STUDENT SERVICES REVIEW January 8, 2014. Context – Administrative Unit Reviews Objectives Roles Unit Self-Study Internal Review Committee External Reviewers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Academic Program Review Site Visits
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
New England Association for Schools and Colleges Re-Accreditation for Brandeis University Marty Wyngaarden Krauss Provost and Senior Vice President for.
The Periodic Review Report at the Community College: Opportunities for Collaborative Institutional Renewal Valarie Avalone, Director of Planning Dr. Michael.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
It’s Time to Talk About Risk and Control
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
TCNJ Program Review Overview. Purpose Meet Middle States (MSCHE) Expectations Provide structure of periodic review and update of strategic plans Provide.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
University Council Shared Leadership for Integrated Planning and Consultative Decision-Making.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
CSU Chico Web Site A Unified approach to Governance, Management, and Accessibility.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Timeline for Accreditation Handbook and Early Adopters Stevie Chepko, Sr., VP.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
David Proulx, Assistant Vice President for Financial Planning and Budgeting Budget Office Website:
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
SAS Project Insight Planning Session 1 Good Morning!
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Assessment 101: Back-to-Basics An Introduction to Assessing Student Learning Outcomes.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
April 26, 2012 ISPC Meeting INSTITUTIONAL ACCREDITATION AT EMU.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
T AXI L IMOUSINE A DVISORY C OMMITTEE C OMMUNICATING AND E NGAGING S TAKEHOLDERS March 25, 2011.
Planning Alignment Joseph A. Alutto Executive Vice President and Provost.
University of Massachusetts Boston FY11 Budget Process February 25, 2010.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
American Community Survey (ACS) Program Review Webinar March 6, 2012.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.
Western Carolina University Office of Assessment A Division of the Office of the Provost.
Assessment & Program Review President’s Retreat 2008 College of Micronesia - FSM May 13 – 15, 2008 FSM China Friendship Sports Center.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
Northwest Accreditation. Sandra Elman Visit ( ) General Recommendations  pages maximum  3 major themes for all chapters (standards) Descriptive.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Academic Program Review Committee Report Faculty Senate meeting November 11, 2008.
Planning for Academic Program Review Site Visits
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Program-Review Process Ohio University Link to Program Review Web Site.
Preparing for the Future Criterion 2 Open Forum March 30, 2006.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
Recommendation: Accept P&T Work Group Implementation Recommendations Subject to recommended modifications.
A Presentation for the Annual Conference of the Missouri Community College Association November 6, 2003 Larry McDoniel Ann Campion Riley Assessment of.
University Town Hall May 18, 2016 Co-Chairs: Dr. Claire M. Fraser & Dr. Roger J. Ward.
KEYS TO GREATNESS IN STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Presented by Helena Mariella-Walrond, PhD Provost and Senior Vice President Cory Potter Executive.
Institutional Planning and Effectiveness Integrated system of review that helps drive the overall mission of the College!!! Office of Institutional Research.
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT DR. SHEMEKA MCCLUNG DIRECTOR ARNITRA HUNTER RESEARCH ASSOCIATE.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT DR. SHEMEKA MCCLUNG DIRECTOR ARNITRA HUNTER RESEARCH ASSOCIATE.
Administrative Unit Review
Who’s Who at MU? An introduction to important campus resources and individuals by Hiram G. Martinez, Director of CSIL September 21, 2014 Center for Student.
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
IT Governance Planning Overview
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
OUHSC Graduate College Program Review Overview and Timeline
Administrative Review
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Exploring High Quality Student Affairs Learning Outcomes Assessment Practices at Three American Research Universities Adam S. Green, Ed.D. West Virginia.
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
UGANet Meeting January 7, 2004
Fort Valley State University
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’17
Responsibility for assessment at Brooklyn college – a distributed leadership model OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness September 9, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

STUDENT SERVICES REVIEW January 8, 2014

Context – Administrative Unit Reviews Objectives Roles Unit Self-Study Internal Review Committee External Reviewers Next Steps and Key Timelines Overview

Context – Administrative Unit Reviews “A process primarily intended to gather and use information for purposes of improvement or change, without necessarily having the attending goal of making a final decision about merit or worth.” Diamond, R.(2002). Field Guide to Academic Leadership, 226 “An ongoing process aimed at understanding and improving service quality including: Making our expectations explicit Setting appropriate criteria and standards for quality Systematically gathering, analyzing and interpreting data to determine how well performance matches the expectations and standards Using the information to document explain and improve performance” Angelo, T.(1995). Reassessing (and redefining) assessment. AAHE Bulletin,48(3),

Student Services Review Objectives: 1. To review and ensure Student Services is effective in its purpose Effectiveness: –What is our purpose? Are our objectives consistent with Dalhousie’s strategic priorities? –Are we meeting our objectives? –Who do we serve and are we meeting their needs? –Do our processes enable us to deliver on our mission and the expectations of those we serve?

Student Services Review Objectives: 2. To identify approaches by which services are provided in an efficient manner Efficiency: –Are there improvements we could make to our structure, roles, technology or communication to optimize resources, align expertise, improve service, increase job satisfaction, reduce time and cost? 3.To assess demonstration of continuous improvement 4. To help inform the mandate of Student Services leadership

1.To review and ensure Student Services is effective in its purpose; 2.To identify approaches by which services are provided in an efficient manner; 3.To assess demonstration of continuous improvement; 4.To help inform the mandate of Student Services Leadership. Objectives:

Unit Self-study Key Components include: 1.Unit’s Purpose - Mission and Strategic Direction 2.Organization 3.Description of unit offices and programs 4.Trends in the external environment 5.Opportunities/Challenges

Student Services Functional Areas to be Reviewed -Student Academic Success services -Student recruitment and registration -Scholarship management -International student services -Black student advising -Student health and wellness -Counselling and psychological services -Athletics -Student communications -Career and leadership development -Residence life -Student life -Student services at Dal AC

Internal Review Committee The Review Committee is an ad hoc committee composed of 4-6 members and chaired by the Vice-Provost, Planning, as appointed by the Provost & Vice-President, Academic. Committee will:  Oversee the review process;  Review information and receive feedback;  Accept the report of the external reviewers;  Produce a final recommendation report submitted to the Provost & Vice- President, Academic;  Review the Unit’s strategic direction and plans in the context of strategic priorities and the external environment;  Report to the Provost & VP, Academic on overall performance, appropriateness and feasibility of strategic direction and plans and recommend potential areas for improvement.

External Reviewers Two external reviewers will be appointed by the Provost The individuals are selected from similar units and like institutions. Individuals selected will possess specific expertise in relation to Student Service function(s).

External Reviewers Role Review unit self-study and related submissions Interview Senior Management of unit and other key stakeholders Provide a written recommendations and opinion following their engagement on the appropriateness of the unit’s direction; identify significant issues and make recommendations for improvement. Recommendations are made to help inform decisions or change

DeliverableTimeline Internal Assessment Committee Invited Nov. 28, 2014 External Experts InvitedNov. 28, 2014 Campus Communication about ProcessJan 12, 2015 (week of) Self Study CompletedFeb. 19, 2015 External Experts Site VisitMarch 9 or March 23, 2015 External Reviewer Report & Recommendations March 30, 2015 Internal Review Committee Final Report to Provost April 6, 2015 Initiate Recruitment of Vice-Provost, Student Affairs April 20, 2015 Next Steps and Expected Timelines

Vice-Provost, Student Affairs Consistent with other U15 universities Aligns academic and non-academic priorities Vice-Provost, Student Affairs will be a member of: - Deans’ Council - Provost Executive Committee - Provost Committee Replaces Vice President, Student Services

Thank You Questions