation for Reviewing Photos
Presentation transcript:

Technical Session for Preparing MELP Report MyCDNet’s MELP Training II 12 August 2015 Technical Session for Preparing MELP Report

What should be submitted? How to use the updated tools? Session outline What has been changed? What has been added? What should be submitted? How to use the updated tools?

Outcome Evaluation Report IMPORTANT! MELP = Plan ≠ Report MELP Report (Before) Outcome Evaluation Report

Can be downloaded at http://www.cap-net.org/ MELP is used as network management tool

Tools for Monitoring and Evaluation (Before) Process monitoring Tool 1: Network Progress Reports / Activity Reports Tool 2: Sample Course Evaluation Form Result evaluation Tool 3: Monitoring Forms For Network Outputs Tool 4: Measuring LFA Outcomes Tool 5: Assessment Of Network Management Before this, these tools were used to prepare outcome evaluation report

New and Revised Tools New: Revised: GUIDELINE for Preparing Outcome Evaluation Report TEMPLATE of Outcome Evaluation Report TEMPLATE for Result Categorization TEMPLATE for the list of participant Revised: Tool 3- Form A (Outcome Evaluation Question) Tool 2 (Training’s questionnaire) Template for course evaluation report, financial report, network progress report Outline for Technical Report

Problem 1 Lack of standardized theory of outcome evaluation We did not have a standardized definition about the theory of change of Cap-Net Cap-Net’s MELP Manual was developed in 2009 and some information have to be updated

Solution for Problem 1 Guideline of Outcome Evaluation Report

Problem 2: Different questions were used for outcome evaluation Networks Question in 2014 Outcome Evaluation Reports A How have you used the knowledge? B Was the information useful? C How the knowledge has been used in their institutions? Some networks didn’t attach the question that they used Some networks didn’t ask this question

Solution for Problem 2 Revised Outcome Evaluation Question REVISED TOOL 3 FORM A

Problem 3: Different format in reporting results and categorizing results Network B Network A Network C: 89 percentage of the respondents mentioned the knowledge was used differently.

Solution for Problem 3 Result Categorization Template

Problem 4: Different content of the MELP Reports 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Tools and Methodology of MELP 3.0 Results of Monitoring and Evaluation 4.0 Assessment of network management 5.0 Lesson Learnt 6.0 Conclusion and Recommendation 7.0 Appendix

Solution for Problem 4 Template of Outcome Evaluation Report

Outcome Evaluation Question REVISED Outcome Evaluation Question (Tool 3-Form A)

OUTCOME EVALUATION QUESTION When should this be applied? between 6 – 12 months How are the results to be used? prepare the evaluation report. review and revise work plans and priorities. promoting network and increased visibility. Improve management, relevance and efficiency of future activities.

BEFORE Outcome Evaluation Question (Tool 3[A]) 1) How have you used the knowledge from the course to improve your own performance at work? 2) How have you shared the knowledge from the course to improve the performance of your organization? 3) How have you spread the knowledge from the course to other people and institutions?

AFTER Outcome Evaluation Question (Tool 3[A]) Question 1: SPLIT a) Have you used the knowledge from the course to improve your working performance? Yes [ ] No [ ] b) If YES, please explain how you have used the knowledge. If NO, please mention the limitations. (Before): How have you used the knowledge from the course to improve your own performance at work?

AFTER Outcome Evaluation Question (Tool 3[A]) Question 2: COMBINED Q2&Q3 a) Have you shared or spread the knowledge gained from the course within or beyond of your organization? Yes [ ] No [ ] b) If YES, please explain how you have shared/spread and to whom you have shared/spread the knowledge. If NO, please mention the limitations.

AFTER Outcome Evaluation Question (Tool 3[A]) Question 3: NEW Have you identified positive or any specific change in water resource management that contributed by the knowledge that you gained from the course? What change was that? For developing short story

NOTE Network are pleased to modify the question but the questions should be able to obtain the information that Cap-Net requires Keep the keywords! So that you can fill in the tables that provided in the reporting template

RESULT CATEGORIZATION TEMPLATE

Your question and comment are most appreciate QUESTION OR COMMENT?? Your question and comment are most appreciate

Lai Chee Hui chlai87@yahoo.com

Where does these information come from? Work plans Network progress reports. Surveys Project reporting, Outcome Evaluation report Data bases Government and agency reports on reforms to implement IWRM. Reports from participating local authorities. Sector agency policies on water management. External Evaluation