Mr. Nick Linkowitz HQMC/LPV 21 Sep 2006 A View on Sense & Respond Logistics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unclassified: Pre-Decisional 1651 v1.1 AIM FRB May 2010 Mr. Larry G. Paige II Head, Navy Policy, Strategy, Vision and Requirements (N152) Total Force Training.
Advertisements

C2 Integration Division Marine Corps Combat Development Command
AF Aerial Layer Network Approach
Defense Daily Open Architecture Summit EMS Panel
Speed, Flexibility, & Agility
Defense Transformation: Concepts and Affordability Jack Treddenick George C. Marshall Center DRESMARA 16 October 2006.
United States Marine Corps
Structural issues in Network Enabled Defence Matie du Toit (SISPA) Hugo Lotriet (University of Pretoria)
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Force (EAF) Getting lighter, leaner, and more responsive Col.
Commodity Architectures and Army Research Challenges Workshop on Edge Computing Using New Commodity Architectures (EDGE) 24 May 2006 J. Michael Coyle Program.
Mink Spaans What are the problems that need to be solved What is hard.
Open FTL Foundations of Team Leadership 11-1 Foundations of Team Leadership MBTI & Leadership New Yorker Magazine 2004.
United States Army Combined Arms Center
California Common Operating Picture (Cal COP) for Public Safety
CLAIMING THE FUTURE THE ASSOCIATION OF THE FUTURE.
MARINE AVIATION APW / LtCol Beach 05 May 2009 Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the Connected Battlespace.
Themes and Types of Amphibious Operations
SENSE AND RESPOND LOGISTICS R&D Activities at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill S&RL Workshop Fort Belvoir, Virginia September 21, 2006 Dr. Noel.
Foundational Doctrine Guiding Fire Suppression in the Forest Service Product of the Pulaski Conference June 2005.
Opening Remarks Sense and Respond Logistics Forum Fort Belvoir, VA
16 October 2007 Focus and Convergence Challenges for Complexity Science List of Candidate Topics Focus and Convergence Challenges for Complexity Sciences.
Battle Drills Break Contact React to Ambush React to Contact
Delivering Materiel Readiness “THE FUTURE OF ARMY LOGISTICS” March 2004 BG Charlie Fletcher United States Army Deputy G-4 NDIA.
VisionVision StrategyStrategy ExpeditionaryExpeditionary.
Smiths Aerospace Sense and Respond Logistics Forum Defense Acquisition University September 21, 2006.
THE BRITISH APPROACH TO OPERATIONAL ART Lt Col David Broadfoot MBE The Highlanders Chief Instructor JSOC.
Sustainability/Logistics – Transportation and Distribution Management (4b) Technology Enabled Capability Demonstration Alan Santucci
STRATEGIC PLAN DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF FOR PERSONNEL, INFRASTRUCTURE AND LOGISTICS U.S. ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND OCTOBER 2005.
Joint Vision Why a New Document n Sustain and build on momentum of Joint Vision process ã Continue evolution of the joint force n Lessons learned.
Logistics Modernization Logistics Modernization Logistics Modernization Maj Jeff Manning, USMC Log Mod TTF Installations & Logistics Headquarters, U. S.
Marine Corps Logistics Modernization Colonel R. M. Nixon, USMC Logistics Vision & Strategy HQMC.
Import of New Security Environment Keys to Transformation: Exploit Technology Exploit DOD ability to integrate processes Result: JV2010 Vision shall.
1 24 Apr Descriptive, not prescriptive Departure point for the logistics advocacy construct View logistics through a holistic Marine Corps lens.
Mr. Tom Matthews OUSD(I) The overall classification of this brief is UNCLASSIFIED Discussion with the Intelligence Community Officer Course 10 April 2006.
FA50 Qualification Course
Network-Enabled Platforms – Tools to Maximize Operational Performance.
CAPT RUSTY STILES Deputy Fleet Surgeon U.S. Fleet Forces Command
1 Joint Doctrine: The Authoritative Vocabulary For and Explanation of Joint Warfare and Joint Operations October 16, 2015 Representing Reality\Big Data\Big.
Defense Science Board Task Force on Sea Basing. Summary of Conclusions Sea basing - a critical future national competence for assuring access to areas.
CAPT Brian Hinkley Director, Fleet EW Center 15 October 2009
Mine Warfare - A Total Force Approach for the Future
1 Power to the Edge Agility Focus and Convergence Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century presented to the Focus, Agility and Convergence Team Inaugural Meeting.
Logistics Initiatives
HUMAN DIMENSION MCDP 1 OVERVIEW Understanding of the physical dimensions of combat.
Latest Strategies for IT Security Margaret Myers Principal Director, Deputy CIO United States Department of Defense North American Day 2006.
Execution and Implementation
Marine Aviation 1 BGen Marty “Wiley” Post 9 Mar st Century Marine Corps Creating Stability in an Unstable World.
Authorized for Public Release IAW SPR dtd RDML Mark R. Milliken Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy, International Programs (DASN IP)
Strike, Land Attack and Air Defense Marine Corps Systems Command
 The benefits of interior lines could be gained either by central position or superior lateral communications.
TOA Theorist Briefing: USMC Warfighting
Network Centric Planning ---- Campaign of Experimentation Program of Research IAMWG Dr. David S. Alberts September 2005.
1 Sense & Respond Logistics David Schrady 22 ISMOR 1 September 2005.
Center of Excellence PEACE OPERATIONS COMMAND & CONTROL AND COMMAND & CONTROL AND TRANSITION ISSUES Lt Col (R) John Derick Osman Center of Excellence in.
Employment Considerations: Considerations at the Outset of Combat
UNCLASSIFIED 6/24/2016 8:12:34 PM Szymanski UNCLASSIFIED Page 1 of 15 Pages Space Policy Issues - Space Principles of War - 14 June, 2010.
GORT Planning/Guidance Session with LTG Barclay
Current Event Brief!.
Evolution of Warfare Warfighting MCDP-1.
Distributed Operations Concept
Marine Corps Transformational Concepts and Seabasing
US Marine Corps
NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference: Joint Seabasing Panel
Seabasing…Enabling Operational Maneuver from the Sea
Presented to: Change Management Group 23 October 2003
Joint Protection of the Sea Base
NDIA / USMC War Game 2006 “Adapting to Change” Cell 1 Outbrief.
Bush/Rumsfeld Defense Priorities/Objectives A Mandate For Change
NDIA 2005 Group D Outbrief.
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
Presentation transcript:

Mr. Nick Linkowitz HQMC/LPV 21 Sep 2006 A View on Sense & Respond Logistics

Characteristics of an Expeditionary Force: Agile and flexible force Capable of a broad range of military objectives Deploy rapidly Enter objective though forcible means Sustain itself for an extended period of time Withdraw quickly Reconstitute rapidly General J. L. Jones CMC What’s in a Word? AFJI - Oct 2000 Marine Corps Vision

“Sense and Respond” Key Ideas Demand can be unpredictable, so success depends on speed of pattern recognition and speed of response The best supply chain is no longer one that is highly optimized, but one that is highly flexible Organizes Units and subunits into “modular capabilities” that negotiate with one another over commitments Networks “self-synchronize” via a common environment and set of shared objectives Uses IT for data sharing, “knowing earlier,” commitment tracking, and role reconfiguration

Sense & Respond Logistics Concept Supply network is dynamic –Supply doctrine anticipates reconfigurable supply nets –Emphasizes transportation flexibility over large inventories Negotiation-based relationships –Entities use commander’s intent and situation awareness to negotiate and synchronize –Roles and commitments of entities are dynamically defined Networks are difficult to analyze and attack –More robust to node failure –Adapts to real-time demand driven by unit signals Supports a more logistically agile force –Network adaptivity allows logistics decisions to be made early

fight S&RL is first and foremost, a demand driven process that requires a real-time view of the “fight” left in combat platforms. S&RL provides vital, timely information for maneuver warfare, sustainability, and life cycle support. Sea Basing Within the Sea Basing context, S&RL should be considered a “combat enabler” like fires, maneuver, protection, sensing, and command. Need to know how to best use demand information in an integrated data environment that feeds Marine Corps Autonomic Logistics. USMC Near Term Focus

GCSS-MC Operational Architecture (SCOR Model) Logistics Modernization (LogMod) 5 to 3 Levels of Maintenance Realignment of Supply Autonomic Logistics (AL) Naval Logistics Integration (NLI) MAGTF Logistics Integration (MLI) Enabling MAGTF & Naval Common Operating Picture (COP) Near & Mid Term Impacts

Metrics Responsiveness Measures operational flexibility Presence, power, & assistance Reach The duration of sustainment Staying power & ability to build-up forces LtCol Cassel, USMC, NWC, 1993

Less Logistics Mass Adaptive Change Superior Information – Ops / Intel / Log Respond better at-Sea to changes Ashore A Logistics Path to Change… Constant Innovation Joint Operational Capabilities Effects-Based Logistics

On the Sense & Respond Logistics Initiative… -- DC, I&L to CMC, Nov 2003 “The benefit of supporting S&RL is that it brings to the Marine Corps an experiment to stress the transformational war fighting concept of Expeditionary Maneuver from the Sea-Base. The goal is to have operations, logistics, & intelligence all working together, leveraged by available information. The stretch goal is to have logistics solutions that can be integrated into situational awareness supporting common operating pictures – Service, Naval, and Joint.”

S&R and Network Centric Warfare Agility at all Levels Logistics AssetsCombat ForcesIntelligence Assets Physical Layer Assets in the Battlespace Logistics ControlsC2Intelligence Controls Controls Layer Policy, Doctrine, Rules, Processes & Management Info Systems Layer Information infrastructure Mission Effectiveness Integration Logistics Information Systems Command & Control Information Systems Intelligence Information Systems Sense & Respond Logistics

“Expeditionary” describes the immediate ability to go where the enemy is, displace him, and operate from his terrain. Embracing austerity Adaptability to the environment at hand Innovation to ensure advantage Physical and psychological rigor Maneuver Warfare is a concept for how Marines… Gain the advantage by rapidity of decision-making Seize the initiative Exploit fleeting opportunities Shatter the cohesion and will of the enemy Maneuver Warfare is a philosophy of leadership that is based on trust and decentralized decision-making that enables Marines to thrive in the chaos and friction of combat Expeditionary & Maneuver: Combat Multipliers

Friction Uncertainty Fluidity Disorder Human Dimension Violence and Danger Moral and Physical Forces Violent contest of human will Enduring and Nature of War Col Art Corbett, USMC, MCCDC, 2003

Pragmatic approach to effective integration of IT into C2 Provides a “what is it” approach to IT Supports a network enabled force Technology leverage vs. technology reliance Command or Control Eases the Command or Control dilemma Supports and enhances warfighting philosophies Paradigm for Future C2

Distribute Uncertainty Those who are most affected by uncertainty and risk are usually in best position to overcome uncertainty Perfect solutions are not necessary Resolve uncertainty at lowest practical level, quickly, with greatest situational awareness

Maneuver Warfare requires Decision Makers Concentration and Speed Surprise and Boldness Exploiting Vulnerability and Opportunity Empowered by Mission tactics Commander’s intent Focus of effort Proliferating Decision Makers

“We must guard against over reliance on technology. Technology can enhance the ways and means of war by improving man’s ability to wage it, but technology cannot and should not attempt to eliminate man from the process. Better equipment is not the cure for all ills; doctrinal and tactical solutions must also be sought.” (MCDP-1 Warfighting) Technology Leverage vs. Technology Reliance