Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

1 UN Coherence: High level monitoring and evaluation approach.
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
MODULE 8: PROJECT TRACKING AND EVALUATION
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Performance management guidance
RBM Communications Assessment Challenges and Opportunities in Ghana, Mali, Senegal, Tanzania and Uganda.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
POLICY AND PLANNING BRANCH (PPB) Proposed M&E action plan Charles Mvula IAC WAGENINGEN UR February 9 –
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Objectives and Indicators for MCH Programs MCH in Developing Countries January 25, 2011.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
1 Module 6 Putting It All Together. 2 Learning Objectives At the end of this session participants will understand: The monitoring and evaluation process.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Objectives and Indicators for MCH Programs
Action Research In Organizational Development. Action Research Coined by Kurt Lewin (MIT) in 1944 Reflective process of progressive problem solving Also.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
FORMATIVE EVALUATION Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011, Billings, MT.
Professional Development Programs
USAID’s Experience and Lessons Learned in Approaches used in Monitoring and Evaluating Capacity Building Activities Duane Muller, USAID November 7, 2008.
PROGRAMS MONITORING AND SUPERVISION
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
9 Closing the Project Teaching Strategies
Step 6: Implementing Change. Implementing Change Our Roadmap.
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Eight Steps to Improving Career Services in Schools, Colleges, and Agencies James P. Sampson, Jr. National Career Development Association Global Conference.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
1 What are Monitoring and Evaluation? How do we think about M&E in the context of the LAM Project?
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Introducing QI Tools and Approaches Taking QI & PI Approaches and Tools to Scale APPENDIX F Session G Facilitative Supervision for Quality Improvement.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee June 25, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD
Purposes of Evaluation Why evaluate? Accountability: Justify trust of stakeholders (funders, parents, citizens) by showing program results (Summative)
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Introduction to Social Audits. Assessing Social Performance Process Results Audit ToolsRating Tools Intent & Design Internal Systems/ Activities OutputsOutcomes.
Independent Evaluation Group World Bank November 11, 2010 Evaluation of Bank Support for Gender and Development.
Monitoring and Evaluation
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.
Goal Attainment Scales as a way to Measure Progress Amy Gaumer Erickson & Monica Ballay December 3, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Practical Experiences - Evaluation of Program 1 Geneva January 29, 2016.
Choosing Questions and Planning the Evaluation. What do we mean by choosing questions? Evaluation questions are the questions your evaluation is meant.
SPM Essentials Module 6- Social Audit & Social Rating.
Improved socio-economic services for a more social microfinance.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Approaches to Partnership
Implementing Career Resources, Service-Delivery Tools, and Services
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Implementing Career Resources, Service-Delivery Tools, and Services
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012

 Session objectives : Explain similarities and differences between monitoring and evaluation Describe the major purposes, types and tools for MCH program evaluation Contrast traditional evaluation approaches with participatory evaluation Develop a monitoring plan for one program activity

 Improve program planning process  Improve program management  Improve program performance  Assess program effects on beneficiaries  Strengthen links with participant groups

 Periodic, regular collection and analysis of selected indicators  Determines whether key activities are being carried out as planned, and corrections needed  The HMIS (health management information system) provides early indication of progress, or a lack of progress

 Carried out by any staff, not a specific evaluation staff person  Shows strengths & weaknesses of the strategies: do we need to refine them?  Important: use it to provide regular feedback to staff

 We monitor implementation of an intervention – typically output and process indicators  We supervise an individual

Annual totals: 2009 = = 7203

Monitoring and Evaluation: how are they related?

 Monitoring: the regular collection and analysis of selected indicators conducted to determine whether key activities are being carried out as planned, and identify corrections needed  Evaluation: done at longer intervals than monitoring conducted to provide an indication of success of a program, and identify problem areas

 Assesses value Carried out selectively – costly and time consuming Includes a review of evidence  Assess performance and effects of program efforts:  Process: outputs, organization, management  Outcome or impact: effects on beneficiaries

 Strategy – Are the right things being done?  Operations – Are things being done right?  Learning – Is it having the desired effects? Are there better ways?

 Formative vs. summative  Of relative need for a program  Of the feasibility of a program design  Of program performance or process  Of direct effects or outcomes of a program  Of long-term impact  Internal or external

 Staff know more history, organization, culture, problems, successes  Known to the program so less likely to be threatening, disruptive  Can interpret evaluation findings more accurately but:  May be too close, hard to be ‘objective’  Part of power structure, may have personal agendas  Likely not highly trained in evaluation

 Can take a ‘fresh’ look at the program  Not personally involved; more ‘objective’  Not a part of normal power structure so less chance of personal gain  Well trained in evaluation methods, seen as an ‘expert’ by program but:  Outsiders may not understand the program or people involved  May cause anxiety if not known and trusted

 Participation by a range of stakeholders  Focus on program participants, not donors  Focus is on learning, not just accountability  Flexible design, not predetermined  Use rapid appraisal methods, less formal  Consultants are facilitators, not the actual ‘evaluator’  Evaluation team is key to approach

InputsActivities Processes Outputs Objectives OutcomesImpact

Preparation:  Establish purpose, methods (‘scope of work’) including the evaluation questions  Develop data gathering instruments  Develop team plan and itinerary Main activities:  Visit main offices, field sites  Gather data (document review; observations, group discussions, interviews; review surveys)

The evaluation report :  Team discussion of findings, come to tentative conclusions/recommendations  Draft main findings of the evaluation report  Discuss draft of findings with program staff, other stakeholders  Revise findings, recommendations as needed  Finalize and submit report  Share with staff, community, MOH, others  Plan how to implement recommendations

From Halcolm’s Evaluation Laws

Choose one objective for your group project For that objective, select one important activity that the project will monitor Discuss and fill in the information for the six exercise questions