State Of California E911 Next Generation Project CalNENA CalNENA March 2, 2010

State Vision “ Anyone, anywhere within the State of California, will have access to the fastest, most reliable, most accurate and most secure services.”

Current Environment Switch/Trunk-Centric Switch/Trunk-Centric –Point-to-Point TDM trunk network. –Geographically restrictive. –Limited disaster recovery capability. –Restrictive cost model.

Current E9-1-1 Network Configuration E9-1-1 Selective Router ALI Database End-Office PSAP

Wireless E9-1-1 Digital network. Digital network. Multi-database functionality. Multi-database functionality. Tandem-to-Tandem capability. Tandem-to-Tandem capability.

VoIP E9-1-1 Leveraging wireless techniques. Leveraging wireless techniques. –Tandem-to-Tandem. –Multi-database. Static vs. Dynamic location. Static vs. Dynamic location. –Different than wireless mobility.

Current E9-1-1 Network Configuration with Wireless and VoIP E9-1-1 Selective Router ALI Database End-Office PSAP WirelessVoIP 3 rd Party Database

Today’s Technology CAMA – Developed in the 1950sUpdated for E9-1-1 Add-ons for Wireless and VoIP

Statewide Issues Wireless calls Wireless calls –66% of all are wireless. –CHP 167 funded call-taking positions. –PSAPs ~1700 funded call-taking positions. Ability to provide “virtual” functionality. Ability to provide “virtual” functionality. –CHP –Butte County –Greater Pasadena area –Mendocino –Ventura

Reduce network costs. Reduce network costs. –Northeastern California Over $1M a year, or 10% of total network costs for <1% of all PSAPs. Build a Foundation for NG Build a Foundation for NG Statewide Issues

The Path to Next Generation Technology Solve today’s issues. Solve today’s issues. –Use existing technology. Identify “high probability” of success targets. Identify “high probability” of success targets. –Start with wireless calls only! –Northeastern California. –Manageable projects. Provide the building blocks or “best suspension” to provide additional data for real “Next Gen 9-1-1”. Provide the building blocks or “best suspension” to provide additional data for real “Next Gen 9-1-1”.

Tomorrow’s Technology The best suspension we have today… …on which to build the real Car of Tomorrow!

Yesterday’s Technology E9-1-1 Selective Router ALI Database End-Office PSAP WirelessVoIP 3 rd Party Database

14 NENA NG9-1-1 Architecture March 2007

State RFI Rationale for RFI. Rationale for RFI. –Gather costs for Federal Grant application. –Identify solution providers. –Application deadline Aug 4, –Grant funds awarded Sept. 25, 2009 $4.3M (State match).

Major Points. Major Points. –Meet the needs of wireless. –“Virtual PSAP” capability. –Reduce network costs. –Leverage “NGEN” technology to meet the needs of TODAY! State RFI

State Next Gen Project Critical Path Issue RFI to help identify costs. Issue RFI to help identify costs. Apply for “seed” money (E9-1-1 Grant). Apply for “seed” money (E9-1-1 Grant). Identify requirements. Identify requirements. Select solution provider. Select solution provider. Implement “limited application”. Implement “limited application”. Evaluate, Refine, Perfect. Evaluate, Refine, Perfect. Identify state-wide costs. Identify state-wide costs. Appropriate funding. Appropriate funding. State-wide implementation. State-wide implementation.

Tentative Project Scope Butte Butte Lassen Lassen Plumas Plumas Modoc Modoc Siskiyou Siskiyou Yuba Yuba Sutter Sutter Glenn Glenn Tehema Tehema Trinity Trinity Sierra Sierra CHP CHP

Proposed Project Phases Phase I – Butte. Phase I – Butte. –7 PSAPs. – trunks. –Projected budget $2.6M. Phase II – Lassen, Plumas, Modoc. Phase II – Lassen, Plumas, Modoc. –6 PSAPs. – trunks. –Projected budget $2M.

Proposed Project Phases Phase III – Siskiyou. Phase III – Siskiyou. –9 PSAPs. – trunks. –Projected budget $1M. Phase IV – Yuba, Colusa, Sutter, Glenn, Tehama. Phase IV – Yuba, Colusa, Sutter, Glenn, Tehama. –13 PSAPs. – Trunks. –Project budget $2M.

Proposed Project Phases Phase V – Sierra, Trinity. Phase V – Sierra, Trinity. –2 PSAPs. – trunks. –Projected budget $1M. Total Project. 37 PSAPs. 37 PSAPs trunks trunks. Projected budget $8.6M. Projected budget $8.6M.

Project Goals Route on wireless phase II location. Route on wireless phase II location. Distribute calls to the most appropriate PSAP the “first time”. Distribute calls to the most appropriate PSAP the “first time”. Ease the demands on CHP. Ease the demands on CHP. Provide a more elegant back-up utility. Provide a more elegant back-up utility. Reduce mileage sensitive network costs. Reduce mileage sensitive network costs.

Project Goals “Anyone, anywhere within the State of California, will have access to the fastest, most reliable, most accurate and most secure services.”

Proposed Timeline Selection Consultant – 3/15. Selection Consultant – 3/15. –Standards/Deliverables/IV&V and solution provider. CalNET II addendum – 7/1. CalNET II addendum – 7/1. Implementation Plan development – 3/15 – 12/31. Implementation Plan development – 3/15 – 12/31. Implementation – 10/1/2010 – 9/1/2012. Implementation – 10/1/2010 – 9/1/2012. Solution evaluation 6/1/2011 – 6/1/2013. Solution evaluation 6/1/2011 – 6/1/2013. State-wide implementation plan – 1/1/2014. State-wide implementation plan – 1/1/2014.

Current Status Conducting internal validation. Conducting internal validation. Developing Consultant RFO. Developing Consultant RFO. Evaluating contractual vehicles. Evaluating contractual vehicles. Amending current contracts. Amending current contracts. Leveraging other projects to build on. Leveraging other projects to build on. –Pasadena RING. –Routing on Empirical Data (RED).

State Contacts: Doug Peck (916) Andy Nielsen (916) Questions???