Developing Highway Safety Performance Metrics in an Advanced Connected Vehicle Environment Utilizing Near-Crash Events from the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
Advertisements

Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop Michael S. Griffith, Director FMCSA Office of Research and Analysis TRB Transportation Safety Planning Working Group.
National Safety Council Driver Improvement Programs.
HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
LAPD TELEMATICS PRESENTATION. Why Consider Telematics? 1. Advanced Vehicle Technology 2. Advanced Wireless Communications 3. New Generation of Police.
FL Department of Education School Bus Crash Data/FIRES Introduction Justin Atwell, Project Manager.
1 ARIES 2009 ARIES 2009 OVERVIEW. ARIES 2009 Welcome to the training module for the ARIES 2009 crash reporting system update. ARIES 2009 contains numerous.
SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study [Presenter’s Organization] [Presenter’s Name] [Presenter’s Title] Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal,
Lec 32, Ch5, pp : Highway Safety Improvement Program (objectives) Learn the components of FHWA’s Highway Safety Improvement Program Know typical.
Mandy Chu Office Chief Highway System Information and Performance Division of Research, Innovation and System Information Introduction to HPMS Highway.
Module 1-1 Road Safety 101. Module Tracking Your Progress Through Highway Safety Core Competencies Core Competency 1: Core Competency 2: Core Competency.
Fleet Safety. Introduction: Why Address Fleet Accidents Frequency of Fleet Accidents (NSC) 22% of workplace fatalities were highway accidents 80-90% were.
Hypothesis 1: Narrow roadways and roadways with higher speed limits will increase risk of vehicle/bicycle crash Hypothesis 2: Bicycle lanes and signage.
The Nature and Dimensions of the Road Safety Problem Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety January 2003.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Rail Transportation Sept. 18, 2012 Kevin Chesnik.
SHRP 2 Safety Implementation: Strategic Planning Using the Data Meeting with AASHTO Safety Management August 30, 2012 Accelerating solutions for highway.
Driver Distraction: Results from Naturalistic Teenage Driving Studies Charlie Klauer, Ph. D. Research Scientist Group Lead: Teen Risk and Injury Prevention.
SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study [Presenter’s Organization] [Presenter’s Name] [Presenter’s Title] Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal,
ITS America – April 2004 The Naturalistic Driving Study: Why are Crashes Occurring? Suzie Lee Research Scientist, Center for Crash Causation and Human.
Analysis of the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data [S08(B)] Evaluation of Offset Left-Turn Lanes Jessica M. Hutton Presentation to MCTRS August 15,
Proposed DriveCam ® Program Board of County Commissioners November 13, 2007.
Cost Benefit Analysis Do Speed Cameras Produce Net Benefits? Evidence from British Columbia, Canada.
People Saving People Dec. 4, 2000 Overview of U.S. Crashes & Weather Environment Louis V. Lombardo Office of Human-Centered Research.
11. 2 Recall from the Lecture on Epidemics and Substance Abuse The importance of road traffic collisions determining the index of disabilty adjusted life.
EPI 2670: Injury Epidemiology Transportation Related Injuries Thomas Songer, PhD University of Pittsburgh.
Rural Intersection Collision Avoidance System (RICAS) US Highway 53 and State Highway 73 Minong, Wisconsin Additional information Project Website:
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
State Farm’s Dangerous Intersections Initiative
Wyoming’s Approach to Safety Using the New SHRP2 Data Martin Kidner, State Planning Engineer Wyoming DOT July 22, 2015.
1 Highway Venue. Injury Facts  2 Injury Data Highlights Injury Facts® 2011 Edition Injury Facts® 2011 Edition Most current data available – 2009, 2008,
® © 2011 National Safety Council Highway Venue. © 2011 National Safety Council 2 Highway Venue 212 million drivers (+1%) 255 million vehicles (+
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
IIHS 2 nd Annual Regional Safety Conference Emerging Vehicle Safety Technology October 18, 2007 Stephen Oesch.
October 25, 2015 Funding Your Program October 20, 2008 ATSSA Sign Maintenance and Management Workshop Addison, Texas.
Overview of Road Safety in the United States Jeff Michael, Ed.D. Associate Administrator National Highway Traffic Safety Administration February 16, 2009.
Prepared for Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security Office of Grants and Research, Highway Safety Division Traffic Safety Forum Presented.
TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES A BRIEF SUMMARY.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
Accident Scene Safety Module 1 – Vehicle Safety Section 1 - Driving Safety.
Working Smart for the Customer’s Benefit Pam Hutton AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager June 11, 2013.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
2010 SCOHTS Annual Meeting Ken Campbell SHRP2 Chief Program Officer Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity.
The H-GAC Traffic Safety Program 2004 Status Report Report to the Technical Advisory Committee September 8, 2004 Ned Levine, PhD Houston-Galveston Area.
Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division.
World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on ITS Cross Regional Cooperation and Freight and Logistics Applications June 22, 2010 I ntelligent.
Fall  The central goal of SHRP 2 Safety research is to address the role of driver performance and behavior in traffic safety. This includes developing.
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
Technology and Resources In “Quick Clearance” Incident Management.
PHASE 1 OF SHRP 2 DATA IMPLEMENTATION & OVERSIGHT WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD Update on TRB Activities July 29, 2015 PHASE 1 OF SHRP 2 DATA IMPLEMENTATION.
1 Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Initiative Jack Ference United States Department of Transportation 2006 ITS World Congress 8-12 October 2006.
The Greater Metropolitan Houston Traffic Safety Program October 14, 2004 Ned Levine, PhD Houston-Galveston Area Council Houston, TX 2004 AMPO Annual Conference.
Safe Communities Highway Safety Information And Community Programs International Traffic Records Forum August 5, 2002 Orlando, Florida.
Utah Driver Education and Training Strategies for Managing Risk with Vehicle and Highway Designs Part I Source: FHWA.
SHRP 2 Safety Databases: Continuous Observations of Seat Belt Use Jim Hedlund APHA Annual Meeting November 18, 2014 Accelerating solutions for highway.
County of San Diego Division of Emergency Medical Services EMS Multivictim Motor Vehicle Crashes in San Diego County Alan M. Smith, MPH; Edward M. Castillo,
1 Planning Andrea Stevenson. 2 What’s the Big Deal About Ohio’s Transportation System? Ohio is within a single day’s drive (600 miles) of 60% of the United.
ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology
Driving Schools in Virginia - Market 200 Driver Training schools Driver Improvement clinics 2 –Average repeat offenders per clinic every year: 32.
Saving Lives Through Data Jeffrey W. Runge, MD Administrator, NHTSA 29 th International Traffic Records Forum Denver, Colorado.
Office of Research and Information Technology 2013 Large Truck and Bus Crash Overview Office of Analysis, Research, and Technology June 2015.
TRB Update AASHTO SCOHTS Annual Meeting April 2016.
Office of Research and Information Technology On-Board Monitoring for Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety April 10, 2013 Dr. Martin Walker, Chief Research.
V9 Vehicle Manoeuvering. Fleet Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS) FORS is important to our company because.
Presented to presented by Alabama Department of Transportation April 8, 2016 The Alabama Transportation Planner’s Guide to Safety Data Access and Documentation.
Challenge: Numerous Governmental Layers
Shrp2 and safety training and analysis center (stac)
Safety Update First Quarter FY 2017
Safety Research within Strategic Highway Research Program 2:
Operational Risk Management (ORM) and the Driving Task
Presentation transcript:

Developing Highway Safety Performance Metrics in an Advanced Connected Vehicle Environment Utilizing Near-Crash Events from the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study Kevin Majka & Alan Blatt, CUBRC First Annual TransInfo Symposium August13, 2015 Buffalo, NY

Outline of Presentation 1.Introduction and Motivation 2.Methodology 3.Data Sources 4.Preliminary Results 5.Next Steps 6.Summary 2

Buffalo, NY Rome, NY Dayton, OH D.C. Area San Antonio, TX Roswell, NM Palmdale, CA CUBRC is an independent scientific not-for-profit corporation established in 1983 with core competencies in: Aeronautics Chemical, Biological, and Medical Sciences Information Exploitation Public Safety & Transportation  $45M in sales,  130 employees (1/3 of which have advanced degrees) in 2014 CUBRC has a history of successful collaborations with private companies, public agencies, and academia (SUNY at Buffalo). Introduction to CUBRC 3

Motivation 4 This research represents work in progress MAP-21 requires a greater emphasis on developing performance measures to justify roadway safety improvements Advanced Driver Assistance Systems, Infrastructure Based Technologies, and Active Traffic Management have the potential to greatly reduce the number and severity of crashes This project proposes an alternative highway safety performance measure through the monitoring and classification of near crash events Collaborators

Methodology 5 Near crash events are normally defined as the exceedance of accepted thresholds for various vehicle kinematics such as lateral/longitudinal acceleration/deceleration, forward or rear time to collision, and yaw rates Kinematics data from the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study can be used as a surrogate of CV measures and as a way to identify new metrics and demonstrate their value Near Crash events can be compared to the number of fatal, serious, and property damage only crashes and rates

Data Sources 6

Preliminary Results 7 NYS SMS Data for 2013: (K) Fatal 54 (A) Incapacitating Injury 632 (B) Non Incapacitating Inj.1,116 (C) Possible Injury 5,577 (O) Property Damage Only 14,883 VMT (millions) 5,036 Crash Rates per 100 million VMT (K) Fatal 1.07 (A) Incapacitating Injury (B) Non Incapacitating Inj (C) Possible Injury (O) Property Damage Only Crash Severity Distribution: Erie County, NY, 2013

Preliminary Results (Cont') 8 SHRP2 NDS Data (Total) Data Collection Sites6 Drivers3,247 Vehicles3,362 Trips5,414,063 Vehicle Miles Travelled49,700,000 Total Data4 Petabytes SHRP2 NDS Data (NY: InSight) Drivers772 Vehicles784 Trips1,312,668 Vehicle Miles Travelled8,006,145 Head Unit Radar Unit DAS Main UnitAntennasOBD Connector Rear Looking Camera

Preliminary Results (Cont') 9 SHRP2 NDS Data (NY: S06/InSight) (I) Most Severe15/22 (II) Police-reportable Crash27/46 (III) Minor Crash36/121 (IV) Low-risk Tire Strike57/111 VMT (millions) 8.01 Rate per 100 million VMT (NY: S06/InSight) (I)Most Severe187/275 (II) Police-Reportable Crash337/575 (III) Minor Crash450/1,512 (IV) Low-Risk Tire Strike712/1,387 I - Most Severe Crash Any crash that includes an airbag deployment; any injury; a vehicle roll over; a high Delta V; or that requires vehicle towing. II - Police-Reportable Crash Includes sufficient property damage that it is police reportable (minimum of ~$1500 worth of damage, as estimated from video). III - Minor Crash Physical Contact with Another Object. Includes most road departures IV - Low-Risk Tire Strike Tire strike only with little/no risk element

Preliminary Results (Cont') 10

Next Steps 11 Rectify crash numbers on InSight vs. SHRP2 S06 final report Verify the exposure rates for SHRP2 fleet Develop a mapping of kinematics to near crash & crash events to provide a correlation coefficient and provide reliable metrics Better define the relationship between near crashes and less studied factors such as ABS and Traction Control activations Expand analysis to other SHRP2 NDS test sites

Summary 12 Data from SHRP2 NDS allows for the characterization of drivers while data from a CV environment could provide numerous more events for analysis In 2015 NHTSA will require that all new vehicles contain event data recorders to store vehicle kinematic data Near crash events can provide meaningful safety performance metrics and will be more widely available in the future The anticipated results of this project will provide transportation safety analysts with insights into the frequency of near crash events, pre-near crash contributing factors, and the types of evasive crash maneuvers

Questions?