Session 1 S3.1 session day 5 4 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011 in Thailand.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Impact Assessment
Advertisements

WASH Cluster – Emergency Training S WASH STRATEGY Session 1 Introduction S1 1.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING. M&E DEPARTMENT WELIME Using Technology in Monitorin g and Evaluation (e-ProMIS)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Green Recovery And Reconstruction: Training Toolkit For Humanitarian Aid Project Design, Monitoring and Evaluation Session 2: Environmental Monitoring.
Pillar 4a Information management
Role of Result-based Monitoring in Result-based Management (RBM) Setting goals and objectives Reporting to Parliament RBM of projects, programs and.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Humanitarian coordination S3.1 session day 5 3 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.
Lesson 5 – Logical Framework Approach (LFA)
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Lesson 3: Monitoring and Indicator Macerata, 23 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Evaluation SG Seminar 9 March 2009 Svend Jakobsen and Sara Hector, SG.C3.
Developing Indicators
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
Delegation of the European Commission to Thailand 17 September 2009 EC Funding Mechanisms for coastal and climate hazards in ASIA: Priorities and opportunities.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
S3.1 day 6 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011 in Thailand approved by the Advisory.
Action planning and evaluation How to apply workshop learning and action points to deepen that learning further Identify and plan next steps for post-
S3.1 session day 3 1 training delivered by Oxfam GB, RedR India and Humanitarian Benchmark; January 2012, Yangon, Myanmar approved by the Advisory.
S3.1 session day 5 2 Programme management download resources from Approved by the Advisory Group: Programme management Programme and project.
SUMMARY Macerata, 8 th April Andrea Gramillano, t33 srl.
Developing a session plan S3.1 session day Text Dimension 40 Arial BOLD Position: Horizontal 5.44 Vertical 2.40 Text Dimension 24 Arial BOLD ITALICS Position:
ICT4D: Evaluation Dr David Hollow DSV, University of Stockholm.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Developing a session plan S3.1 session day training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
ALNAP Biannual Meeting 9-10 June 2005
Project monitoring and evaluation
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Disaster and Emergency Planning
Monitoring and Evaluation
CCP: Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Introductory Presentation by David Hegarty David Hegarty Phone:
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Part 2: How to ensure good project management?
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
2017 On the Ball Initiative On the Ball is a collaborative HSE initiative designed to refresh and re-energise HSE , with the ultimate goal of achieving.
Communicate the Impact of Poor Cost Information on a Decision
Communicate the Impact of Poor Cost Information on a Decision
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Communicate the Impact of Poor Cost Information on a Decision
Communicate the Impact of Poor Cost Information on a Decision
RST processes Session 5 Presentation 2.
Humanitarian Architecture in Bangladesh
ROOTS 1+2 Advocacy toolkit
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Discussions support slides
Nutrition Cluster Advocacy
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
SUSTAINABLE MICRO-FINANCE for WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
Field monitoring Project (number and title)
Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation
Financial Control Measures
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Monitoring and Evaluation
Financial Control Measures
Presentation transcript:

session 1 S3.1 session day 5 4 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011 in Thailand approved by the Advisory Group members Monitoring and evaluation Monitoring & Evaluation

Developing a session plan Text Dimension 24 Arial Position: Horizontal 5.44 Vertical 2.40 Text Dimension: 20 Arial By the end of this session, you will have an understanding of Objective 1 The aims and goals of monitoring and evaluation Objective 2 The difference between Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) and when to use each Objective 3 Monitoring & Evaluation in the disaster cycle Learning objectives

Developing a session plan Discussion in groups Write down key points 20 minutes Group Brainstorm Exercise What is the purpose or goal of Monitoring & Evaluation? On post it notes write down the aims, goals purposes, reasons for doing monitoring and evaluation

Developing a session plan Accountability to The affected community Donors Management Government Risk management Identifying, tracking and Creating hazard mitigation procedures to manage potential risks Providing a record for analysis now or in the future How the information changes over time How the response has impacted those affected Is the program on track and how can we improve it. What is the purpose or goal of Monitoring & Evaluation?

Developing a session plan Relevance – does the project address needs? Efficiency– are we using the resources wisely? Effectiveness – are we achieving the outputs? Impact – has the goal be achieved? Sustainability – will the impact last? Monitoring & Evaluation should address:

Developing a session plan Discussion in groups Write down key points 20 minutes Group brainstorm exercise Which aims or goals are best achieved through monitoring and which through evaluation?

Developing a session plan Where does M & E fit in the disaster cycle Impact assessment Response Reconstruction Prediction & early warning Preparedness Mitigation & prevention M & E should directly link to Log-frames and other management tools

Developing a session plan Physical and financial progress Ongoing priorities and allocation of resources Equitable distribution of benefits among affected groups Acceptance and usefulness of project among affected groups Implementation problems and constraints Monitoring The purpose of monitoring is to track the:

Developing a session plan

Spectrum of data collection tools Conversation with concerned individuals Community interviews Field visits Reviews of official records & info systems Key informant Interviews Participant observation Focus group interviews Direct observation Surveys Census Field experiment Informal/less structured Qualitative Formal/more structured Quantitative

Developing a session plan Discussion in groups Write down key points 20 minutes Group Exercise (10 min) As a group pick one monitoring tool that you have used and discuss how well it worked and what were its benefits and limitations.

Developing a session plan To assess an on-going or completed project/ programme/ policy To determine the relevance and fulfilment of objectives To establish efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability The aim and purposes of Evaluation Provide credible and useful information Enable the incorporation of lessons into management decision-making Provide improvements for other projects/ programmes/ policies

Developing a session plan Internal vs external evaluations What are the advantages and disadvantages of both? Objective 3 Evaluation

Developing a session plan Discussion in groups Write down key points 20 minutes Group exercise Without the use of written or spoken words 1) Demonstrate the difference between monitoring and evaluation 2) Demonstrate an example of good practice in monitoring 3) Demonstrate an example of good practice in evaluation

Developing a session plan 15 Evaluation example

Developing a session plan 16

Developing a session plan 17

Developing a session plan 18

Developing a session plan 19

Developing a session plan 20

Developing a session plan 21

Developing a session plan 22

Developing a session plan Text Dimension 24 Arial Position: Horizontal 5.44 Vertical 2.40 Text Dimension: 20 Arial Any questions Share your experiences Do you have any comments or experiences you would like to share? Do you have any questions? Any questions?

Developing a session plan Text Dimension 24 Arial Position: Horizontal 5.44 Vertical 2.40 Text Dimension: 20 Arial Title BOLD Publisher: Regular S3.1 session day training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011 in Thailand approved by the Advisory Group members Further reading WASH 4 5 Shelter after disaster 1a. Assessment Shelter Centre, 2010 HAP International accountability and quality management HAP international, 2010 ALNAP Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action