Washtenaw County 800 Megahertz Consortium Business Plan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PAGE 1 May 9, 2012 – Ohio APCO/NENA Combined Chapter Business Meeting MARCSIP Business Plan/Rollout SHARED COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FOR OHIO PUBLIC SAFETY.
Advertisements

Puyallup IT & Communications Puyallup Services and South Sound 911 TOPICS Summary – Current Direction of IT & Communications South Sound Updates Puyallup.
Washtenaw County Strategic Space Plan Recommendations November 1, 2006.
Cameron County - Office of Emergency Management Radio Tower Site # 1 CAMERON COUNTY - WEST Existing - 7 Channel Motorola Public Safety Trunking System.
Radio Interoperability Initiative. Problems Facing Public Safety Communications Technology  Higher Frequencies  Lower Power  Trunking  User Expectations.
____ __ ____ _____ ____ ______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth.
Mutual Aid and Interoperability CTC Presentation February 23, 2006 Chuck Miller Office of Enterprise Policy & Planning.
Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Overview Developed by Nevada Communications Steering Committee Version 2.0 – Adopted April 6, 2006.
Orange County Fire Rescue Consolidation Commission Presentation Fire Communications.
Page 1 FIRSTNET IN WASHINGTON STATE GRANT COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ROUNDTABLE – JULY 8, 2014 Washington State Interoperability Executive Committee (SIEC)
1 Kentucky Wireless Interoperability Executive Committee (KWIEC) Wireless Data Communication Interoperability Ken Born Commonwealth Office of Technology.
ENP Study Group Principles of Telecommunications- Radio BROUGHT TO YOU BY: THE FLORIDA NENA EDUCATION COMMITTEE.
Conventional vs. Trunking Radio Systems
1 Indiana's Statewide Interoperable Communications Plan (SCIP)
Fighting Transportation Myths with Reality Since 2011, Gov. Rick Snyder has called on the Michigan Legislature to dramatically reform Michigan transportation.
FCC Narrow Band Mandate: It’s Closer Than You Think.
Georgia Interoperability Network Training Project Overview Mark Hodges Georgia Tech Research Institute.
1 Public Safety Wireless Network – State of Wyoming.
Statewide Operational Needs and Technical Resources Assessment Presented to the Public Safety and Education Communications Governance Council by the Idaho.
Overview and Next Steps 8/27/2015.
Kentucky Wireless Interoperability Executive Committee Briefing October 5, 2006 Mark Rutledge, Commissioner of Technology General Norman Arflack, Justice.
Bucks County Commissioners James F. Cawley, Esq., Chairman Charles H. Martin, Vice Chairman Diane M. Ellis-Marseglia, LCSW David M. Sanko, Chief Operating.
 Statewide 800 MHz trunked radio system available for all emergency responders (local, State, Federal)  Goal: 95% in-street portable coverage based.
User Technical Committee Radio Technology Discussion
Scott Longhurst CalWA Vice Chairman, Education Committee.
Wisconsin’s INTER PERABILITY Initiative Seamless Public Safety Radio Communications Interoperability Update March 3, 2011 Jennifer Lord Communications.
Spokane Regional Communication System Overview By Scott Grimmett of Industrial Communications.
Waukesha County Wisconsin Daniel P. Vrakas, County Executive Presentation by Richard H. Tuma, ENP Director of Emergency Preparedness.
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE Gregory C. Miniutti, Chief of Communications Joel Vetter, Chief of Emergency Support Services
Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Overview Developed by Nevada Communications Steering Committee Version 2.0 – Adopted April 6, 2006.
Interoperable Communications Equipment (ICE) Grant Program Jim Turk DHS/ODP Program Manager December 12, 2005.
FirstNet in North Carolina Allan Sadowski Director of Infrastructure Planning – FirstNetNC Office of Digital Infrastructure.
1 NG9-1-1 Initiative Action Team Conference Call #2 Aug 2,
FCC Narrowband Update June 24, Presented by: Chief Paul Maplethorpe Greater Round Lake F.P.D. Co-Chair MABAS Communications Committee
FoxComm Initiative Presentation Calumet County Board of Supervisors June 19, 2007 Karen Carlson, ENP FoxComm Management Information Coordinator (920)
Target Audience Audience:
Greater Austin-Travis County Regional Radio System
Australian Front-line Policing Communications: The Next Decade Presented by Grant Pitman Acting Chief Superintendent Queensland Police Service.
SHERIFF JOE LESTER CLEVELAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE 0 Impact of Broadband on Sheriff’s.
Vermont Communications (VCOMM) Board Meeting Randolph, VT August 2, 2007.
Florida’s Traffic Incident Management Program A Plan For Success Florida’s TIM Strategic Plan Paul Clark – Florida DOT Traffic Incident Management and.
Regional Concept for Transportation Operations: An action plan to address transportation operations in Southeast Michigan Talking Technology & Transportation.
Communications Interoperability Wisconsin Moves Forward.
Public Safety Radio System Upgrade & Reband Presented to the Board of County Commissioners September 9, 2008.
Chief Harlin R. McEwen Chief of Police (Ret) City of Ithaca, NY FBI Deputy Assistant Director (Ret) Washington, DC Public Safety Spectrum Trust Chairman.
1 NCHRP Guidance on Quantifying Benefits of TIM Strategies – Quarterly Progress Review WebEx Idaho Transportation Department TIM Program Robert.
VHF/UHF Narrowbanding Region X Webinar March 15, 2012 Federal Communications Commission Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau.
OCED Housing Assistance OCED through the Home Weatherization and Housing Rehabilitation program can address: Energy efficiency home improvements General.
TETRA Gateways and Repeaters
Paul Kindell Director, Warren County Telecommunications Chairman, SOSINK Interoperability Subcommittee Chairman, Homeland Security Region 6 Interoperability.
Flagler County Radio System Current Status & DRAFT Expansion Plans Rolf Preuss, ENP, FPEM Coordinator/Radio Systems Manager.
Livingston County Transportation Connectivity Plan Final Report December 2013.
P-25 Digital Communication System History: October 2007 explored changing from analog to P-25 digital system. At that time the P-25 standards had not been.
Welcome. Agenda Introductions Tour of Dispatch Center 911 Call & Response Process – From Citizen Call to First Responders Arrival To Resolution of 911.
WILL COUNTY RADIO SYSTEM PROJECT RFP Proposal Review & Recommendation TUSA CONSULTING SERVICES.
Update on FirstNet in Washington BILL SCHRIER, CHAIR, WASHINGTON SIEC 2014 FALL TRAINING CONFERENCE WASHINGTON SHERIFFS AND POLICE CHIEFS 18 NOVEMBER 2014.
Missoula County Budget State Special Revenue aka “The Quarter Fund.”
Maintaining and Upgrading Land Mobile Radio Systems [NAME OF PRESENTER] [TITLE/OFFICE] [DATE]
Oneida County Public Safety Communications Upgrade Project:
Fighting Transportation Myths with Reality
Indiana Department of Health
Tusa Consulting Services Ben Hill County, Georgia Board of Commissioners Conceptual Report Presentation.
EMA Forum Presentation November 2007
Integrated Public Safety Commission
Integrated Public Safety Commission
Public Safety Millage Proposal November 2018 Election
Washtenaw County Office of Community and Economic Development (OCED) Weatherization and Housing Rehabilitation Programs November 28th 2018.
STARCOM21 State Wide Communications System
Dearborn Unified Dispatch Center
Presentation transcript:

Washtenaw County 800 Megahertz Consortium Business Plan

Desired Outcomes  Share information about emergency response and communications equipment  Answer any questions about the 800 MHz Consortium Business Plan

Agenda  Interoperability discussion Interoperability across disciplines (police, fire, EMS) Interoperability across jurisdictions  Coverage discussion  Details of business plan, including funding

Current Reality  Countywide agencies: 15 fire, 12 police, 1 primary ambulance, 1 Hazmat, 1 State Police  Four communication systems – not interoperable  400+ fire fighting personnel  800+ police officers  341,000+ County residents  Approx XXXXXX people dialed 911 in 2004  Change in federal communication standards (APCO 25)

Current users of Washtenaw County 800 MHz Radio System  Police – Ann Arbor, Chelsea, EMU, Milan, Northfield Twp., Pittsfield Twp., Saline, Washtenaw County, Ypsilanti (10 of 12)  State Police – MSP/Ypsilanti (1 of 1)  Fire – Ann Arbor Twp., Northfield Twp., Pittsfield Twp., Ypsilanti, Ypsilanti Twp. (5 of 15)  EMS – part of Huron Valley Ambulance  HazMat – part of the HazMat team

Why isn’t communication equipment already interoperable?  Different jurisdictions use different equipment  Limited local funding; competing local priorities  Planning is limited and fragmented  Requires shared management  Limited amount of radio spectrum available to public safety

Coverage  Rural coverage is poor Manchester, Sylvan, Lyndon, Milan, Bridgewater, Sharon, York, Augusta People transporting through areas also have poor coverage  Urban coverage In-building communication for fire safety is poor Non-public safety users on system

800 MHz Consortium Charge  Develop a plan for one system Interoperability: all police, fire, EMS can talk directly with one another 95% geographic coverage: recognizing the amount of time residents spend traveling Sustainable from a funding perspective  Nine options were examined  Recommendation: Migrate to Michigan Public Safety Communication System (MPSCS)

MPSCS  State system, used by State Police  Lowest cost option  Allows Washtenaw to take advantage of infrastructure in Jackson, Livingston, and Monroe  Communication statewide  APCO 25 compliant

How County agencies benefits  More efficient communications  Greater radio signal coverage and strength  Replacement of obsolete equipment  Compliant with federal guidelines  Positions agencies for mobile data  Common communications platform  Required upgrade to digital communication

How County residents benefit

Plan Details  Build additional towers  Replace all current radios & consoles for Fire, Police, EMS  Purchase radios for Fire agencies not now on the 800 MHz radio system  Finalize details with MPSCS  Seek voter approval Dedicated millage of XXX November 2005 ballot issue

Summary o Interoperability o Coverage o Sustainability

Questions?