Homework Complete the connector activity on the ‘Group Success’ Tab – reviewing the two videos Complete the ‘Ryder Cup’ article Questions on Page 203 Complete.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Group Dynamics and Performance in Team sports.
Advertisements

AS / A Level Sport and Physical Education
‘There is no ‘I’ in team……
Supervision in Organizations
Organizational Behaviour Social Behaviour
CfE Higher Physical Education
Social factors Impacting on performance. The Social Factor  Sport has always had a social element to it  People take part in sports for various reasons.
Social Sub Factor: Team Dynamics
Organizational Behaviour Social Behaviour Groups and Teamwork.
1 Team Development and Performance OS 386 October 17, 2002 Fisher.
Sports Psychology – Carron’s Model
1 Group Cohesiveness Group Cohesiveness Curt Matthews MGMT 301/301W Prof. William S. Gardner.
November/December 08 Groups/Cohesion - Introduction Every team needs a Hero … Every hero needs a Team …
KWL - sheet What do I know about group dynamics. What I would like to know about group dynamics? What I have learnt about group dynamics?
Virtual teams These are teams that work together and solve problems through computer-based interactions. What are some benefits? Drawbacks? They save time,
Section B: Psychology of sport performance 2. Group dynamics of sport performance.
Fitness and Recreation Leadership PLF 4C Team Cohesion.
Team Building.
The Effective Project Manager Chapter 2 Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Group Dynamics and Sporting Performance
Part 2 – Group dynamics Group cohesion. Aims for today  Be able to define a group or team.  Understand Steiner’s model of group performance.  Explain.
Group and Team Cohesion. What Is a Group? Group: A collection of interacting individuals who share a collective identity, a sense of shared purpose or.
Achievement Standard Describes the effect of interpersonal skills on the functioning of a group, such as the skills related to leadership.How and.
Home learning Review using green pen the questions Focus on :
Group Success. What is a group?  2 or more individuals who have a shared objective which will bring about interaction. Characteristics of a group  A.
Teamwork and Leadership Skills
Cohesion and Teamwork Wendy Boller, Sarah Mack, Robbie Wacker and Shelby Morose.
Homework Complete the connector activities on the ‘Group Success’ Tab – answering the questions after reviewing the two videos Annotate ‘Ryder Cup’ article.
Focus Questions 1. Discuss how the Ronald Allen (Delta’s Chairman) case study illustrates the importance of social relations on group performance and.
Establishing positive work relationships = Good working environment.
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007 Groups In Organization OBJECTIVES: A.GROUPS- DEFINITION AND ROLES -STAGES (EVOLUTION) - TYPES - NORMS.
MADE BY: Shalini Prakash….(018) Monisha Gautam..(026)
Group Dynamics of Performance. Mr. P. Leighton Sports Psychology Yr13.
Social Sub Factor: Team Dynamics
Social Factors. Team dynamics Communication Cooperating Contributing to a team Relationships BBC Bitesize Clip on the Team
DEVELOPMENT OF COMPETITIVE SPIRIT
A2 Physical Education Sport Psychology Week 4 Revision Group cohesion and Attribution Theory.
Leadership & Team Work. Team Cohesion An effective team has cohesion, the team members work well together and share similar goals Cohesion is influenced.
Mr Beaumont A group is defined as: Two or more individuals interacting with each other To be defined as a groups people must also: Be interdependent.
What is cohesion? What different types of cohesion are there? 4.3- Cohesion.
Team development and trust Describe what influences trust within a team and how to build trust Identify stages of team development and how these are affected.
Chapter 8 Group Cohesion.
Groups- Recap Put these in order: Storming Norming Forming Performing Forming Storming Norming Performing Match these characteristics to the stages: Familiarisation.
Group Dynamics AS P.E. The role of group dynamics in sport Groups –An interaction between individuals –Communication over a period of time –Collective.
Sport Psychology Skills.  To understand the differences between teams and groups  To explore group roles and group norms  Review social phenomenon.
Sport Psychology Skills
Mr Beaumont. Understand faulty group processes Be able to give a definition and explain with examples what the Ringlemann effect is Explain how a group.
Teams Kevin Posalski David Shin. What are Teams Teams are groups of two or more people who interact and influence each other, are mutually accountable.
Project Leadership: Requirements and Qualities. In order for someone to successfully manage a project they need to have certain personal qualities and.
Social Factors Approaches to developing performance.
Chapter 8: Group Cohesion 8 Group Cohesion C H A P T E R.
Unit 13 Leadership in sport
Psychological factors in leading sports activities
Group Success & Leadership
How they impact on our performance when playing sport
Group Success.
Homework Complete the connector activities on the ‘Group Success’ Tab – answering the questions after reviewing the two videos on the mypeexam.org website.
Sports Psychology.
Skills Lesson Starter Get out plain piece of paper and a pen
4.4 Theories of Cohesion What is Steiner’s model of productivity?
What is a group? How and why do groups form?
7. Group Dynamics and Attribution
Goal setting in sports performance
PHED 3 Sport Psychology GROUP FORMATION
Home learning Review using green pen the questions Focus on :
PHED 3 Sport Psychology GROUP COHESION
Homework – Book 1 Pg 196 Complete the connector activities on the ‘Group Success’ Tab – answering the questions after reviewing the two videos on the mypeexam.org.
Quick Quiz What is the meant by the terms social facilitation, social inhibition and evaluation apprehension? What factors can affect how an audience affects.
Team Dynamics Learning objectives
Home learning 15 mark questions for Monday Coursework – two copies next Thursday.
Presentation transcript:

Homework Complete the connector activity on the ‘Group Success’ Tab – reviewing the two videos Complete the ‘Ryder Cup’ article Questions on Page 203 Complete the connector activity on the ‘Leadership Tab’

KWL - sheet What do I know about group success? What I would like to know about group success? What I have learnt about group success?

Card Exercise Need one observer One group of 3 1 person on their own

What is a group? Page 194 and 195

Evolution of a group - worksheet Forming – Storming – Norming - Performing - Tuckman (1965)

Tuckman’s model

What happened to AVB and Chelsea and now Tottenham?

Cohesion Cohesion? Task cohesion? Social cohesion?

Group dynamics example

Bootcamp It takes people from all backgrounds, and from different parts of the country who may have nothing in common. They are given the same appearance, which identifies them as the same. The instructor gives them a shared negative experience that will give them something in common. In one quick experience they become a group.

Measuring cohesion Observation of behaviour Sociogram Questionnaire - The Group Environment Questionnaire

Do cohesive groups win? There are exceptions - Rodman and Jordan Desire to win may supersede personal dislikes task cohesion overcomes social cohesion Cohesion alone cannot ensure success.

Factors (antecedents) that contribute to cohesion (Carron 1982) What are the factors that affect group cohesiveness? (4 marks)

INSERT MODEL

Carron’s model explained Group composition - gender, resources, compatibility, etc. Group environment - group size, home advantage, etc. Group structure - positions, status, norms, roles, etc. Group cohesion - can be task or social – Task - group works to achieve a goal. – Social - group gets on well. Group processes - communication, co-operation, competition, etc. Group products - winning, losing, outside of sport - starting a family. Individual products - personal satisfaction, bonus, etc.

Strategies to develop an effective group and cohesion Page 199

Example of group norms Are you sitting in your ‘ normal ’ seat? Why do you sit there?

Productivity (Steiner’s Model) Actual Productivity Potential Productivity Process Losses = - If 2 individuals in a tug-of-war team are each able to pull 100kg, their potential productivity is 200kg. However, they will pull less than this, probably around 180kg - because of the inability to coordinate their efforts and/or because each person might expect the other to carry the main load. Therefore there are process losses of 20kg.

Who is going to win?? Group A will beat Group B if: – Group A possesses greater relevant resources and experiences fewer or equal process losses – Group A possesses equal relevant resources but experiences fewer process losses – Group A possesses less resources but experiences much less process loss

Football example with numbers If Arsenal ’ s potential productivity = 90 and Hull City ’ s potential productivity = 60, Hull can still win. If Arsenal experience process losses equal to 40, and Hull only lose 5, Hull ’ s actual productivity will = 55, while Arsenal will = 50. This is how giant killings happen each year.

Causes of process losses Process losses are commonly caused by: – Co-ordination losses eg… – Motivational loses eg…

The Ringlemann effect Ringlemann observed individuals, groups of 2, 3, and 8 people pulling on a rope. Did 2 people pull twice as hard as 1 person? NO! 1 in a group of 2 pulled on average 93% of the individual score. In groups of 3 it fell to 85%, and groups of 8 to 49%.

Social loafing “The tendency for individuals to put in less than maximum effort when working as part of a group”. This is different from the Ringlemann effect. How? Latane (1979) found that people in groups do not clap as hard as individuals - individual effort is lost in a crowd!

How to beat social loafing and the Ringlemann effect! Identify individual contribution - individual playing statistics - this be detrimental to cohesion Increase peer pressure Improve group co-ordination skills (set plays) Select ‘team players’ Give more responsibility / set individual roles / targets

What else can coaches do? Limit process losses. Ensure that players are clear about their roles within the team. Establish clear team rules and expectations. Encourage social cohesion, but do not expect everyone to socialize together. Democracy increases cohesion - allow the team to make some decisions. Team building exercises.

Summary A group is 2 or more individuals working towards a common goal. Group cohesion can be related to the task or to social relationships. The Ringlemann effect and social loafing explain how some groups under-perform.

‘ Team ’ talks Team talks are open only to group members. As such they bring the group together. Some team talks are more effective than others… Compare these examples

GNrJ-e2hB8

What were the differences…? Next week… leadership