Define Tollgate Checklist

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
Advertisements

Project leaders will keep track of team progress using an A3 Report.
Project Storyboard Template
Dr. Ron Lembke SCM 462.  Financial return  Impact on customers and organizational effectiveness  Probability of success  Impact on employees  Fit.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Supercharging DMAIC IT’S TIME TO USE THE POWER OF THE COLLECTIVE MIND.
Overview of Lean Six Sigma
6  Methodology: DMAIC Robert Setaputra. PDCA / PDSA PDCA / PDSA is a continuous quality improvement tool. PDCA is introduced by Shewhart. PDSA is Deming’s.
Barry Murash MBBit Nortel 2007
Overview of DMAIC A Systematic Framework for Problem Solving
1. 2 What is Six Sigma? What: Data driven method of identifying and resolving variations in processes. How: Driven by close understanding of customer.
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
PMP® Exam Preparation Course
Welcome to Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Training
Black Belt Project Storyboard Template
ASQ Raleigh ASQ Raleigh Section 1113 Six Sigma SIG DMAIC Series.
What is a Business Analyst? A Business Analyst is someone who works as a liaison among stakeholders in order to elicit, analyze, communicate and validate.
Ahmad Al-Ghoul. Learning Objectives Explain what a project is,, list various attributes of projects. Describe project management, discuss Who uses Project.
SacProNet An Overview of Project Management Techniques.
Applying Business Process Re-engineering
Business Process’s Blue Print Pertemuan 3 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
Continuous Improvement Story Cover Page The cover page is the title page Rapid Process Improvement Story Template O Graphics are optional This CI Story.
Practical Assessment Project Template
Insert: Title of Improvement Read Out Date:. 2 Objectives for Today’s Session Share results of improvement effort Demonstrate fact-base, analytical approach.
The Development of BPR Pertemuan 6 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
TEPM 6304: Quality Improvement in Project Management Project Quality Management & Course Overview.
Finance Vic Rainsford Vice President Planning & Analysis Jim Palmer Sr. Mgr. Planning & Analysis.
1 66 1 Six Sigma – Basic overview. 2 66 2 WHAT IS THIS SIX SIGMA ? A Philosophy A Statistical Measurement A Metric A Business Strategy make fewer.
Introducing Project Management Update December 2011.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Initiation and Planning for Success Sridhar Seshagiri Rao, PMP Innova Solutions Inc. Santa Clara, CA. April 9 th 2004.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
© 2002 Six Sigma Academy Eliminate Waste Reduce Variability Growth Six Sigma Elements Six Sigma is a business philosophy that employs a client-centric,
BSBPMG501A Manage Application of Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification.
Six Sigma Continuous Improvement Training Introduction to Benchmarking Six Sigma Simplicity.
What is project management?
Managing programs that promote personal effectiveness.
ANALYSIS PHASE OF BUSINESS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY.
Black Belt Project Storyboard Template Can be used in combination with Black Belt Storyboard Submission Guide Visit GoLeanSixSigma.com for more Lean Six.
Last Updated: MONTH, YEAR Team: M. W. (Team Leader)R. F. T. D.M.G. T. L.D. J. (Sponsor) Green Belt Project Objective: TITLE Green Belt Project Objective:
Practical Assessment Project Template
Sponsor Checklists Sponsor Checklists Lean Six Sigma Group Lean Six Sigma Tollgate Checklists.
Phase-1: Prepare for the Change Why stepping back and preparing for the change is so important to successful adoption: Uniform and effective change adoption.
Analyze Wrap Up and Action Items
Continuous Improvement Project (A Guideline For Sponsors)
TM 720: Statistical Process Control DMAIC Problem Solving
Practical Assessment Project Template

Lean Six Sigma Road Map Improvement Process Road Map
Control Phase Wrap Up and Action Items
Green Belt Project Storyboard Template See Green Belt Storyboard Checklist for required contents Visit GoLeanSixSigma.com for more Lean Six Sigma Resources.
Six-Sigma : DMAIC Cycle & Application
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Story
Continuous Improvement Projects
Project life span.
Control Phase Wrap Up and Action Items
Black Belt Project Storyboard Template Can be used in combination with Black Belt Storyboard Submission Guide Visit GoLeanSixSigma.com for more Lean Six.
Project Management.
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Story
OPS/571 Operations Management
Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Improvement Story
Quality Management Six Sigma
Phase 1 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Project Charter START IT! By Catherine B. Calio, PMP
Improve Phase Wrap Up and Action Items
DMAIC Roadmap DMAIC methodology is central to Six Sigma process improvement projects. Each phase provides a problem solving process where-by specific tools.
Measure Phase Wrap Up and Action Items
Lean-Green belt six sigma program
Practical Assessment Project Template – DMADV
Presentation transcript:

Define Tollgate Checklist Has the team defined the opportunity from both business and customer perspectives? Tollgate Review Stop Is this project important, i.e. has the project been chosen because it is in alignment with goals and the strategic direction of the ‘business’? What is the problem statement – detailing (what) is the problem, (when) was the problem first seen, (where) was is it seen, and what is the (magnitude or extent) of the problem. Is the problem measured in terms of Quality, Cycle Time or Cost Efficiency, not expected financial benefits? Ensure there is no mention or assumptions about causes and solutions. Does a goal statement exist that defines the results expected to be achieved by the process, with reasonable and measurable targets? Is the goal developed for the “what” in the problem statement, thus measured in terms of Quality, Cycle Time or Cost Efficiency? Does a financial business case exist, explaining the potential impact (i.e. measured in dollars) of the project on the BU, PM’s, Competencies, Budgets, MOR, etc.? Is the project scope reasonable? Have constraints and key assumptions been identified? Have IT implications been addressed and coordinated with IT managers? Who is on the team? Are they the right resources and has their required time commitment to the project been confirmed by Competency and Team? What is the high level work plan? What are the key milestones (i.e. dates of tollgate reviews for DMAIC projects)? Who are the customers (Internal and External) for this process? What are their requirements? Are they measurable? How were the requirements determined? Who are the key stakeholders? How will they be involved in the project? How will progress be communicated to them? Do they agree to the project? What kinds of barriers/obstacles will need assistance to be removed? Has the development of a risk mitigation plan to deal with the identified risks been developed? Deliverables: SIPOC Process Map and/or Value Stream Map Communication Plan Validated Project Charter Initial Work plan Risk Mitigation Plan Leader Actions: Deliverables Uploaded to Community of Interest Deliverables Inserted into the Project “Notebook”

Measure Tollgate Checklist Does the team understand or has gathered the right data to help understand the process? Has the team base-lined current process performance? Tollgate Review Stop Has a more detailed Value Stream Map been completed to better understand the process and problem, and where in the process the root causes might reside? Has the team conducted a value-added and cycle time analysis, identifying areas where time and resources are devoted to tasks not critical to the customer? Has the team identified the specific input (x), process (x), and output (y) measures needing to be collected for both effectiveness and efficiency categories (i.e. Quality, Speed and Cost measures)? Has the team developed clear, unambiguous operational definitions for each measurement and tested them with others to ensure clarity and consistent interpretation? Has a clear, reasonable choice been made between gathering new data or taking advantage of existing data already collected by the organization? Has an appropriate sample size and sampling frequency been established to ensure valid representation of the process we’re measuring? Has the measurement system been checked for repeatability and reproducibility, potentially including training of data collectors? Has the team developed and tested data collection forms or check sheets which are easy to use and provide consistent, complete data? Has baseline performance and process capability been established? How large is the gap between current performance and the customer (or project) requirements? Has the team been able to identify any ‘Quick Wins’? Has the team begun to fill in the financial benefits worksheets for type 1 and 2 savings? Deliverables: Detailed Value Stream Map(s) Data Collection Plan Measurement Collection Results Process Capability Results Quick Wins, if applicable Identification of Kaizen Opportunities, if applicable Refined Charter, as necessary Updated Risk Mitigation Plan Leader Actions: Deliverables Uploaded on Community of Interest Deliverables Inserted into the Project “Notebook” Have any opportunities to do Kaizen projects been identified to accelerate momentum and results? Have ‘learning's’ to-date required modification of the Project Charter? If so, have these changes been approved by the Project Sponsor and the Key Stakeholders? Have any new risks to project success been identified, added to the Risk Mitigation Plan, and a mitigation strategy put in place?

Analyze Tollgate Checklist Has the team identified the key factors (critical X’s) that have the biggest impact on process performance? Have they validated the root causes? Tollgate Review Stop Has the team examined the process and identified potential bottlenecks, disconnects and redundancies that could contribute to the problem statement? Has the team analyzed data about the process and its performance to help stratify the problem, understand reasons for variation in the process, and generate hypothesis as to the root causes of the current process performance? Has an evaluation been done to determine whether the problem can be solved without a fundamental ‘white paper’ recreation of the process? Has the decision been confirmed with the Project Sponsor? Has the team investigated and validated (or de-validated) the root cause hypotheses generated earlier, to gain confidence that the “vital few” root causes have been uncovered? Does the team understand why the problem (the Quality, Cycle Time, or Cost issue identified in the Problem Statement) is being seen? Has the team been able to identify any additional ‘Quick Wins’? Have ‘learning's’ to-date required modification of the Project Charter? If so, have these changes been approved by the Project Sponsor and the Key Stakeholders? Have any new risks to project success been identified, added to the Risk Mitigation Plan, and a mitigation strategy put in place? Deliverables: List of Potential Root causes Prioritized List of Validated Root Causes Additional “Quick Wins”, if applicable Refined Charter, as necessary Updated Risk Mitigation Plan Leader Actions: Deliverables Uploaded on Community of Interest Deliverables Inserted into the Project “Notebook”

Improve Tollgate Checklist Has the team developed improvement solutions for the critical X’s, piloted the solution and verified that the solution will solve the problem? Tollgate Review Stop What techniques were used to generate ideas for potential solutions? What narrowing and screening techniques were used to further develop and qualify potential solutions? What evaluation criteria were used to select a recommended solution? Do the proposed solutions address all of the identified root causes, or at least the most critical? Were the solutions verified with the Project Sponsor and Stakeholders? Has an approval been received to implement? Was a pilot run to test the solution? What was learned? What modifications were made? Has the team seen evidence that the root causes of the initial problems have been addressed during the pilot? What are the expected benefits? Has the team considered potential problems and unintended consequences (FMEA) of the solution and developed preventive and contingency actions to address them? Has the proposed solution been documented, including process participants, job descriptions and if applicable, their estimated time commitment to support the process? Has the team developed an implementation plan? What is the status? Have changes been communicated to all the appropriate people? Has the team been able to identify any additional ‘Quick Wins’? Have ‘learning's’ to-date required modification of the Project Charter? If so, have these changes been approved by the Project Sponsor and the Key Stakeholders? Have any new risks to project success been identified and added to the Risk Mitigation Plan? Deliverables: Prioritized List of Solutions “To-Be” Value Stream Map(s) Pilot Plan & Results Approved Solution and Detailed Implementation Plan Additional “Quick Wins”, if applicable Refined Charter, as necessary Updated Risk Mitigation Plan Leader Actions: Deliverables Uploaded on Community of Interest Deliverables Inserted into the Project “Notebook” Note: Benefits realization will begin upon improvement implementation, unless approved by Financial Representatives

Control Tollgate Checklist Has the team implemented the solution, and a control plan to insure the process is robust to change? Tollgate Review Stop Deliverables: SOP’s Training Plan Process Control System Financial Benefit Worksheets (Type 1 or 2 savings) Benefits Realization Schedule, validated by Financial Representative Validated Solution Replication/ Standardization Plan Lessons Learned Transitioned Project Project Risk Performance Leader Actions: Deliverables Uploaded on Community of Interest Deliverables Inserted into the Project “Notebook” Has the team prepared all the essential documentation for the improved process, including revised/new Standard Operating Procedures (SOP’s), a training plan and a process control system? Has the necessary training for process owners/operators been performed? Have the right measures been selected, and documented as part of the Process Control System, to monitor performance of the process and the continued effectiveness of the solution? Has the metrics briefing plan/schedule been documented? Who owns the measures? Has the Process Owner’s job description been updated to reflect the new responsibilities? What happens if minimum performance is not achieved? Has the solution been effectively implemented? Has the team compiled results data confirming that the solution has achieved the goals defined in the Project Charter? Have the Financial Benefit Worksheets been filled in? Has the financial representative reviewed. Has the Benefits Realization Schedule been verified by the Financial Representative? Has the process been transitioned to the Process Owner, to take over responsibility for managing continuing operations? Do they concur with the control plan? Has a final Storyboard documenting the project work been developed? Has the team forwarded other issues/opportunities, which were not able to be addressed, to senior management? Have “lessons learned” been captured? Have replication opportunities been identified and communicated? Has the hard work and successful efforts of our team been celebrated? Note: Benefits realization will begin upon improvement implementation, unless approved by Financial Representatives

Validate Tollgate Checklist Is the process still in control? Has the Process’ Performance been sustained? Are the results being realized? Tollgate Review Stop Are the Key Process Input Variables (KPIVs) and Key Process Output Variables (KPOVs) under control and capable? Is the Process Control Plan still in place and being followed? Are metrics monitored and adequately controlling the process? Was there a clear transfer of ownership from the Green Belt/Black Belt to the Project Sponsor? Have the Business results been achieved? What are they to-date? Is the Business impact “in control”? Are the financial results being measured and confirmed? Are the Financial Benefit Worksheets accurate? Does your Financial Representative concur? Are results tracking to the Benefits Realization Schedule? If not, why? Has any other Business metric deteriorated since the implementation of the process? Can we close out and certify the project? Have any and all loose ends from the project been addressed? Does the Process Owner agree that the project and the implemented improvements met all the objectives as defined in the Project Charter? Are there any changes in the process which affect the original, desired outcome? If so, what are they? If other factors are affecting the process, does the Process Owner agree that, on a like-basis, the final goals of the project were achieved? Have “lessons learned” been captured? Has an appropriate reward/recognition recommendation been submitted and approved? What new Best Practices were identified during the Project? How have these been documented and communicated? Which replication opportunities have been identified, started, and/or realized? Is visual communication utilized (KPIs, charts, changes, etc.)? Are there means of capturing and managing on-going improvement ideas (e.g. suggestion boxes)? Are there scheduled internal audits of the improved/active processes? Deliverables: Clear transfer of ownership Control Plan Process Control System Financial Benefit Worksheets (Type 1 or 2 savings) Benefits Realization Schedule, validated by Financial Representative Lessons Learned Replication Opportunities Project Sponsor Actions: Deliverables Uploaded on Community of Interest Deliverables Inserted into the Project “Notebook” Note: Benefits realization will begin upon improvement implementation, unless approved by Financial Representatives