STATE TECHNOLOGY PLAN DRAFT GOAL DEVELOPMENT. The five goals of the 2010 Plan are: 1. Teaching for Learning: Michigan students will have meaningful technology-enabled.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.

Advertisements

Click here to add text Click here to add text. Local Control, Accountability, and Transforming How We Finance Our Schools Elk Grove Unified School District.

Understanding your District’s Plan Colleen Miller, Director of Leadership Development.

LCAPs in Orange County and the Role of the Orange County Department of Education Jeff Hittenberger, Ph.D. Chief Academic Officer.

The Effects of the National Technology Plan on Aldine ISD William Danes EDLD 5362 Section 8026.

1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.

1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,

Katherine Kingston EDLD May 15, 2011 This presentation will see just how well Galena Park ISD’s technology plan compares with the National.

ICT in Education UNESCO Bangkok

Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,

Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements

Wethersfield Board of Education December 10, 2013.

Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.

WELCOME. AGENDA  LCFF/LCAP Review  LCAP Process  Community Input/Findings  2014/15 LCAP  Plan Alignment- LEAP/LCAP/SPSA  Planning and Input.

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

Local Control Accountability Plan. LCAP  The Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) is a document that provides details regarding the District’s services,

1 How does Blackboard Learn Help? 1. 2 District Benefits 2 Nurture an educational community by encouraging community and parental involvement Ensure every.

Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.

Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.

1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.

PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT

Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.

CCISD TECHNOLOGY PLAN by Patti Shields Cohort 10 EDLD 5362 Information Systems Management.

Literacy21 Watertown Public Schools Administrative Council Teaching & Learning Goals January 2011.

The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.

Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.

Katie McDermott. National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers The Maryland Technology Consortium has developed Maryland Teacher Technology Standards,

FCCLA Basics. Family, Career and Community Leaders of America is a dynamic and effective national student organization that helps young men and women.

Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.

Worcester Public Schools Worcester, Massachusetts District Comprehensive Accountability Framework June 2010 Annex A ros #0-13 Page 1.

HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.

Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.

S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.

Evelyn Wassel, Ed.D. April 5, 2010 Maple Avenue Campus.

PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.

1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.

GWDC Education Policy Workgroup Draft Policy Recommendations Mo Amundson, Chair GWDC Quarterly Meeting May 13, 2010.

New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.

By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.

UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.

Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.

NCCE 2009 Administrator/IT Summit Strategy Session: Leadership.

Raising the Bar: Common Core State Standards Idaho State Department of Education

WASC Western Association for Schools and Colleges.

Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.

External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.

Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.

February 28, 2012 Presented By: Eileen Rohan, Superintendent Sean Maher, Network Manager Katie Frank, White Hill Michael Bessonette, Brookside Upper Ron.

2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.

1 Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology Karen Cator Director, Office of Education Technology U.S. Department of Education 1.

Strategic and School Improvement Plans: WPS 2021 Wareham Wakes up the World! Every Student Every Day.

PRESENTED BY DIANE DUGAS, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM JON LAMBERT, DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY GRANBY THREE YEAR TECHNOLOGY PLAN.

ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March

UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.

Using PLCs to support MTSS Florida Association of Staff Developers September 24, 2012 Florida Association of Staff Developers September 24, 2012.

Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.

External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.

Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.

External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.

Teaching and Learning with Technology

New Hanover County Schools

President, Virginia Board of Education

21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development

Strategic Plan: Tri-Cities High School

Allegheny-Clarion Valley School District Comprehensive Planning Meeting January 13, 2013.

Instructional Services: Budget Presentation

Minnesota State University, Mankato

Local Control and Accountability Plan Annual Update for

Presentation transcript:

STATE TECHNOLOGY PLAN DRAFT GOAL DEVELOPMENT

The five goals of the 2010 Plan are: 1. Teaching for Learning: Michigan students will have meaningful technology-enabled learning opportunities, including assistive technologies and virtual learning opportunities that develop proficiencies as defined by the Partnership for 21st Century Skills (21stcenturyskills.org), required to become lifelong learners, including ethical, safe, and discerning behavior while using information and media technology. 2. Leadership: Michigan Department of Education (MDE) will continue to provide leadership for educational technology by expanding and developing transformative learning environments that increase student academic achievement. 3. Professional Learning: Michigan educators will have competencies in 21st Century Skills, especially information and media fluency, to enable the transformation of teaching and learning to improve student achievement. 4. School and Community Relations: Michigan school board members, parents, and community members will understand the impact educational technology, including virtual learning options and data have on informing and improving instruction. Schools, parents, and community members will be able to access and use school level data to make meaningful decisions related to the education of all Michigan children. 5. Data and Information Management: Michigan educators will have access to data for effective classroom decision making and school improvement planning through an integrated local and statewide decision support system, and have access to professional learning opportunities to develop competencies in data-driven decision making.

COLLABORATIVE EFFORT

 Teaching and Learning  Leadership  Assessment  Productivity  Infrastructure 2016 – 2020 State Technology Plan

Teaching and Learning DRAFT All Michigan students, educators, and administrators will effectively use technology as an integrated tool to prepare all students to graduate college and career ready.

Leadership Michigan will provide leadership for educational technology in order to expand and develop transformative learning environments that increase student achievement. DRAFT: no modifications yet made…

Assessment Measure what matters – Our education system at all levels will leverage the power of technology to measure what matters and use assessment data for continuous improvement. DRAFT

Productivity Innovate and Scale: Michigan’s education system at all levels will redesign and continuously improve processes and structures to take advantage of the power of technology to improve learning outcomes while making more efficient use of time, money, and staff. DRAFT

Productivity DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT *

Infrastructure Access and Enable – All students and educators will have access to a comprehensive infrastructure for learning when and where they need it. DRAFT

Infrastructure DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT

Infrastructure DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT

Infrastructure DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT

Infrastructure DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT * DRAFT

NEXT STEPS  Finalize the goal language  Develop, refine and prioritize objectives  Get out for broad review  Finalize and adopt by Winter 2016

?? Questions? Thoughts? Comments?

REQUEST FOR INPUT