Skillz That Killz Critical Design Review Jocelyn Mulkey, Jess Davidoff, Kaitlyn Zimmitti, Taylor Smith, Travis Dowdy, Hunter Hoopes October 8, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UP, UP, AND AWAY! CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Ty Bailey, Soo Park, Cameron Coupe, Trevor Arrasmith, Carolyn Mason, Sam Frakes, Brandon Harris, Peter VanderKley.
Advertisements

Matt Breihan, Jay Davis, Jack Gregory, Ashton Schrage, Sara Schuette, and Lydia Whitney October 14, 2008.
Space Debris Conceptual Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathan Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth
Clean Air Project: Team Big Green SpaceGasm Launch Readiness Review Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin.
Team Space Jam Launch Readiness Review Paul Guerrie, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Taylor King, & Jamie Usherwood November 2,
Team Lightning Rod Launch Readiness Review Fall 2010 Rev C 11/2/2010 Trevor Luke Chris Bennett Matt Holmes Sushia Rahimizadeh Alex Shelanski Matthew Dickinson.
DYNAMO TEAM 2 CAREFUL HARRY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW GLENDA ALVARENGA J.J. BUSSE EMILY EGGERS ADAM KEMP GABRIELLE MASSONE DALTON SMITH COREY WILSON SEPTEMBER.
TEAM kkkkk Conceptual Design Review Saad Alqahtani, Charles MacCraiger, Alexa Warly, Connor Jacobson, Kyle Skjerven, Matt Busby 09/19/11 Fall 2011 Rev.
Team R3D3 Critical Design Review Kate Kennedy Greg McQuie Nicole Ela Henk Wolda Marisa Antuna Devon Campbell Tyler Smith 10/04/11.
Team 2 Careful Harry Glenda Alvarenga J.J. Busse Emily Eggers Adam Kemp Gabrielle Massone Dalton Smith Corey Wilson Dynamo Critical Design Review.
Brynn Larson Trey Karsten Terek Campbell Marcus Flores Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki 2015/6/10 Team Ochocinco.
Flight Club Critical Design Review Evan Akselrad, Chris Anaya, Natalie Bixler, Melanie Dubin, Logan Finch, Ted Maritz, and Scott Williams October 14, 2008.
BalloonSat “Optimism Prime” Team “Thumbs Up” Conceptual Design Review Nick Lenk, Greg Nelson, Eddie Cyrus, Jake Varey, Chase Pritchett, Brian Inglis 9/23/08.
Khufu’s Starship Jennifer Nill Chelsea Donaldson Graham Risch Henry Shennan Jonathan Lumpkin Jennifer Nill Chelsea Donaldson Graham Risch Henry Shennan.
Paul “Trey” Karsten Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki Brynn Larson Terek Campbell Marcus Flores 11/25/09 Final Revision.
Team Zephyr Critical Design Review Joseph Sheehey, Huy Le, Andrew Zizzi, Alex Morrow, Sam Evans, Logan Wright October 14, 2008.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn October 17, 2006.
Team R3D3 Final Presentation Devon Campbell Greg McQuie Kate Kennedy Henk Wolda Marisa Antuna Nicole Ela Tyler Smith 12/1/11.
Team Helios. Mission and Experiment Mission: Launch a balloonsat to determine the light filtering effect of the atmosphere and test the effectiveness.
Carnivorous Ninja Warriors Critical Design Review Cameron Comeau, Katie Brissenden, Kat Bryant, Arley Hendrick, Aram Podolski, Hannah Williams 06OCT2009.
Team Thumbs Up Launch Readiness Review Nick Lenk Eddie Cyrus Brian Inglis Chase Prichett Greg Nelson Jake Varey 11/11/08.
Space Debris Critical Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathon Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth October 14, 2008 Fall 2008 Rev.
Carnivorous Ninja Warriors Launch Readiness Review Katie Brissenden, Hannah Williams, Aram Podolski, Kat Bryant, Arley Hendrick, Cam Comeau November 5,
Garlic Armageddon BioSat Lauren Persons, Ryder Whitmire, Lenny Komow, Kirstyn Johnson, Jon Pfohl, Dave Borncamp October 6 th 2009.
Skillz That Killz Team 3 Conceptual Design Review Travis Dowdy, Jocelyn Mulkey, Hunter Hoopes, Taylor Smith, Kaitlyn Zimmitti, Jess Davidoff September.
Team Dionysus Critical Design Review Alijah Smith, Chris Koncilja, Elise Kowalski, Josh Tiras, Mike Beach, Becca Seigel 10/06/09.
Team R3D3 Conceptual Design Review Henk Wolda Kate Kennedy Greg McQuie Nicole Ela Marisa Antuna Devon Campbell Tyler Smith 9/20/2011.
Critical Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani October 17, 2006.
Team SST Conceptual Design Review Eric James, Vlad Soukhovei, John Marcantonio, Kara Bongiovanni, Sean Rivera 09/16/10.
Amelia Weller, Erick Chewakin, Will Hakes, Emma Mossinger, Brendon Barela, Jason Schelz, Ethan Long October 5, 2010 TEAM MATE CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Fall.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Oddballs Critical Design Review Team 8: Grant Fritz, Jessica Brown, Stephanie Jalovec, Jennifer McGraw, Brian Roth, Evan Townsend 10/18/07.
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
Conceptual Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani September 21, 2006.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
Design Review Corinne Desroches Saad Alqahtani Charles MacCraiger Alexa Warly Connor Jacobson Kyle Skjerven Matt Busby.
CDR Presentation. - Team T.E.N.’s objectives are to fly Ralph with all the systems functioning properly. This includes the boom arm, radiation badge,
Space Debris Launch Readiness Review Seanna Renworth, Emily Logan, Corey Godwin, Sean Murphy, Cole Bostrom, Jonathan Kirchmaier November 11 th, 2008.
Thomas Jeffries, Anthony Anglin, Dylan Cooper, Dustin Fishelman, Colin Harkins, Joao Mansur, Starteya Pais, Andrew Trujillo 10/2/2012.
SPIRIT of the Koala Project VOLT Critical Design Review Anthony Anglin, Colin Harkins, Dylan Cooper, Thomas Jefferies, Starteya Pais, Joao Mansur, Andrew.
Hang Seven Launch Readiness Review Lucas Migliorini, Becca Lidvall, Paul Smith Chase Goodman, Ethan Hollenbach, Nikhil Desai, Abby Caballero, Sierra Williams.
Team Lightning Rod Critical Design Review Fall 2010 Rev A Trevor Luke Chris Bennett Matt Holmes Sushia Rahimizadeh Alex Shelanski Matthew Dickinson.
Hang Seven Critical Design Review Sierra Williams, Lucas Migliorini, Abby Caballero, Chase Goodman, Paul Smith, Becca Lidvall, Ethan Hollenbach, Nikhil.
James Bader, Jordan Dickard, Blake Firner, Amanda Kuker, Michael Lotto, Diana Shukis
Zachary Cuseo, Andrew Fruge’, Tyler Knappe, Christopher Nie, Sydni Smith, and Shweta Maurya 5 November, 2009.
Space Monkeys Launch Readiness Review Project Curious George November 11, 2008 Project Curious George November 11, 2008.
Evan Akselrad, Chris Anaya, Natalie Bixler, Melanie Dubin, Logan Finch, Ted Maritz, and Scott Williams September 23, 2008 Fall 2008 Rev A
Matt Breihan, Jay Davis, Jack Gregory, Ashton Schrage, Sara Schuette, and Lydia Whitney September 23, 2008.
Zachary Cuseo, Sydni Smith, Andrew Fruge’, Tyler Knappe, Christopher Nie, and Shweta Maurya 8 October 2009.
Team Magnaritaville Conceptual Design Review Zachary Cuseo, Andrew Fruge, Shweta Maurya, Sydni Smith, Christopher Nie, Tyler Knappe 9/22/09 Fall 2009 Rev.
Team SSCSC Critical Design Review Nick Brennan, Kier Fortier, Tom Johnson, Shannon Martin, Dylan Stewart, and Adam Wright October 05, 2010 Fall 2010 Rev.
Napoleon Connor Strait | Chris Gray | Chad Alvarez Akeem Huggins | Ashley Zimmerer Tucker Emmett | Ginny Christiansen |Caleb Lipscomb Conceptual Design.
Victor Taberski, Ryan Walker, Allen Marshall, Matt Kerwin, Andrew Winthrop, Steven Ramm October 14, 2008 UANIOOU – (Upper Atmosphere Near-Infrared Optical.
Space Monkeys Conceptual Design Review Project Curious George Michael Bartek, Jacob Blakely, Katelynn Finn, Katie Fletcher, Lance Markovchick, Michael.
Team Hubble Jr. Critical Design Review Ryan Del Gizzi, Evan Levy, Kyle Norman, Chris Everhart, Holly Zaepfel, Rachel Small October 17, 2006.
PROJECT SCREAM PROPOSAL Josh Yeaton Kevin Dinkel Chris Kopacz Conrad Schmidt Chris Warren Dillon Thorse
Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin Wong 05 October 2010.
S.H.I.E.L.D. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Addison, Travis, Jared, Evan, Aaron, Matt 10/14/08.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
Junk in a Box Critical Design Review
Skillz That Killz Team 3 Final Presentation
Team Go Go Gadgets Launch Readiness Review
Team Thumbs Up Final Presentation
S^3 Launch Readiness Review
Clean Air Project: Team Big Green SpaceGasm Conceptual Design Review
Space Debris Critical Design Review
Team Solkraft Conceptual Design Review
Team Mate Conceptual Design Review
Proposal Team 8: Grant Fritz, Jessica Brown, Stephanie Jalovec, Jennifer McGraw, Brian Roth, Evan Townsend.
Panoramic Rays Critical Design Review
Presentation transcript:

Skillz That Killz Critical Design Review Jocelyn Mulkey, Jess Davidoff, Kaitlyn Zimmitti, Taylor Smith, Travis Dowdy, Hunter Hoopes October 8, 2009

Mission Overview To investigate both the benefits and cost s of generating energy with solar at high altitudes Solar cells use photons as light energy to create electricity We would like to determine if encapsulated monocrystalline solar cells generate more electricity at higher altitudes as a result of clearer and more intense light Purpose of Our Experiment: Answer the question: Could solar cells replace batteries in future BalloonSat missions? If this is true, future BalloonSat missions may not be constrained by battery life, weight and volume Our results may also increase knowledge about solar energy Could help answer the question: Is installing solar panels to airplanes to power them a feasible solution to reducing their carbon footprints?

Requirements Flowdown Goal (G1)‏ –Our BalloonSat shall rise to an altitude of roughly 30 kilometers in order to perform a scientific experiment that will measure the energy output of solar cells at altitudes higher than ground level so as to better understand the ability of these cells to generate more electricity at higher altitudes as a result of clearer and more intense light. O1 (comes from G1)‏ –Assemble BalloonSat in order to advance our understanding of solar energy at an altitude of 30 kilometers for under $100 by 11/07/2009. O2 (comes from G1)‏ –Determine altitude by measuring tilt in one axis. O3 (comes from G1)‏ –Establish a function of altitude to find the correlation between altitude and solar energy.

Design Structural Design 17 centimeter cube Double-layer foam core, secured with hot glue, aluminum tape, and Velcro, if necessary We will have a small Plexiglas window on one side to protect the camera's lens during flight. We will have a solar cell on each side of the cube placed into an inset in the foam core The solar cells are monocrystalline and encapsulated (no further protection needed from moisture) ‏ Hardware Design Six solar cells will be connected to an 8-input multiplexer inside the cube, which will direct the analog input from each cell to one input on the AVR Microcontroller board. The multiplexer is necessary because we only have four available inputs on the AVR, but six solar cells from which to collect data. The AVR will record the voltage from each solar cell. Because the AVR records data in volts, and the solar cells output in volts, there will be no need to convert the data after retrieval other than with the Data Parser Utility. When we are retrieving our data, we will use the utility to convert the data from binary to voltages.

Other hardware pieces AVR Microcontroller board (to record data from temperature, altitude, air pressure, and voltage from solar cells)‏ Heater system (temperature control to protect hardware)‏ Digital camera (to record pictures from the flight)‏ Multiplexer (to take the voltage inputs from all 6 solar panels and channel them into one input on the AVR)‏ Four 9V batteries, foam core, Velcro, hot glue, insulation, a non-metal flight string tube, extra wire, MUX, test batteries, and dry ice. (All of these materials are provided or are in the SpaceGrant inventory except for the solar cells and the MUX, which will be purchased from Sundance Solar and West Florida Components, and the test batteries and dry ice, which will be paid for by our team and purchased from Safeway. )‏ Experimental Design The reason for placing a solar cell on the four sides of the cube is to ensure there is always light reaching at least one cell. The bottom cell –May collect photons reflected from the ground (especially if snow is present), and, when high enough, reflected from the clouds – We will draw conclusions from our data if this is true.

Design Sketches

Functional Block Diagram

ItemWhere to get itCostWight AVR Microcontroller and batteries Provided$0150 g Heater system and batteries Provided$0100 g Foam CoreProvided$0108 g InsulationProvided$0TBD SwitchesProvided$020g Flight String TubeProvided$0TBD Canon Digital CameraProvided$0220 g Monocrystalline Solar CellsSundance Solar$ g (6 cells) 8-Input MultiplexerWest Florida Components$26.78TBD Plexiglas (9x7.5 cm)Space Grant Inventory$064 g Resistors (if needed)SGI$0Not required at this time VelcroSGI$0Not required at this time Aluminum TapeSGI$0<1 g Hot GlueSGI$016 g Extra WireSGI$0Not required at this time Test Batteries and Dry IceSafewayApprox $35 (cost covered by team) N/A TOTAL$96.18 (not including cost covered by team) Total of Known: 721 g Weight allowed for unknowns: 129 g

Project Schedule Team Meetings: All Tuesdays at 2:00 p.m. Design complete 9/20/09 Complete Proposal 9/15/09 Proposal Due9/17/09 6 p.m. Conceptual design review 9/ 22/09 8 a.m. Program AVR 9/27/09 Order all hardware 9/29/09 Foam Core Structure Built 0/05/09 Critical design review 10/06/09 8 a.m. DD Rev A/B due 10/06/09 Structure Testing – Drop/Whip Tests 10/06/09 2 p.m. Prototyping design complete 10/13/09 Experiment Testing 10/14/09 Subsystem Testing (Heater/Solar Cells) 10/14/09 Testing final design complete 10/20/09 Cold Test 10/20/09 Functional Test – Heater, Camera 10/20/09 Camera/Imaging Test 10/20/09 Subsystem Test 10/20/09 Pre-Launch Inspection (Bring hardware) 10/27/09 Mission simulation tests (bring B.Sat) 10/29/09 Launch Readiness Review 11/03/09 8 a.m. DD Rev C due 11/03/09 8 a.m. BalloonSat Weigh-in and Turn in 11/06/09 2 p.m. DLC 270 A and FRR Cards Due 11/06/09 Launch Day!!! 11/07/09 4:45 a.m.

Test Plans TestPlans Experimental Testing Place BalloonSat in sun for same amount of time as flight Rotate B.Sat to simulate spin during flight Record voltage input from solar cells and temperature (to test temp effects on cells) Retrieve and analyze data from cells and temp sensor Make sure input from solar cells does not exceed 5V limit and install resistors if needed Structural Testing Whip test (determine force of flight will not destroy or weaken structure) Drop test (determine burst/landing will not destroy structure) 4-story drop + kick down stairs Cold Test (placed in a cooler of dry ice for ~2 hours to simulate temperatures during flight) Functional/Subsystem Testing Test correctness of software codes Test camera’s ability to turn on Test heater’s ability to keep B.Sat above (-10°c) for ~2 hours Test all subsystems work together and that power input/output does not exceed 5V Mission Simulation TestingIn class mission simulation Camera/Imaging TestingTest camera to ensure Images/videos are being recorded Images/videos are clear Determine if Plexiglas obstructs images

TestCompletion Date Experiment Testing10/14/2009 Structural Testing10/6/2009 Functional/Subsystem Testing10/20/2009 Mission Simulation Testing10/29/2009 Camera/Imaging Testing10/20/2009

Expected Results The purpose of our mission is to determine the advantages of generating energy with solar cells at altitudes other than ground level. We hope to discover if solar cells are more beneficial when at higher altitudes. Expected Results: To either show increased energy as altitude increases or show negligible difference in energy input. To retrieve data: Connect AVR board with data to computer and use Data Retrieval Utility to retrieve data from board. To read data: Use Data Parser Uttility to transform data from binary to voltages which we can use to analyze data To organize data: Use Excel where we can then interpret and draw conclusions.

These graphs indicate what our data for the four side cells should look like, whether the payload is spinning, if it is stationary, or a combination of the two circumstances. The data from the top and bottom cells will not be affected by spin so they are not included in the graphs. If the payload rotates, each reading should provide about the same average voltage reading over the course of the flight: If the payload starts rotating and ends in a static condition, we should see several of the cell's data drop-off and only one or two cells producing current: If there is no or minimal rotation we should only see in the data two cells providing current: The data of the voltages of each solar cell will allow us to determine which solar cell was facing the sun (or snow, for the bottom cell) at what time. The voltage data of the cell facing the sun will be higher than the others. This will help us to visualize the attitude of the satellite throughout the flight. In order to determine altitude from the air pressure data, we will use the equation p = ( h) where p = air pressure (Pa) and h = height above sea level (m).

Team Organization Team MemberTitleSecondary TitleAdditional Responsibilities Jocelyn MulkeyProgramming/ Schedule ScienceFunctional Testing Mission Simulation Testing Schedule Jess DavidoffPower/ Team Leader Budget/ReportingCamera Testing Presentations Reporting Kaitlyn ZimmittiBudgetSoftwareMission Simulation Testing Hardware Ordering/Budget Experiment Testing Taylor SmithStructure Design/ Testing Leader PowerFunctional Testing Satellite Recovery Design Documents Travis DowdyScienceProgrammingExperiment Testing Camera Testing Data Analysis Hunter HoopesSoftwareStructure DesignFunctional Testing Data Recovery Block Diagram

Biggest Worries Flight weather conditions Voltage input from cells over 5V Effects of temperature on solar cells