10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE1 IES - Institute for Environment and Sustainability Ispra - Italy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An experience on modelling-based assessment of the air quality within the Air Quality Directive framework Ana Isabel Miranda, Isabel Ribeiro, Patrícia.
Advertisements

Directive 2008/50/EC of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe These slides do not provide a complete description of the requirements.
UK feedback on Delta V3.0 Presented by: John Stedman, Daniel Brookes, Keith Vincent, Emily Connolly 10 April 2013.
Summary discussion Top-down approach Consider Carbon Monitoring Systems, tailored to address stakeholder needs. CMS frameworks can be designed to provide.
EIONET 2008, Bruge Guidance on the use of models for the European air quality directive: an activity of FAIRMODE Bruce Denby 1, Steinar Larssen 1, Cristina.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
EUROPEAN UNION INITIATIVES AND REQUIREMENTS : AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY MECHANISM Sonja Vidič Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia.
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: Health impacts of PM.
COST ES0602: Towards a European Network on Chemical Weather Forecasting and Information Systems.
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for air quality monitoring and forecasting Laurence ROUÏL.
IMPLEMENTATION OF EU AQ LEGISLATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC J. FIALA Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
Land as a Resource State of play 5 March Land as a Resource: at the crossroad of objectives 1 and 2 of 7 th Environmental Action Programme (EAP)
MSFD Interactions EMODNET Chemistry 2 Kick-off meeting Giordano Giorgi Trieste (Italy), 3-5 June 2013.
Implementation of the Water Framework Directive - Uncertainty issues - Michiel Blind, RWS-RIZA.
1 ESA Noordwijk 20 Jan 2004 Frank Raes, Peter Bergamaschi, Hugh Eva, Alan Belward Institute for Environment and Sustainability Joint Research Centre European.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
The Euro- and City-Delta model intercomparison exercises P. Thunis, K. Cuvelier Joint Research Centre, Ispra.
Inter-comparison and Validation Task Team Breakout discussion.
Wish-list to the Emission community.  TFMM annual meeting held in Zagreb on the 6-8 May 2013  Main issues :  Review of the implementation of the EMEP.
Synergies between EMEP and EUSAAR Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
| Folie 1 Assessment of Representativeness of Air Quality Monitoring Stations Geneva, Wolfgang Spangl.
FAIRMODE Forum for Air Quality Modelling in Europe Re-organisation & future work programme 18th EIONET Air Quality Meeting, Dublin, October 2013.
1 Monitoring and assessment in Europe Joining forces between EMEP and EEA Roel van Aalst 30 May 2001.
Fairmode: Latest developments P. Thunis + Fairmode chairs & co-chairs + Fairmode Community.
Analysis of station classification and network design INERIS (Laure Malherbe, Anthony Ung), NILU (Philipp Schneider), RIVM (Frank de Leeuw, Benno Jimmink)
Sub Group 2 – Contribution of natural sources and source apportionment FAIRMODE Sub Group 2 – Contribution of natural sources and source apportionment.
Eskes, TROPOMI workshop, Mar 2008 Air Quality Forecasting in Europe Henk Eskes European ensemble forecasts: GEMS and PROMOTE Air Quality forecasts for.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
21-22 March 2005 LMD, Palaiseau, France CHIMERE workshop Air quality assessment for Portugal A. Monteiro, C. Borrego, A.I. Miranda, R. Vautard Universidade.
POMI kick-off meeting 7 March, 2008 Collaborative research project in support to the reduction of atmospheric pollution in REGIONE LOMBARDIA ( )
FAIRMODE MEETING NORRKÖPING JUNE Session: The use of Receptor Models in Source Apportionment (coordinator C. Belis) General considerations.
Kick off meeting, 2008, Cavtat Guidance on the use of models for the European air quality directive An activity of WG1 FAIRMODE Bruce Denby 1*, Steinar.
D EVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL METHODOLOGY FOR ESTIMATING POPULATION EXPOSURE Maxime Beauchamp, Laurent Létinois, Laure Malherbe*, Frédéric Tognet
Air Quality trend analyses under EMEP/TFMM and link to EEA work Augustin COLETTE (INERIS), Chair of the TFMM/CLRTAP TFMM National Experts, CCC, MSC-E,
Hemispheric transport – Why is EMEP interested? Peringe Grennfelt, Jurgen Schneider.
HARMO13, 1-4June 2010, Paris, France1 Institute for Environment and Sustainability Procedure.
FAIRMODE and the implementation of ambient air quality directives Andrej Kobe ENV C3, DG Environment.
The FAIRMODE PM modelling guide Laurence ROUIL Bertrand BESSAGNET
1 European air indicator reporting Process and experience © iStockphoto.com/cmisje.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
Impact of various emission inventories on modelling results; impact on the use of the GMES products Laurence Rouïl
Expert Meeting Methods for assessing current and future coastal vulnerability to climate change 27 – 28 October 2010 Draft conclusions.
The CAMS Policy products
The FAIRMODE ways of communication
The French National Reference laboratory (NRL)
Forum for Air quality Modelling FAIRMODE ew. eea
An experience on modelling-based assessment of the air quality within the Air Quality Directive framework Ana Isabel Miranda, Isabel Ribeiro, Patrícia.
Organisation Météorologique Mondiale Pour une collaboration active dans le domaine du temps, du climat et de l’eau OMM Operating principles of the WMO.
Contribution from AQUILA to Air Policy Review
Urban Emissions and Projections
QUALITY ASSURANCE OF MODELS
QUALITY ASSURANCE OF MODELS
Laurence Rouïl (INERIS) on behalf of the CAMS_71 team
FAIRMODE Update Fairmode Steering Group.
Study on non-compliance of ozone target values and potential air quality improvements in relation to ozone.
IMPROVING PUBLIC INFORMATION
Bruce Rolstad Denby FAIRMODE 4th Plenary, Norrkjoping Sweden June 2011
Contribution from AQUILA to Air Policy Review
Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012
2nd plenary, Ispra 18 November 2009
The French National Reference laboratory (NRL)
EURODELTA III RCG-Model
FAIRMODE WG2 The main aim of WG2 activities is to create a European Framework for Model Evaluation which will include the development of widely accepted.
EMEP case studies on HMs: State of the art
Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Forum for Air Quality Modelling in Europe
Report on the EEA workshop dedicated to the use of GMES data for emission inventories John Van Aardenne (EEA), Justin Goodwin (Aether), Peter de Smet.
Presentation transcript:

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE1 IES - Institute for Environment and Sustainability Ispra - Italy Joint Research Centre (JRC) WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance of Models in Relation to the new EU Air Quality Directive (WG2 - FAIRMODE) E.Georgieva, P.Dilara

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE2 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... Purpose of the Scoping Paper: Provide background information on compliance related aspects of the models quality assurance procedures Define the aims of WG2 activities Propose methodologies and relevant issues to be discussed at the kick-off meeting At present the document has a “open questions” character

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE3 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... Modelling in the context of the new EU AQD: 1. Assessment of ambient air quality 2. Planning and mitigation strategies (e.g. emission scenarios) 3. Assessment of the contribution of natural sources, road dust and winter sanding/salting (source apportionment) 4. Short term forecast for exceedances of information and /or alert thresholds Modelling: implicitely referred as most like methodology 1.- In all zones and agglomerations, depending on pollution levels with respect to LT, UT and LV

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE4 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... Assessment (AQD) : modelling shall be sufficient : combination of modelling and measurements : measurements may be supplemented by modelling LAT UAT LV Limit value, Upper and Lower assess. Threshold SO2, CO, NO2, NOx, PM, lead, benzene

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE5 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... Models in support of the AQD should be reliable and trustful Model Quality Assurance is a crucial stage and has to be tailored to different type of models use (explicitly or implicitly mentioned in the Directive)

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE6 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... Model Quality Objectives (MQO) Relevant to AQ assessment Defined as modelling uncertainty with regard to hourly, 8h avg., daily or annual values WG1: Relative Directive Error PollutantQuality IndicatorModelling uncertainty SO 2, NO 2, NO x, CO Hourly 50 % 8-hour averages 50 % Daily averages 50 % Annual averages 30 % PM 10, PM 2.5, Pb Daily averages Not yet defined Annual averages 50 % Ozone and related NO and NO 2 Hourly 50% 8-hour averages 50% Benzene Annual averages 50%

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE7 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... Modelling uncertainty, WG1 interpretation Relative Directive Error O LV is the closest observed concentration to the limit value (LV) and M LV is the correspondingly ranked modelled concentration.

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE8 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... The uncertainty concept ( …remind) e.g. Britter,94; Borrego, Miranda et al.,2008 essential for models supporting political decision Can be determined by statistical evaluation comparing observations with model results TOTAL uncertainty MODEL uncertainty INPUT DATA uncertainty Variability = + + Emissions, meteorology, chemistry Stochastic atm. + anthropog. processes Parameterizations, numerical, grid

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE9 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... Uncertainty and model quality assurance AQD criteria for acceptability of modelling results: Modelling uncertainty Model evaluation (fitness- for- purpose): scientific evaluation verification validation model intercomparison sensitivity analysis uncertainty analysis operational evaluation If generally accepted Model Evaluation Protocol is missing, model validation and intercomparison usually address the model assessment

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE10 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... Open questions 1/2: stations Representativeness of stations – compound specific? data Quality of monitored data (data coverage, comparability of PM instruments, treatments of small concentrations) single modules Uncertainties of the single modules of the modelling system (emission, meteorology, chemical transport model) nested models Uncertainty of nested models (multiscale model cascades) (different spatial scales in emission inventory top/down and bottom/up, nesting in the meteorological and chemical transport model)

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE11 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... Open questions 2/2: combination of monitoring and modelling Uncertainty for combination of monitoring and modelling (data assimilation), uptake of Kopernikus (GMES) Atmospheric Service statistical indexes Identify complimentary quality indicators (statistical indexes) for different type of model applications, compound specific ? Communication Communication of model uncertainty to decision makers (uncertainty spatial mapping, reporting for further use in health and environmental applications) model’s The model’s user as a source of uncertainty – how to evaluate and how to overcome it

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE12 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... AIMS of WG2 activities: Overall goal: To develop methodology for quality assurance of models in support of the new EU – AQD (i) Develop and recommend an EU wide standard procedure for uncertainty evaluation and model performance indicators in support of AQ assessment according the AQD

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE13 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... AIMS of WG2 activities - continued: (ii) Create a European Framework for Model Validation for different type of models (from hotspot to regional scale) and different purposes (assessment, scenario calculations, forecast of exceedances, contribution from natural sources and winter sanding/salting) (iii) Steer any potential modifications of the AQD

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE14 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... WG2 participation: All EU national experts (bring their needs and expectations, practical test cases) DG-ENV (collaborate with respect implementation of the AQD) JRC- Ispra: chair for the beginning (meetings, workshops) EEA-ETC/ACC: contribute External experts if needed Others?

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE15 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... Activities of WG2 (tentative list): a) Organisation of intercomparison exercises for the purposes of the AQD. b) Uncertainty analysis c) Characterisation of monitoring stations

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE16 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... a) Organisation of intercomparison exercises for the purposes of the AQD. Models will be evaluated in two ways: How well are the models able to reproduce current air pollution ? (AQ assessment) How well do the models respond to emission changes? (scenario calculations) JRC experience with CityDelta, EuroDelta

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE17 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... ….Intercomparison exercise – possible objectives/activities Study the impact of different modules of an AQ system on hourly, daily and annual concentrations Study and develop appropriate statistical parameters (indexes) in addition to the AQD parameter Propose and test benchmarks Develop/adopt appropriate graphical representation (compound specific?)

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE18 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... b) Uncertainty analysis: Develop/adopt and regularly update datasets (make use of databases by ACCENT, COST728/732, JRC- DAM, EU – INSPIRE Initiative) Uncertainty/sensitivity due to individual physical and chemical processes Sensitivity analysis to input parameters (IC/BC, meteo, land use etc.) How to define uncertainty for Ensemble Means? Address contribution of stochastic variability

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE19 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... c) Characterisation of monitoring stations: Representativeness, both for AQ and Meteo Number and types Analyse if compound specific or not

10 October 2008, Cavtat (CROATIA) – First Planery Meeting FAIRMODE20 WG2 Scoping Paper on Quality Assurance... Concluding remarks: The Scoping paper is very general We invite participants to share their needs and expectations SIGN UP in FAIRMODE web site for WG2 Questionnaire Meeting in January 09 on definition of the framework, topics and first exercises