JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Application of the Troop Leading Procedures
Advertisements

Risk Management Introduction Risk Management Fundamentals
Course of Action Analysis
Course of Action Development
Joint Operation Planning Process:
TROOP LEADING PROCEDURES FM 7-8
OPORD Crosswalk.
MISSION ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Maj Tom Woods
Commander’s Intent & Guidance Deployable Joint Task Force Augmentation Cell (DJTFAC) Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) Major Paul Zavislak.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 3-37; and Army
Commander’s Intent & Guidance
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Crisis Action Planning Commander’s Guidance and Intent
Operations Security (OPSEC) Introduction  Standard  Application  Objectives  Regulations and Guidance  OPSEC Definition  Indicators.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
Unit 8:COOP Plan and Procedures  Explain purpose of a COOP plan  Propose an outline for a COOP plan  Identify procedures that can effectively support.
Joint Special Operations University
MPAT TE-2 COMBINED TASK FORCE TRAINING Information Management.
The Military Decision Making Process
Air Force Doctrine Document 2-1: Air Warfare
Crisis Action Planning 01 January 2006 CTF Course of Action Development UNCLASSIFIED CTF Training.
Multinational Force Staff Estimates
USSOUTHCOM J35 Organization and Functions
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team
Troop Leading Procedures
Mission Analysis “COMBINED” TASK FORCE TRAINING
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
Military Decision Making Process – Multinational (MDMP-M)
Crisis Action Planning Process پروسه پلان گذاری عملکرد بحران Situation Development Crisis Assessment COA Development COA Selection Execution Planning Execution.
1 The Military Decision- Making Process (MDMP). 2 MDMPAgenda MDMP Agenda 1. Module 1: MDMP Overview/Receipt of Mission/Mission Analysis PE # 1 – Cdr’s.
Military Decision-Making Process
THE MILITARY DECISION MAKING PROCESS (MDMP)
Prepare and Issue the Coalition / Combined Task Force OPORD Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) Purpose References Discuss the process of preparing.
JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Comparison.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
Crisis Action Planning
UNCLASSIFIED Crisis Action Planning 01 January 2006 CTF Operation Order UNCLASSIFIED ing.
UNCLASSIFIED As of W Mar 08 1 Course of Action Development (MDMP) 3 Mar 08 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT)
Campaign Planning Process Guide / Brief Template
COMMANDER’S INTENT & GUIDANCE
Purpose To understand Commander’s Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action planning Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action.
Campaign Planning Process Step 5 – Linking Planning to Execution
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
MPAT SECRETARIAT Multinational Force Crisis Action Planning Overview COALITION/COMBINED TASK FORCE TRAINING.
Framework for Effective Multinational OPs Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) MNF SOP WORKSHOP JTF to CTF Transition Guide (Annex)
Course of Action Comparison Purpose u Define course of action comparison and its role in the crisis action planning process u Discuss the associated task.
THIRD FLEET COMTHIRDFLT Crisis Planning & HA/DR Exercise Strong Angel THIRD FLEET HA/DR Team COMTHIRDFLT COMTHIRDFLT.
Staff (Running) Estimate
Crisis Action Planning & the Commander’s Estimate Process 23 February 2001.
Crisis Action Planning (CAP) and The Commander’s Estimate Joint Pub 3-0, Doctrine for Joint Operations Joint Pup , Joint Task Force Planning Guidance.
Course of Action (COA) Comparison
Multinational Force Course of Action Development
Center of Excellence PEACE OPERATIONS COMMAND & CONTROL AND COMMAND & CONTROL AND TRANSITION ISSUES Lt Col (R) John Derick Osman Center of Excellence in.
Course of Action Analysis (MDMP)
Course of Action Analysis Maj Kelly Lawson
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team Course of Action Analysis
MDMP-M Step 3: Course of Action Analysis & Gaming
Course of Action Analysis
CRISIS ACTION PLANNING (CAP) and COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE
CRISIS ACTION PLANNING (CAP) and COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE Maj Kelly Lawson
Religious Inputs/Outputs
The MDMP Process MDMP Inputs MDMP Outputs Step 1 MDMP Inputs Step 5
What is Planning? “In preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable.” General of the Army Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute The Army’s only organization for Peace and Stability Operations at the strategic and operational level.
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
TROOP LEADING PROCEDURE
Course of Action Development
MDMP-M Step 3: Course of Action Analysis & Gaming
Presentation transcript:

JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Analysis

Purpose u Define course of action analysis and its role in the crisis action planning process u Discuss the associated task steps u Identify the products resulting from COA analysis u Provide lessons learned from previous exercises and operations

References u AFSC Pub 1, The Joint Staff Officer’s Guide,1997 u JP 3-0, Doctrine for Joint Operations, App B, Feb 95 u JP , Joint Task Force Planning Guidance and Procedures, 13 Jan 99 u JP , JOPES, Volume I, (Planning Policies and Procedures), Annex P, Aug 93 u CJCSM , JTF HQ Master Training Guide, 15 Apr 97

Crisis Action Planning Process CRISISCRISIS I Situation Development II Crisis Assessment IV Course of Action Selection V Execution Planning AND/OR III Course of Action Development I Mission Analysis/ Restated Mission IV Comparison of Own Courses of Action III Analysis of Opposing Courses of Action V Commander’s Decision II Course of Action Development Commander’s Estimate Process OPORD Deployment Data Base VI Execution Planning Order Alert Order Warning Order Execute Order

Courses of Action Analysis The purpose of course of action analysis is to “evaluate each proposed friendly COA as though opposed by each enemy capability. This series of wargaming exercises illustrates that the commander considered the most significant and influential confrontations.” AFSC Pub 1, 6-38

u Determine the probable effect of most likely enemy COA on the success of each friendly XO u Conduct this analysis in an orderly fashion – By time phasing – Geographic location – Functional event – Consider the potential actions of subordinates two echelons down Analysis of Opposing COAs

u Consider conflict termination issues; think through own action, enemy reaction, counteraction u Conclude with: – Revalidation of suitability, adequacy, feasibility – Determine additional requirements – Make modifications – List advantages and disadvantages of each COA Analysis of Opposing COAs (Cont)

Task Steps Gather Gather theTools ListAssumptions Critical Events & Decision Points WargamingMethod RecordingMethod Wargame & Assess RiskAssessment Revalidate Course of Action Analysis

Task Steps Gather the Tools List Assumptions Critical Events & Decision Points Wargaming Method Recording Method Wargame & Assess Risk Assessment Revalidate Course of Action Analysis

Gather the Tools u Friendly COAs u Enemy COAs u Joint operations area (JOA) depiction u Representation of friendly and enemy force distribution u Representation of environmental/civil conditions u Synchronization Matrix u Action-Reaction-Counteraction matrix u Identify and review existing limitations

Task Steps Gather the Tools List Assumptions Critical Events & Decision Points Wargaming Method Recording Method Wargame & Assess Risk Assessment Revalidate Course of Action Analysis

List Assumptions u List the assumptions delivered during mission analysis u Validity: – Is the assumption necessary? – Will the result change without the assumption? u Logical, realistic, stated positively

Task Steps Gather Gather theTools ListAssumptions Critical Events & Decision Points WargamingMethod RecordingMethod Wargame & Assess RiskAssessment Revalidate Course of Action Analysis

List Known Critical Events and Decision Points u Critical events are essential tasks that require detailed analysis u Decision points identify decisions the commander must make to ensure timely execution and synchronization u Time available for analysis affects length of the critical events list

Task Steps Gather Gather theTools ListAssumptions Critical Events & Decision Points Wargaming Method RecordingMethod Wargame & Assess RiskAssessment Revalidate Course of Action Analysis

Select Method of Wargame for Analysis u Computer Assisted – Integrated theater management model – Tactical warfare model – Joint conflict model u Manual – Deliberate timeline analysis – Operational phasing – Critical events

Task Steps Gather Gather theTools ListAssumptions Critical Events & Decision Points WargamingMethod Recording Method Wargame & Assess RiskAssessment Revalidate Course of Action Analysis

Select Technique to Record and Display Wargaming u Techniques –Narrative technique –Sketch and note technique –Wargame matrix u Considerations –Assets available –Time available

Task Steps Gather Gather theTools ListAssumptions Critical Events & Decision Points WargamingMethod RecordingMethod Wargame & Assess RiskAssessment Revalidate Course of Action Analysis

Wargame the Operation and Assess Results u Visualize the flow of operations u Assess the JTF performance two echelons down u “Action-Reaction-Counteraction”

Synchronization Matrix TIME CONTINUOUS OR SINGLE EVENT ENEMY ACTION DECISION POINTS CRITICAL INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS OPN MOVEMENT AND MANEUVER OPN FIREPOWER OPN PROTECTION OPN INFORMATION OPN INTEL OPN SUPPORT ARFOR/LAND COMPONENT MARFOR/LAND COMPONENT NAVFOR/MARITIME/JFACC AFFOR/AIR COMPONENT/JFACC JSOTF OTHERS FUNCTION FUNCTION JOINTJOINT AREASAREAS COMPONENTSCOMPONENTS D-DAY/ H-HOUR D + 1D + 2

Simplified Sync Matrix ACTOR JTF ARFOR NAVFOR AFFOR MARFOR JSOTF JPOTF EVENT COMMENT

Sample Wargame Worksheet SEQ- UENCE NUMBER ACTIONRE- ACTION COUNTER- ACTION ASSETSTIMEDECISION POINT CCIRREMARKS CRITICAL EVENT:

Action/Reaction/Counteraction ACTIONREACTION COUNTERACTION C141 landing City X Riot SAM hit inbound DOS and JTF LNO w/ local police Evac late night Local security Deception PSYOPS Evac late night ECM if not optical track Ground SAR from embassy Abort lift DOS appeal to X Govt for military security Evac by helo, ground

Advantages & Disadvantages Advantages Disadvantages COA 1 Single lift in threatened cities Almost no footprint Duration of Ops Weather restriction Security is HN Force Ability to pick up outlying areas

Advantages & Disadvantages Advantages Disadvantages COA 1 Single lift in threatened cities Almost no footprint Duration of Ops Modifications1. Inf Bn to conduct evac via land transport 2. Branch: ARFOR QRF to threatened areas 3. JSOTF assemble and deliver evacuees Weather restriction Security is HN Force Ability to pick up outlying areas

Results of Wargaming u Identification of advantages and disadvantages of each friendly COA u Identification of additional assets required (if any) u Refinements or modifications to the COA u Risks and actions to reduce the risk at each geographic location or functional event u Adjustments to any established control measures

Wargaming Results (Cont) u TPFDD requirements u Synchronization requirements u Estimate of the duration of critical events as well as the operation as a whole u Required support from outside of the JTF u Requirements for logistic support u Clear picture of command relationships branches and sequels

Wargaming Results (Cont) u Critical information required to support decision points u Additional commander’s decision points u Measures of effectiveness for each phase u Areas of high interest for reconnaissance, surveillance u Identification of component tasks u Task Organization requirements

Task Steps Gather Gather theTools ListAssumptions Critical Events & Decision Points WargamingMethod RecordingMethod Wargame & Assess Risk Assessment Revalidate Course of Action Analysis

Conduct Risk Assessment u Identify risks u Assess risks u Analyze acceptability of risk u Identify ways and means of risk mitigation

Task Steps Gather Gather theTools ListAssumptions Critical Events & Decision Points WargamingMethod RecordingMethod Wargame & Assess RiskAssessment Course of Action Analysis Revalidate

u Suitable (Adequate): Will the COA accomplish the mission when carried out successfully, In other words, is it aimed at the right objectives? u Feasible: Do we have the required resources and can those resources be made available in time? u Acceptable: Even though the COA will accomplish the mission and we have the required resources, is it worth the cost in term of possible losses (military, time, political, etc.)?

Lessons Learned u Identify events/locations and enemy capabilities first, or this will take forever. u Wargame the endstate and transition. u Don’t make tactical decisions or get bogged down. First cut thoughts only. u The purpose of wargaming is to identify advantages and disadvantages, not to prescribe component reactions. u During the COA analysis, the staff must not compare friendly COAs. The COAs will be analyzed against the enemy’s COAs.

QUESTIONS?