JANUARY 12, 2012.  My Voice Staff Survey Results: % in agreement StatementSEP 10 JUN 11 I feel valued for my unique skills and talents5042 School is.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
District Awards for Teacher Excellence A presentation to the ACISD Board of Trustees 4/17/08.
Attendance Turnaround Team Coaching Model Supporting schools and community to improve low student attendance.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
Presented by: Sandy O’Neil Title II, Part A Coordinator
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Summer Non-effective School Districts district staff issue a plethora of uncoordinated and often contradictory directives while presiding over resource.
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
King and Queen Central High School King and Queen County Public Schools Home of the Royal Tigers.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
High School Inc. Academies at Valley High School April 26, 2011 Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Division.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Title I Parent Meeting Boston Sept 1, Agenda 8:15-8:20 Welcome Sign in 8:20-8:25 Ice Breaker 8:25-8:40 Pilot School Innovation Zone 8:40-8:50Title.
Single Plan for Student Achievement Session #2.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Mock School Board Meeting Vernon Johns Junior High School Dr. Ronnie Watson, Principal Stepping into Greatness because We won't QUIT, won't FAIL and won't.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.
JANUARY 12, Subject Change from previous year English89%85%89%+5% Math74%76%88%+12% History83%86%69%-17% Science74%
SAISD Focus/Priority Training Samantha Gallegos, Coordinator III
Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
January 12, 2012 Peabody Middle School Yardley Farquharson, Principal.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
Wells Branch Leadership Academy Annual Title 1 Meeting September 23, 2015.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
FACE Symposium Michele P Brooks M.Ed Assistant Superintendent, Office of Family & Student Engagement Boston Public Schools.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
Mr. Rickie Hopkins, Principal Ms. Treena Leecost, Assistant Principal Mr. William Reese, Assistant Principal Thompson Middle School January 12, 2012.
Multi-year Academic Acceleration Plan (MAAP) and Community Plan for Accountability in Schools (ComPAS) Oakland Unified School District January 31, 2007.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
Mock Board Meeting E. W. Chambliss Elementary School Grades K – 3 Diane Brown, Principal January 12, 2012 Home of The CES Tiger Cubs.
Ms. April Hawkins, Principal Mr. Zeno Hines, Assistant Principal Mr. William McGee, Assistant Principal Ms. Angela Mosley, Assistant Principal Armstrong.
Mrs. Widad Abed, Principal Mrs. Cynthia Kight, Assistant Principal Dr. Joseph Cooper, Interim Assistant Principal Mrs. Clara Daniel, Edison Vice-President.
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS Heather Ouzts, NC DPI Parent Liaison Beverly Roberts, ECAC NC SIP Project Coordinator.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Spring 2016 Title I Parent Meeting. AGENDA  School Wide Plan  School/Parent Compact  Parent involvement Policy  Teacher training on parental involvement.
Sustainable Educator Evaluation and Compensation Supported by the Teacher Incentive Fund Improved educator performance = Increased student growth seec.nefec.org.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
The New John Muir High School Reinvention Update Pasadena Unified School District February 24, 2009.
Orientation Meeting, October 26, 2015 M.S.G.A. Media Center.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Continuous School Improvement & ASSIST ACIP Dr. Melissa Shields, NBCT
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night
Schoolwide Programs.
Presentation transcript:

JANUARY 12, 2012

 My Voice Staff Survey Results: % in agreement StatementSEP 10 JUN 11 I feel valued for my unique skills and talents5042 School is a welcoming and friendly place4250 I am proud of my school5742 I feel accepted for who I am at school6050 I am a valued member of my school community 3942 Staff respect each other7350 I am recognized when I try my best1342

StatementSEP 10 JUN 11 I enjoy working here4250 School is a dynamic and creative learning environment 733 I have a voice in decision-making at school 42 We communicate effectively in our building 5042

 Building a turnaround zone (team) to include central office, school and community. ◦ Internal Lead Partner ◦ Lead Turnaround Partner ◦ Strategic Implementation Team (school level) ◦ Student Assistance Coordinator ◦ Parent and Community Involvement

 Renewed focus on using data to drive decisions. ◦ Initial Pearson Diagnostic Study and Theory of Action Planning  MyVoice Surveys (faculty, students, parents)  Classroom observations  Student performance data ◦ State approved Alternate Accreditation Plan ◦ Development of Three Year Improvement Plan  School wide discipline plan  Token Economy  Student engagement and instructional practices

 Embedded professional development coach ◦ Frequent classroom observations and feedback ◦ Mini workshops during planning periods  Learning targets  Standards based instruction  Student engagement  Pearson’s Learning Teams  Formative Assessment

 School climate ◦ Staff morale ◦ Student involvement ◦ School-wide discipline  Parental and community involvement  Providing targeted instruction to all students through the development of a standards- based instructional model

 School Level a. Implementation of the Pearson Education STEP Model including a designated Academic Coach and account manager; b. Assessment of school culture and development of a Theory of Action derived from surveys, including teachers, parents and students; c. Implementation of a school level improvement structure; d. Implementation of Istation Reading Program and Datacation reporting mechanism; e. Recruit, hire and retain highly qualified staff members in core areas and utilize bonuses; f. Increased staff based on need (counselors, math teacher, and instructional coach); g. Provide embedded professional development opportunities for all and targeted groups of staff members (most recently Professional Learning Teams Model); and h. Supported school’s Token Economy System, field trips, parental and community involvement activities, and Formative Assessment workshop

 Division level a. Assigned Internal Lead Partner (ILP) to manage the process and to create a division level Turn Around zone; b. ILP manages the Memorandum of Understanding ; c. Replication of best practices to other schools within the division; and d. Funded on-going attendance at SIG meetings with Dr. Rhim, Corbett Education Consulting, and Pearson Education professional development;

Model StrandsLevel of Implementation A. Creation & Use of District TeamFull Implementation B. Enabling School AutonomyPartial Implementation C. Principal & Hiring TeachersFull Implementation D. Stakeholder EngagementPartial Implementation E. Creation & Use of School TeamHigh Implementation F. Leading ChangePartial Implementation G. Evaluating, rewarding, removing staffPartial Implementation H. Professional DevelopmentHigh Implementation I. Learning TimePartial Implementation J. Reforming InstructionHigh Implementation

 Engaging all relevant participants in the Turn Around Process;  Size of the faculty (small);  Time – teachers involved in other Danville Public School Programs and Initiatives;  Transient nature of student population;  Need for organizational and instructional rituals and routines;  Balancing management and instructional time.

 Continue work on instructional improvement through implementation of Learning Teams.  Continue focus on parent and community involvement.  Develop plans to target student involvement in school planning and climate.  Focus on ideas to improve student attendance and discipline.  Assessment For Learning as critical key to standards-based instruction.  Develop service learning/community based learning opportunities.

 The number one initiative of the Lead Turnaround Partnership with Pearson Education was to build “Capacity”…capacity in the school’s administration, capacity in the school’s Leadership Structure (School Improvement Team), capacity in the teacher’s instructional effectiveness, and capacity in the Division’s Academic Support Structure.  Development of a new Memorandum of Understanding in year four using local, state, and federal funding outside the previously allocated SIG grant;  Funding, local, state, and federal, to continue Istation, Algebra Readiness Initiative, and Datacation;  Embedded professional development sustainability using Title II funding;  Incentives for recruitment and retention of staff members; and  Federal, state and local funding to increase learning time for all students.