Master Teacher Academy East Dakota Educational Cooperative Vickie Venhuizen & Janeen Outka.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome! Master Teacher Academy June 15-19, 2009 Funded by South Dakota Department of Education Enhancing Education Through Technology Program.
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
PROJECT INTEGRATE END OF YEAR SUMMARY AUGUST 4, 2011.
The Florida Reading Initiative (FRI) is a research-based school wide reform effort committed to providing the professional development and follow up support.
Project RACE: Rigorous Academic Curriculum for Everyone.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Steve Klass, Nadine Bezuk & Jane Gawronski
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
ESA Region 2 April st Century Skills: More Than Just Computers.
Title II D Sharing Session Wednesday, August 12 Partnering for 21 st Century Success Lead Agency: Brookings School District Partnering LEA: Castlewood.
KEDC Project for Special Educator Effectiveness (Project SEE) KEDC Special Education.
A Mathematics Specialist Program: Its Structure and Impact on Practicing Elementary Teachers Nadine Bezuk & Susan Nickerson.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Promoting Learning & Understanding for Students MSP project meeting  January 9, 2014 MathPLUS 1 and 2.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Reading First Site Visits Jane Granger Meadows, M.S. Lisa A. Slover, M.S. Mary Raiford Mickey McKinnes 2006 Just Read, Florida! Leadership Conference.
June, Welcome Introductions Overview of Agenda.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Donna Bryant and Mary Beth Singleton Education Technology Resource Teachers.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
Effective Family and Community Connections: Challenges at the Middle/High School Level Opening the Next Level of Involvement Southwest Educational Development.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot (TPEP). Objectives & Agenda What we’re going to learn General Pilot Details …. Who, What, How, What Then Explore.
Michigan MSPs June 2007 Wendy Tackett, PhD, iEval
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
Supporting Leadership of Effective Reading Programs Stephen M. Nettles, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research.
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Imagine School at Town Center Academic Update June 17, 2014.
Lenoir County Public Schools SIOP Leadership Meeting for Planning, Support, and Implementation February 3, 2011 Rochelle Middle School.
Southern Regional Education Board Florida Leadership Academy for Innovation and Improvement US DOE Communication Hub Meeting Albuquerque, NM September.
Sandra Johnson, M.A. & M.S. Susie Ceppi- Bussmann, Ph.D. New Mexico State University.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE SCIENCE EDUCATION PRESENTED BY GIBSON & ASSOCIATES A CALIFORNIA MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP RESEARCH GRANT WISE II Evaluation.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
1 SEC Summer Conference Milwaukee September 8-10, 2008 Idaho’s PRINCIPAL ACADEMY of LEADERSHIP and the SEC Curt Rathburn, Project Manager Scott Smith,
Master Teacher Academy East Dakota Educational Cooperative Vickie Venhuizen & Janeen Outka.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
The Pike County School Corporation “The Role of the School Administrator In School Improvement” The Learning Conference Indianapolis, IN January 30, 2006.
Kalamazoo Public Schools MiBLSi, A District-Wide Initiative to present Cindy Green Patricia Steinert-Otto Linda Campbell Dorr Catherman.
Creative Classroom Collaboratives (C 3 ): Research Update December 1, 2011 Sponsored B y: Eastern Suffolk BOCES Presented By: Susanne Hartnett.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
The Art and Science of Teaching Marzano’s principles in action at Wahoo Public Schools John Harris – Wahoo Middle School Principal.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Garrett Elementary Accountability Report Kids are our Business! October 14,
1 SEC State Collaborative Meeting San Diego February 10-12, 2008 Idaho’s PRINCIPAL ACADEMY of LEADERSHIP and the SEC Peter Kavouras Curt Rathburn.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.
San Rafael City Schools Board Meeting January I NTEGRATING T ECHNOLOGY E NGINEERING A ND M ATH /S CIENCE.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Success through Technology and Assessment August 1 st -3 rd Attended workshops and training to prepare for the grant o Achievement Series o eMetric o Obtaining.
SNRPDP Self Evaluation
Beginning Educator Support Team NEWESD 101 Consortium
Augusta School Department School Board Presentation
Marshall Public Schools Assessment Update
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting September, 2013
Professional Development Update
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Standards-Based Reporting
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
Recruitment & Retention Committee Update Job & Task Analysis Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Master Teacher Academy East Dakota Educational Cooperative Vickie Venhuizen & Janeen Outka

Overview of Project What were the goals and objectives of your project? What activities helped you achieve project goals and objectives? Evaluation What data was collected? What tools and processes did you use to collect the data? What were the measurable results? Synopsis What success did you have with this project? What were your major challenges and how did you meet those? What did you learn from this project? What products were created as a result of your project? (i.e. units, wikis, websites etc.) What advice would you have for future project leaders?

South Dakota Master Teachers

2010 South Dakota Master Teachers

Participants 31 completed 2009 MTA cohort 67 began 2010 MTA cohort 56 Teachers 8 Higher Education 3 student teachers

Schedule June 17-18, 2010 (2009 cohort) June 21-25, 2010 (2010 cohort) Understanding of 21 st century skills & Project Based Learning Write/Revise lesson Plan for district/school inservice

Overall Grant Goals Increase student achievement Increase teacher comfort level with use of technology & 21 st century skills Train additional teachers

MTA Goals SA Goal #1: Student Achievement will increase by 1% for the schools participating in the June 2009 MTA, based upon the DSTEP test from the spring of 2009 to the spring of GOAL PARTIALLY MET Reading – All Grades Reading – Grades 9-12 Math – All Grades Math – Grades 9-12 Science – All Grades Science – Grades Avg of MTA Schools 21%22%28%31%22%20%33%30%25%34% STATE 23% 30% 24%23%33%31%29%35% Students’ math scores in participating MTA schools increased by 2% for all grades and 3% for grades Students in MTA schools performed better than the State Average. Reading scores in participating MTA schools decreased by 1% for all grades and 3% for grades Students in MTA schools performed 1% better than the State Average for all grades, but 1% below the state average for grades Science scores were unavailable at the time of this report.

MTA Goals SA Goal #2: Based on the DSTEP data, there will be a decrease in the number of schools participating in the June 2009 MTA in SD who are identified for school improvement. – GOAL NOT MET School Belle Fourche MSBelle Fourche MS * Brandon Valley Hi SchBrandon Valley Hi Sch * Brandon Valley Middle SchBrandon Valley Middle Sch * SF Lincoln High SchoolDouglas Middle School SF Longfellow ElementarySF Lincoln High School * SF Longfellow Elementary School made AYP in Four of the six schools identified for school improvement in 2010 made adequate yearly progress, but must make AYP for two consecutive years to be removed from the list.

MTA Goals SA Goal #3: 80% of students in classrooms of June 2009 MTA participants will utilize 21 st century skills in a current context by grant completion. – GOAL EXCEEDED 100% of the students in the classrooms of the 31 participating teachers utilized 21 st century skills during the classroom observation.

MTA Goals SA Goal #3, Objective 1: 80% of students in classrooms of June 2009 MTA participants will use 21 st century tools. – OBJECTIVE EXCEEDED 99% of the students in the classrooms of the 31 participating teachers utilized 21 st century tools during the classroom observation.

MTA Goals PD Goal #1: 85% of the June 2009 MTA participating teachers (31) will complete all of the requirements of the Master Teacher Academy and train additional teachers in subsequent years. OBJECTIVE EXCEEDED Objective#1: 50% of the June 2009 MTA participating teachers will increase their level of technology integration by one stage as measured by a team designed technology questionnaire. OBJECTIVE EXCEEDED (70.5%) Objective#2: 95% of June 2009 MTA participants will implement two technology infused lesson plans or 1 unit. OBJECTIVE EXCEEDED

MTA Goals Objective #3: 95% of June 2009 MTA participants will share information on 21 st century skills at their local district or within their ESA region. OBJECTIVE EXCEEDED Objective #4: 95% of June 2009 MTA participants will meet a minimum of one time with a coach OBJECTIVE EXCEEDED

MTA Goals PD Goal #2: 80% of participating administrators will increase their understanding of 21 st century skills as determined by pre and post surveys. GOAL NOT MET - Only four of the 31 administrators attended the two day workshop Objective #1: 80% of grant administrators will complete a minimum of two walkthrough visits to determine if building teachers are using 21 st century skills while teaching students. OBJECTIVE NOT MET

MTA Goals PD Goal #3: Create an increased awareness of the 21 st Century Framework in South Dakota teachers Objective #1: 35 teachers will increase their understanding of the 21 st Century framework by participating in a 5 day Master Teacher Academy (MTA 2010) OBJECTIVE EXCEEDED 69 applicants were selected to attend – two declined in early June due to family conflicts. 67 applicants were in attendance June 21-25, 2010

What activities helped you achieve project goals and objectives? District/School Inservices Coaching visits Sharing Sessions

Evaluation What data was collected? Survey data DSTEP scores Participant Reflections What tools and processes did you use to collect the data? State survey (members.k12.sd.us) Data collected on-site (wikispaces.com & paper checklists) What were the measurable results? See goals/objectives report 70.5% increase in teacher comfort level

Synopsis Successes Many 2009 cohort teachers have taken on more of a leadership role in their schools – with providing professional development Classroom practices have changed for 2009 cohort teachers (students are more in charge of their own learning) 2010 Participants have a plan for sharing the information with colleagues (continuation beyond scope of the project) Major challenges Teachers are very nervous about using Live Meeting (even with training)

Synopsis Lessons learned Teachers want to learn in small groups Advice Provide support for participants throughout the year/process – Keep in close contact with them Encourage the participants to network and learn from each other Start collecting data early & update throughout the year

Questions, Comments, Thoughts