Today I Decide (TOM) Nele Leosk e-Governance Academy (eGA) Tallinn, November 6, 2007.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

NeDAP eSecurity Action Line SOIS meeting , Riga Jaak Tepandi, Estonia.

Advertisements

E-services in Estonia Nele Leosk e-Governance Academy Program Director Chisinau, Moldova

PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING & CAPACITY BUILDING

Building up capacity for Roma inclusion at local level Kosice, November 6 th, 2013.

Involving the Public in Risk Communication Katherine A. McComas, Ph.D. University of Maryland.

External Document Mohamed Abdulaziz Abdulla Assistant Director - eService Delivery 23 rd April, 2014.

WORKING GROUP: Trento, 2010 Conference of European Regional Legislative Assemblies.

EU Information and Publicity Policy Claudia Salvi e Anna Claudia Abis Formez 8 May 2007.

Start January 2009 – March 2011 Participating Regions: Ionian Islands Region (IonR) – Greece Valencia Region (Spain) e-Participation Call for Proposals.

Call bis- Infoday, July 1st, 2009, Brussels Project Idea: PARTICIPATE Contact: İstanbul MunicipalityMobile.

ICT TOOLS AND SOCIETY INVOLVEMENT AMONG THE EUPAN NETWORK HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE SURVEY RESULTS TANYA CHETCUTI EUROPEAN COMMISSION.

Strengthening Public Finance Management Through Computerization of Procurement Management System High Level Forum on Procurement Reforms in Africa Tunisia.

Office of Information Technology (OIT) PROJECT INITIATION DOCUMENTS - BUSINESS CASE, ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS AND STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

Introduction to CDNC CDNC Secretariat Walter Wu. What’s CDNC n CDNC ( The Chinese Domain Name Consortium) was formally established on May 20, n.

CREATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF E-SERVICES FOR SERVICE AVAILABILITY IMPROVEMENT Indrek Mõttus Chief specialist of employment infosystems EUIF.

PROPOSAL FROM WORKSHOP B4 PARTICIPANTS LIFELONG LEARNING AND CIVIC EDUCATION-NGOS FOR BETTER EMPLOYMENT BSC NGO FORUM 2015 Daiva Malinauskiene, BSC NGO.

Estonian ICT market. Key facts about Estonian ICT market 52 per cent of the population (aged 6-74 years) are Internet users (TNS EMOR, spring 2004). 52.

3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,

E-participation tools. E-services for citizens Birutė Leonavičienė Analyst Department of Information Technologies and Telecommunications May 2011,

CSO engagement in policy process Hille Hinsberg State Chancellery Government Communication Officer

Networking Technologies for Collective Action: Two Opposing Models of Activism Presentation to the Greek Politics Specialist Group Conference Athens, 4-5.

Estonian Civil Society Development Concept “Cooperation Between the Government and Civil Society Organisations in Estonia” Kaja Kaur Chief Specialist.

Strengthening e-Participation: Overcoming Obstacles for Better Consultation Mechanisms. Case studies PhD. Andreea STOICIU Director, Institute of Management.

Ensuring Transparency of Public Authorities Through Open Data Portal egovernment.uzegovernment.uz Khusan Isaev First Deputy Director of the.

Regional workshop on exchange of experiences between African countries “Better statistical dialogue for better development results” Bamako, June.

Specialized Training for e-Governance Programme (under NeGP Capacity Building Scheme) Department of Information Technology Ministry of Communications &

E-participation and transparency in the decision making process Rauna Nerelli Ministry of Justice, Finland.

Understanding & Use of the Internet E-government Spring 2011 G. F Khan, PhD.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. The regulatory framework in Romania allows the civil society to impact public decision making. There are.

Results of audit “Quality of public services in the information society” Markko Kard Alo Lääne The 9th Annual Meeting of the Representatives of the Baltic,

Local Government Reform Project WA E - Government System.

Trade Union Training on Social Security and Social Protection INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL LABOUR STANDARDS Turin, 5 May 2004.

THE CITY OF TAMPERE Valma - forum. THE CITY OF TAMPERE Eija Uurtamo project manager 2 Agenda Background information Valma is democracy on the.

1 Sibiu, Romania June 2008 Development of National IP Strategies Sibiu, Romania June 2012.

Involvement of civil society and interest groups in the law- making process in the Netherlands Jan A.B. Janus Jakarta 4-7 July 2011.

Hanan Alyafei Portal Administrator Ministry Of Education Sultanate of Oman.

1 The World Bank Internet Services Program Rajan Bhardvaj

Participative democracy in Romania. Participative Democracy The legal framework 1 – A national phenomenon 2 - Legal basis for participatory democracy.

Public Participation in Tampere T A M P E R E E N K A U P U N K I Mr. Antti Leskinen Head of Local Democracy Unit City of Tampere, Finland.

Participative Local democracy in Finland. The Legal Context of Local Participative Democracy in Finland An essential aspect of the local government decision-making.

Central Election Commission of Georgia September 9, 2010 Formation of the Voters’ List in Georgia Existing Situation and Future Project.

WELCOME BY CAL Rasma Pipiķe CIVIC ALLIANCE -LATVIA Riga’s report on the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea region, progress in implementing.

Kaspar Karm Head of notaries IS division Center of Registers and Information Systems REGNO 2007 | Riga, Lativa 26th to 27th.

BT Wholesale Products June, SOR Management Tool Angus Flett John Skingle.

Access to Public Information in Ukraine DiXi Group, UA-Energy.org.

Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.

Public Policy Processes and Citizen Participation in South Korea Governance in Korea st semester March 18, 2013 Organized by Saori Kakihara.

© International Training Centre of the ILO Training Centre of the ILO 1 International Labour Standards (ILS) and their.

Multi-stakeholder Dialogue on Benchmarking Water Quality and Services Brussels - 9 September 2014 The ECI 'right2water' Commission response.

Web portal predlagam.vladi.si (“ my.suggestion.gov.si ”) Involvement of citizens in the decision-making process with the help of new technology tools.

The procedures for project under Measure 1.2 submission for SF financing Joint Seminar “Capacity building for designing projects dealing with sustainable.

Role of Marketing in data dissemination Birgit Hansson Statistics Estonia

Communication with public via media and social media Anu Ots Communications Manager of Statistics Estonia

GETTING ENGAGED: WOMEN IN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT Poznan May, 2007 Regional Social Welfare Resource Centre Budapest.

E-Government in Germany: The Example of Process Chains Federal Chancellery Better Regulation Unit

November | 1 CONTINUING CARE COUNCIL Report to Forum Year

Estonian experience in implementing e-governance by linking it to the research and educational field Dr. Ingrid Pappel, PhD 1.

Bridging the Gap - CORDIS and the Accession & Candidate Countries November 21, 2003 NIROC/IGLO, Brussels Bridging the Gap.

Implementation of Leader program in Estonia Kristiina Tammets.

CARIBBEAN WORKSHOP ON E-GOVERNMENT BEST PRACTICES Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago, July 26-28, 2005.

Enterprise Development for Secondary School Students in Sri Lanka Lalith Welamedage Roger Candy.

PARTICIPATORY BUDGET ‘16 cascais.

Structured Dialogue in ESN

Using E-tools to promote public participation in law-making: Estonian experience Kaidi Tingas, REC 10 December 2003.

The Participatory Budget of Cologne Experiences and Challenges

Chapter 6: Community Features.

E-participation tools in the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania

Laur Mägi Department of Information Systems and Document Management

Implementing paperless management at local level

Stakeholder Engagement: Webinar Part I: The Regulatory Development Process for the Government of Canada Part II: Making Technical Regulations Under.

Presentation transcript:

Today I Decide (TOM) Nele Leosk e-Governance Academy (eGA) Tallinn, November 6, 2007

TOM - Government Initiative ● Main idea – to enhance public participation in political decision-making providing opportunity to propose and discuss new legislative initiatives via Internet ● Also- to enhance dialogue between citizens, public officials, etc ● Started in June, 2001 ● Administrated by State Chancellery ● Promoted as Direct Democracy Portal

TOM - Two modes of operation ● Policy documents presented for discussion by ministries (functioned just 2 months) ● Proposals submitted by people ● Only registrated users can submit proposals and participate in discussions ● Everybody can follow discussions

How TOM works How TOM works Idea Commenting Editing Voting Signing (not any more) Answer ID card (for a short time)n

Processing ideas ● Idea is presented ● 10 days for discussion ● 3 days for editing ● 3 days for secret voting Only ideas getting more than half of votes in favour are considered further ● Ministry has 1 month for analysis and answer ● Posted on TOM, commenting an answer

TOM statistics ● 1140 ideas presented (64% voted in, 34 % voted out) ● 654 proposals sent to the ministries (89% answered: 6% possible implementation, 48% negative, 7% supportive) ● 6910 registered users ● visits per day (up to 300 when mentioned elsewere, eg in blogs, forums, etc) ● 30 proposals applied Introduction of summer time Wireless internet signs Estonian anthem downloadable from the Internet

TOM typical users ● Men (71%) ● Age 26 – 39 (38%) ● University degree (51%) ● Specialists (40,3%) ● Inhabitants of Tallinn (48%) ● Everyday Internet users (88%)

TOM evaluation by users and public officials

Is TOM going to die out?

Visits to TOM

New users of TOM (registered)

New ideas

Positive sides of TOM ● Possibility to rise political issues ● Obligation of state administration to respond ● Communication between users ● Communication with state administration ● Everybody can follow proposals and discussions

Problems of TOM ● Many non-constructive proposals ● Passive discussions, low level of discussions (???) ● Low level of the idea author’s ivolvement (35% participate in later phases) ● Few votes ● Small number of active users ● No publicity, buzz ● Rejection of proposals by state administration on formal grounds ● No real dialogue between citizens and political decision makers ● No political will and support

...and e-participation Technical solutions are developing, however how to develop or support cultural changes? Information about e-participation possibilities? Skills of e-participation? How to raise the capacity of e-participation? Passiveness? Participation fatigue? Information gap- how much information gets out of the inner circles (lists, forums, blogs, etc)

THANK YOU!