ياهلا... اليوم الأكاديمي Yahala … Academic Orientation

Faculty Performance Review and Development System (2010/2011) 2

Domains DomainPercentage Teaching50%-60% Scholarly endeavor10%-40% University and community service 10%-30% Total100% 3

General Principals Each college is entitled to modify the review criteria providing that faculty members are made aware of such changes at the beginning of the academic year. The Head of Department, in collaboration with each faculty member, should agree on the different weights at the beginning of each academic year. 4

The Head of the Department may seek help from whoever he/she finds necessary to assess any activities or domains included in the review process. After completion of the review, the concerned Head of the Department is required to meet with every faculty member in person to provide necessary feedback on strengths and weaknesses of the faculty performance. 5

Department Head’s Roles Establish that the faculty has received the necessary materials Present criteria against which faculty performance will be reviewed in the respective department. Verify the documents presented by the faculty member. Meet individually with each faculty to present feedback on strengths and improvements. Agree on a plan for the subsequent year. 6

7 qualitative Grade Specified Performance / in different domains General Performance Exceptional More than expected43.8 – 4.6 Expected Less than expected21.8 – 2.7 Unsatisfactory

8 General Faculty Performance SerialDomainActivityPercentageGrade 1 Teaching performance Teaching Process/Course Grade: ____ 50% - 60% Students’ opinion Grade: ____ 2 Scholarly endeavor 10% - 40% 3 University and community service 10% - 30% Total100%

General Faculty Performance (Foundation Program / Lecturers) Serial DomainActivity% Respective grade Grade 1 Teaching performance Teaching Portfolio 20% 70% Lesson Observation 25% HOD Score25% Student Questionnaires 30% 2 Professional Development Activities (10 – 20%) 30% 3 University and Community Service (10 – 20%) FPAS Overall Grade 9

10 Rate of the Supporting academic staff Member's Overall Performance (Teaching Assistants) serialMain TasksGrade 1. Teaching Performance 2. Students’ opinions 3. Academic advising 4. Committee Work 5. Research Duties 6. Professional Development 7. Any other activities Competencies Required for the Execution of the Tasks 1. Work quality and competency 2. Ability to create and initiate 3. Promptness of work execution 4. The ability to communicate appropriately with the stakeholders General Total

Office of Evaluation My.qu.edu.qa Tel: / E.mail: 11

Thank You 12