Staff meeting Monday 20th February 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leading Learning in the Social Sciences MARGARET LEAMY National Coordinator Social Sciences Te Tapuae o Rehua Consortium
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Eighth Grade MYP Service Project
Standards, data and assessment. Links to Tfel 1.6 Design, plan and organise for teaching and learning 2.4 Support and challenge students to achieve high.
Introducing the New College Scheme Seevic Performance Appraisal.
External Mentor and Link Tutor Conference Tuesday 27th January 2015
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT HOW TO GET THE MOST OUT OF THE PROCESS Tuesday 2nd September pm.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Performance and Development Process What to take from 2014/15 Improved understanding of the guidelines Reflective Teacher Practice Genuine and meaningful.
Welcome to the Secondary PGCE New Mentor meeting.
Principles of Assessment
Seevic Performance Appraisal
PGCE Full-time SE3 Briefing March Aims Be aware of the expectations of SE3 Understand what is expected of you during the block experience Understand.
Aotearoa/New Zealand A Bi-cultural Classroom.. To gain full registration PRTs must participate in an Induction and Mentoring programme supervised by a.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Roles and Responsibilites of the Mentor Teacher Thank you for participating in our Mentor/Mentee Program! Parkway School District Summer 2010.
Effective Learning Support: The key to quality and success Enhancement of Learning Support.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Identifying Assessments
Oregon Department of Education March 10, 2005 Video Conference Title ID Subpart 2 Formal Agreements with Facilities to Provide Academic Programs.
Learn Local Quality Preaccredited Teachers Community of Practice Moderation Workshop South East Victoria ACFE Region 5 th August 2015.
 “I have to teach the same information skills each year because students do not learn them.”  “I don’t have time to give tests so I do not assess student.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Appraisal It’s about learning It’s about growth It’s about accountability.
Curriculum Forum Secondary Tuesday 6 June 2017
Visible Learning Plus: an introduction
Montgomery Township Board of Education
Personal Learning Planning Learning Logs and Pupil Achievement Folders
Thinking with Technology Course Module 4
LSRN Discussion Workshop: 24 November 2016
Evaluation Emma King.
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
Naumai Haere mai. Ko Kerry Mitchell ahau.
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Alternative Assessment (Portfolio)
St Andrew’s College: Teaching as inquiry 2017
Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Chapter Reflections: 1,2,3,5,6 By: Amy Howland.
WELCOME How do we define assessment?.
School Self-Evaluation 
Consistency of Teacher Judgement
Professional Learning Cycle Day 3
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Teaching as Inquiry 2017:  We are evaluators. We assess our impact.
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Improvement through Self-Assessment
Le Bocage international school Information evening September 24, 2015
Curriculum for Wales Creating the Climate for Change
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
INTASC Standards By: Michelle Dea.
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
OTL:NGP:EA:1217.
February 21-22, 2018.
Assessment The purpose of this workshop / discussion is to extend further teachers’ understanding of the Department's Assessment Advice. This workshop.
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Appraisal Training Hyperlink.
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
PERCENTILE. PERCENTILE What is percentile? Percentile (or Centile) the value of a variable below which a certain percent of observations fall.
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Staff meeting Monday 20th February 2017 St Andrew’s College Staff meeting Monday 20th February 2017 Ali McCormick a) Learner Support processes (RTI) Helaina Coote (Assistant Head of Secondary School): Working with the PTCs b) Appraisal at St Andrew’s College

Aim of the session: Outline RTI referral system You will be able to: Outline RTI referral system List 3 important diagnostic questions List 3 types of interventions   Agenda: Why Rti? (2) Referral system (1) Diagnosis (3) Types of Intervention Delivery (1) Check for understanding: Exit ticket (3)

St Andrew’s College Staff Meeting Working with the Practising Teacher Criteria (PTCs) Appraisal at St Andrew’s College Learning Objectives: Revise what each PTC is requiring from you Identify and discuss the types of evidence you could use for each PTC Understand the Appraisal Process at StAC Success Criteria: You will have a deeper understanding of the PTCs to help you with this year’s appraisal process You will have clarity about this year’s appraisal process (evidence, self reviews, student voice, the focus of meetings with your appraiser)

Working with the Practising Teacher Criteria (PTCs): How are they organised?

Professional relationships and professional values Fully certified teachers engage in professional relationships and demonstrate commitment to professional values Professional knowledge in practice Fully certified teachers make use of their professional knowledge and understanding to build a stimulating, challenging and supportive environment that promotes learning and success for all akonga.

Sources of evidence through: Observation: Formal observations of teaching or aspects of teaching with structured feedback and next steps are discussed with the teacher and are documented in Appraisal Connector. Discussion: Includes follow up to observations; appraisal meetings; structured mentoring conversations and critical self-reflection Documentation in Appraisal Connector: reflective journals of teaching practice in; records of planning for teaching and learning; assessment records including reflective analysis of learners’ assessment information; appraisal records; records of professional development; teacher’s teaching as inquiry; teacher’s self-review.

Task: Discuss and record your answers to the following questions: Working with the Practising Teacher Criteria (PTCs) In groups of three, you will be given one PTC criterion to focus on. Task: Discuss and record your answers to the following questions: What quality practices take place at St Andrew’s College that connect with this criterion? What would valid evidence look like for a teacher to demonstrate they have met this criterion? Record answers from other groups and the discussion on the handout provided.

Teacher as agent of change b) Appraisal at St Andrew’s College Teacher as agent of change The objective of the appraisal process is to conduct a meaningful and valued system which: Engages teachers in thoughtful and reflective professional conversations around their practice information (observation, discussion and documentation) Encourages and promotes continuing inquiry into effective teaching practices Leads to significant improvements in both teaching practice and student outcomes Promotes professional growth through partnership learning

Appraisal for learning aims to raise student achievement through teacher development and must: Focus on the teacher’s progress towards meeting the Practising Teacher Criteria Occur throughout the year (three meetings) Ensure i-smart goals (department / personal) are set and evaluated in relation to their outcomes on student learning each year Be evidence-based (DATA, observations, feedback) Involve classroom observation(s) Include self-reflection on teaching practice and inquiry outcomes by the teacher (recorded in Appraisal Connector) Ensure the teacher has the opportunity to discuss their practice and performance that year Be finalised in a report, signed by both the appraisee and the appraiser and emailed to the Head of Secondary School’s PA, Barbara Moore by the end of the academic year.

Regular journaling in Appraisal Connector to provide evidence of impact on student learning outcomes and PTCs Conversations about professional practice and growth with appraiser throughout the year Construction of an Appraisal Report that summarises professional practice and growth for each that year. These will be used (alongside a conversation with the Head of Secondary School) to renew Practising Teacher Certificate every three years

What evidence? A Checklist: (page 5 of the Appraisal for Learning 2017 handbook)

Also includes: Each meeting with your appraiser is an opportunity to: Discuss the evidence in Appraisal Connector Check the extent to which the PTCs are being met Construct your Appraisal Report (as you go, not at the end of the year, is the recommendation for this)

What evidence could you provide at your first meeting (prior to 17th March)?

Ask yourself: so what? Evidence: Reflecting on practice Appraisal Connector has a tool where you can complete reflections on your practice: The key with any reflection is to move beyond description to outline the impact of whatever you are reflecting about on your future practice: Ask yourself: so what? What will you do differently as a result of this new learning / piece of data / information / conversation?

Positive Behaviour Management Content and Curriculum Knowledge Evidence: Self reviews Appraisal Connector has a tool where you can complete a self-review against four vital teaching practices: Positive Behaviour Management Content and Curriculum Knowledge Instructional Practice Formative Assessment These self appraisals may be used to develop a focus for inquiry and development over the year. See your appraiser if you would like them to set up a self-review for you (they have the rights to do this).

Informal (conversations) and formal (surveys) Evidence: Student voice It is important to collect student voice to gauge the impact of your practice on your learners: Informal (conversations) and formal (surveys) Throughout the year is preferable to only at the end of the year because it allows you to respond to the feedback and adjust your programmes Appraisal Connector has a tool for this Kathy Scott also has a student voice survey that she can set up for you