Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Inspection Process Louisiana Pipeline Safety Seminar August 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT
Advertisements

Joe Killins & Associates, LLC Pipelines & Risk Based Management How Safe is Safe?
Preparing for Compliance Monitoring Reviews Understanding CMS Protocols Used by Review Organizations January 14, 2009 Presented by: Margaret deHesse, RN,
Integrity Management Program Special Permits (IMP-SP) Draft Administrative Plan 12/5/2007.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
Contractor Safety Management
Overview of Key Rule Features
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
Slide 1 FAA’s Special Technical Audit of Boeing and the Audit Resolution Plan.
Adjusting EPLC to your Project Colleen Robinson & Teresa Kinley Friday, February 6, 2009.
TRAINING AND DRILLS. Training and Drills Ensure A comprehensive, coordinated, and documented program as an integral part of the emergency management program.
Course Material 1.Overview of Process Safety 2.Compliance with Standards 3.Process Hazard Analysis 4.Standard Operating Procedures 5.Safe Work Procedures.
AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
© 2008 Prentice Hall11-1 Introduction to Project Management Chapter 11 Managing Project Execution Information Systems Project Management: A Process and.
Project Execution.
Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual: MARLAP Presentation to the Radiation Advisory Committee/Science Advisory Board April.
December 2010 Project Director’s Report OIDAP Quarterly Meeting Baltimore, MD Sylvia Karman OIDAP Member & Director, Office of Vocational Resources Development.
Software Inspections and Walkthroughs By. Adnan khan.
Integrity Management Inspection Process Don Moore, OPS Central Region.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Authorization Basis Plan Steven Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting December 10 – 11, 2009.
Regulatory Affairs Personnel Training and Qualification (RA T&Q) Overview.
Federal Agency Update - A Public Real Estate Symposium Las Vegas, Nevada January 26, 2010 Procedures Guide for Right of Way Cost Estimation and Cost Management.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
Current Inspection Process for Operators of Hazardous Liquids Pipelines Rod Seeley OPS SW Region Director May 18, 2005.
Quick Recap Monitoring and Controlling. Phases of Quality Assurance Acceptance sampling Process control Continuous improvement Inspection before/after.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Stephanie Weidman Austin Regional Manager Oversight and Safety Division Pipeline Safety September 2015.
Lecture 11 Managing Project Execution. Project Execution The phase of a project in which work towards direct achievement of the project’s objectives and.
Office of Pipeline Safety Qualifications of Individuals: Protocol Review Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Objectives: Develop a solution to either enhance or replace the FasTrak tool Scope/Why is this important?: Increase the transparency for issues that are.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TOOLS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING IRRS EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY Presentation to the Workshop on Lessons Learned.
NRC Region I Lessons Learned Steve Barr Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector Region I US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2010 NRC Region I Joint Exercise.
The Canadian USOAP Experience
Analysis & Presentation of Integrity Management Audit Results Western Regional Gas Conference August 21, 2007 Gary R. White.
A Framework for Your Pipeline Integrity Program. 2 A Few Thoughts Before Beginning l This rule is new to the pipeline industry although many of the concepts.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part III.
OMB Memorandum M Implementation of the Government Charge Card Abuse Prevention Act of 2012 (Charge Card Act) September 2013.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Public Health Lessons from HACCP-Based Inspection Models Project Presentation by Loren D. Lange August 7, 2007 United States Department of Agriculture.
Office of Pipeline Safety Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity Management July , 2002 Houston, Texas Welcome.
U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Integrity Management Systems November 18, 2015 Chris McLaren - 1 -
ASTRA Update Sunflower Project Statewide Management, Accounting and Reporting Tool (SMART) February 12, 2009.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration State Program Action Plan Linda Daugherty – OPS July 12, 2012.
Development of IM Inspection Process Workshop on the Integrity Management Rule for Large Liquid Pipelines Bruce Hansen August 7, 2001.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
ECC Task Force Webinar September 3, Peak Anti-Trust Statement Phase 1A Update webSAS Integration PSE Access Peak and the Task Force Next Steps.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Overview of Risk Informed Inspection Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City,
Enforcement of Integrity Management Rule Workshop on the Integrity Management Rule for Large Liquid Pipelines Chris Hoidal, Director OPS Western Region.
Office of Pipeline Safety Remedial Action Review Protocol Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.
Page 1 Portfolio Committee on Water and Environmental Affairs 14 July 2009.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Slide 1 POA Seminar 02 March 2016 Personnel Competence Including Certifying Staff and Release to Service Andy Swift / Michael Greer.
Project Delivery Working Group FY2016 EFCOG Annual Meeting Robert P. Miklos Idaho National Laboratory Battelle Energy Alliance Working Group Chair June.
Integrity Management Continuous Improvement Project Status and Implementation Process Presentation for: PHMSA Advisory Committees July 11, 2012.
Software Engineering — Software Life Cycle Processes — Maintenance
Project Management PTM721S
Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Module 2 Key Principles of the Peer Review Programme
Distribution Integrity
CR-GR-HSE-302 Management of change
Management of Change GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-302)
HSE Requirements for Pipeline Operations GROUP HSE GROUPE (CR-GR-HSE-414) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule defines the minimum HSE requirements related to the.
Presentation transcript:

Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Inspection Process Louisiana Pipeline Safety Seminar August 2003

Office of Pipeline Safety IM Inspection Schedule January – April, 2002 “Quick Hit” Segment Identification Inspections September – October, Inspections – First Application of Protocols January, June 2003OPS IM Inspection Lessons Learned Meetings February – August, Additional Inspections Conducted July, 2003 – Estimate mid 2004 Pilot “Small” Operator Inspections September 2003 – Early 2004 Remaining “Large” Operator Inspections March, 2004 Begin Large Operator Re-inspections

Office of Pipeline Safety Review of Quick Hit Inspections Segment Identification and Completeness Check: Objectives  Confirm Segments Affecting HCAs have been Identified (Required by 12/31/01)  Assure Baseline Assessment Plans and IM Frameworks have Essential Elements

Office of Pipeline Safety Review of Quick Hit Inspections  40 Inspections  ~ 159,000 Miles of Pipe  Percentage of Operator Mileage Identified that “Could Affect” HCAs = 39% Median – 44% Maximum – 100% Minimum – 0%

Office of Pipeline Safety Presentation Topics  Integrity Management Inspection Scope  Inspection Preparation  Overview of Example Inspection  Inspection Documentation

Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Inspection Scope  Separate from Standard Inspections  All Integrity Management Program Requirements in Baseline Assessment Plans Integrity Management Program Elements Follow-up on Segment Identification Issues from “Quick Hit” Inspections

Office of Pipeline Safety Inspection Scope (cont’d)  Program Implementation, including: Integrity Assessments Completed Repairs Preventive and Mitigative Actions Performance Measures

Office of Pipeline Safety Presentation Topics  Integrity Management Inspection Scope  Inspection Preparation  Overview of Example Inspection  Inspection Documentation

Office of Pipeline Safety Inspection Preparation Coordination/Interaction with Operator  Inspection Logistics Inspection Physical Arrangements Team Size and Composition Inspection Topics Operator Personnel Needed Inspection Schedule and Estimated Duration for each Phase of Inspection IMDB Access for Operator Inspection Team Access to Records, Documentation

Office of Pipeline Safety Inspection Preparation Coordination/Interaction with Operator  Review: Operator Assets (Pipelines and Facilities) within Scope of Inspection QH Inspection Issues  Obtain: System Maps IM Program Documentation  Provide: Inspection Protocols Performance Data Form In-line Inspection Results Summary Form System Leak Detection Capabilities Form

Office of Pipeline Safety OPS IM Team Preparation  Summarize Accident/Failure History Recent, Significant Compliance Concerns Segment Identification Inspection Results Notification Information: IMDB State and Region Identified Issues  Specific Areas for Segment Identification Verification  Review with Team Members at Team Pre- Inspection Meeting

Office of Pipeline Safety Current Inspection Team Composition (OPS)  Multi-Region Teams Reflective of Regions with Operator’s facilities  Inspectors with IM Inspection Experience  Rotate in New OPS Inspectors Over Time Inspectors Receive Set of IM Courses On-the-Job Training with Experienced IM Inspectors

Office of Pipeline Safety Inspection Preparation: Team Composition (States)  States to be Invited by Operators to Inspection Operator has Facilities in State States with Interstate Agent Status States with Intrastate Programs  State Participants Will Also Complete IM Training  State Input to Inspection Encouraged

Office of Pipeline Safety Presentation Topics  Integrity Management Inspection Scope  Inspection Preparation  Overview of Example Inspection  Inspection Documentation

Office of Pipeline Safety Overview of Example Large Operator Inspection  Duration: 4-9 Days  Could be Longer for Operators with: Large Systems Large Number of Assessments Completed Geographically Separated Operating Units  At least 1 week Separation between First and Second Weeks

Office of Pipeline Safety Example IM Inspection Day 1  Begin Monday Afternoon  Introductions/Review Agenda  Operator Introductory Presentation of IM Program

Office of Pipeline Safety Example IM Inspection Day 2  Segment Identification Review Methods Address Issues from Quick Hit Inspections Additional Verification of Segments

Office of Pipeline Safety Example IM Inspection Week 1, Day 3  Risk Analysis Process  Completed Risk Analysis Results

Office of Pipeline Safety Example IM Inspection Week 1, Day 4  Baseline Assessment Plan Review Approach for Assessment Method Selection Segment Prioritization Methodology Segment Specific Threats & Assessment Methods  OPS Team Caucus to Prepare Feedback

Office of Pipeline Safety IM Inspections Conclusion of Week 1, Day 5  Week 1 Close Out Meeting with Operator  Inspection Issues from First Week  Conclude Week 1 Noon Friday

Office of Pipeline Safety Example IM Inspection Week 2, Day 1  Start Monday Afternoon  Discussion/Resolution of Week 1 Issues  Integrity Assessment Results Approach

Office of Pipeline Safety Example IM Inspection Week 2, Day 2  Integrity Assessment Results Approach (cont’d)  Verify Schedule is Met for Completed Assessments  Results from Completed Assessments  Repair & Mitigation Records for Conditions Identified through Integrity Assessments

Office of Pipeline Safety Example IM Inspection Week 2, Day 3  Approach to Evaluate Additional Preventive & Mitigative Actions  Preventive & Mitigative Action Decisions & Implementation  Evaluation and Implementation of EFRDs & Leak Detection System Enhancements

Office of Pipeline Safety Example IM Inspection Week 2, Day 4  Continual Integrity Assessment and Evaluation Approach  Performance Evaluation Approach  OPS Team Caucus to Prepare Feedback

Office of Pipeline Safety Example IM Inspection Week 2, Days 5  Exit Interview Follow-up to Inspection Issues Define Follow-up Field Verifications and Subsequent Inspections (if needed)  Complete Week 2 Noon Friday

Office of Pipeline Safety General Inspection Subjects  Team can use Subsets of Inspectors for Specific Tasks (Team Lead Discretion)  Team may Conduct Daily (or more frequent) Debriefs Summarize Day’s Results & Plan Next Day’s Activities Identify Potential Issues  Team will Keep Operator Informed about Changes to the Schedule  Order of Inspection and Time Allotted are Guides Only

Office of Pipeline Safety Different Approaches for Conducting Inspection Using Protocols  Sequential Completion of Protocol Questions  Operator Presentations and Follow-up Questions  General Discussion of Each Program Element, guided by Protocol Questions and Topics  Take Time to Read Program Documentation

Office of Pipeline Safety Supplemental Guidance  Support Consistency for Performance- based Requirements Evaluations  Reference for Teams During Inspections  Reflect OPS Knowledge Base Acquired during Inspections Continues to Improve Practical Guidance for Inspecting Operator Processes Compliance Basis

Office of Pipeline Safety Presentation Topics  Integrity Management Inspection Scope  Inspection Preparation  Overview of Example Inspection  Inspection Documentation

Office of Pipeline Safety Inspection Documentation  Responses to Protocol Questions Inspection Notes Potential Issues  Inspection Summary Report  Inspection Executive Summary  Enforcement Documents  Performance Related Data  Potential Improvements to Protocols and Guidance