NUCLEAR TRANSPARENCY WATCH Prevent and anticipate through transparency and participation Nuclear energy related planning – obstacles and challenges in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal issues on shale gas activities raised in petitions received by the European Parliament Committee on Petitions.
Advertisements

SEA & ETC Strategic Environmental Assessment and European Territorial Cooperation programmes Annual meeting with the Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes.
Overview of Environment Agency Decommissioning and Clean up programme – delivering Nuclear site restoration Peter Orr, decommissioning and clean up programme.
Energy National Policy Statements Anne Stuart DECC Energy Development Unit 22 October 2009.
TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group D1- Nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear waste QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES  Why is the NPP decommissioning required / necessarily?  How.
Comments Mari KOYANO Graduate School of Law Hokkaido University 1.
The Montana Coal Gasification and Fischer-Tropsch Project Joe Wendland Cliff Robbins.
1 East Asia Science and Security Project: Status, Planning, and Outlook David F. von Hippel and Peter Hayes Nautilus Institute Prepared for the East Asia.
Energy National Policy Statements Nick Cooper DECC.
1 CEER How to balance the public’s concerns and critical infrastructure construction Matti Vainio, Deputy HoU DG ENV – C.5, European Commission.
Nuclear Energy: Viable Energy Alternative? By Andrew Henry.
Is the UK Leading Europe? UK Offshore Wind March 2003 London Christian Kjær Policy Director European Wind Energy Association (EWEA)
Jerzy Jendrośka The EIA Directive in the case law of CJEU INTERACTION BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND THE NATURE DIRECTIVES ACADEMY OF.
Nuclear program of Lithuania Dr. Vidas Paulikas, Radiation Protection Department VATESI Visaginas, 29 June 2009.
EREF - European Renewable Energy Federation Sustainable Energy for Europe - INFORSE-Europe Seminar, Brussels - André Vieira Pinheiro – Brüssel November.
1 Brendan Devlin Adviser, Markets and Infrastructure Directorate B, DG ENER European Commission.
World Nuclear Association 38th Annual Symposium September 2013, Central Hall Westminster, London Nuclear Operation and Radioactive Waste Management.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
1 9/15/2015 Gogita Todradze National Statistics Office of Georgia Institutional Arrangements for Energy Statistics in Georgia.
TEAM 1 NONAMECOUNTRY 1SU RUI (LEADER)CHINA 2TENG IYU LIN (PRESENTER)MALAYSIA 3MUHAMMAD TARIQ AZIZ (RAPPORTEUR)PAKISTAN 4NORAISHAH PUNGUTMALAYSIA 5MOHAMMAD.
Major project development in the Framework of CF and ERDF funds JASPERS - a technical support facility Presented at an InterAct Danube Region Strategy.
0 Tadas Matulionis Lietuvos Energija AB Strategic planning manager Minsk, December 07, 2007 Environmental Impact Assessment of a New Nuclear Power Plant.
5 Engineering Technology Goals in the Energy Value Chain 2 EmpowerPromoteTransformReinventRevolutionize.
Jerzy Jendrośka Implementing the Aarhus Convention’s provisions in national legislation and practice: experience of countries of the UNECE region in the.
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
SEA - National plan Electricity Supply Arend Kolhoff Netherlands Commission for EIA Jordan - September 2003.
E nvironmental Protection in Bulgaria facts and challenges Workshop on : “Protection of the environment: climate change, pollution and biodiversity” Sofia,
1. Sustainable Development. International commitment. COORDINATION. A LONG-TERM VISSION. Policies Enhance the economic growth. Certainty and Economic.
APEC Energy Working Group Ms Vicki Brown representing the Lead Shepherd APEC Energy Working Group Presentation to the APEC EGCFE Workshop Taipei, Chinese.
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Nuclear energy. OECD Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris 1960) Convention on Civil.
Social Acceptance of Waste Management Facilities A real challenge Experience from Tunisia.
Assessing alternative energy sources to fossil fuels NS4053 Week 6.2.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
A view from the field Ir. Jan Haverkamp Greenpeace EU policy advisor dirty energy nuclear transparency.
TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group D2- Nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear Waste - QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES 1. Is it reasonable for a country to build a fuel fabrication.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Burkina Faso Delwendé NABAYAOGO RAF9038 Final Coordination Meeting Arusha, Tanzania 2 – 5 December 2013.
1 |1 | Workers' Health in the Green Economy and Sustainable Development _____ Dr Ivan D. Ivanov Department of Public Health and Environment World Health.
It Is a Moral Issue – Why We Should Say ‘No’ to Nuclear Andrew Blowers Presentation at Thornbury, November 2010.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
Jussi helske1 Workshop on the learning of EC approaches and experience in Licensing of New NPP’s Existing in European Union countries procedures.
Heat Network Demonstration SBRI: policy context & objectives for the competition Natalie Miles Heat Strategy and Policy (Heat Networks)
Nuclear versus Coal plus CCS Bob van der Zwaan (ECN and Columbia University) with Massimo Tavoni (FEEM and Princeton University) International Energy Workshop.
Russian Nuclear Boomerang to Europe. Challenges and Possible Solution Oleg Bodrov JSC Decommission General Director, St. Petersburg, Russia Risks and Responsibilities.
The Energy Problem Henry Lee Director Environment and Natural Resources Program John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University National Energy.
Nuclear decommissioning: Turning waste into Wealth
Chapter 12 Nuclear Energy.
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
REFLECTED IN JAMAICA’S ENERGY POLICY
Chapter 12 Nuclear Energy.
Overview of public participation in strategic decision-making in the UNECE area David Aspinwall.
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Energy Technology Policy Progress and Way Forward
مستلزمات بناء المحطات النووية ضو مصباح الهيئة العربية للطاقة الذرية
Renewable energy and sustainable development
Towards Modern Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Uzbekistan
Jerzy Jendrośka Transboundary procedures
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
RCF Plenary Session 21 September 2018
EESC – Brussels – 7 September 2015
Coal – security of coal supply considerations of EURACOAL
Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Program
Copenhagen Strategy European Policy Seminar on Off-shore Wind Power
Relationship between World Bank and Romanian EA requirements
WCSSG draft response to NDA Strategy III consultation
Anni Podimata, Vice President ITRE
India Energy Congress 2013 Sustainable Sources of Energy February 2013.
ROMANIA 2019 NEEDS IDENTIFICATION ROMANIA 2019.
HELCOM Meeting May 2019 OSPAR’s monitoring and assessment in reducing discharges of radioactive substances to the North-East Atlantic Kinson Leonard (Vice.
Presentation transcript:

NUCLEAR TRANSPARENCY WATCH Prevent and anticipate through transparency and participation Nuclear energy related planning – obstacles and challenges in Aarhus implementation

LEVELS OF PLANNING GENERAL PLANS (climate, environment, economy, financial, spacial planning, security, social) ENERGY STRATEGIES and NUCLEAR ENERGY STRATEGIES CONSTRUCTION RELATED PROJECTS 2 / 9

ENERGY STRATEGIES and NUCLEAR ENERGY STRATEGIES I SEAs procedural problems  no SEA - art. 7 AC  too short times for public to participate - art. 7 and art. 6(3) AC  no hearings or other participative formats 3 / 9

ENERGY STRATEGIES and NUCLEAR ENERGY STRATEGIES II SEAs content quality  lack of sufficient and sufficiently realistic and detailed alternatives - art. 6(6)(e) AC no scenarios leading to 100% renewable energy 2050 no assessment full chain environmental impacts  lack of sufficiently detailed overview of consequences of nuclear energy - art. 6(6)(b) AC technologies siting options nuclear risks and emergency situations radioactive waste (and spent fuel) management 4 / 9

CONSTRUCTION I EIAs procedural problems  standing - art. 3(9) AC  time frames public participation - art. 6(3) AC  early public participation - art. 6(4) AC  hearings – format - art. 6(5) and 6(7) AC  taking public participation into due account - art. 6(8) AC  frivolous EIA procedures 5 / 9

CONSTRUCTION II EIAs content  highly technical non-technical summaries (cut-and- paste) - art. 6(6)(d) AC  no alternatives to the project including zero option - art. 6(6)(e) AC  no assessment of severe accidents with substantial emission of radioactive substances - art. 6(6)(b) AC 6 / 9

CONSTRUCTION III EIAs salami tactics  fuel chain emissions – no data on mining, fuel production - art. 6(4) and art. 6(6)(b) AC  waste management, spent fuel management - art. 6(4) and art. 6(6)(b) AC  supporting technology (grids, transformer stations, infrastructure) - art. 6(4) and art. 6(6)(b) AC 7 / 9

ACCESS TO JUSTICE  no standing - art. 9(2) AC  no direct applicability Aarhus Convention  no injunctive relief - art. 9(4) AC  long procedures  high costs  no implementation of court rulings 8 / 9

NUCLEAR TRANSPARENCY WATCH Prevent and anticipate through transparency and participation