A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
Advertisements

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
NNPS Teacher Performance Assessment System The Framework.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Lesson Planning and Preparation
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching
The Framework for Teaching: Overview of the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Webcast October 11, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Research-Based Cutting Edge Professional Development Communicate, Connect, Collaborate, Conceptualize, Create For Results Oriented Learning Experiences.
Arkansas Teacher Evaluation Pilot Program
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Making a Difference in Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
A framework for teaching (Danielson, 1996) Domain 2: The classroom environment – 2a: Creating an environment of respect and rapport – 2b: Establishing.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
Make It Happen The Power of Communication and Thinking
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Effective Instructional Practices for Middle School.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Comprehensive Planning
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)

The Framework is… ▪ Grounded in research ▪ Aligned to the New York State Teaching Standards ▪ Independent of any particular Teaching Methodology ▪ Coherent in Structure ▪ Used to Prepare New Teachers ▪ A Road Map for Novices ▪ Guidance for Experienced Professionals ▪ A New Paradigm ▪ Beyond passing on knowledge to forming conceptual understandings. ▪ See classrooms as communities of learners, not just the teacher conveying the understanding.

The Framework is NOT … ▪ A Checklist of Teaching Behaviors ▪ Teachers may accomplish many of the same things, but they don’t often achieve them in the same way. ▪ An Endorsement of a Particular Teaching Style ▪ Not an overly prescriptive model ▪ Teachers need flexibility and professional trust to select instructional strategies for each situation.

Features of the Framework ▪ Comprehensive – ▪ it aims to describe all of teaching; referring not only to what occurs in the classroom but also what happens behind the scenes and beyond the classroom walls. ▪ This may include the following activities; ▪ Planning for Instruction ▪ Communicating with parents ▪ Using educational resources ▪ Public ▪ One of the main principles is that the framework is publicly known. ▪ There is no “gotcha” mentality ▪ Used to promote meaningful discussions ▪ Important vehicle for professional development

Features of the Framework ▪ Generic ▪ Supports that every teaching situation is unique ▪ Grade level of lesson ▪ Content of lesson ▪ Diversity of students ▪ Urban vs. Rural areas ▪ Addresses other school personnel and their roles & responsibilities ▪ School Psychologists ▪ School Counselors ▪ School Nurses ▪ Teaching Assistants ▪ Instructional Support Specialists ▪ Library/Media Specialists ▪ Therapeutic Specialists

Danielson Model… 4 Domains ▪ 1-Planning and Preparation ▪ 6 components ▪ 2- The Classroom Environment ▪ 5 components ▪ 3- Instruction ▪ 5 components ▪ 4- Professional Responsibilities ▪ 6 components

Rubrics ▪ There are rubrics for each Domain & its’ components that break down to the element level. ▪ We have aligned it to the HEDI model. ▪ Highly Effective ▪ Effective ▪ Developing ▪ Ineffective ▪ Danielson’s levels of performance are; ▪ Distinguished ▪ Proficient ▪ Basic ▪ Unsatisfactory

Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Components ▪ 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy ▪ 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students ▪ 1c: Setting Instructional Outcomes ▪ 1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources ▪ 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction ▪ 1f: Designing Student Assessments

Domain 2: The Classroom Environment Components ▪ 2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport ▪ 2b: Establishing a Culture of Learning ▪ 2c: Managing Classroom Procedures ▪ 2d: Managing Student Behavior ▪ 2e: Organizing Physical Space

Domain 3: Instruction Components ▪ 3a: Communicating with Students ▪ 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques ▪ 3c: Engaging Students in Learning ▪ 3d: Using Assessment in Instruction ▪ 3e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness

Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Components ▪ 4a: Reflecting on Teaching ▪ 4b: Maintaining Accurate Records ▪ 4c: Communicating with Families ▪ 4d: Participating in a Professional Community ▪ 4e: Growing and Developing Professionally ▪ 4f: Showing Professionalism

What you can do to become more familiar with this framework ▪ Read our APPR document!!! ▪ pg. 20 reads; “The focus of this plan includes Quality professional growth of teachers and principals in their instructional practices. Use of evidenced-based standards in each area of classroom instruction that are more objective and rubrics that are clearly defined. Establishes a procedural manual to make the evaluation system clear and available to everyone. All correspondence and documentation will be electronic. Employee is responsible for maintaining a backup and personal copies.” ~ Teachscape

Resources for Teachers and other School Personnel

The Next Step ▪ Teachscape Training will take place Wednesday, December 12 th.