Wednesday 14 th October 2015 RE Network Meeting: 1. Draft a form to monitor the use of the schemes of work posted on the EGfL. 2. Look when tricky situations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Self Evaluation – writing a good SEF
Advertisements

What is an ITP? Individual training plan What is an ITP for a Goldsmiths PGCE student? Progress check, a record of achievement, a log of experiences,
Plantation Primary School
Ofsted ITE Inspection Briefing PCET trainees, ex-MMU PCET trainees, Course Team Leaders, Mentors and Quality Managers.
We were given 2 weeks notice… All staff AfPE trained (after recent meeting) Risk Assessment up to date/CRB checks uptodate Timetable checked (2 hours PE.
The Index for Inclusion. Why have an Index Forum? Purpose To offer regular opportunities to discuss school improvement with other neighbouring schools,
OUTSTANDING PE LESSONS Key features that contribute to an outstanding lesson and the strategies used to get consistency across the department.
NEW STATUTORY REGULATIONS FOR TEACHER APPRAISAL AND CAPABILITY 2012 Mary Higgins, Advisor.
DEVELOPING LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM Trerobart Primary School, Ynysybwl, Rhondda Cynon Taff Robert Devereux & Emma Coates.
St Anne’s: Ofsted Summary. Why is St Anne’s in Special Measures?  Achievement is poor. Progress is inconsistent  Some weak teaching observed and over.
RE Subject Leadership - Christopher Power - June 2008 RE Subject Leadership RE Subject Leadership Developing Religious Education in School and Gathering.
The role of the mathematics subject leader in leading sustainable improvements Thursday 23 rd September 2010 Jo Lakey School Improvement Officer.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT HOW TO GET THE MOST OUT OF THE PROCESS Tuesday 2nd September pm.
August 23, 2015 Education Bradford Curricular Targets Georgina Graham and Jonathan Nixon ISP Consultants, Education Bradford.
Our Vision Bishops Lydeard Primary School. Improve the quality of teaching to good or better through:  Continuing Professional Development  North Somerset.
The effective use of tests and tasks to support teacher assessment in Y2 4 th February 2014 Karen Samples.
Impact & Evidence Primary Sport Premium
Please help yourself to a drink. We will start at 9.15a.m.
Mrs. Bland’s Infant and Nursery School Mrs Bland’s Infant and Nursery School.
24 June 2011 Raising standards, improving lives Moving to outstanding post-16 provision Tom Winskill HMI Principal Officer, Framework Development Ofsted.
Leading from the front – the role of English in developing literacy across the school 20 March 2015 Lesley Daniel Associate inspector.
Promoting improvement ITE thematic dissemination conference: secondary modern languages 26 November 2013 Elaine Taylor HMI, National Lead for Modern Languages.
Ian Hodgkinson HMI 19 June 2015
Reepham Primary School School Improvement and Development Flexible, real purpose, independent thinking Fun, engaging, exciting and relevant Supports.
Ofsted lessons Clerks’ Update Jan Ofsted Sept 2012 The key judgements: Inspectors must judge the quality of education provided in the school – its.
© Myra Young Assessment All rights reserved. Provided for the use of participants in AM circles in North Lanarkshire Council.
Leading the successful inspection in a changing educational landscape.
Middle Leaders’ Role in School Self-Evaluation
Stockton Primary School OFSTED Inspection November
DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Inspection 2012 S48 Diocesan Inspection.
Raising standards, improving lives The new inspection arrangements for maintained schools and academies from January 2012.
OFSTED SUBJECT SURVEY INSPECTIONS (2009 framework)
Another New Framework Major Changes: No more satisfactory 2 strikes and you are out All criteria changed Very short notice No pre-inspection brief.
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Subject Leader Training Literacy Co-ordinator Session Monitoring Progress - Book Trawls/Scrutinies.
Improving standards in learning and teaching: the role of the subject leader in moderating work samples.
OFSTED: Parents’ meeting WHAT THE INSPECTORS DIDN’T TELL YOU… OFSTED Inspection 21st-22nd February 2013.
Hertfordshire County Council Science Subject Leader Development Meeting April 5 th 2011.
Primary Inspection Models 14 September Overview of today’s briefing Revisions to the overall effectiveness conclusion Revisions to the performance.
What Ofsted does to reach a judgement about teaching and what can be learned from this by academies?
Somerset Primary Network Ltd The Effective Subject Leader Sarah Cook.
Middle Leadership Programme Day 1: The Effective Middle Leader.
DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Inspection S48 Diocesan Inspection and Catholic life.
Update on Ofsted inspections in schools January 2012.
Before we begin : Short inspections of good schools The frequency of inspection is proportionate to the performance and circumstances of schools. From.
Primary.  There was a greater level of improvement in Literacy than Numeracy for both FSME and Non-FSME pupils.  Boys showed a greater level of.
1 Hertfordshire County Council Knowing your school.
Governors Introduction Part Three WELCOME Accountability.
Tracking and Target Setting. Ensuring impact on pupil learning  Identify strand from an area of learning in literacy and mathematics  Identify focus.
The 2012 Ofsted inspection framework SCHOOLS North East 14 th October 2011.
© Crown Copyright 2003 Secondary National Strategy © Crown copyright 2005 ICT Subject Leader development meeting Presented by: Rowena Pryor, Ray Powell.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
Maintenance Targets Celebrate the achievements in upper school though the department newsletter - Ensure key stage newsletters include a section on supportive.
ENGLISH APP TRAINING Cohort 3 NOVEMBER AIMS To be familiar with the APP materials and how they link together To develop understanding of the APP.
2015 / 2016 and beyond.  1. High quality leadership drives school improvement  2. Quality of teaching and learning  3. Quality of maths provision 
Sawtry Junior School Development Plan. Raise achievement and improve the quality of teaching to be good or better by: Key priority One for improvement.
Moving to Outstanding Ofsted Findings Improvement update meeting.
Parents’ Forum - Tuesday 7 th June 2016 Ofsted. Update from the last forum Parents views on the school planner… …A big review is in place, but the changes.
Developing classroom practice to raise standards Rosemarie Sadler, Primary Performance Adviser Val Phillips – Primary Performance Adviser.
Raising standards, improving lives
School Improvement Priorities
POST-OFSTED MEETING FOR PARENTS 22nd June 17
Work Scrutiny Charlton Park Academy November 2016.
Our Vision Bishops Lydeard Primary School
Headteacher Briefing 18th September 2013
Ofsted Findings Improvement update meeting
Raising standards, improving lives
Background To Development of RE
Network meeting 30th November Assessment, tracking and
Review process What’s involved?.
Mentor training.
Presentation transcript:

Wednesday 14 th October 2015 RE Network Meeting: 1. Draft a form to monitor the use of the schemes of work posted on the EGfL. 2. Look when tricky situations that arise in the class e.g. when a student perceives an activity as an act of worship and doesn’t want to participate. 3. Discuss what might be the foci of the future network meetings

Drafting a monitoring form for the use of the schemes of work posted on the EGfL. Discussion points: What schemes are being used in your schools? Which ones have you found particularly useful? How do you monitor the RE schemes of work? (use post-it notes for shared/group discussions)

Monitoring in general 1. Identify trends in performance 2. Making sure the policies, schemes of work and practices are being followed 3. Checking how far students and teachers are moving towards their targets 4. Making sure that you have a clear picture of the quality of the provision

Monitoring activities: ‘Learning Walks’ Formal and informal lesson observations – including peer and pair observation work-sampling or scrutiny both formal with a group of subject teachers and by sampling pupils work in class during a lesson. Pupil voice – taking account of the views of pupils, all staff as well as parents and carers Interviewing a sample of pupils on their experience of RE or completing a questionnaire (

Monitoring Termly book Looks – looking at progress across the school in RE work (see pro forma in word doc.) Peer mentoring – staff observing each other to help another develop an area of their teaching and share good practice. Keeping schemes of work file in which all planning for RE is collated The use of staff INSETs to develop teachers understanding of best practice in RE

Monitoring… Display – (See display feedback form) eg. Is the display hands on/ easier to see/key words displayed/are critical questions asked?

Drafting a monitoring form for schemes of work Points for discussion

1- School Self-Evaluation Subject leaders provide leadership and management for RE to secure high quality teaching, effective use of resources leading to improved standards of learning and achievement for all pupils.

Subject Area: Religious Education 1 - Standards How well do pupils achieve in your subject area? Excellent/Good/Require Improvement/Inadequate How do you know?

Forms of evidence Displays Work scrutiny lesson observations Teacher planning Feedback from teachers Discussion with children Comparison with QCA examples Ofsted inspection reports Monitoring short term (weekly)/medium plans

Year----- RE Book Look Date___________ Looked at HA/MA/ LA across all year groups Coverage/Progress Ensure that pages are filled in or used all the way up. Some are half way. Where a piece is unmarked, pupils to peer mark. Be aware of a lack of difference in handwriting/presentation from the beginning of the year. Target: Use of RE in topics Differentiation: Consistency: Good to see whole school policies being practiced. Lots of work produced in books with very few work sheets. Most of the questions asked in the books are being answered. Are the supply teachers checking this? Expectation: Pupils are being challenged to improve. Some pick up on grammar and spelling. Substandard work is not accepted and pupils are asked to redo or edit when this is the case. General presentation and marking: Books look great. Marking is of a high standard that reiterates learning and promotes high expectation of presentation. Target: Need to be aware of presentation progress

In which areas and stages do pupils do best and why? Easiest to assess work in KS2 as a greater portion is written

In which areas and stages is improvement needed, and what action is being taken? Eg Foundation and Y6 Is there evidence of differential achievement according to gender, ethnic background or other grouping and, if so, what action is being taken? Evidence/No evidence

2-Teaching and Learning How effective are teaching and learning? Excellent/Good/Require Improvement/Inadequate How do you know? Teachers report back that the updated version of the schemes of work are well structured and give sufficient guidance. Teachers are using the resources and Website links. Opportunities for visitors or visits are welcomed. Positive feedback from staff.

Which are the strongest features of learning and why? Eg. Teachers have all adopted the EGfL schemes and this gives good background information and resources suggestions.

What aspects of teaching and learning most need improvement, and what actions is being taken? Eg. In Foundation stage Re needs to be integrated into the learning areas. I am in discussion with the reception teachers. In Y6 opportunities to be found for extended writing in RE. This requires extended teaching time and we are considering links with Literacy genre.

3 - Assessment How effective is assessment? What are the strongest features of assessment? E.g. the new level descriptions published in the schemes What aspects most needed improvement, and what action is being taken? E.g. Familiarity with the new level descriptors. Staff have each been given a small laminated card for the ease of reference when planning and assessing.

4 - Curriculum How well does the RE curriculum meet pupil’s need? Excellent/Good/Require Improvement/Inadequate How do you know? Which are the best and most innovative aspects of the curriculum, and why? What areas of your subject need improvement, and what action is being taken?

Evaluative judgements must include how well pupils are making progress the effectiveness of teaching, assessment, the curriculum, policies, schemes of work and systems in achieving the best outcomes for pupils the strengths and weaknesses of the subject work in the context of the whole school and its community how staff are performing in relation to pupils’ Religious Education, including non-teaching staff

Improvement planning: Collaborative activity at a staff or department meeting Asking individuals to draft a specific section of the plan Discussions at a pupil forum or school council Finalising a development

5. Resources How well does the use of the school’s resources meet the need of your curriculum areas? What are the best features and their impact? Identify implications of next years budget

6. Aids and Barriers What are the significant aids and barriers to raising achievement? What are the most significant aids to raising achievement? What are the most significant barriers, and what is their effect?

7 – What will be priorities on next year’s plan? To develop contacts with faith communities

8- Identify areas for development over the next 2-5 years

Research references and acknowledgements: Retoday.org.uk Re-handbook.org.uk Cds.bromley.gov.uk