An overview in slides. A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EFFECTS OF BOLOGNA PROCESS ON GEOGRAPHY DEPARTMENTS IN TURKISH UNIVERSITIES Dr. Yilmaz Ari Department of Geography, Balikesir University, Turkey. Future.
Advertisements

BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF- 18 MAY BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF 18 MAY 2009 BACKGROUND - ERASMUS SORBONNE DECLARATION 1998 (FRANCE, GERMANY, ITALY, UK)
1 Bologna Shaping the Agenda Bologna today and tomorrow Lesley Wilson Secretary-General, European University Association.
Attractiveness of the HEIs in the EHEA An Introduction to WG 3 Pavel Zgaga University of Ljubljana Bologna Conference Fostering student mobility: next.
ENQA’S CONSULTATIVE MEMBERSHIP IN THE BFUG - WHAT DOES IT ENTAIL
The Bologna Process and the Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework Dr Gillian Mackintosh Head of Registry.
1 Bologna Process Seminar Friday 12 May The Mobility Challenge Sorbonne Declaration, May 1998 “At both undergraduate and graduate level, students.
How quality and competitiveness of European universities are reflected in global academic rankings a Bologna perspective on competitiveness: it can help.
Bologna proces, from idea to implementation Tempus JEP “Introduction of the ECTS at B&H universities” Workshop, Porto,
The European Higher Education Area A dream worth having! Dr Anthony Vickers, FIEE, MInstP, CEng, CPhys UK Bologna Expert.
The Bologna Process Dr Anthony Vickers, FIEE, MInstP, CEng, CPhys
Bologna Process and Quality Assurance
BOLOGNA PROCESS and the COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONTRIBUTION RUDN, Moscow, 12 December December 2007 Katia Dolgova-Dreyer, Council of Europe.
Prof. Dr. Andrä Wolter Permeability between Vocational Training and Higher Education New Opportunities for Non-traditional Students and Lifelong Learners.
COIMBRA GROUP ANNUAL CONFERENCE Anita Lehikoinen.
The “Bologna Process” and the European Higher Education Area in the global setting. Donatella Palomba - Università di Roma “Tor Vergata ” YICGG 2008 –
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
Bologna Process  A co-ordinated reform process in more than 30 signatory countries.  Co-ordinated by the common platform in the Bologna Declaration of.
Tempus “QUASYS” Dubrovnik, October 11-12, Harmonization with European Trends in Higher Education Prof. dr. Pero Lučin Vice-Rector University of Rijeka.
The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova.
The Bologna Process The UK HE Europe Unit Tish Bourke.
Vasyl Shynkaruk Deputy Minister of Education and Science of Ukraine “Qualifications Framework in Higher Education of Ukraine” International Seminar «National.
The UK Credit Framework and the Bologna Process Tim Cobbett Director of Quality and Governance.
Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Fiona Crozier QAA
International Trends: the Bologna Process and the European Research Area Ruth Thompson Director of Higher Education Strategy and Implementation Department.
University Reforms in Europe: In search of the holy grail of quality April 13th, 2012 Astrid (Bassanini) Conference Rome Professor Geert Bouckaert Public.
BOLOGNA PROCESSES On June 19, 1999, 29 European Ministers of Education signed a declaration in the oldest town of Bologna. By signing the document the.
European Higher Education and the Bologna Process Dr Frank McMahon Director of Academic Affairs Dublin Institute of Technology August 2010.
Universities UK How will the Bologna Process and EU initiatives affect higher education worldwide? Diana Warwick 1.
The Framework of Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area Azerbaijan Seminar Baku, 12th June 2007 Stuart Garvie National Qualifications Authority.
TEMPUS AND BOLOGNA PROCESS IN BIH TEMPUS AND BOLOGNA PROCESS IN BIH BERGEN – LONDON PHASE Tempus Information Day, Sarajevo, June 7, 2006.
The Qualification Frameworks Pros et Contras Sigmund Grønmo University of Bergen SIU Seminar Gardermoen June 17, 2011.
THE BOLOGNA PROCESS. Political Aims Create a European Higher Education Area by 2010 Simplify the European qualification systems Improve mobility within.
Bologna Process and Developments in the Netherlands, 9 May 2005 Robert Wagenaar Director of Undergraduate and Graduate Studies Faculty of Arts / Chair.
KNU - Bishkek (KS) 21 April 2015 DOQUP PROJECT FINAL DISSEMINATION CONFERENCE 1 Tempus Project n TEMPUS IT-SMGR Documentation for QA of.
BFUG Work Program on QA Agenda Gayane Harutyunyan Astana, Kazakhstan Ensuring quality higher education is one of the most important.
The Bologna Process and studying with a disability esdon / Gasmeterlaan 134 B-9000 Gent Belgium 1 Gilles Verschoore Coordinator.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
Bologna Process Based on Sorbonne Declaration (1998) Signed in Bologna (1999) Currently 33 voluntary signatories Progress reviewed in Prague (2001) and.
Update on Bologna process Current status of Quality Assurance Conference on self-evaluation July, Belgrade Lewis Purser.
The Bologna Process and the Syrian Context Dr. Ali Saud Hasan Prof. of Applied linguistics (ELT) Faculty of Education, Damascus university
Bologna self-certification Implications and challenges.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
After the Bologna Bucharest Conference: What is new on the way to Bologna New Developments in European QA CEENQA-Workshop in Sarajevo 11 and 12 May 2012.
Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.
University autonomy and governance Baku Bologna Seminar - Current issues in the Bologna process Bastian Baumann, Baku, 26 May 2008.
QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA: DEVELOPMENTS AND OVERVIEW OF THE ISSUES Launching meeting for a South East European QF.
Bologna Process in Croatia Melita Kovačević University of Zagreb Consortia Meeting of the Tempus Project UM-JEP Moving Ahead with the Bologna Process.
Bologna Declaration Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher Education Quality Assessment in SSH (PHOENIX) Bishkek,
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Erevan, Armenia, 2008 The Three-Cycle System Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis, Bologna.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto Vice-President, ENQA Ljubljana, 20 October 2009.
Bologna Declaration: Professional Education for Landscape Architects LE:NOTRE Spring Workshop, Budapest, DRAFT, Summary 1. Bologna.
Role of Quality Assurance in the Establishment of the EHEA presentation given at the conference ”Bologna Process Implementation in Turkey after 10 Years”,
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
Recognition issue in the Bologna Process: from London to Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve Kevin Guillaume NARIC-French Community of Belgium DG non compulsory education.
European Higher Education Area: focus from structures to better learning Head of Higher Education Unit Helka Kekäläinen, PhD.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
The scorecard indicators for 2012 Overview of the scorecard indicators for the integrated implementation report for the BFUG 2012.
On the way to London Dr. Maria Ebel. Lisbon Convention April 1997 Sorbonne Joint DeclarationMay 1998 Bologna DeclarationJune 1999 European Council.
1 Presentation 2 Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland. Ireland.
Tempus THE BOLOGNA PROCESS An overview in slides.
Reforming higher education in Europe, The Role of Qualifications Frameworks Mogens Berg Former chair of the Bologna Working Group Belgrade, 1 November.
The Framework of Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
The Bologna Process and Tuning Project: Educational Structures in Europe Dag Wiese Schartum.
HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM IN EUROPE – AN OVERVIEW
Bastian Baumann, Secretary General, Magna Charta Observatory
- Quality Assurance – Current perspectives
Reforming higher education in Europe, The Role of Qualifications Frameworks Mogens Berg Former chair of the Bologna Working Group Yerevan, 8 September.
Presentation transcript:

An overview in slides

A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001 Step 4 : Berlin Communiqué 2003 Step 5 : Bergen Communiqué 2005 Tempus

Sorbonne Declaration 1998: ”harmonisation of the architecture of the European Higher Education System” Signed in May 1998 the ministers in charge of higher education of France, Italy, the United Kingdom and Germany Other European countries later subscribed to the Declaration.

Tempus a progressive convergence of the overall framework of degrees and cycles in an open European area for higher education a common degree level system for undergraduates (Bachelor's degree) and graduates (Master's and doctoral degree) enhancing and facilitating student and teacher mobility The Sorbonne Declaration focused on:

Tempus In June 1999, 29 European ministers in charge of higher education met in Bologna to lay the basis for establishing a European Higher Education Area by 2010 and promoting the European system of higher education world-wide. Bologna 1999

Tempus In the Bologna Declaration, the ministers affirmed their intention to:Bologna Declaration adopt a system of easily readable and comparable degrees adopt a system with two main cycles (undergraduate/graduate) establish a system of credits (such as ECTS) promote mobility by overcoming obstacles promote European co-operation in quality assurance promote European dimensions in higher education Bologna 1999

Tempus Bologna 1999 And after….

Tempus the ministers in charge of higher education of 33 European signatory countries met in Prague in May 2001 to follow up the Bologna Process and to set directions and priorities for the following years. In the Prague Communiqué the ministers reaffirmed their commitment to the objectives of the Bologna DeclarationPrague Communiqué Prague 2001

Tempus Ministers emphasised as important elements of the European Higher Education Area: lifelong learning involvement of students enhancing the attractiveness and competitiveness of the European Higher Education Area to other parts of the world (including the aspect of transnational education) Prague 2001

Tempus Prague 2001 And after…

Tempus in Berlin in September 2003, Ministers defined three intermediate priorities for the next two years: quality assurance the two-cycle degree system recognition of degrees and periods of studies. In the Berlin Communiqué, specific goals were set for each of these action lines. Berlin Communiqué Berlin 2003

Tempus Quality assurance national quality assurance systems should include: A definition of the responsibilities of the bodies and institutions involved Evaluation of programmes or institutions, including internal assessment, external review, participation of students and the publication of results A system of accreditation, certification or comparable procedures, international participation, co-operation and networking Berlin Intermediate priorities I

Tempus Ministers asked for the development of an overarching framework of qualifications for the European Higher Education Area. Berlin Intermediate priorities I

Tempus Recognition of degrees and periods of studies Ministers underlined the importance of the Lisbon Recognition Convention, which should be ratified by all countries participating in the Bologna Process. Every student graduating as from 2005 should receive the Diploma Supplement automatically and free of charge.Lisbon Recognition Convention Berlin Intermediate priorities II

Tempus Recognition of degrees and periods of studies Ministers underlined the importance of the Lisbon Recognition Convention, which should be ratified by all countries participating in the Bologna Process. Every student graduating as from 2005 should receive the Diploma Supplement automatically and free of charge.Lisbon Recognition Convention Berlin Intermediate priorities II

Tempus Recognition of degrees and periods of studies Ministers underlined the importance of the Lisbon Recognition Convention, which should be ratified by all countries participating in the Bologna Process. Every student graduating as from 2005 should receive the Diploma Supplement automatically and free of charge.Lisbon Recognition Convention Berlin Intermediate priorities II

Tempus The third cycle beyond the present the two main cycles, two additional objectives: to include the doctoral level as the third cycle in the Bologna Process to promote closer links between the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) and the European Research Area (ERA). Berlin Intermediate priorities III

Tempus Bologna Declaration 1.Adoption of a system of easily readable and comparable degrees 2.Adoption of a system essentially based on two cycles 3.Establishment of a system of credits 4.Promotion of mobility 5.Promotion of European cooperation in quality assurance 6.Promotion of the European dimension in higher education 10 Action Lines – based on Bologna, Prague & Berlin

Tempus Prague Communiqué 7.Lifelong learning 8.Higher education institutions and students 9.Promoting the attractiveness of the European Higher Education 10 Action Lines – based on Bologna, Prague & Berlin

Tempus Berlin Communiqué 10.European Higher Education Area and European Research Area – two pillars of the knowledge based society. 10 Action Lines – based on Bologna, Prague & Berlin

The Bergen Communiqué ● highlights the central role of higher education institutions and their staff and students in implementing the Bologna reforms ● adopts the three-cycle framework with generic descriptors based on learning outcomes and competences and commits the 45 participating countries to creating compatible national frameworks. ● Credit ranges adopted for the first and second cycles. Bergen 2005

● accepted ENQA’s standards and guidelines for quality assurance, stressing the need for improvement in student involvement and international cooperation. ● welcomed the concept of a European register of QA agencies. Bergen 2005

● elaborated on the general principles of doctoral programmes, and confirmed the need for these to be aligned with the Bologna Process ● ongoing commitment to mutual recognition, lifelong learning; the social dimension and mobility ● an undertaking to ensure higher education institutions have the necessary autonomy and sustainable funding to carry out reforms. Bergen 2005

thank you very much for your kind attention