2. Defense Forum: Coalition and Joint Interoperability Solving the Policy, Technical, Procedures and Operational Issues

3. VADM Nancy Brown The Joint Staff (J-6) Moderator Director, Command, Control, Communications and Computer (C-4)Systems Directorate

4. Globalization – Community Issue Complexities of globalization – Resources and infrastructure required to manage and maintain – Foreign disclosure – COI information separation Current architecture and supporting requirements are currently being piece-mealed vice having a global perspective.

5. EXAMPLE Of PROBLEM SIPR TBMCS Coalition GCCS GCCS Shared to Command GCCS US//Coalition-Exchange E-Mail Server Coalition - JOCS ATO/ACO Plain Text ATO/ACO Plain Text Via JOCS to AOR US JOC ATO/ACO COP Data US to Coalition ATO/ACO/COP Data Flow Limited interoperability frustrates our ability to share information with mission partners

6. Organizing/integrating construct for IT, NSS, and IT Resource Management Includes the connected people, processes, and equipment to support DoD and Warfighter mission All DoD Components are entities within this environment not pieces, parts, connective tissue or backbone but entities DoD Components must exercise authorities and processes to ensure that this environment is: –Interoperable, supportable, enabler of DoD and Warfighter mission success Today’s Global Environment Connected IT/NSS Program Portfolio Portfolios Capability Programs Capabilities DOTMLPF

7. US-Mission Partner Environment -E-mail, Web, Service Oriented Architectures (SOAs) - Enterprise Services, Tailorable/User – Defined/Shareable COP -Comprehensive/Universal Data Standards/Tagging -Event-, Role-, and Content-Based Sharing - Identity Management -Combined Tactics and Procedures Coalition Information Exchange Vision Network Enterprise for Seamless Information Sharing Common Suite of Information Services to All Mission Partners with Controlled Access to C2/Intel Applications on a Common Network – Access is Based on Country Trust and User Role

8. Panel Question? "What are your greatest barriers, challenges or impediments to delivering operational agility?" Our collective efforts are essential to this nation’s ability to enable net- centric forces today and tomorrow

9. Maj Gen Alan Cowles National Guard Bureau (J-6) Director, Command, Control, Communications and Computer (C-4)Systems Division

10. Homeland Defense in Depth An Operational Force—A National Asset National Interest/Control, Decentralized Execution Operational Title 32 Military Civil Overseas Conflict Border Security Local & State Crisis Management Preemptive and Retaliatory Strikes Missile Defense/ Air Sovereignty Law Enforcement (MSCLEA) Regional Consequence Management (EMAC) Airport Security Local & State Consequence Management Counter Narco- Terrorism Physical or Cyber Attack on Homeland National Security Special Events Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) 2 Swiftly defeat efforts in two regions 1 Win decisively in one region 1 Defense of the Homeland Theater Security Cooperation Governor/State Equities 4 D eter forward in four critical regions

11. A Joint Operational View of all NG IT Attributes GAP State/Territory Emergency Operations Center (EOC) INCIDENT AREA Incident Command System Mobile Incident Command Post Civilian Emergency Responders GAP C2, Info Sharing, Collaboration, and/or Coordination Requirements GAP Combatant Commanders (JOC/TNCC) & Interagency Partners GAP ANG Operati ons Center ARNG Operatio ns Center JOC/ JCCC Other Stakeholders Other JFHQ-State FEMA Regional Opns Ctr FBI—State-Level State Agencies Others Other Stakeholders Local EOCs Coord Officers (SCO/FCO/DCO) FEMA/FBI—Incident Area Others JFHQ-State JOC/C4 Management AOR-Level State/Territory-Level Incident-Level National Guard Active Component Other RCs Federal Response Request HLD/DSCA Military Response Active Duty Other RCs Joint Task Force (Title 10/32) GAP Operational Process and Supporting IT Requirements NGB TACTICAL OPERATIONAL STATEGIC

13. Increasing Capabilities Enhancements Event Driven Data Architecture Mission Data linked to Events Situation Reporting Standardized Battle Update Brief AKO Single Sign On / CAC - enabled Web Services Enabled (.NET Platform) Available to Federal and State Mission Partners over AKO. Enhancements Event Driven Data Architecture Mission Data linked to Events Situation Reporting Standardized Battle Update Brief AKO Single Sign On / CAC - enabled Web Services Enabled (.NET Platform) Available to Federal and State Mission Partners over AKO. Enhancements Implement formal Configuration Management processes for JIEE and plan for upcoming releases Discover State Interoperability Functional Requirements and Validate Provide enhancements approved by Stakeholders Enhancements Implement formal Configuration Management processes for JIEE and plan for upcoming releases Discover State Interoperability Functional Requirements and Validate Provide enhancements approved by Stakeholders Enhancements Critical State level data integration and interoperability Initial Integrated Portal and GIS Capability based on Requirements Additional Discovery and Analysis of potential requirements Enhancements Critical State level data integration and interoperability Initial Integrated Portal and GIS Capability based on Requirements Additional Discovery and Analysis of potential requirements Enhancements Additional State Interoperability NG COP Integration Critical asset tracking Layer management DHS Common Operational Database Initial data sharing TBD Enhancements Additional State Interoperability NG COP Integration Critical asset tracking Layer management DHS Common Operational Database Initial data sharing TBD JIEE V4.1 JIEE V4.1 JIEE V4.X JIEE V4.X JIEE V5.0 JIEE V5.0 TBD JIEE V6? JIEE V6? TBD Phase IPhase IIIPhase IIFuture JIEE 4.0 JIEE 4.0 June 2007 Event-Driven Database Proposed Capability Delivery Phases

14. Strategic Information Sharing Challenges Military – Civilian Mission Integration Coalition Policy / Governance –Enabling a Military-Civilian netcentric environment (coordinate JCCSE Initiative, DoD ISE, PM ISE, DHS HSIN initiatives) –Ensure mission information sharing environment is fully validated from “end to end” and adjust policies as necessary to enable agile coalition environment –Interagency coordination around capability management, leveraging capabilities (e.g., FEMA State Interop Initiative or JIEE use by USNORTHCOM) Operational Issues –Interagency Information Management (DHS, DOD, NGB) Planning Underway and Draft IM Plan developed –Exercise the IM Plan / Information Sharing Environment and provide feedback to improve IM and synchronize mission essential processes –Operation Control Group (OCG) as interagency group supporting IM evolution

15. Strategic Information Sharing Challenges Military – Civilian Mission Integration Developing an HLD/DSCA “Enterprise” Architecture –State and Federal Information Sharing infrastructure to enable interoperability –Coordinate network / IA policies and provisioning of capabilities to support mission integration

16. We have made great advancements… but we have not reached the end-state…yet.

17. RDML Kendall Card US Northern Command (J-6) Director, Command Control Systems

18. Dimensions of Information Sharing Unclas Internet Law Enforcement Sensitive FBI Medical Sensitive Canada Mexico US Other Canada Mexico Other Law Enforcement Sensitive FBI Medical Sensitive US Unclas Internet Secret Releasable Secret NOFORN Canada Mexico US Other Law Enforcement Sensitive FBI Medical Sensitive Unclas Internet Secret Releasable Secret NOFORN DHSNORAD-USNORTHCOMNational Guard FEMADHSNCSJTF-NARNORTHJTF-CSLATXFL Users Registered and Authorized Data Tagged Secret Releasable Secret NOFORN

19. Centrally managed and funded, redundant, GIG-centric, protected, endurable, survivable system of systems which enables optimal Multinational Information Sharing and cross domain execution, providing enterprise secure access to the edge. ….and World Peace What I REALLY need is a ….

20. BG Mark Bowman US Central Command (J-6) Director, Command, Control, Communications and Computer (C-4)Systems “It takes a Network to defeat a Network”

21. Challenge Current multinational information exchange frameworks are cumbersome for the user and increasingly unsupportable for the maintainer Why? –Current policy requires physically separated networks for each community of interest (COI) and classification domain –Information exchange between these multiple networks induces the requirement for multiple Cross Domain Solutions (CDS)

22. Impact of Multiple Networks USCENTCOM HQ: 10 different networksAffordable separation technologies are evolving, yet still immature

23. Cross Domain Solution Process/Standardization Bridging the Information Sharing Gap Standardization Process 3-13 months 33 Guards in USCENTCOM AOR

24. Information Sharing Architect DoD needs a dedicated Information Sharing Architect –The UCDMO construct for information protection is a good start, however…. –A similar organization is required to develop key multinational information exchange requirements and operational architectures Establish best-of-breed process to “down select” from existing solutions (close fight) Determine which capabilities are ready for programmatic insertion (near term fight) Identify capability gaps for the science and technology community to research (deep fight)

25. Single Policy Framework for Information Separation EAL/SML PL SABI TSABI CDS UCDMO DNI - CIO DOD - CIO PL – Protection Level EAL – Evaluation Assurance Level SML – Strength of Mechanism Level SABI – Secret and Below Interoperability TSABI – Top Secret and Below Interoperability CDS – Cross Domain Solutions

26. Funding SIPRNET/ REL DMZ CENTRIXS = = ?

27. Summary Incentivized Industry Partners Funding Architect Policy Technology

28. Brig Gen Dave Warner Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Director of C2 Programs, PEO C2C

29. Unclassified Tenets of Net-Centric Warfare Tenets of Net-Centric WarfareDoDNet-Centric Data Strategy InformationAssuranceStrategy Global Connectivity (TransformationalCommunications) Core Enterprise Services(NCES) Global connectivity, real-time collaboration, and rapid and continuous information exchange 29 C2 Apps

30. Unclassified Capabilities Required 1.Ability to share, collaborate, and synchronize information with mission partners 2.Ability to interoperate with and leverage mission partners 3.Ability to extend MNIS capabilities to mission partners 4.Resolving non-materiel information sharing approaches is essential regardless of the material approach chosen Observe Orient Act Decide Compress and facilitate!

31. Unclassified Coalition Information Sharing (CIS) Problem (Today – Stove-piped) Timelines to establish domains are long Neither Standard nor Transparent Drives “swivel chair” Gymnastics Dis-connected National C2 networks Need to know vs. Obligation to share Physical Netting

32. Unclassified Then …December 2004 DISA assume lead for CENTRIXS Began centralizing PACOM and CENTCOM CENTRIXS and Global Griffin Shifting From Regional to Enterprise Focus Now …Since September 2006 Griffin develops new services to support allied operations –Bi-Lateral CHAT / Web Services CENTRIXS remains regionally focused, but… –Re-Engineering the larger CENTRIXS networks –Transitioning additional CENTCOM, PACOM and National Enclave services –Mapping regional CENTRIXS networks for the first time –QDR footprint Expansion in five COCOM AORs Next …not your current MNIS PMO MNIS Objective Capability AoA kick-off September 2007 –Draft AoA to influence POM 10 –JROC submission by Spring 2008 MNIS Objective Capability ICD expected in December 2007 CCER Funding Proposal submitted for FY09-11 Transferring network services to GIG Enterprise Services FY08 Planning future coalition enterprise services & capabilities

33. Unclassified CCER Overview Spiral 1 What CCER Brings: -Net-Centric approach (Global Enterprise) -Single common coalition network environment (CMIL) -Centralized network management -Common core applications (NCES and NECC) -Ability to quickly build / scale COIs -Ability to seamlessly expand network -Reduces cross domain requirements -Reduces O&M Convergence: GCTF & MCFI (Spiral 1) Current Logical vs. Physical Coalition “Four-eyes” COCOM EMBASSIES CFE COCOM EMBASSIES GCTF Global Counterterrorism Task Force COALITION PARTNERS Multinational Coalition Forces - Iraq COCOM EMBASSIES COALITION PARTNERS MCFI Embassies Coalition Partners COCOMs CMIL.MIL 6

34. Unclassified Coalition Info Sharing Roadmap Physical Separation Current - 2009 Hybrid Separation 2010-2012 Logical Separation 2013-2016 CCER Assess Tech, Dev, Test COCOM/COI CENTRIC PARTIAL ENTERPRISE CENTRIC ENTERPRISE CENTRIC CCER AIS Enables: NECC NCES DISN Info Sharing I-Plan Coalition IS CONOPS CCER CONOPS CCER Migration Plan Griffin CFE, ISAF, CNFC, CENTRIXS- J / K, Bi-lats… ExtraNet – Unclass Std, Dev, Test DOD ExtraNet Portal CDS Baseline Enterprise CDS Enterprise Gateways OBJECTIVE SYSTEM MNIS/AIS AOA CENTRIXS Consolidate/ Standardize svcs @ DECCs PK Enabled

35. Unclassified Conclusion What we need help with from Industry! –Standardized Open Architecture –Data Tagged –IA Built In –Common Solutions

36. Brig Gen Bradley Butler HQ Air Force Space Command Director, Logistics and Warfighting Integration Chief Information Officer

37. Expeditionary Air and Space Force Information is a KEY part of the equation Lean Lethal Light

38. Ensure Availability, Sustainability & Integration of ICBM & Space C2 & ISR Systems JOB #1: CIO Better IT Tools (Information/Knowledge) for AFSPC Airmen and Their Families -- Wherever They Live and Work! AFSPC A4/6 Focus Areas

39. Integrating and Delivering Space Capabilities and Effects for the Joint and Coalition Warfighters JFCC SPACE

40. Joint Space Operations Center Coordination & Direct Support Optimizes Assigned/Attached Space Forces Through the Joint Space Tasking Order (JSTO) CDR JFCC SPACE - Monitor & Redirect Combat Plans - Produce JSTO Combat Ops - Target & Assess ISR - Define Objectives Strategy CDRUSSTRATCOM JSpOC Director Integrated Space Effects Supporting JFC Objectives DIRSPACEFOR THEATER JFACC & DIRSPACEFOR

41. NAVY Socorro JFCC SPACE Presentation of Forces AIR FORCE ARMY Guam Prospect Harbor Stennis Space Center Point Mugu Schriever Camp Roberts Fort Meade Fort Detrick Stuttgart Fort Buckner Osan Landstuhl Colorado Springs Qatar Diego Garcia Clear Thule Fylingdales Oakhanger Moron Ascension Antigua Kaena Pt Maui Kwajalein Cape Cod New Boston Beale Holloman Cavalier Peterson Schriever Buckley Cheyenne Mtn Eglin Cape Canaveral Onizuka AF Fence Patrick Vandenberg Socorro Dahlgren

42. On Any Given Day… USNORTHCOM USPACOM USSOUTHCOM USEUCOM USCENTCOM Exercises OIF/OEF Hurricane Nuclear Posturing

43. 43 Space Capabilities: Critical to Military Operations Position, Navigation & Timing (PNT) Enroute navigation for all forces Precision-guided munitions Personnel & aircraft tracking in support of Combat Search & Rescue (CSAR) Network timing source Launch vehicle tracking Missile Warning (MW) Force protection posturing Geolocate for attack ops Cueing data for missile defense Cueing for CSAR Satellite Communications Land, sea & air forces comm Emergency Action Messages Unmanned Aerial System Ops C2 dissemination (CTO) Theater broadcast Environmental Monitoring Mission Planning Munitions loading decisions MW conditions assessment CONUS weather monitoring & forecasting Solar activity impacts to space operations & communications

44. Focus Areas/Challenges “Where we need to Improve” Schriever IV Wargame – “Big Ten” Objective 1 (Defend/Augment/Replace) 1.Defensive Counterspace Ops Planning 2.Space Situational Awareness 3.Required SpaceArchitecture 4.Operationally Responsive Space Objective 2 (C2 Relationships) 5.Decide – Observe – Act Construct 6.Global / Regional Aspect of Space Objective 3 (Integrated Operations) 7.Evolution from Big 2 to Big 4 8.Coalition Operations Objective 4 (Homeland Defense) 9.Space Support to Homeland Defense Space Policy & Rules of Engagement (ROE) 10.Sufficiency of Space Policy & ROE We need to shift from: “Force Enhancement” to “Responsive Force Enhancement” in a “Contested Environment” Gen Bob Kehler AFSPC/CC

45. Fly – Fight – Win Space Situation Awareness (SSA) Spacecraft are now threatened in every orbit, at all altitudes by both Directed Energy and Kinetic Energy weapon systems Current systems are taxed to keep up with space awareness demands Ground-based space surveillance systems Space is no longer a sanctuary; National Space Policy mandates protection of space assets

46. Fly – Fight – Win Monitoring U.S. space assets, capabilities, and operations Intelligence on adversary space activities Space Situation Awareness (SSA) SSA is knowledge of all aspects of space. Achieving it requires: Surveillance of all space objects and space activities Detailed reconnaissance of space objects of interest Monitoring and analyzing conditions in the space environment Conducting integrated tasking, processing, fusion, analysis, dissemination, archiving

47. Interoperability--Enablers & Solutions Architectures – Know Roles & Players SOA Framework is key – Universal Core Services Data – Leverage COIs (e.g. SSA COI) What do I need? Who has it? How do I get it? Cross-Domain Sharing Fusion Tools Collaboration Tools Wargaming & Experimentation Integrated space, air & ground capabilities & support for COCOMS Explore Title 50, 10 & 32 policy seams Explore & Tighten Relationships/TTPs JSpOC & NROC JFCC Space & JTF-GNO—e.g. Leverage Transformational Comm Warfighter Focus Always !!! DIRSPACEFOR in COCOMS

48. Space Impact to Theater “Improving Interoperability” Increased dependence on space demands increased space integration Increased dependence on space demands increased space integration More calls for space pros in theater More calls for space pros in theater Tightly integrated day-to-day reachback support Tightly integrated day-to-day reachback support Effects focused operations at tactical space units Effects focused operations at tactical space units Detailed, real-time collaboration must occur to ensure dependable and continuous space effects

49. 49 “Critical Enablers for Joint Warfighting” “There’s no GIG (Global Information Grid) Without Space!!” Space Capabilities/Effects and Warfighting Integration

50. 50 Space-enabled Warfighter

51. Defense Forum: Coalition and Joint Interoperability Solving the Policy, Technical, Procedures and Operational Issues Questions ?

52. Defense Forum: Coalition and Joint Interoperability Solving the Policy, Technical, Procedures and Operational Issues